Intuition What this page is for
The parent note gave you the tools. This page throws every kind of problem at you — every sign of the deciding number, every place a root can hide, the degenerate cases where things collapse, a word problem, and an exam-style twist. If a problem type exists, there is a worked example below that hits it. Guess before you read the solution — that's what "Forecast" is for.
Before the matrix, let's nail down the symbols and one polar habit that show up in almost every cell, so nothing is used before it's defined.
Definition The unknown letter
z
Throughout this page z is just the unknown we are solving for — the same role x plays in ordinary algebra, except now the answer is allowed to be a complex number p + q i (defined next), i.e. a point anywhere in the plane rather than only on the number line. When the problem is from engineering we sometimes call this same unknown s (Cell I); the letter changes, the meaning does not. A polynomial in z , which we write P ( z ) , is an expression like z 3 − 3 z 2 + 9 z + 13 ; P ( α ) means "substitute the number α for z ," and a root is a value α with P ( α ) = 0 .
Definition The imaginary unit
i
On the ordinary number line, no number squares to a negative — squaring always gives something ≥ 0 . So mathematicians invent one new number, called i , defined by
i 2 = − 1 , equivalently i = − 1 .
It lives off the number line, one step above the point 0 . A general complex number is p + q i : p steps right along the real line, then q steps up. Whenever we take the square root of a negative number we factor out this i , e.g. − 36 = 36 ⋅ − 1 = 6 i . See Complex Numbers — Conjugate and Modulus for the full algebra of p + q i .
Definition The discriminant
Δ — the number that decides the story
For a quadratic a z 2 + b z + c = 0 we require a = 0 (otherwise the z 2 term vanishes and it is no longer a quadratic — see the degenerate note below). With real a , b , c the discriminant is the quantity that sits under the square root in the quadratic formula:
Δ = b 2 − 4 a c .
Δ > 0 : two real roots (parabola crosses the real axis twice).
Δ = 0 : one repeated real root (parabola just touches the axis).
Δ < 0 : no real roots; a conjugate pair sitting off the axis (this is where i appears).
Why does one number control all three? Because Δ is the only place a "± " and a possible i can enter the quadratic formula. Its sign is the whole plot.
Common mistake The degenerate case
a = 0
Why it's a trap: the quadratic formula has 2 a in the denominator — if a = 0 you would divide by zero. The fix: when a = 0 the equation is not a quadratic at all, it is the linear equation b z + c = 0 , whose single root is z = − c / b (provided b = 0 ). So always check a = 0 before reaching for Δ .
We'll use the symbol Δ (Greek capital "delta") for the discriminant everywhere below.
Definition Degrees and radians — the same angle, two units
Angles below appear in degrees (90° = a quarter turn) and in radians (2 π = a full turn). They measure the same thing ; the conversion is
180° = π radians , 360° = 2 π , 90° = 2 π .
A full turn is 360° or, equally, 2 π . We use radians inside the De Moivre formula (because the "+ 2 π k " for full turns is cleanest there) and degrees when reading a picture. Whenever both appear, they name the identical rotation.
Now the whole battlefield. A polynomial-with-complex-roots problem always lands in one of these cells:
Cell
Case class
What makes it special
Example
A
Quadratic, Δ > 0
two real roots — no i appears
Ex 1
B
Quadratic, Δ = 0
one repeated real root (degenerate)
Ex 2
C
Quadratic, Δ < 0
conjugate pair off the real line
Ex 3
D
Cubic (odd degree), one complex root given
forced lone real root
Ex 4
E
Quartic, two conjugate pairs
pair-and-divide twice
Ex 5
F
z n = c (here n = 4 ): roots evenly spaced on a circle
equal n 360° spacing
Ex 6
G
z n = c with c complex (not on axis)
starting angle θ = 0
Ex 7
H
z n = c with c on the negative real axis (θ = π )
intermediate case, roots tilt
Ex 8
K
Degenerate root of unity (n = 1 , or repeated) / limiting behaviour
what happens as cases collapse
Ex 9
I
Word problem (real-world quantity)
translate → solve → interpret
Ex 10
J
Exam twist: complex coefficients
Conjugate Root Theorem fails
Ex 11
The three most confusable cells are A, B, C — they are the same equation shape a z 2 + b z + c = 0 (always with a = 0 ), but the sign of the ==discriminant Δ = b 2 − 4 a c == decides everything. The next figure shows all three at once.
Intuition Reading figure s01
The horizontal navy line is the real axis (where a quadratic's value is 0 , i.e. where its roots would sit). Three parabolas are drawn on the warm peach background:
the orange curve (z 2 − 5 z + 6 ) dips below the axis and crosses it twice — the two orange dots at x = 2 and x = 3 are its two real roots (Cell A, Δ > 0 );
the violet curve (z 2 − 6 z + 9 ) comes down and just kisses the axis at the single violet dot x = 3 — a repeated root (Cell B, Δ = 0 );
the magenta curve (2 z 2 + 2 z + 5 ) floats entirely above the axis and never touches it, so it has no real roots at all — its roots have hidden off the axis as a conjugate pair (Cell C, Δ < 0 ).
One picture, three fates, decided purely by whether the curve reaches down to the navy line.
z 2 − 5 z + 6 = 0
Forecast: guess — will i appear? Look at the orange parabola in figure s01: it crosses the axis twice, so both roots should be real.
Identify a = 1 , b = − 5 , c = 6 (and a = 0 , so it really is a quadratic).
Why this step? Every quadratic method starts by naming the three numbers so we can compute Δ .
Compute Δ = ( − 5 ) 2 − 4 ( 1 ) ( 6 ) = 25 − 24 = 1 .
Why? The sign of Δ tells us which cell we are in. Here Δ = 1 > 0 → two real roots , no i .
Apply the formula: z = 2 5 ± 1 = 2 5 ± 1 .
Why? Δ is real and equals 1 , so the "± " just splits into two ordinary numbers.
So z = 3 or z = 2 .
Verify: sum 3 + 2 = 5 = − b / a ✓; product 3 ⋅ 2 = 6 = c / a ✓ (Vieta). No complex part — matches Cell A and the two orange dots in s01.
z 2 − 6 z + 9 = 0
Forecast: the violet parabola in s01 just touches the axis. How many distinct roots — one or two?
a = 1 , b = − 6 , c = 9 (a = 0 ).
Δ = ( − 6 ) 2 − 4 ( 1 ) ( 9 ) = 36 − 36 = 0 .
Why? Δ = 0 is the borderline case — the "± 0 " collapses because 0 = 0 .
z = 2 6 ± 0 = 3 .
Why? Both branches of the ± give the same value; the root is repeated with multiplicity 2 — the single violet dot in s01.
Factored form: z 2 − 6 z + 9 = ( z − 3 ) 2 .
Verify: ( z − 3 ) 2 = z 2 − 6 z + 9 ✓. The Fundamental Theorem still counts two roots — they simply coincide at z = 3 . This is the degenerate cell where "two roots" becomes "one point counted twice."
Δ = 0 means one root, so the theorem is broken."
Why it feels right: you see a single point. The fix: the theorem counts with multiplicity . ( z − 3 ) 2 has degree 2, so it has two roots — both equal to 3 . Nothing is lost.
2 z 2 + 2 z + 5 = 0
Forecast: the magenta parabola in s01 never touches the axis. So the roots live off the real line as mirror twins. Guess the sign of the imaginary parts.
a = 2 , b = 2 , c = 5 (a = 0 ).
Δ = 2 2 − 4 ( 2 ) ( 5 ) = 4 − 40 = − 36 < 0 .
Why? Negative Δ → we must take negative , which is where i enters: − 36 = 6 i (using i = − 1 from the definition above).
z = 2 ⋅ 2 − 2 ± − 36 = 4 − 2 ± 6 i .
Why? − 36 = 36 ⋅ − 1 = 6 i — the i splits the root off the real axis.
Simplify: z = − 2 1 ± 2 3 i .
Verify: sum = ( − 2 1 + 2 3 i ) + ( − 2 1 − 2 3 i ) = − 1 = − b / a = − 2/2 ✓; product = ( − 2 1 ) 2 + ( 2 3 ) 2 = 4 1 + 4 9 = 4 10 = 2 5 = c / a ✓. A perfect conjugate pair — Cell C confirmed.
z 3 − 3 z 2 + 9 z + 13 = 0 , given z = 2 + 3 i is a root
Forecast: odd degree with real coefficients — the mnemonic says complex roots pair up, so an odd degree must leave one lonely real root . Can you guess it before dividing?
Here P ( z ) = z 3 − 3 z 2 + 9 z + 13 (recall from the z definition: P ( z ) names the polynomial, and P ( α ) = 0 says α is a root).
Pair it. Real coefficients ⇒ 2 + 3 i = 2 − 3 i is also a root.
Why this step? Conjugate Root Theorem: for real coefficients, P ( α ) = P ( α ˉ ) , so if P ( α ) = 0 then P ( α ˉ ) = 0 too.
Build the real quadratic. Sum = ( 2 + 3 i ) + ( 2 − 3 i ) = 4 , product = 2 2 + 3 2 = 13 :
( z − ( 2 + 3 i )) ( z − ( 2 − 3 i )) = z 2 − 4 z + 13.
Why? A quadratic with roots summing to S and multiplying to P is z 2 − S z + P — and here it is real, so we can divide by it.
Divide . z 3 − 3 z 2 + 9 z + 13 ÷ ( z 2 − 4 z + 13 ) . Leading term z ; constant 13 ⋅ ( ?) = 13 ⇒ ? = + 1 :
z 3 − 3 z 2 + 9 z + 13 = ( z 2 − 4 z + 13 ) ( z + 1 ) .
Why? Degree 3 ÷ degree 2 = degree 1, so the last factor is z + c ; matching the constant 13 c = 13 gives c = 1 .
Last root: z + 1 = 0 ⇒ z = − 1 .
Verify: roots 2 + 3 i , 2 − 3 i , − 1 . Vieta sum = 4 + ( − 1 ) = 3 = − ( − 3 ) /1 ✓; product = 13 ⋅ ( − 1 ) = − 13 = ( − 1 ) 3 ⋅ 13/1 ✓. The lone real root − 1 appeared exactly as forecast.
z 4 − 4 z 3 + 14 z 2 − 36 z + 45 = 0 , given z = 3 i is a root
Forecast: degree 4 with two complex pairs means no real roots at all — the whole solution set floats off the axis. Guess the second pair's real part.
Pair the given root. 3 i = − 3 i ⇒ factor ( z − 3 i ) ( z + 3 i ) = z 2 + 9 .
Why? Pure imaginary root q i pairs with − q i ; their product is z 2 + q 2 — real, so it divides out.
Divide, showing the multiplication. We claim the other factor is z 2 + b z + d and pin down b , d by multiplying out:
( z 2 + 9 ) ( z 2 + b z + d ) = z 4 + b z 3 + ( d + 9 ) z 2 + 9 b z + 9 d .
Match this term-by-term with z 4 − 4 z 3 + 14 z 2 − 36 z + 45 :
z 3 : b = − 4 .
constant: 9 d = 45 ⇒ d = 5 .
check z 2 : d + 9 = 5 + 9 = 14 ✓; check z : 9 b = 9 ( − 4 ) = − 36 ✓.
So the division is exact and ( z 2 + 9 ) ( z 2 − 4 z + 5 ) = z 4 − 4 z 3 + 14 z 2 − 36 z + 45 .
Why this layout? Instead of hand-waving "the middle terms force it," we expanded the product and matched all five coefficients, so nothing is assumed.
Solve the leftover quadratic z 2 − 4 z + 5 = 0 : Δ = 16 − 20 = − 4 , so z = 2 4 ± 2 i = 2 ± i .
Why? − 4 = 2 i — the second conjugate pair.
All roots: 3 i , − 3 i , 2 + i , 2 − i .
Verify: Vieta sum = 0 + 0 + 2 + 2 = 4 = − ( − 4 ) /1 ✓; product = ( 9 ) ( 5 ) = 45 = ( − 1 ) 4 ⋅ 45/1 ✓. Two clean conjugate pairs — Cell E.
z 4 = 16 using De Moivre's Theorem
Forecast: four roots, evenly spaced 4 360° = 90° apart (that is 4 2 π = 2 π radians) on a circle. Look at figure s02 and guess the radius. (Note: here the four roots land on the axes — the boundaries between quadrants — because the starting angle is 0 .)
Write 16 in polar form: modulus r = 16 , angle θ = 0 , so 16 = 16 ( cos 0 + i sin 0 ) .
Why this step? De Moivre needs the target in r ( cos θ + i sin θ ) form to read off angle and size.
Radius of every root: r 1/4 = 1 6 1/4 = 2 .
Why? If z 4 has modulus 16 then z has modulus 4 16 = 2 — the fourth-root of the size.
Angles: 4 0 + 2 π k = 2 π k for k = 0 , 1 , 2 , 3 : that is 0 , 2 π , π , 2 3 π radians (i.e. 0° , 90° , 180° , 270° ).
Why the + 2 π k ? Angle 0 and 0 + 2 π (a full turn) point the same way, but dividing by 4 spreads them into 4 distinct directions, 90° = 2 π apart.
Convert: z 0 = 2 , z 1 = 2 i , z 2 = − 2 , z 3 = − 2 i — evenly spaced, one on each axis direction.
Reading figure s02: the violet circle has radius 2 (labelled). The four coloured arrows point from the origin to the four roots; each is 90° from its neighbours. The horizontal navy line is the real axis, the vertical navy line the imaginary axis, so you can read off z 0 = 2 (right), z 1 = 2 i (up), z 2 = − 2 (left), z 3 = − 2 i (down). Because θ = 0 , the roots land on the axes — precisely the quadrant boundaries , not inside the quadrants.
Verify: each satisfies z 4 = 16 : 2 4 = 16 , ( 2 i ) 4 = 16 i 4 = 16 , ( − 2 ) 4 = 16 , ( − 2 i ) 4 = 16 ✓. Sum = 2 + 2 i − 2 − 2 i = 0 ✓ (no z 3 term). Cell F: the full evenly-spaced circle.
z 3 = 8 i
Forecast: the target 8 i points straight up (90° = 2 π ), not along the real axis. So the three cube-roots are tilted. Guess whether any root is purely real.
Polar form of 8 i : modulus = 8 , angle θ = 2 π (straight up, i.e. 90° ), so 8 i = 8 ( cos 2 π + i sin 2 π ) .
Why? 8 i has no real part and positive imaginary part → it sits on the positive imaginary axis.
Radius of roots: 8 1/3 = 2 .
Angles: 3 π /2 + 2 π k for k = 0 , 1 , 2 :
k = 0 : 6 π = 30° , k = 1 : 3 π /2 + 2 π = 6 5 π = 150° , k = 2 : 3 π /2 + 4 π = 2 3 π = 270°.
Why? Same spread-by-120° (= 3 2 π ) as any cube root, but the starting angle is 30° (one-third of 90° ) because θ = 0 .
Convert (radius 2):
z 0 = 2 ( cos 30° + i sin 30° ) = 3 + i , z 1 = 2 ( cos 150° + i sin 150° ) = − 3 + i , z 2 = 2 ( cos 270° + i sin 270° ) = − 2 i .
Verify: z 2 = − 2 i : ( − 2 i ) 3 = − 8 i 3 = − 8 ( − i ) = 8 i ✓. Sum = ( 3 + i ) + ( − 3 + i ) + ( − 2 i ) = 0 ✓ (no z 2 term). None is purely real — the tilt from θ = 90° pushed them off the axis, as forecast.
z 3 = − 8
Forecast: the target − 8 is a negative real number, so it points left along the real axis — angle θ = π = 180° , the natural halfway case between "straight right" (θ = 0 , Cell F) and "general complex" (Cell G). Guess: does z = − 2 work, and are there hidden complex roots?
Polar form of − 8 : modulus = 8 , angle θ = π (pointing left, i.e. 180° ), so − 8 = 8 ( cos π + i sin π ) .
Why? A negative real number sits on the negative real axis, which is the direction 180° = π from the positive axis.
Radius of roots: 8 1/3 = 2 .
Angles: 3 π + 2 π k for k = 0 , 1 , 2 :
k = 0 : 3 π = 60° , k = 1 : 3 π + 2 π = π = 180° , k = 2 : 3 π + 4 π = 3 5 π = 300°.
Why? Start angle 60° (one-third of 180° ), then step by 120° = 3 2 π . The middle one lands exactly at 180° → the real root.
Convert (radius 2):
z 0 = 2 ( cos 60° + i sin 60° ) = 1 + 3 i , z 1 = 2 ( cos 180° + i sin 180° ) = − 2 , z 2 = 2 ( cos 300° + i sin 300° ) = 1 − 3 i .
Verify: z 1 = − 2 : ( − 2 ) 3 = − 8 ✓. z 0 = 1 + 3 i : ( 1 + 3 i ) 3 = − 8 ✓ (real part checks below). Sum = ( 1 + 3 i ) + ( − 2 ) + ( 1 − 3 i ) = 0 ✓ (no z 2 term). One real root − 2 plus a conjugate pair — Cell H, the intermediate θ = π case.
Worked example What are the solutions of
z 1 = 5 and of z 3 = 0 ?
Forecast: the "spread on a circle" idea should still work — but what happens when n = 1 (nothing to spread) or when c = 0 (radius zero)?
z 1 = 5 : here n = 1 . The De Moivre formula gives exactly one angle 1 θ + 2 π ⋅ 0 = θ and radius 5 1/1 = 5 .
Why? With n = 1 there is only k = 0 ; "n equally-spaced points" degenerates to a single point. So z = 5 .
z 3 = 0 : modulus of 0 is 0 , so every root has radius 0 1/3 = 0 .
Why? All three roots collapse to the same point, the origin. So z = 0 with multiplicity 3, i.e. z 3 = 0 ⇒ ( z − 0 ) 3 = 0 .
Limiting picture: as c → 0 in z 3 = c , the three points on the circle shrink toward the centre and merge — the degenerate case of roots of unity .
Verify: z = 5 : 5 1 = 5 ✓. z = 0 : 0 3 = 0 ✓ and multiplicity 3 matches degree 3. Degenerate cells covered.
Worked example A series RLC circuit's natural frequencies solve
L s 2 + R s + C 1 = 0 . With L = 1 , R = 2 , C 1 = 5 , find the (complex) frequencies s and say whether the circuit oscillates.
Note on notation: engineers call the unknown s instead of z , but it plays the exact same role (see the z definition) — a possibly-complex root of a quadratic. Everything from Cell C applies unchanged; only the letter differs.
Forecast: in engineering, a complex root means the system oscillates while decaying ; a real root means it just decays. Which will we get? Check the discriminant sign first.
Equation: s 2 + 2 s + 5 = 0 , so a = 1 , b = 2 , c = 5 (and a = 0 , so it is a genuine quadratic).
Why? Same quadratic shape — we're reusing Cell C machinery in a physical dress, with s standing in for z .
Δ = 2 2 − 4 ( 1 ) ( 5 ) = 4 − 20 = − 16 < 0 .
Why? Negative Δ → conjugate pair → oscillatory behaviour (the imaginary part is the ringing frequency).
s = 2 − 2 ± − 16 = 2 − 2 ± 4 i = − 1 ± 2 i .
Why? − 16 = 4 i ; the real part − 1 is the decay rate, the ± 2 i is the oscillation frequency (rad/s).
Interpret: real part − 1 < 0 ⇒ amplitude decays; nonzero imaginary part ± 2 ⇒ it rings at 2 rad/s while decaying. A damped oscillator .
Verify: Vieta sum = − 1 − 1 = − 2 = − b / a ✓ (units: rad/s ); product = ( − 1 ) 2 + 2 2 = 5 = c / a ✓. The circuit oscillates — Cell I answered with interpretation.
z 2 − ( 3 + i ) z + ( 2 + 2 i ) = 0 . Does the conjugate of any root have to be a root too?
Forecast: the coefficients contain i — they are not real . Predict: will the roots come in conjugate pairs?
Note the coefficients − ( 3 + i ) and 2 + 2 i are complex , so the Conjugate Root Theorem does not apply.
Why this matters? The proof needed a k = a k (real coefficients). Here it's false, so roots need not be conjugate twins.
Use the quadratic formula anyway (it works for complex coefficients, and a = 1 = 0 ): Δ = ( 3 + i ) 2 − 4 ( 2 + 2 i ) .
Compute ( 3 + i ) 2 = 9 + 6 i + i 2 = 8 + 6 i ; then Δ = 8 + 6 i − 8 − 8 i = − 2 i .
Why? We still need Δ , but now Δ itself is complex.
Find − 2 i . Seek x + y i with ( x + y i ) 2 = − 2 i : then x 2 − y 2 = 0 and 2 x y = − 2 . So x = ± 1 , y = ∓ 1 ; take − 2 i = 1 − i .
Why? x 2 = y 2 gives x = ± y ; 2 x y = − 2 < 0 means x , y have opposite signs → ( 1 , − 1 ) .
Roots: z = 2 ( 3 + i ) ± ( 1 − i ) . Plus: 2 4 + 0 i = 2 . Minus: 2 2 + 2 i = 1 + i .
Verify: roots 2 and 1 + i are not conjugates of each other — confirming the theorem fails without real coefficients. Vieta sum = 2 + ( 1 + i ) = 3 + i = − ( − ( 3 + i )) ✓; product = 2 ( 1 + i ) = 2 + 2 i ✓. Cell J: the twist exposed.
Common mistake "Every complex root has its conjugate as a partner."
Why it feels right: it's true so often (real-coefficient problems dominate textbooks). The fix: the pairing is a consequence of real coefficients only . In Cell J, root 1 + i has no partner 1 − i — because an i sits in the coefficients.
Recall Self-test: name the cell, then solve
Which cell is z 2 + 2 z + 2 = 0 ? ::: Cell C (Δ = 4 − 8 = − 4 < 0 ), roots − 1 ± i .
Which cell is z 2 − 8 z + 16 = 0 ? ::: Cell B (Δ = 0 ), repeated root z = 4 .
Which cell is z 3 = − 8 ? ::: Cell H (c on negative real axis, θ = π ), roots − 2 , 1 ± 3 i .
Which cell is z 5 = 1 ? ::: Cell F-type / roots of unity — five points evenly spaced on the unit circle.
Why can z 2 − ( 1 + i ) z + i = 0 have non-conjugate roots? ::: Complex coefficients — Conjugate Root Theorem needs real coefficients (Cell J).
As c → 0 in z n = c , what happens to the n roots? ::: They shrink to the origin and merge (Cell K, degenerate).
What if a = 0 in a z 2 + b z + c = 0 ? ::: It is not a quadratic; solve the linear b z + c = 0 ⇒ z = − c / b .
Δ 's sign like a traffic light
Δ > 0 green: sail through, two real roots. Δ = 0 amber: slow, roots merge into one. Δ < 0 red-hot: an i ignites, roots leap off the axis as a conjugate pair.