Intuition What this page is for
The parent note built the machinery. Now we stress-test it against every situation it can meet : each quadrant, the ± sign trap, the degenerate inputs where a denominator dies, the limiting angles 0 ∘ and 18 0 ∘ , a real-world problem, and an exam-style twist.
Before anything: the three formulas we lean on the whole way down.
Here A is the "full" angle we are given, and A /2 is the half we want facts about. A quadrant is one of the four corners of the circle: QI is 0 ∘ –9 0 ∘ (both sin , cos > 0 ), QII is 9 0 ∘ –18 0 ∘ (sin > 0 , cos < 0 ), QIII is 18 0 ∘ –27 0 ∘ (both < 0 ), QIV is 27 0 ∘ –36 0 ∘ (sin < 0 , cos > 0 ).
Cell
Case class
What can go wrong
Example
C1
A in QI → A /2 in QI
signs all + (baseline)
Ex 1
C2
A in QII → A /2 in QI
mixing given-quadrant with half-quadrant
Ex 2
C3
A in QIII → A /2 in QII
sin 2 A > 0 but cos 2 A < 0
Ex 3
C4
A in QIV → A /2 in QII
reproduce parent's QIV case, plus cos 2 A
Ex 4
C5
Degenerate A = 18 0 ∘
denominator 1 + cos A = 0 → which tan form survives
Ex 5
C6
Degenerate A = 0 ∘ / limit
denominator sin A = 0 → the other form dies
Ex 6
C7
Exact value (word: geometry)
half of a known angle → exact surd
Ex 7
C8
Real-world word problem
a slope/reflection angle bisection
Ex 8
C9
Exam twist: solve an equation
half-angle turns a nasty equation linear
Ex 9
The figure below is the map every example refers back to — memorise the four coloured corners.
A = 6 0 ∘ in QI, find sin 2 A and cos 2 A .
Forecast: A /2 = 3 0 ∘ , which sits in QI. Guess before reading: will both come out positive?
Step 1. Locate A /2 . Since 0 ∘ < 6 0 ∘ < 9 0 ∘ , halving gives 0 ∘ < 3 0 ∘ < 4 5 ∘ → QI .
Why this step? The ± is decided by the quadrant of A /2 , so we find it first , before touching a formula.
Step 2. Plug cos A = cos 6 0 ∘ = 2 1 into the sine formula.
Why this step? The formula only needs cos A , and 6 0 ∘ is a standard angle.
sin 3 0 ∘ = + 2 1 − 2 1 = 2 1/2 = 4 1 = 2 1 .
Step 3. Same for cosine:
cos 3 0 ∘ = + 2 1 + 2 1 = 4 3 = 2 3 .
Why + ? Both sin and cos are positive in QI (see s01, lavender corner).
Verify: these are the textbook exact values sin 3 0 ∘ = 2 1 , cos 3 0 ∘ = 2 3 . ✓ (See Exact trig values .)
cos A = − 5 3 , A in QII . Find cos 2 A .
Forecast: QII means 9 0 ∘ < A < 18 0 ∘ . Halving: 4 5 ∘ < A /2 < 9 0 ∘ → still QI . So the answer should be positive even though A itself has a negative cosine. Guess the sign before continuing.
Step 1. Range of A /2 : from 9 0 ∘ < A < 18 0 ∘ divide by 2 → 4 5 ∘ < 2 A < 9 0 ∘ = QI.
Why this step? This is exactly the trap the parent warns about — the given quadrant (II) and the half-quadrant (I) differ.
Step 2. Apply cos 2 A = ± 2 1 + c o s A with cos A = − 5 3 :
cos 2 A = + 2 1 + ( − 5 3 ) = 2 2/5 = 5 1 = 5 1 .
Why + ? A /2 is in QI where cosine is positive.
Verify: ( 5 1 ) 2 = 5 1 , and 2 1 + ( − 3/5 ) = 2 2/5 = 5 1 . ✓ Numerically 1/ 5 ≈ 0.4472 .
cos A = − 5 4 , A in QIII . Find sin 2 A and cos 2 A .
Forecast: QIII is 18 0 ∘ < A < 27 0 ∘ , so 9 0 ∘ < A /2 < 13 5 ∘ → QII . In QII sine is + and cosine is − . This is the first case where the two answers get different signs . Predict them.
Step 1. Locate A /2 : 18 0 ∘ < A < 27 0 ∘ ⇒ 9 0 ∘ < 2 A < 13 5 ∘ = QII (see s01, coral corner).
Why this step? We need two different sign decisions, so pin down the quadrant carefully.
Step 2. Sine (positive in QII):
sin 2 A = + 2 1 − ( − 5 4 ) = 2 9/5 = 10 9 = 10 3 .
Step 3. Cosine (negative in QII):
cos 2 A = − 2 1 + ( − 5 4 ) = − 2 1/5 = − 10 1 = − 10 1 .
Why opposite signs? QII gives sin > 0 , cos < 0 — read straight off the map.
Verify: Pythagorean check (Pythagorean identity ): ( 10 3 ) 2 + ( − 10 1 ) 2 = 10 9 + 10 1 = 1 . ✓ And sin 2 A cos 2 A = − 10 3 ; doubling, 2 sin 2 A cos 2 A = − 5 3 = sin A — matches QIII (sin A < 0 ). ✓
cos A = 25 7 , A in QIV . Find sin 2 A and tan 2 A .
Forecast: QIV is 27 0 ∘ < A < 36 0 ∘ so 13 5 ∘ < A /2 < 18 0 ∘ → QII . The parent found sin 2 A = 5 3 . Predict whether tan 2 A is positive or negative before reading. (Hint: QII → tan < 0 .)
Step 1. A /2 ∈ ( 13 5 ∘ , 18 0 ∘ ) = QII.
Why this step? Sign hunting, as always, comes first.
Step 2. Sine (positive in QII):
sin 2 A = + 2 1 − 25 7 = 2 18/25 = 25 9 = 5 3 .
Step 3. For tan 2 A use the radical-free form sin A 1 − cos A . We need sin A : in QIV, sin A < 0 , and sin 2 A = 1 − cos 2 A = 1 − 625 49 = 625 576 , so sin A = − 25 24 .
Why this form? It carries the sign automatically — no ± to agonise over.
tan 2 A = − 25 24 1 − 25 7 = − 24/25 18/25 = − 24 18 = − 4 3 .
Result: negative, as QII demanded. ✓
Verify: tan 2 A = cos ( A /2 ) sin ( A /2 ) . We have sin 2 A = 5 3 ; from cos 2 2 A = 2 1 + 7/25 = 25 16 and QII gives cos 2 A = − 5 4 . Then − 4/5 3/5 = − 4 3 . ✓ Both routes agree.
tan 2 A at A = 18 0 ∘ . Which formula survives?
Forecast: A /2 = 9 0 ∘ , and tan 9 0 ∘ is undefined (infinite). Which of the two radical-free forms blows up correctly, and which gives a fake 0/0 ? Guess.
Step 1. Values: cos 18 0 ∘ = − 1 , sin 18 0 ∘ = 0 .
Why this step? We must see which denominator hits zero.
Step 2. Try 1 + cos A sin A = 1 + ( − 1 ) 0 = 0 0 — indeterminate , useless here.
Step 3. Try sin A 1 − cos A = 0 1 − ( − 1 ) = 0 2 — diverges to ± ∞ , which is the correct behaviour: tan 9 0 ∘ is undefined/infinite.
Why the difference? The two forms share a value everywhere except at their respective bad points. At A = 18 0 ∘ the form with sin A on the bottom is the honest one.
Step 4 (limit check). Approach A → 18 0 ∘ from below with A = 17 9 ∘ : cos 17 9 ∘ ≈ − 0.99985 , sin 17 9 ∘ ≈ 0.01745 . Then sin A 1 − cos A ≈ 0.01745 1.99985 ≈ 114.6 , i.e. growing large — consistent with tan 89. 5 ∘ ≈ 114.6 . ✓
Verify: tan 89. 5 ∘ ≈ 114.589 , matching the limit. So the s i n A 1 − c o s A form is the safe one near A = 18 0 ∘ .
tan 2 A at A = 0 ∘ . Which formula survives now?
Forecast: A /2 = 0 ∘ , so tan 0 ∘ = 0 . Which form gives a clean 0 and which gives 0/0 ? (It's the mirror of Ex 5.)
Step 1. Values: cos 0 ∘ = 1 , sin 0 ∘ = 0 .
Step 2. Try sin A 1 − cos A = 0 1 − 1 = 0 0 — indeterminate .
Step 3. Try 1 + cos A sin A = 1 + 1 0 = 2 0 = 0 — clean and correct .
Why swapped from Ex 5? Each form is undefined where its own denominator vanishes; sin A = 0 at both 0 ∘ and 18 0 ∘ , but 1 + cos A = 0 only at 18 0 ∘ . So near A = 0 ∘ prefer 1 + cos A sin A .
Verify: small-angle check A = 2 ∘ : 1 + cos 2 ∘ sin 2 ∘ = 1.999391 0.034899 ≈ 0.017454 = tan 1 ∘ . ✓
This pair (Ex 5 & 6) is exactly why Weierstrass substitution quietly prefers tan 2 x and why you keep both forms in your pocket.
cos 7 5 ∘ exactly, using A = 15 0 ∘ .
Forecast: 7 5 ∘ is QI so the answer is positive. It is half of 15 0 ∘ , a standard angle. Predict roughly: bigger or smaller than cos 6 0 ∘ = 0.5 ? (7 5 ∘ is steeper, so smaller.)
Step 1. cos 15 0 ∘ = − 2 3 (QII, cosine negative).
Why this step? We need cos A for the half-angle cosine formula, and 15 0 ∘ is exact.
Step 2. Apply cos 2 2 A = 2 1 + cos A :
cos 2 7 5 ∘ = 2 1 − 2 3 = 4 2 − 3 .
Step 3. 7 5 ∘ is QI → take + :
cos 7 5 ∘ = 2 2 − 3 ≈ 0.2588.
Why + ? QI (see s01, lavender corner) has cosine positive.
Verify: direct evaluation cos 7 5 ∘ = 0.258819 , and 2 2 − 3 = 0.258819 . ✓ Smaller than 0.5 , as forecast.
Worked example A ray of light hits a flat mirror set at angle
A = 12 0 ∘ to the ground. A designer needs the half-angle direction A /2 (the bisector) and its tangent, because that fixes the slope of the reflected beam guide. Find tan 2 A .
Forecast: A /2 = 6 0 ∘ , QI, so tan 6 0 ∘ = 3 . Let's confirm the formula reproduces it.
Step 1. cos 12 0 ∘ = − 2 1 , sin 12 0 ∘ = 2 3 .
Why this step? We want the radical-free tangent, which needs sin A and cos A .
Step 2. Use sin A 1 − cos A (safe, since sin 12 0 ∘ = 0 ):
tan 6 0 ∘ = 2 3 1 − ( − 2 1 ) = 3 /2 3/2 = 3 3 = 3 .
Step 3. Interpret: the bisector guide rises 3 ≈ 1.732 vertical units per 1 horizontal unit — a 6 0 ∘ slope.
Verify: tan 6 0 ∘ = 3 ≈ 1.7320508 . ✓ Units: a slope (rise/run), dimensionless. ✓
1 + cos θ = sin θ for θ ∈ [ 0 ∘ , 36 0 ∘ ) .
Forecast: Both sides carry θ nonlinearly. But 1 + cos θ sin θ = tan 2 θ turns this into a single tangent equation. Guess how many solutions.
Step 1. Rearrange to 1 + cos θ sin θ = 1 provided 1 + cos θ = 0 .
Why this step? The left side is exactly a radical-free half-angle tangent — that's the whole trick.
Step 2. So tan 2 θ = 1 , giving 2 θ = 4 5 ∘ (within the valid range θ ∈ [ 0 , 360 ) → θ /2 ∈ [ 0 , 180 ) ), hence θ = 9 0 ∘ .
Why only 4 5 ∘ ? Over θ /2 ∈ [ 0 ∘ , 18 0 ∘ ) , tan = 1 occurs only at 4 5 ∘ (13 5 ∘ gives tan = − 1 ).
Step 3. Check the excluded case 1 + cos θ = 0 , i.e. θ = 18 0 ∘ : then LHS = 1 + ( − 1 ) = 0 but RHS = sin 18 0 ∘ = 0 too — it is a solution the algebra dropped! Add θ = 18 0 ∘ .
Why this matters: dividing by 1 + cos θ silently assumed it was nonzero; degenerate inputs (Ex 5) must be reinstated by hand.
Verify: θ = 9 0 ∘ : 1 + cos 9 0 ∘ = 1 + 0 = 1 , sin 9 0 ∘ = 1 ✓. θ = 18 0 ∘ : 1 + ( − 1 ) = 0 = sin 18 0 ∘ ✓. Two solutions: { 9 0 ∘ , 18 0 ∘ } .
Common mistake The dropped degenerate root
Whenever you replace 1 + cos θ sin θ by tan 2 θ , you divided by 1 + cos θ . Always re-test θ = 18 0 ∘ (and θ 's where sin = 0 for the other form) separately — Ex 9 loses a genuine solution otherwise.
Recall Which
tan 2 A form near which degenerate angle?
Near A = 0 ∘ use ::: 1 + cos A sin A (denominator = 2 = 0 ).
Near A = 18 0 ∘ use ::: sin A 1 − cos A (the other one gives 0/0 ).
A in QIII puts A /2 in ::: QII, so sin 2 A > 0 but cos 2 A < 0 .
cos 7 5 ∘ exact ::: 2 2 − 3 ≈ 0.2588 .
When you write 1 + c o s θ s i n θ = tan 2 θ you must recheck ::: θ = 18 0 ∘ (where 1 + cos θ = 0 ).
Mnemonic Quadrant of the half, not the whole
"Halve first, sign second. " Compute the range of A /2 , read its corner off the map (s01), then place + or − .
Double angle formulas — the seed identities behind every formula used here.
Weierstrass substitution — Ex 5/6 explain why t = tan 2 x needs both tangent forms.
Pythagorean identity — the verification tool in Ex 3.
Exact trig values — Ex 1, 7 produce 3 0 ∘ , 7 5 ∘ surds.
Product-to-sum formulas — sibling manipulations of the same double-angle seed.