Intuition What this page is for
The parent note taught you the three tools:
sin 2 A = 2 sin A cos A , cos 2 A = cos 2 A − sin 2 A = 2 cos 2 A − 1 = 1 − 2 sin 2 A , tan 2 A = 1 − t a n 2 A 2 t a n A .
Knowing a formula and knowing which case you are in are different skills. A "case" is decided by where the angle lives (which quadrant), what sign each ratio carries there , and whether anything degenerates (a zero on top, a zero on the bottom, an infinite tangent).
This page marches through every such case so you never meet a scenario you have not already seen worked.
Before we build the matrix, we fix two pieces of shared language: the three named forms of cos 2 A , and the word quadrant .
Draw two perpendicular axes: the horizontal x -axis and the vertical y -axis. They cut the plane into four regions called quadrants , numbered anticlockwise starting from the top-right:
Q1 (top-right): x > 0 , y > 0
Q2 (top-left): x < 0 , y > 0
Q3 (bottom-left): x < 0 , y < 0
Q4 (bottom-right): x > 0 , y < 0
For an angle A measured anticlockwise from the positive x -axis, cos A is the x -part of the point on the unit circle and sin A is the y -part . So the quadrant is the sign pattern of ( cos A , sin A ) .
Figure 1 below is the master map for this whole page. Each amber label names a quadrant; underneath it in white is the sign pattern ( cos A , sin A ) you must read off before touching any formula. The amber arrow shows a sample angle A in Q1. Every worked example starts by locating its angle on exactly this picture, so keep it in view.
Figure 1 — the four quadrants and their sign patterns.
Why does this matter for double angles? Because to use sin 2 A = 2 sin A cos A you often first recover a missing ratio (say cos A from sin A ), and cos A = ± 1 − sin 2 A — the ± is decided by the quadrant (read the x -part sign off Figure 1), nothing else. Get the quadrant wrong and every later number flips sign.
Every problem this topic can throw at you falls into one of these cells. Each row is worked below and tagged with its cell code .
Cell
Scenario class
What is tricky
Worked in
C1
A in Q1 (all ratios positive)
baseline, no sign traps
Ex 1
C2
A in Q2 (sin > 0 , cos < 0 )
picking the negative root
Ex 2
C3
A in Q3 (sin < 0 , cos < 0 )
two negatives → sin 2 A > 0
Ex 3
C4
A in Q4 (sin < 0 , cos > 0 )
sin 2 A < 0 but 2 A can leave Q4
Ex 4
Z
Zero / degenerate input (sin A = 0 , or tan A undefined)
limits, 0/0 , blow-ups
Ex 5
T
tan 2 A undefined (tan 2 A = 1 )
the denominator hits 0
Ex 6
W
Word problem (real-world)
translating physics → angle
Ex 7
X
Exam twist (identity + given range)
choose the right form, respect the range
Ex 8
A acute, cos A = 13 12 . Find sin 2 A , cos 2 A , tan 2 A .
Forecast: cos A = 13 12 ≈ 0.923 means A ≈ 22. 6 ∘ , so 2 A ≈ 45. 2 ∘ . Guess sin 2 A ≈ 0.71 , cos 2 A ≈ 0.70 , tan 2 A ≈ 1.0 .
Step 1 — recover sin A . sin A = + 1 − cos 2 A = 1 − 169 144 = 169 25 = 13 5 .
Why this step? sin 2 A needs both sin A and cos A ; we only had cos A . Why the + root? C1 = Q1, where sin A > 0 .
Step 2 — sin 2 A . 2 sin A cos A = 2 ⋅ 13 5 ⋅ 13 12 = 169 120 .
Why? Direct formula; both factors known and positive.
Step 3 — cos 2 A . We already have cos A , so pick Form 2 : 2 cos 2 A − 1 = 2 ⋅ 169 144 − 1 = 169 288 − 169 = 169 119 .
Why Form 2? It reuses the number we were given , minimising fresh algebra.
Step 4 — tan 2 A . cos 2 A sin 2 A = 119/169 120/169 = 119 120 .
Why this route? Once sin 2 A , cos 2 A are known, their ratio is tan 2 A for free — no separate formula needed.
Verify: ( 169 120 ) 2 + ( 169 119 ) 2 = 28561 14400 + 14161 = 28561 28561 = 1 . ✓ Consistent with sin 2 ( 2 A ) + cos 2 ( 2 A ) = 1 . And 119 120 ≈ 1.008 ≈ tan 45. 2 ∘ . ✓
sin A = 5 3 with 9 0 ∘ < A < 18 0 ∘ . Find sin 2 A and cos 2 A ; say which quadrant 2 A lands in.
Forecast: Q2 means A between 9 0 ∘ and 18 0 ∘ , so 2 A is between 18 0 ∘ and 36 0 ∘ — the lower half. Sine there is often negative. Expect sin 2 A < 0 .
Step 1 — recover cos A with the RIGHT sign. cos A = − 1 − 25 9 = − 5 4 .
Why the minus? In Q2 the x -part is negative (read it off the master map, Figure 1), so cos A < 0 . This is the single most common slip — the square root offers ± , the quadrant chooses .
Step 2 — sin 2 A . 2 sin A cos A = 2 ⋅ 5 3 ⋅ ( − 5 4 ) = − 25 24 .
Why negative? One positive (sin A ) times one negative (cos A ) → negative. Matches the forecast.
Step 3 — cos 2 A . Use Form 3 (we were given sin A ): 1 − 2 sin 2 A = 1 − 2 ⋅ 25 9 = 25 7 .
Why Form 3? It never touches cos A , so the sign worry in Step 1 can't leak in here.
Step 4 — where is 2 A ? sin 2 A < 0 and cos 2 A > 0 ⇒ 2 A is in Q4 .
Why? Q4 is exactly the ( + , − ) region for ( cos , sin ) .
Figure 2 below makes this concrete: the cyan arrow is A sitting in Q2, and the amber arrow is 2 A — doubling has swung it right around into Q4, exactly where a negative sin 2 A and positive cos 2 A must live. The dashed white arc traces the doubling.
Verify: ( − 25 24 ) 2 + ( 25 7 ) 2 = 625 576 + 49 = 625 625 = 1 . ✓ A concrete check: A = 143.1 3 ∘ gives 2 A = 286.2 6 ∘ , sin ≈ − 0.96 , cos ≈ 0.28 . ✓
Figure 2 — A in Q2 doubles to 2 A in Q4.
tan A = 4 3 with 18 0 ∘ < A < 27 0 ∘ . Find sin 2 A , cos 2 A , tan 2 A .
Forecast: tan A > 0 can happen in Q1 or Q3 (tan repeats every 18 0 ∘ ). We are told Q3, so both sin A and cos A are negative. Two negatives multiplied give a positive, so expect sin 2 A > 0 .
Step 1 — build the triangle, then fix signs. tan A = adj opp = 4 3 , so a 3 − 4 − 5 triangle. In Q3 both legs point negative: sin A = − 5 3 , cos A = − 5 4 .
Why this step? tan A alone doesn't give sin , cos — only their ratio . The hypotenuse 5 (always positive) and the Q3 sign pattern pin them down.
Step 2 — sin 2 A . 2 ⋅ ( − 5 3 ) ( − 5 4 ) = 2 ⋅ 25 12 = 25 24 .
Why positive? ( − ) × ( − ) = + . The forecast holds.
Step 3 — cos 2 A . Form 1 is cleanest here since we have both squares: cos 2 A − sin 2 A = 25 16 − 25 9 = 25 7 .
Why Form 1? We already know both squares directly; no trading needed.
Step 4 — tan 2 A from the formula. 1 − tan 2 A 2 tan A = 1 − 16 9 2 ⋅ 4 3 = 16 7 2 3 = 2 3 ⋅ 7 16 = 7 24 .
Why the tan-formula and not sin 2 A / cos 2 A ? Both give 7/25 24/25 = 7 24 — showing the two routes agree is itself a check.
Verify: 7/25 24/25 = 7 24 ✓ matches Step 4. And ( 25 24 ) 2 + ( 25 7 ) 2 = 1 ✓.
cos A = 17 8 with 27 0 ∘ < A < 36 0 ∘ . Find sin 2 A , cos 2 A .
Forecast: Q4 has sin A < 0 , cos A > 0 . Product sin A cos A < 0 , so sin 2 A < 0 . Also A near, say, 33 2 ∘ doubles to ≈ 66 4 ∘ ≡ 30 4 ∘ — still lower half. Expect sin 2 A < 0 .
Step 1 — recover sin A . sin A = − 1 − 289 64 = − 289 225 = − 17 15 .
Why the minus? Q4 ⇒ y -part negative ⇒ sin A < 0 .
Step 2 — sin 2 A . 2 ⋅ ( − 17 15 ) ⋅ 17 8 = − 289 240 .
Why negative? ( − ) × ( + ) = − ; matches forecast.
Step 3 — cos 2 A . Form 2 (we were given cos A ): 2 cos 2 A − 1 = 2 ⋅ 289 64 − 1 = 289 128 − 289 = − 289 161 .
Why Form 2? Reuses the given cos A ; note the sign of cos A never matters here because it's squared — a nice safety feature.
Verify: ( − 289 240 ) 2 + ( − 289 161 ) 2 = 83521 57600 + 25921 = 83521 83521 = 1 . ✓
Worked example Three degenerate checks: (a)
A = 0 ∘ , (b) A = 9 0 ∘ , (c) the limit of tan 2 A as A → 9 0 ∘ .
Forecast: At the "corners" of the circle, formulas should still behave — either give a clean number or a clearly-flagged infinity. Guess: at 0 ∘ everything is 0 or 1 ; at 9 0 ∘ , sin 2 A collapses.
(a) A = 0 ∘ . sin A = 0 , cos A = 1 .
sin 2 A = 2 ⋅ 0 ⋅ 1 = 0 ; cos 2 A = 2 ⋅ 1 2 − 1 = 1 ; tan 2 A = 1 − 0 2 ⋅ 0 = 0 .
Why check this? 2 A = 0 ∘ too, and indeed sin 0 = 0 , cos 0 = 1 , tan 0 = 0 . The formulas pass the trivial gate.
(b) A = 9 0 ∘ . sin A = 1 , cos A = 0 .
sin 2 A = 2 ⋅ 1 ⋅ 0 = 0 ; cos 2 A = 2 ⋅ 0 2 − 1 = − 1 ; tan 2 A = cos 2 A sin 2 A = − 1 0 = 0 .
Why interesting? 2 A = 18 0 ∘ : sin 18 0 ∘ = 0 ✓, cos 18 0 ∘ = − 1 ✓, tan 18 0 ∘ = 0 ✓. Note sin 2 A = 0 arises not because sin A = 0 but because cos A = 0 — the product structure matters. And here tan 2 A is perfectly defined (= 0 ) because the denominator cos 2 A = − 1 = 0 ; contrast this with case (c).
(c) tan 2 A as A → 9 0 ∘ . Here tan A → ∞ , so plugging into 1 − tan 2 A 2 tan A gives − ∞ ∞ — a 0/0 -style indeterminate. Divide top and bottom by tan 2 A :
tan 2 A = 1/ t a n 2 A − 1 2/ t a n A t a n A → ∞ 0 − 1 0 = 0.
Why divide by tan 2 A ? It converts the runaway tan A into the shrinking quantity 1/ tan A → 0 , turning nonsense into a clean limit. And tan ( 2 ⋅ 9 0 ∘ ) = tan 18 0 ∘ = 0 ✓ — reassuringly the same value the direct route (b) gave.
Verify: all sub-results (0 , 1 , 0 ; then 0 , − 1 , 0 ; then limit 0 ) are machine-checked in the page's verification block.
every A in 0 ∘ ≤ A < 36 0 ∘ where tan 2 A is undefined, and interpret it.
Forecast: The formula's denominator is 1 − tan 2 A . It vanishes when tan 2 A = 1 , i.e. tan A = ± 1 . In one full turn, tan A = ± 1 happens at the four diagonal angles 4 5 ∘ , 13 5 ∘ , 22 5 ∘ , 31 5 ∘ — not just the first two. Expect a division-by-zero at all four.
Step 1 — solve tan 2 A = 1 over the whole turn. tan A = ± 1 . Because tan repeats every 18 0 ∘ :
tan A = 1 at A = 4 5 ∘ and A = 22 5 ∘ (add 18 0 ∘ ).
tan A = − 1 at A = 13 5 ∘ and A = 31 5 ∘ (add 18 0 ∘ ).
So the full list is A ∈ { 4 5 ∘ , 13 5 ∘ , 22 5 ∘ , 31 5 ∘ } .
Why this step? A fraction is undefined exactly where its denominator is 0 ; that's the only place the formula can fail, and tan A = ± 1 recurs four times per turn.
Step 2 — interpret geometrically. Doubling each angle: 2 A = 9 0 ∘ , 27 0 ∘ , 45 0 ∘ ≡ 9 0 ∘ , 63 0 ∘ ≡ 27 0 ∘ . Every one lands on 9 0 ∘ or 27 0 ∘ , where cos 2 A = 0 , and tan 2 A = cos 2 A sin 2 A divides by zero — a vertical asymptote .
Why does this match? "Denominator 1 − tan 2 A = 0 " and "cos 2 A = 0 " are the same event: indeed cos 2 A = cos 2 A − sin 2 A = cos 2 A ( 1 − tan 2 A ) , which is 0 exactly when 1 − tan 2 A = 0 .
Verify: at each of 4 5 ∘ , 13 5 ∘ , 22 5 ∘ , 31 5 ∘ we get cos 2 A = 0 (checked in the verification block), so tan 2 A is undefined at all four — no case in the interval is missed.
Worked example Projectile range. A ball is launched at speed
v and angle A above flat ground. Physics gives horizontal range R = g v 2 sin 2 A . If v = 20 m/s , g = 10 m/s 2 and the launch angle is A = 3 0 ∘ , find R . Then explain why 4 5 ∘ is the best angle.
Forecast: sin 2 A = sin 6 0 ∘ = 2 3 ≈ 0.87 , and g v 2 = 10 400 = 40 m . So R ≈ 40 × 0.87 ≈ 35 m .
Step 1 — substitute. R = 10 2 0 2 sin ( 2 ⋅ 3 0 ∘ ) = 40 ⋅ sin 6 0 ∘ = 40 ⋅ 2 3 = 20 3 m ≈ 34.6 m .
Why does sin 2 A appear at all? The range depends on up-speed × across-speed ∝ sin A cos A , and 2 sin A cos A = sin 2 A packs that product into one clean term. That is the whole reason the double-angle formula lives in this equation.
Step 2 — why 4 5 ∘ maximises range. R is largest when sin 2 A is largest, i.e. sin 2 A = 1 , i.e. 2 A = 9 0 ∘ , i.e. A = 4 5 ∘ .
Why this step? sin maxes out at 1 ; solving sin 2 A = 1 is trivial because we compressed the messy product into a single sine.
Step 3 — units check. g v 2 = m/s 2 ( m/s ) 2 = m , and sin 2 A is dimensionless, so R is in metres. ✓
Verify: 20 3 ≈ 34.64 m. At 4 5 ∘ : R = 40 ⋅ sin 9 0 ∘ = 40 m > 34.6 m, confirming 4 5 ∘ beats 3 0 ∘ . ✓
cos 2 A + 3 sin A = 2 for 0 ∘ ≤ A < 36 0 ∘ .
Forecast: There's a cos 2 A and a sin A . To solve, everything must be in one ratio. Since sin A is already here, convert cos 2 A to sine using Form 3 . Expect a quadratic in sin A .
Step 1 — choose the form that unifies the equation. Form 3: cos 2 A = 1 − 2 sin 2 A . Substitute:
1 − 2 sin 2 A + 3 sin A = 2.
Why Form 3? It leaves the equation in sin A only — no stray cos A to worry about. Form 2 would introduce cos A and force another conversion.
Step 2 — tidy into a standard quadratic. Let s = sin A :
− 2 s 2 + 3 s + 1 − 2 = 0 ⇒ − 2 s 2 + 3 s − 1 = 0 ⇒ 2 s 2 − 3 s + 1 = 0.
Why let s = sin A ? Renaming exposes an ordinary quadratic we can factor. (I multiplied through by − 1 to make the leading coefficient positive — easier to factor.)
Step 3 — factor and solve for s . 2 s 2 − 3 s + 1 = ( 2 s − 1 ) ( s − 1 ) = 0 ⇒ s = 2 1 or s = 1 .
Why factor? A product of factors is zero only when a factor is zero — the fastest route to both roots.
Step 4 — back-substitute s = sin A and find every A in range. We must return from s to the actual angles inside 0 ∘ ≤ A < 36 0 ∘ .
sin A = 2 1 : sin is positive in Q1 and Q2. The reference angle is 3 0 ∘ , so A = 3 0 ∘ (Q1) or A = 18 0 ∘ − 3 0 ∘ = 15 0 ∘ (Q2). Both lie in range → keep both.
sin A = 1 : this is the single peak of sine, at A = 9 0 ∘ only. (There is no second solution, because sin A = 1 touches the top of the circle exactly once per turn.)
Why two answers for 2 1 but one for 1 ? A horizontal line sin A = c with − 1 < c < 1 cuts the sine wave twice per turn (once rising in Q1, once falling in Q2 for positive c ); at the extreme c = 1 the line is tangent to the peak and touches once .
Solution set: A ∈ { 3 0 ∘ , 9 0 ∘ , 15 0 ∘ } .
Verify (plug each root into the ORIGINAL equation):
A = 3 0 ∘ : cos 6 0 ∘ + 3 sin 3 0 ∘ = 2 1 + 3 ⋅ 2 1 = 2 ✓
A = 15 0 ∘ : cos 30 0 ∘ + 3 sin 15 0 ∘ = 2 1 + 3 ⋅ 2 1 = 2 ✓
A = 9 0 ∘ : cos 18 0 ∘ + 3 sin 9 0 ∘ = − 1 + 3 = 2 ✓
All three satisfy the original equation and lie in the required range, so the solution set is complete.
Recall Recall — pick the right cell fast
Given only sin A , how do you get the sign of cos A ? ::: The quadrant of A decides it; the only gives the magnitude.
Given tan A > 0 , which quadrants could A be in? ::: Q1 or Q3 (tan repeats every 18 0 ∘ ).
Which cos 2 A form makes cos 2 A + 3 sin A = 2 into a quadratic in sin A ? ::: Form 3, 1 − 2 sin 2 A .
In [ 0 ∘ , 36 0 ∘ ) , at which angles is tan 2 A undefined? ::: 4 5 ∘ , 13 5 ∘ , 22 5 ∘ , 31 5 ∘ (all where tan 2 A = 1 ).
Why does sin 2 A appear in projectile range? ::: Range ∝ up-speed × across-speed ∝ sin A cos A = 2 1 sin 2 A .
Mnemonic Cell-picking checklist
Q uadrant first (fixes signs) → F orm that matches your given ratio → D egenerate? (check for cos A = 0 or tan 2 A = 1 ) → V erify with sin 2 ( 2 A ) + cos 2 ( 2 A ) = 1 .
Parent topic — the formulas these examples exercise.
Compound (Addition) Angle Formulas — where all three formulas are born.
Pythagorean Identity — the sign-fixing and verification tool used in every example.
Power-Reduction / Half-Angle Formulas — the Form-3 rearrangement behind Ex 8's strategy.
Integration of sin²x and cos²x — the natural next home for these identities.
Triple Angle Formulas — the same "substitute and simplify" game, one step further.
Weierstrass t = tan(A/2) Substitution — pushes the tan 2 A idea into integration.