Worked examples — Rational expressions — simplification, operations
The scenario matrix
Before any example, let's map the whole territory. Each row is a case class — a distinct kind of thing that can happen. Every worked example below is tagged with the cell it covers.
| # | Case class | What is special about it | Covered by |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Clean simplify, common factor cancels | A factor on top matches one on bottom | Ex 1 |
| B | The "hole" trap | A cancelled factor leaves a hidden restriction | Ex 2 |
| C | Sign flip: vs | Factors that are negatives of each other | Ex 3 |
| D | Multiply / divide with cross-cancel | Two fractions, factors cancel across them | Ex 4 |
| E | Add/subtract, unlike denominators, LCD | Build a common denominator first | Ex 5 |
| F | Degenerate / zero input | Numerator becomes ; result is legitimately | Ex 6 |
| G | Limiting behaviour () | What the expression approaches for huge | Ex 7 |
| H | Real-world word problem (rates) | Meaning + units, not just algebra | Ex 8 |
| I | Exam twist: complex fraction | A fraction stacked inside a fraction | Ex 9 |
We will need the picture of a hole more than once, so let's draw it first.

Forecast: guess the final fraction before reading on. (Hint: both parts factor.)
- Factor the top. Why this step? Cancelling only works on multiplied factors, so we must expose them.
- Factor the bottom. Why? Same reason — find factors, not terms. Two numbers multiplying to , adding to : that's and .
- List restrictions from the ORIGINAL bottom. Why now? The forbidden values are decided before we cancel anything.
- Cancel the shared factor . Why allowed? when .
Answer: , where .
Verify: put : original ; simplified . ✓
Forecast: the tidy form is obviously — but how many forbidden values?
- Spot restrictions first. Why? Both bottom factors matter before we simplify.
- Cancel . Why? Common factor top and bottom.
- Carry BOTH restrictions forward. Why? The cancelled leaves a hole — look at s01: the curve is drawn, but there's an open circle at .
Answer: , where .
Verify: at the original is (undefined) while — different, confirming must stay excluded.
Forecast: and look almost the same — do they cancel?
- Factor the bottom. Why? Expose factors. .
- Rewrite the top so factors match. Why this step? and are negatives of each other: . Pulling out makes the shared factor visible.
- Restrictions from original bottom. .
- Cancel , keep the minus. Why keep it? The is a genuine factor, not garbage to drop.
Answer: , where .
Verify: : original ; answer . ✓
Forecast: division flips the second fraction — then watch factors vanish across the whole product.
- Flip the divisor (multiply by reciprocal). Why? Dividing by equals multiplying by .
- Factor everything. Why first? So factors can cancel across both fractions.
- Collect all restrictions. Why every denominator, including the flipped one? Each zero was forbidden in the original setup: , and from the original divisor top .
- Cancel and .
Answer: , where .
Verify: : first fraction ; divisor ; . Formula: . ✓
Forecast: you can't subtract until both bottoms match. What's the smallest common denominator?
- Factor the first denominator. .
- Choose the LCD. Why ? It contains every factor present, each to its highest power. The second fraction is missing .
- Rebuild the second fraction. Why multiply by ? That equals , so the value is unchanged.
- Combine numerators — mind the minus sign over the whole bracket. Why brackets? The subtraction distributes to both terms of .
Answer: , where .
Verify: : original ; answer . ✓
Forecast: one input makes the top zero — is the answer or undefined?
- Factor the top. Why? To see when it hits zero. .
- At : top , bottom . Why this matters: — perfectly legal, the expression equals .
- At : top , bottom , so again . Why check separately? is a root of the top, not of the bottom, so it is allowed.
- Contrast with the forbidden input. Only is excluded (makes bottom zero).
Answer: ; the sole restriction is .
Verify: direct substitution and . ✓
Forecast: guess — does it blow up, die to zero, or settle on a number?
- Divide top and bottom by the highest power . Why this tool? For huge , comparing everything to the biggest term reveals what dominates.
- See what tiny pieces do. Why? As grows, and . This is the idea of a limit — the value the expression approaches.
- Read off the survivor.
The curve flattens toward the height — a horizontal asymptote (see s02).
Answer: the expression approaches as (and as ).
Verify: : . ✓

Forecast: it's a subtraction of two fractions — units will be hours.
- Write the difference. Why subtract? "Time saved" = slower time minus faster time.
- LCD ; rebuild each fraction. Why? Cannot subtract unlike denominators.
- Combine numerators.
- State restriction & meaning. (a rate of makes no physical sense anyway). Units: hours.
Answer: time saved hours, .
Verify: : , , saved h; formula . ✓
Forecast: a complex fraction — a fraction inside a fraction. Clear the little ones first.
- Combine the top into one fraction. Why? Two stacked layers are hard to cancel; make the top a single fraction. LCD of and is .
- Rewrite the whole thing as a division. Why? A fraction bar means "top divided by bottom."
- Handle the sign-flip factor. Why? , so it cancels with leaving a minus.
- Restrictions: original had (inside) and (outer bottom).
Answer: , where .
Verify: : original ; answer . ✓
Recall check
Recall Why do cancelled factors still restrict the domain?
Because the original denominator was zero there — that value was never allowed, and cancelling only tidies the formula, it does not change what the expression "was."
Recall How do you handle
against ? Factor out : . Then the factor cancels and you keep the leftover minus sign.
Which cell has a genuinely answer (not undefined)?
As , approaches what?
The value forbidden by a cancelled factor creates what on the graph?
Related: Polynomial factoring · Domain and range · Complex fractions · Rational equations · Polynomial long division · Limits and continuity · Partial fraction decomposition