Exercises — Rational expressions — simplification, operations
A quick reminder of what "restriction" means in a picture. A forbidden is a place the graph is not allowed to exist — sometimes a hole (the factor cancels), sometimes a vertical wall (it doesn't).

Level 1 — Recognition
These test one idea each: can you name the factor, spot the excluded value, or recognise the pattern?
L1.1
Recall Solution
What we do: a fraction is undefined only when its bottom is . So we set each factor of the denominator to zero. Why the top doesn't matter: the numerator being just makes the whole fraction — that's perfectly allowed. Only a zero denominator breaks the rule "never divide by zero." Answer: undefined at and .
L1.2
Recall Solution
Top: is a difference of squares, with : Bottom: find two numbers multiplying to and adding to → and : Common factor: the piece appearing in both is .
L1.3
Recall Solution
False. The on top is added to , not multiplied. You may only cancel multiplied pieces (factors). Here and are single lumps that cannot be split. Number test: let . Then , but . Not equal, so the "cancel the 's" move is wrong.
Level 2 — Application
Run the standard procedure end to end: factor → note restrictions → cancel/combine → state domain.
L2.1
Recall Solution
Factor top (difference of squares): . Factor bottom: two numbers multiplying to , adding to → and : Restrictions first (from original bottom): and . Cancel the shared factor : Answer: , where .
L2.2
Recall Solution
Factor everything first (so we can cancel across the two fractions before multiplying): Restrictions (every original denominator): . Write as one fraction and cancel the and the : Answer: , where .
L2.3
Recall Solution
Flip and multiply (dividing by a fraction = multiplying by its reciprocal): Factor: and : Restrictions: the original bottom gives ; the divisor has bottom so ; and dividing by that fraction needs its top , so . Altogether . Cancel and : Answer: , where .
L2.4
Recall Solution
LCD = product of the two distinct denominators . Rewrite each fraction by multiplying by a clever form of : Combine numerators: . Answer: , where .
Level 3 — Analysis
Now you must notice something: a hidden hole, a sign flip, or a degenerate case.
L3.1 (the disappearing factor)
Recall Solution
Restrictions first: original bottom is , so and . Cancel : . Key insight: even though looks fine at , the original expression was never defined there. We keep . Picture: at the factor cancelled → a hole (a single missing dot). At the factor survives in the bottom → a vertical wall (asymptote). See the figure below. Answer: , where .

L3.2 (subtraction sign trap)
Recall Solution
Factor: , so the LCD is . Subtract the whole second numerator — wrap it in brackets so the minus hits every term: Answer: , where .
L3.3 (opposite factors)
Recall Solution
Recognise the flip: . This is the classic "opposite of a factor" move. Factor bottom: . Restrictions: . Cancel , keeping the minus sign: Answer: , where .
Level 4 — Synthesis
Several tools in one problem: factor, flip, common denominator, and a complex fraction.
L4.1
Recall Solution
Factor each of the four polynomials:
- Restrictions: . Cancel , , and one : Answer: , where .
L4.2 (complex fraction)
Recall Solution
Strategy: multiply top and bottom by the LCD of all small fractions, which is . This clears every mini-fraction at once (multiplying by changes nothing). Top: . Bottom: . Restrictions: (the inner fractions need it), and the bottom . Answer: , where .
L4.3 (division then addition)
Recall Solution
Do the division first (flip and multiply): after cancelling and . Restrictions so far: . Now add (same denominator ): Answer: , where .
Level 5 — Mastery
No scaffolding. You decide the plan, track all restrictions, and cover the awkward cases.
L5.1
Recall Solution
Factor both bottoms: and . LCD: take each distinct factor to its highest power → . Restrictions: . Rewrite each fraction over the LCD. First needs an extra , second needs an extra : Combine (bracket the subtraction): Answer: , where .
L5.2 (build a hole/wall model)
Recall Solution
Factor: top , bottom . Restrictions from original: . Cancel : . Classify:
- : the factor cancelled → the discontinuity is a hole. Its height is the simplified value , a missing point at .
- : the factor survives in the bottom → vertical wall (asymptote), since the bottom → while the top → . Answer: , domain ; hole at , wall at .
L5.3 (the sign-splitting boss)
Recall Solution
Top: . (Pull the minus out so factors line up.) Bottom: . Restrictions: . Cancel , keep the minus: Equals zero: when the numerator (and is allowed, so it's a genuine zero). Undefined: at (hole, cancelled factor) and (wall). Answer: ; zero at ; undefined at .
Recall Self-check summary
The one habit that fixes 90% of errors here ::: Write down all denominator-zero restrictions before you cancel, and only cancel multiplied factors. Hole vs wall in one sentence ::: A factor that cancels leaves a hole; a factor that survives in the denominator is a wall (vertical asymptote). Difference of squares pattern ::: . How to kill a complex fraction fast ::: Multiply top and bottom by the LCD of all the little fractions.
Related deep prerequisites & next steps: Polynomial factoring · Domain and range · Rational equations · Polynomial long division · Partial fraction decomposition · Complex fractions · Limits and continuity