2.2.6 · D2Doping & PN Junctions

Visual walkthrough — Built-in potential of a junction

3,090 words14 min readBack to topic

Before any symbol appears, here is the whole cast of characters, in plain words:

Everything below is built from just these ideas.


Step 1 — Two crowds, one door

WHY we start here: a potential is a difference between two places. So the very first thing to draw is the imbalance that will drive everything — a big pile of electrons on one side, almost none on the other.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

Look at the density of cyan dots: dense on the left, sparse on the right. That lopsidedness has a name.


Step 2 — Diffusion: crowds spread out

WHY this tool: we need to describe flow caused purely by crowding, with no pushing force. Diffusion is exactly that — the flow a concentration gradient creates all by itself. The measured law is: flow steepness of the crowd.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

Step 3 — Exposed ions build a field

WHY this matters: those bare ions are charge that cannot move. Positive charge on the left, negative on the right — that is exactly what makes an electric field.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

The field's job: it pushes electrons back toward the n-side — opposing the diffusion of Step 2. Flow caused by a field has its own name: drift.


Step 4 — Equilibrium: the tug-of-war ties

WHY this is the key move: "no battery ⇒ no net current" is the single physical fact that pins down . It converts a hard dynamics problem into one algebra equation.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

Solve for the field by moving one term across and dividing by : Notice the ratio appeared on its own. That ratio is not free — it is fixed by physics, which is the next step.


Step 5 — The Einstein relation replaces

WHY this tool and not another: we have an unknown ratio stuck in our equation. Einstein's relation is the one law that evaluates exactly that ratio — it is the perfect key for this lock.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

Substitute into Step 4's field: The messy microscopic coefficients are gone; only the thermal voltage remains.


Step 6 — Turn the field into a voltage

WHY: a field lives at every point and is hard to add up directly across the messy junction. A voltage difference only cares about the two endpoints. So we trade the field for the thing we can integrate cleanly.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

Set the two expressions for equal: The cancels on both sides (multiply through by ), leaving a much friendlier relation between and :


Step 7 — Add up across the junction

WHY: the sum of all the little steps across the whole depletion region is the built-in potential, by definition.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction

The integral is exactly the one whose answer is a logarithm (the is defined as the area under ):


Step 8 — Replace carrier counts with doping we control

WHY: to make the formula usable, every symbol must be something an engineer can dial in.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction
  • On the n-side, essentially every donor gives an electron: .
  • On the p-side, electrons are rare; use the Mass-action law (restated below) to get .

Substitute:


Step 9 — Where the derivation breaks: the degenerate limit

WHY this deserves its own step: the boxed formula is only as trustworthy as its assumptions. A reader must know the fence around it, not just the field inside.

PICTURE:

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction
Recall The ordinary (non-degenerate) edge cases — all safe

These stay inside the valid regime and are handled correctly by the boxed formula:

  • Equal doping : — symmetric, finite.
  • Raise doping 10×: ratio grows 10×, but turns that into mV. Weak control (Step 7's promise).
  • Raise temperature: grows fast, so the ratio shrinks and falls (~ mV/°C for Si) — the rising prefactor cannot win.
  • Undoped limit : ratio , , so . Correct — no junction, no built-in potential.
  • Add a battery: equilibrium breaks, , and the whole derivation stops — that regime is PN junction under bias leading to the Diode I-V equation.

The link to bands: is exactly how far the Energy band diagrams bend across the junction — the potential hill of height in volts becomes an energy step of height in joules (or electron-volts), which is precisely the offset between the n-side and p-side band edges at equilibrium. That is the same we just derived, now read off a band diagram instead of a potential plot.


The one-picture summary

Figure — Built-in potential of a junction
Recall Feynman retelling of the whole walkthrough

Two crowded rooms share a door — n on the left, p on the right (that's our -axis, pointing right). Room N is packed with cyan balls; room P is nearly empty of them. Open the door — balls spill toward the empty side just because there's more room there (that's diffusion, Step 2). But each ball that leaves abandons a sticky charged spot in the wall (an ion, Step 3), and those spots build up an invisible wall of pull — an electric field that yanks balls back (drift). Balls keep crossing until the pull-back exactly matches the spill-out: a standstill with no net flow, (Step 4). Because both the spilling and the pulling come from the same warmth of the room, their ratio is fixed — that's Einstein's rule, and it hands us a clean "thermal voltage" (Step 5). We measure the wall not as a force but as a height — a voltage — and add up the tiny climbs across the door (Steps 6–7). The adding-up of a field is always a logarithm — that's why cranking the crowd harder barely raises the wall. Finally we swap "how many balls" for "how hard we doped" (Step 8), and out pops — trustworthy as long as we didn't dope so hard the room became degenerate (Step 9). Nobody plugged in a battery; the balls built the wall themselves, just by wanting to spread out.

Recall Quick self-test

Where does the logarithm come from, physically? ::: The field goes as , and integrating across the junction gives . Why is zero for undoped silicon? ::: Then , the ratio , and — no imbalance, no potential. Which single assumption lets us set ? ::: No external battery, so no net current can persist at equilibrium. What does Einstein's relation eliminate from the field equation? ::: The unknown ratio , replacing it with . Which two steps break for a degenerate (very heavily doped) semiconductor? ::: The mass-action law (Step 8) and the simple Einstein relation (Step 5) — both assumed Boltzmann statistics.


Connections