2.1.8 · D5Band Theory & Carrier Physics
Question bank — Drift current and electric field

The picture above is the mental model behind every trap on this page: left = no field (random zig-zag, no net motion); right = field on (same zig-zag, but the whole cloud slides slowly along ). Refer back to it whenever a question feels abstract.
True or false — justify
Drift velocity keeps growing forever under a constant field.
False — collisions randomize velocity every mean free time , so the systematic part saturates at the steady-state average (like terminal velocity, not free fall).
Electron and hole drift currents cancel because their charges are opposite.
False — they also drift in opposite directions under the same field, so two sign flips cancel and the currents add: .
Drift velocity is much larger than the random thermal velocity.
False — thermal speed comes from thermal energy ( giving in Si at room temperature), whereas drift even at (using ); so drift is a tiny bias on top of huge random motion — see the two-panel figure above.
Higher temperature always raises the current in a doped semiconductor.
False — for phonon (lattice) scattering, more means more collisions, so and drop; with fixed by doping, can actually fall (see Scattering Mechanisms and Mean Free Time).
Mobility is a property of the carrier alone, not the material.
False — depends on the effective mass (band structure) and (scattering in that specific lattice), so it is a carrier-in-a-material property.
At equilibrium with no field, individual electrons are motionless.
False — they move fast (– thermally) but in random directions, so only the net displacement (and net current) is zero — this is the left panel of the figure.
Ohm's law is an assumption we impose, unrelated to microscopic physics.
False — it emerges from with ; linearity in comes from holding at low fields.
Doubling the field always doubles the drift velocity.
False — it doubles only at low fields where is linear; at high fields carriers hit velocity saturation and barely changes, so the "always" makes the statement false.
Spot the error
"Between collisions the carrier has no force on it, so it moves at constant velocity."
Wrong — between collisions the electric force still acts (there is no scattering obstacle, but the field is always on), so the carrier accelerates with .
"Since and , mobility must depend on the applied field ."
Wrong — the cancels: so (magnitude) has no in it. Mobility is field-independent in the linear regime.
"Because holes are just missing electrons, hole current is the same thing as electron current counted twice."
Wrong — holes are a distinct positive carrier with their own density and mobility ; they contribute a separate term that adds to the electron term.
"In n-type silicon we drop the term because holes have zero mobility."
Wrong — holes still have finite ; we drop the term because , so — an 80/20 approximation, not a zero.
"Current density depends on the sample's cross-section, so bigger samples have bigger ."
Wrong — is defined per unit area precisely so it is size-independent; the current scales with area, but does not.
"Electrons drift along because the field pushes charges forward."
Wrong — electrons carry charge , so points opposite to ; the electrons drift against , yet conventional current still points along .
Why questions
Why do we average acceleration over the mean free time instead of over the whole sample's transit time?
Because each collision resets the drift velocity to random (net-zero); only the velocity accumulated within one free flight of duration survives as systematic drift.
Why is the right way to count current, rather than just ?
Current is charge crossing an area per second; in time only carriers within of the surface cross, so the rate is proportional to , giving .
Why does mobility rise when effective mass falls?
A lighter carrier ( small) accelerates more for the same force (), so it builds more drift velocity per free time — is inversely proportional to .
Why is drift current only one of two current mechanisms?
Drift needs a field to bias motion; carriers can also flow down a concentration gradient with no field at all — that is diffusion current, and both combine in the drift-diffusion equation.
Why does the same that controls mobility also link drift to diffusion?
The scattering time sets both how far carriers drift and how far they random-walk; the Einstein relation ties the two together through this shared microscopic origin.
Why does conductivity depend on the product , not or separately?
Current needs both many carriers (large ) and each responding to the field (large ); either being zero kills the current, so they multiply — see Conductivity and Resistivity of Semiconductors.
Edge cases
What is the drift current when ?
Exactly zero — with no field there is no drift velocity (), so despite fast thermal motion the net charge flow vanishes.
What happens to at very large ?
It breaks down — carriers can't gain unlimited speed because they dump energy to the lattice (optical phonons), so flattens to a saturation velocity ( in Si); see Velocity Saturation and High-Field Effects.
What is the drift current in an intrinsic semiconductor where ?
Nonzero and it still adds: ; even though densities are equal, electrons and holes both push current along .
If (carriers scatter constantly), what happens to mobility and current?
, so drift velocity and drift current vanish — an infinitely-collided carrier can never build up any net bias.
What is the drift velocity of a carrier immediately after a collision, before any acceleration?
Its systematic drift is zero — the collision randomized its direction, so the biased velocity must be rebuilt over the next free flight.
If a material had (infinitely heavy carrier), what current would a field drive?
None — , so the carrier is too inert to accelerate; heavy carriers respond weakly to the field regardless of how many there are.
Connections
- Drift current and electric field — the parent this bank stress-tests.
- Effective Mass — why light carriers drift faster.
- Scattering Mechanisms and Mean Free Time — the temperature and traps.
- Velocity Saturation and High-Field Effects — the high-field edge cases.
- Diffusion Current and Carrier Gradients · Drift-Diffusion Equation · Einstein Relation — the "other mechanism" why-questions.
- Conductivity and Resistivity of Semiconductors — the product trap.