Visual walkthrough — Ablative materials — phenolic-impregnated carbon ablator (PICA), AVCOAT, SLA

---

Step 1 — The wall, and what "heat flux" even means

WHAT. Picture the outside face of the heat shield: a thin slab of material with hot gas on the left and cold spacecraft on the right. We zoom in on a tiny 1 metre × 1 metre patch of that face and watch it for a short time.

WHY. Before we balance energy, we need a clear place to balance it and a clear rate to measure. Physics is easiest when you draw a box and ask "what crosses the walls of this box each second?" That crossing rate, per square metre, is called a flux.

PICTURE.

During re-entry (see Re-entry Aerodynamics & Shock Heating) ${\dot{q}}_{in}$ can reach millions of watts per square metre.

---

Step 2 — Energy can't vanish: the three exits

WHAT. Take all the heat arriving, ${\dot{q}}_{in}$, and ask the only question conservation of energy allows: where does it go? It cannot disappear. Every joule must leave the patch by one of exactly three doors.

WHY. This is the single most powerful trick in physics — bookkeeping. If I know energy in equals energy out, and I can name every "out" door, then I have an equation. No calculus yet, just honesty about accounting.

PICTURE. The one arrow of incoming heat splits into three outgoing streams.

There is one way in (Door 0, the incoming ${\dot{q}}_{in}$ from Step 1) and three ways out:

1. Re-radiation — the glowing hot wall shines energy back out to space.
2. Conduction inward — some heat leaks through the material toward the cold structure (this is the enemy).
3. Carried off by escaping mass — bits of material boil/pyrolyze off and take energy with them as they leave.

Everything below is just replacing each English phrase with a picture-backed symbol.

---

Step 3 — Door 1: radiation, and why $T^4$

WHAT. A hot surface glows. The hotter it is, the dramatically more it glows. We label this outgoing flux and give it a formula.

WHY this tool ($T^4$, not $T$ or $T^2$). Experiment and theory (the Stefan–Boltzmann Radiation Law) both show radiated power grows as the fourth power of absolute temperature. We use the fourth power because that is the honest measured law — double the temperature and radiation goes up 16× ($2^4=16$). This is why the char layer is so precious: at re-entry temperatures the $T^4$ term is huge and dumps enormous heat straight back to space.

PICTURE. Same patch, now arrows shooting outward, thicker as $T$ rises.

So Door 1 carries away flux $\epsilon \sigma T_w^4$. This flux points outward, away from the wall toward space.

---

Step 4 — Door 2: conduction, the leak we fight

WHAT. Heat that is not radiated and not carried off soaks inward through the solid toward the cold spacecraft. Call this flux ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$.

WHY name it separately. This is the term we are trying to make small. The whole point of an ablator is to shove energy out through the other two doors so this leak stays tiny. Naming it lets us watch it.

PICTURE. A temperature ramp inside the slab; the steeper it is, the more leaks in.

So Door 2 carries flux ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$, pointing inward, from the hot face toward the cold structure.

---

Step 5 — Door 3: mass leaving town, and the meaning of $Q^{\ast }$

WHAT. The material pyrolyzes (see Pyrolysis & Char Yield) and its gases blow away, plus the char slowly erodes. Every kilogram that departs took energy to make it leave. We measure how much mass leaves per second per square metre, and how much energy each kilogram steals.

WHY these two symbols. We split "energy carried off" into a rate of mass loss times an energy-per-kilogram, because that is exactly how a designer thinks: "how fast am I losing material?" × "how hard-working is each kilogram?"

PICTURE. Little gas parcels streaming off the surface, each tagged with the energy it carries.

The energy carried off per second per area is the product: $\underset{{\text{kg/m}}^2\text{s}}{\underbrace{{\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }}}\times \underset{\text{J/kg}}{\underbrace{Q^{\ast }}}={\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }{Q}^{\ast }\left[\frac{\text{kg}}{{\text{m}}^2\text{s}}\cdot \frac{\text{J}}{\text{kg}}=\frac{\text{J}}{{\text{m}}^2\text{s}}=\frac{\text{W}}{{\text{m}}^2}\right]$ The units come out as flux — good, everything in our equation now speaks the same language. This flux, like radiation, points outward (mass and its energy leave the wall).

---

Step 6 — Assemble the balance and solve

WHAT. Put the three doors from Steps 3–5 into the word-equation of Step 2, then solve for the thing a designer cares about: ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }$, the recession rate.

WHY solve for ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }$. Because mass loss × time × (1/density) = how deep the shield eats itself. That depth decides how thick to build the shield. Everything was aimed at this quantity.

PICTURE. The full labelled balance: one arrow in, three arrows out, on one patch.

Replace words with symbols:

$$\underset{\begin{array}{c}\text{arrives}\\ \text{(inward)}\end{array}}{\underbrace{{\dot{q}}_{in}}}=\underset{\begin{array}{c}\text{carried off}\\ \text{(outward)}\end{array}}{\underbrace{{\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }{Q}^{\ast }}}+\underset{\begin{array}{c}\text{re-radiated}\\ \text{(outward)}\end{array}}{\underbrace{\epsilon \sigma T_w^4}}+\underset{\begin{array}{c}\text{conducted}\\ \text{(inward to structure)}\end{array}}{\underbrace{{\dot{q}}_{cond}}}$$

Now move the two "free" losses to the other side (they happen whether or not mass leaves), and divide by $Q^{\ast }$:

$$\boxed{{\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }=\frac{\stackrel{\text{arrives}}{\overbrace{{\dot{q}}_{in}}}-\stackrel{\text{re-radiated}}{\overbrace{\epsilon \sigma T_w^4}}-\stackrel{\text{leaks in}}{\overbrace{{\dot{q}}_{cond}}}}{\underset{\text{J each kg steals}}{\underbrace{Q^{\ast }}}}}$$

---

Step 7 — Edge case A: the cold wall (start of re-entry)

WHAT. At the very first instant of heating, the wall is still cool: $T_w$ is low, so $\epsilon \sigma T_w^4\approx 0$, and the interior is cold so ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$ is small too. Nearly all incoming heat goes into ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }{Q}^{\ast }$.

WHY show it. You must never meet a scenario the derivation didn't cover. Here the formula degenerates gracefully: ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }\approx {\dot{q}}_{in}/Q^{\ast }$ — maximum ablation, because radiation isn't helping yet.

PICTURE. The $T^4$ arrow shrinks to almost nothing; the mass-loss arrow does all the work.

---

Step 8 — Edge case B: radiation-only steady state (no ablation)

WHAT. Suppose heating is mild — a reusable RCC surface, or an ablator that hasn't reached its pyrolysis temperature. Then ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }=0$ and no mass leaves. Door 3 is shut.

WHY show it. This is the boundary between ablative and reusable TPS. With ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }=0$, the balance says the wall simply heats up until radiation alone matches the input: ${\dot{q}}_{in}=\epsilon \sigma T_w^4+{\dot{q}}_{cond}.$ If ${\dot{q}}_{in}$ is small enough, $T_w$ settles at a survivable temperature and the material never needs to sacrifice itself. If ${\dot{q}}_{in}$ is brutal, $T_w$ would have to rise past melting — that's when you must switch on Door 3 and ablate.

PICTURE. Two regimes side by side: mild (radiation copes) vs brutal (must ablate).

---

Step 9 — Edge case C: the pure-conduction limit (all heat leaks in)

WHAT. Now the opposite nightmare. Imagine a surface that cannot radiate ($\epsilon \to 0$, e.g. a shiny non-glowing wall) and cannot ablate (${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }=0$, below pyrolysis temperature or a purely passive material). Both radiation and mass-loss doors are shut. The balance collapses to a single term: ${\dot{q}}_{in}={\dot{q}}_{cond}.$

WHY show it. This is the failure mode an ablator exists to avoid. With nowhere else to go, every arriving joule conducts straight into the structure — the leak we called the enemy in Step 4 now carries 100% of the load. Nothing is dumped back to space, nothing is carried off by departing mass, so the cold structure heats without limit until it fails. Ablators deliberately open Doors 1 and 3 precisely so ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$ never has to shoulder the whole flux.

PICTURE. Radiation and mass-loss arrows greyed out; one fat blue arrow drives all the heat inward.

Recall Why is this the case an ablator is built to defeat?

Because it is the state where the numerator ${\dot{q}}_{net}={\dot{q}}_{in}-\epsilon \sigma T_w^4-{\dot{q}}_{cond}$ can never become positive to drive ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }$: radiation is off and conduction absorbs everything, so the structure gets the full blast. Opening the radiation and ablation doors is exactly how a real shield keeps ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$ small.

---

Step 10 — From mass loss to shield thickness (the payoff)

WHAT. Integrate the mass-loss flux over the whole re-entry and divide by material density $\rho$ to get recession depth $s$ — how many centimetres of shield are gone.

WHY. This closes the loop with the Thermal Protection Systems (TPS) design job: pick a thickness that survives with margin.

PICTURE. A bar of shield shrinking by depth $s$ as time runs.

$$s=\int \frac{{\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }}{\rho }dt[\frac{{\text{kg/m}}^2\text{s}}{{\text{kg/m}}^3}\cdot \text{s}=\text{m}]$$

---

The one-picture summary

Everything on this page is one patch of wall with one arrow in and three arrows out, and one boxed rearrangement: ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }=\frac{{\dot{q}}_{in}-\epsilon \sigma T_w^4-{\dot{q}}_{cond}}{Q^{\ast }}=\frac{{\dot{q}}_{net}}{Q^{\ast }},s=\int \frac{{\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }}{\rho }dt$

Recall Feynman retelling — say it like a story

A wall gets blasted with heat, and that heat has exactly three ways out — no fourth. Some of it glows back to space: because glowing grows as temperature to the fourth power, a hot char is a fantastic radiator, dumping heat like crazy the hotter it gets. Some heat leaks inward toward the cold ship — that's the leak we hate, and a thick porous char plugs it. Whatever is left over — we named that leftover ${\dot{q}}_{net}$ — has to be carried away by material physically leaving: gases boiling off, char eroding. Each kilogram that leaves takes a fixed chunk of energy, $Q^{\ast }$, with it — and $Q^{\ast }$ quietly bundles together the bond-breaking of pyrolysis, the heating of solid and gas, the blowing that fends off the hot boundary layer, and even a little char sublimation. So the rate you lose material is just "leftover heat divided by energy-per-kilogram," ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }={\dot{q}}_{net}/Q^{\ast }$. Multiply that loss rate by time, divide by density, and you get the few centimetres of shield eaten over a whole fiery re-entry. Watch the edge cases and you'll never be surprised: a cold wall at the start can't radiate yet, so it ablates fastest; a mild heat load lets radiation alone cope, so a reusable tile survives with no mass loss; but a dead surface that can neither glow nor ablate dumps the entire blast straight into the structure — and that is the disaster an ablator is designed to prevent. Make each kilogram a hard worker (big $Q^{\ast }$) and light (small $\rho$), and you win. That's PICA. That's the whole trick.

Recall Self-check

Why kelvin and not Celsius in the radiation term? ::: Radiation depends on absolute thermal energy; $T^4$ only makes physical sense measured from absolute zero (kelvin). Why does the fourth power make the char so protective? ::: Doubling temperature multiplies radiated flux by $2^4=16$, so a hot char sheds enormous heat back to space. In the cold-wall limit, what does ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }$ reduce to and why? ::: ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }\approx {\dot{q}}_{in}/Q^{\ast }$, because $\epsilon \sigma T_w^4$ and ${\dot{q}}_{cond}$ are both near zero at low $T_w$. In the pure-conduction limit, where does all the heat go? ::: Straight into the structure — with radiation and ablation off, ${\dot{q}}_{in}={\dot{q}}_{cond}$ and the structure takes 100% of the load. What physical processes are lumped into $Q^{\ast }$? ::: Latent heat of pyrolysis, sensible heating of solid and gas, the transpiration/blowing credit, and char oxidation/sublimation. A material has higher density but higher $Q^{\ast }$. Better or worse for recession? ::: Depends: recession $s=\int {\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }/\rho dt$; big $Q^{\ast }$ lowers ${\dot{m}}^{\prime \prime }$ and big $\rho$ lowers $s$ — but launch mass penalizes density, so light + high-$Q^{\ast }$ (PICA) usually wins.

---

Parent: Ablative Materials — PICA, AVCOAT, SLA