2.6.6 · D5Equilibrium

Question bank — Heterogeneous equilibria — pure solids - liquids excluded

2,330 words11 min readBack to topic

Symbols used on this page — define once, use everywhere

Before the traps, here is every symbol you will meet, in plain words. Nothing below appears until it is named here.

Recall Why only gases live in

(mini-derivation of ) For an ideal gas, , so its partial pressure is — pressure and concentration differ by exactly a factor . Write as a product of terms and substitute : each gas species drags out one factor of . Products give powers, reactants give powers, so the leftover exponent is . Result: . Solids and liquids never contributed a term (they were excluded, activity 1), so they cannot appear in . Only gases can.

The figure below fixes the three intuitions the whole page rests on: constant solid activity, the saturation ceiling , and how a Le Chatelier squeeze plays out. Refer back to it as you work.

Figure — Heterogeneous equilibria — pure solids - liquids excluded
Figure — Heterogeneous equilibria — pure solids - liquids excluded
Figure — Heterogeneous equilibria — pure solids - liquids excluded


True or false — justify

The word "pure" in "pure solid" is the whole game. Watch for it.

Adding more solid CaCO₃ to a sealed vessel at equilibrium increases the equilibrium .
False — the activity of a pure solid is fixed at 1 regardless of amount (see the flat red line in figure 1), so is untouched; you only added more of something whose "concentration" cannot change.
Water is always excluded from an equilibrium expression because it is a liquid.
False — water is excluded only when it is a pure liquid or a solvent in vast excess (); when water is a reactant/product in a non-aqueous or concentrated setting (see Buffer Solutions (when water matters)), its activity varies and it stays in .
A pure liquid and a pure solid are both dropped from for essentially the same reason.
True — for both, the substance is its own standard state, so ; the ratio is trivially one.
If a solid catalyst appears in the reaction vessel, it must appear somewhere in .
False — a catalyst is neither reactant nor product; it changes the rate of reaching equilibrium, not the position, so it never enters (double-excluded here since it is also a pure solid).
For , doubling the mass of undissolved AgCl doubles the solubility.
False — solubility is fixed by ; extra solid just sits at the bottom with activity 1, changing nothing (see Solubility Product (Ksp)).
The relation counts all species when finding .
False — counts gaseous moles only; only gases contribute a factor, so solids and liquids (already excluded, activity 1) cannot appear in .
Excluding a solid means we are pretending it isn't chemically involved.
False — the solid is fully involved in the reaction; we exclude it because its activity is constant, and a constant factor is absorbed into , not because it is inert.

Spot the error

Each statement below has one flaw. Find it, then reveal.

"For , ."
The denominator is wrong — a pure solid has activity 1 and is dropped, so correctly (strictly ).
"Since is a liquid in , we leave it out."
The water here is labelled — it is steam, a gas, so it stays in the expression; the phase label, not the formula, decides inclusion.
" for is ."
The term is illegitimate — the solid is excluded, so with only the two dissolved ions.
"Activity of a pure solid is 1 because its concentration is zero."
The reasoning is backwards — its concentration is large and constant (), and activity is that value divided by the same standard-state value, giving 1, not because concentration vanishes.
"Adding graphite to the water-gas reaction shifts equilibrium toward more CO."
Graphite is a pure solid with activity 1; adding it changes nothing about the gas-phase ratio, so no shift occurs (a common Le Chatelier's Principle misfire).
"Because for limestone, has units of atm."
The thermodynamic is dimensionless — each is divided by , so quoting "1 atm" really means , a pure number.

Why questions

Say the reasoning before revealing.

Why does the amount of solid not appear in , even though amount clearly affects a reaction's total yield?
Because is built from activities (intensive quantities), not amounts (extensive); the solid's activity stays 1 whether you have a grain or a mountain — total yield in moles can differ, but the equilibrium ratio cannot (link: Activity vs Concentration).
Why is the standard state for a pure solid chosen as the pure solid itself rather than 1 M?
Because a solid never dissolves to give a tunable molarity — its molar "concentration" is fixed by density and molar mass, so the natural, always-available reference is the pure substance, making automatically.
Why can pumping away CO₂ cause more limestone to decompose, if the solid amount doesn't matter?
Removing CO₂ drops below , so the system responds by making more gas to restore ; the gas is what re-equilibrates, and it happens to consume solid to do so.
Why do we say the reaction stops being a heterogeneous equilibrium if all the CaCO₃ decomposes?
With no solid phase remaining, there is no reactant of activity 1 to draw on; the "equilibrium" can no longer be maintained, so you have a single-phase gas that isn't at the heterogeneous equilibrium condition.
Why does temperature, but not initial solid mass, set the equilibrium CO₂ pressure?
depends on temperature through Gibbs Free Energy and Equilibrium (); solid mass never enters , so only (and the value of it produces) fixes .
Why is the "concert hall" analogy about constancy rather than bigness?
The point isn't that solids are large but that their activity doesn't respond to adding or removing material — a huge, effectively unchanging quantity contributes a constant factor that folds into .
Why does a catalyst leave untouched but speed things up?
It lowers the activation barrier for both forward and reverse directions equally, so it changes only how fast equilibrium is reached, not the free-energy difference that fixes the ratio .
Why do only gases show up in of ?
Because the substitution (from ) is what pulls out each factor of ; only gases have a partial pressure to substitute, so only they contribute to the exponent.

Edge cases

The boundaries where the rule bends or breaks.

What happens to the exclusion rule if the "solid" is actually a solid solution (an alloy or mixed crystal)?
It no longer applies cleanly — in a mixture the component's activity is less than 1 and varies with composition, so it must be kept (with an activity coefficient) rather than dropped.
In a very concentrated aqueous solution, can water still be treated as activity 1?
Not reliably — once solutes are abundant ( falls below ), water is no longer in vast excess and its activity dips below 1 (this is where Activity Coefficients in Concentrated Solutions and Buffer Solutions (when water matters) matter).
For dissolving, what breaks if you keep adding NaCl to the water?
The solid stays activity 1, but added raises the reactant side, driving precipitation (common-ion effect) — the ions respond while the solid activity does not, exactly as the rule predicts (see Precipitation Reactions).
If you compress the gas in at fixed , what re-equilibrates?
Only the CO₂: compression raises above , so gas reacts back with CaO to reform solid until again; the solids act only as an activity-1 reservoir.
What if the temperature is so low that the "gas" water in the water-gas reaction condenses to liquid?
Then that water becomes a pure liquid (activity 1) and drops out of the expression — the same species changes its treatment purely because its phase changed.
Is a pure liquid reactant (not solvent) always excluded?
Yes, as long as it is genuinely a pure liquid phase (activity 1); the moment it becomes a component of a mixture whose composition can shift, its activity varies and it re-enters .
Does change if you add a solid product to a reaction?
No — tallies only gaseous moles, so adding solids or liquids to either side leaves , and therefore the conversion, unchanged.
Does the "activity = 1" argument still hold for a supercritical fluid or a molten salt?
Not automatically — a supercritical fluid has a tunable, non-constant density (so its activity varies with pressure and is not fixed at 1), and a molten salt is a liquid mixture of ions whose activities depend on composition; both need explicit activity treatment, not blind exclusion.
What about a polymeric or amorphous solid whose "molar mass" is ill-defined — is its activity still exactly 1?
Only approximately — if it is a single pure phase of essentially constant composition its activity is still , but blends, swollen gels, or composition-varying polymers break the "fixed density/molar mass" premise and can require correction factors.
Recall Quick self-test before you leave

Pure solid/liquid → activity ::: exactly , so it drops out of . Water stays in when ::: it is a reactant/product not in vast excess (), or the solution is concentrated. counts ::: gaseous moles only, because only gases carry a factor. A thermodynamic has units of ::: none — it is a pure ratio . Adding more solid shifts equilibrium ::: never — as long as some solid remains present.