2.6.4 · D5Equilibrium
Question bank — Reaction quotient Q vs K — direction of shift
This page assumes only the parent note: has the same algebraic form as (products over reactants, each raised to its coefficient), but uses whatever concentrations you have right now, while is the fixed target ratio at a given temperature. The master rule is : forward, backward, rest.
The figure below is the single mental picture behind every item on this page: a number line of with as the target, colour-coded by which way the reaction rolls.

True or false — justify
True or false: If , the reaction has stopped.
False — a shift backward is still net motion; the reaction only truly stops when falls back to equal , where .
True or false: A large value of always means lots of product will form.
False — a large means product is already over-represented; if the reaction actually consumes product going backward.
True or false: can change if you add more reactant.
False — depends only on temperature; adding reactant lowers (more denominator), so the system shifts, but itself is untouched.
True or false: and always have the same sign.
False — depends on relative to , not on alone; is negative whenever even if is a large number.
True or false: At the instant of mixing pure reactants, and the reaction must go forward.
True — with no product the numerator is , so , giving : strongly forward. (See Gibbs free energy and spontaneity.)
True or false: If you can never make the reaction shift again.
False — you're at equilibrium now, but changing concentration, pressure, or temperature moves (or ) and restarts a shift, exactly as Le Chatelier's principle predicts.
True or false: For , comparing a pressure-based to a concentration-based tells you the direction.
False — you must compare like with like: against , against , since their numerical values differ (see Relation between Kp and Kc).
True or false: A reaction with has .
False — makes , but the standard change is generally non-zero; the two are different quantities.
True or false: Adding a catalyst changes and lets the system reach a new equilibrium ratio.
False — a catalyst speeds the forward and reverse reactions equally, so it changes neither nor ; it only reaches the same equilibrium faster (see Position of equilibrium vs rate of reaction).
Spot the error
"For , ." Find the mistake.
The solid carbon must be omitted (its activity is ); correct form is (see Activity and why pure solids-liquids are omitted).
"For , ." Find the mistake.
The stoichiometric coefficients were dropped; each species is raised to its coefficient: .
" so and the reaction runs backward." Find the mistake.
The sign is flipped — gives , so and the reaction runs forward.
"Since at equilibrium, both the forward and reverse reactions have stopped." Find the mistake.
Only the net change stops; forward and reverse reactions continue at equal rates (dynamic equilibrium) — is a position, not a rate (see Position of equilibrium vs rate of reaction).
"I added a catalyst, so jumped closer to instantly." Find the mistake.
A catalyst leaves and untouched; it only lowers the activation barrier so both directions go faster, reaching the same equilibrium sooner — it does not move the position.
"I diluted the mixture, but stays the same because I diluted everything equally." Find the mistake.
Dilution does not generally preserve unless the moles of gas are equal on both sides; a non-zero makes shift, so the equilibrium moves.
", and since can be negative when there's no product, is undefined." Find the mistake.
Concentrations are never negative, so ; the true boundary case is (only reactants), giving , a strong forward push — not an undefined value.
Why questions
Why does the ratio , not itself, decide direction?
Because ; only when the current ratio differs from the target ratio is there free energy to release, and the sign of that difference sets the direction.
Why can range from to while is a single number?
reads off whatever concentrations happen to exist (all reactant , all product ), whereas is the one fixed ratio the system settles into at a given temperature.
Why does adding an inert (non-reacting) gas at constant volume not shift ?
An inert gas at fixed volume doesn't change any reacting species' partial pressure, so every term in is unchanged and still holds.
Why is constant while changes as the reaction proceeds?
fixes the standard reference (depends only on ), but carries the live term, which drifts toward zero as .
Why does comparing to give the same prediction as Le Chatelier for adding a product?
Adding product raises above , so and the system shifts backward — exactly what Le Chatelier's principle says about relieving an added stress.
Edge cases
If the reaction has equal moles of gas on both sides (e.g. ), what happens to when you halve the volume?
Nothing — every concentration doubles but the exponents cancel (), so is unchanged and no shift occurs.
You start with only products and no reactants. What is and which way does it go?
(zero denominator), so : for the forward reaction is positive, which means the reverse reaction is spontaneous — the system runs backward to make reactants.
Adding inert gas at constant volume vs constant pressure — does it matter?
At constant volume nothing shifts (partial pressures unchanged); at constant pressure the total volume must grow, diluting every reacting gas, so if then moves and the equilibrium shifts toward the side with more moles of gas.
Two flasks have the same but different temperatures. Can they shift in opposite directions?
Yes — is temperature-dependent, so the same may sit below in one flask (forward) and above in the other (backward).
At exactly , what is the numerical value of and of ?
, so regardless of temperature — the defining condition of equilibrium.
If is enormous (say ), does that guarantee the forward reaction is fast?
No — a huge only means the equilibrium position lies far toward products; the rate of getting there is a separate matter, best fixed by a catalyst (see Position of equilibrium vs rate of reaction).
For a reaction where all species are pure solids and liquids, what is ?
(every activity is ), so the comparison to is fixed and no meaningful concentration-driven shift is defined.
Connections
- Reaction quotient Q vs K — direction of shift (index 2.6.4)
- Equilibrium constant K (Kc and Kp)
- Le Chatelier's principle
- Gibbs free energy and spontaneity
- Relation between Kp and Kc
- Activity and why pure solids-liquids are omitted
- Position of equilibrium vs rate of reaction