Intuition What this deep-dive does
The parent note gave you the equation Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S and a 4-row table. Here we hunt down every possible situation that equation can face — all four sign patterns, the moment when Δ S = 0 or Δ H = 0 , the double-zero degenerate case, the crossover temperature, a real word problem, an equilibrium twist, and a trap where a reaction that "should" be non-spontaneous runs anyway because concentrations are not standard. No cell of the matrix is left empty.
Before anything, we fix the vocabulary so no symbol is used before it is earned.
Definition The three characters (plain words)
Δ H = enthalpy change = the heat the reaction releases (negative) or soaks up (positive) at constant pressure. Think "downhill or uphill in energy." Built in Enthalpy and ΔH .
Δ S = entropy change = how much more "spread out / messy" the system becomes (positive) or how much tidier it gets (negative). Built in Entropy and ΔS .
T = absolute temperature in kelvin (always positive, so it can never flip a sign by itself — it only sets the weight on Δ S ).
Δ G = the single scoreboard. If it goes down below zero, the change happens on its own. From the parent topic note .
Definition A unit rule we will use every time
Δ H is normally quoted in kilojoules (kJ) but Δ S in joules per kelvin (J/K) — a thousand-fold mismatch. Before adding Δ H and − T Δ S you MUST put them in the same unit. We will always convert Δ S to kJ/K by dividing by 1000, so both live in kJ. (Skipping this is the parent's mistake #2 and flips your conclusion.)
Every problem this topic can throw is one of these cells. The rest of the page fills each one.
Cell
Δ H
Δ S
Extra condition
What decides
Example
A
−
+
none
always spontaneous
Ex 1
B
+
−
none
never spontaneous
Ex 2
C
−
−
temperature
low-T only; find crossover
Ex 3
D
+
+
temperature
high-T only; find crossover
Ex 4 (word problem)
E
any
= 0
degenerate
Δ G = Δ H , no T effect
Ex 5
F
= 0
any
degenerate
pure entropy drives it
Ex 6
E′
= 0
= 0
double-zero
Δ G = 0 at all T (no drive)
Ex 5 (note)
G
limiting
—
T → 0 and T → ∞
which term survives
Ex 7
H
standard vs actual
—
non-standard Q
Δ G vs Δ G ∘ trap
Ex 8
I
link to K
—
equilibrium
Δ G ∘ = − R T ln K
Ex 9
Intuition How to read the master figure above
The horizontal axis is temperature T in kelvin; the vertical axis is Δ G in kJ. The thick grey horizontal line is Δ G = 0 (the spontaneity boundary). Each colored line is Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S for one cell, and every line is straight : its intercept (where it meets T = 0 ) equals Δ H , and its slope equals − Δ S . The color key is: lavender = Cell A , coral = Cell B , mint = Cell C , butter = Cell D , dashed slate = Cell E (Δ S = 0 , flat) , dotted grey = Cell F (Δ H = 0 , through the origin) . A line lying below the grey zero-line means the reaction is spontaneous there; the butter line (D) crosses zero at the marked crossover T = Δ H /Δ S . Keep this picture in mind for every example.
Worked example Ex 1 — Combustion-like reaction
Δ H = − 200 kJ , Δ S = + 150 J/K . Is it spontaneous at 250 K ? At 2000 K ?
Forecast: Both terms help — energy falls and mess rises. Guess: spontaneous everywhere.
Match units. Δ S = 150 J/K = 0.150 kJ/K (÷1000).
Why this step? Δ H is in kJ; the − T Δ S term must also be in kJ or the numbers are meaningless (the unit rule above).
At 250 K: Δ G = − 200 − ( 250 ) ( 0.150 ) = − 200 − 37.5 = − 237.5 kJ .
Why: plug into Δ G = Δ H − T Δ S .
At 2000 K: Δ G = − 200 − ( 2000 ) ( 0.150 ) = − 200 − 300 = − 500 kJ .
Why: raising T makes the − T Δ S term more negative here, since Δ S > 0 .
Verify: Both negative → spontaneous at every temperature. Line A (lavender) in the figure never crosses zero and slopes downward. ✓ Matches forecast.
Worked example Ex 2 — Forcing order while soaking heat
Δ H = + 120 kJ , Δ S = − 90 J/K . Spontaneous at any T ?
Forecast: Both terms fight us — energy climbs and mess falls. Guess: never spontaneous.
Match units: Δ S = − 90 J/K = − 0.090 kJ/K (÷1000).
Why this step? Same unit rule — Δ H is in kJ, so Δ S must be in kJ/K before we combine them; otherwise the T Δ S term is a thousand times too big.
General expression: Δ G = 120 − T ( − 0.090 ) = 120 + 0.090 T .
Why this step? Writing Δ G as a function of T shows the whole temperature behaviour at once, not just one point.
Read it: for any T > 0 , both 120 and 0.090 T are positive, so their sum Δ G > 0 always.
Why: a positive constant plus a positive multiple of T can never dip below zero — there is no crossover because Δ H and Δ S have opposite signs.
Verify: Try T = 1000 : Δ G = 120 + 90 = 210 kJ > 0 . Line B (coral) in the figure starts positive and rises — never crosses zero. ✓ Never spontaneous (the reverse reaction is).
Worked example Ex 3 — Freezing water,
H 2 O ( l ) → H 2 O ( s )
Δ H = − 6.01 kJ/mol , Δ S = − 22.0 J/mol⋅K . Above/below what T is freezing spontaneous?
Forecast: Energy wants it (heat released), mess hates it (liquid → orderly solid). Enthalpy and entropy disagree → temperature is the referee. Guess: spontaneous only when cold.
Match units: Δ S = − 22.0 J/mol⋅K = − 0.0220 kJ/mol⋅K ; keep Δ H = − 6.01 kJ/mol .
Why this step? We will divide Δ H by Δ S ; both must be in kJ so the kJ cancels and leaves kelvin.
Set Δ G = 0 to find the crossover.
Why this step? The two effects exactly cancel at the tie point; that temperature is the boundary between "go" and "no go."
Solve: T = Δ S Δ H = − 0.0220 kJ/mol⋅K − 6.01 kJ/mol = 273.2 K .
Why: both negatives cancel, giving a real positive temperature (a physically valid crossover exists only when Δ H and Δ S share a sign).
Pick a side and read the sign. At T = 270 K : Δ G = − 6.01 − 270 ( − 0.0220 ) = − 6.01 + 5.94 = − 0.07 kJ < 0 → freezes.
At T = 276 K : Δ G = − 6.01 + 6.07 = + 0.06 kJ > 0 → does not freeze.
Why this step? Knowing the crossover is not enough — we must test one temperature on each side to learn which side is spontaneous, since Δ G = 0 alone does not say which way the sign flips.
Verify: Crossover is 273.2 K = 0 ∘ C , the real freezing point of water. Below it freezing goes, above it does not. See Phase Transitions . ✓
Worked example Ex 4 — Word problem: baking limestone
A kiln decomposes limestone: CaCO 3 ( s ) → CaO ( s ) + CO 2 ( g ) , with Δ H = + 178 kJ , Δ S = + 161 J/K . What minimum kiln temperature makes this go? Will 1100 K work?
Forecast: Endothermic (needs heat), but a gas is born (mess shoots up). Guess: only hot enough.
Match units: Δ H = 178 kJ = 178000 J , Δ S = 161 J/K .
Why this step? Here we convert Δ H up to joules (×1000) so it matches Δ S in J/K; either direction is fine as long as both agree.
Crossover temperature: T = Δ S Δ H = 161 J/K 178000 J = 1105.6 K .
Why this step? Above this T , the T Δ S term overtakes Δ H and Δ G turns negative.
Test 1100 K and read the sign: Δ G = 178 − 1100 ( 0.161 ) = 178 − 177.1 = + 0.9 kJ > 0 .
Why this step? 1100 < 1105.6 , so we sit just below the boundary; a positive Δ G confirms the reaction is still non-spontaneous there — the crossover value alone would not tell us the sign without this test.
Conclusion: need T > 1106 K (≈ 833 °C). 1100 K is a hair too cold.
Verify: At 1200 K : Δ G = 178 − 1200 ( 0.161 ) = 178 − 193.2 = − 15.2 kJ < 0 → decomposes. Line D (butter) in the figure crosses zero near 1106 K going downward. ✓ Matches forecast.
Worked example Ex 5 — When
Δ S = 0 (and the E′ double-zero note)
A rearrangement has Δ H = − 15 kJ and Δ S = 0 (same number and type of gas molecules, negligible disorder change). Spontaneous? Does temperature matter?
Forecast: No entropy term at all → the scoreboard is just the energy.
Substitute Δ S = 0 : Δ G = Δ H − T ( 0 ) = Δ H = − 15 kJ .
Why this step? The T Δ S term vanishes, so Δ G equals Δ H at every temperature.
Read: Δ G = − 15 kJ < 0 for all T .
Verify: In the figure a Δ S = 0 line (dashed slate) is perfectly horizontal (slope − Δ S = 0 ). Because Δ H < 0 , it sits below zero everywhere → always spontaneous, temperature-independent. ✓
Cell E′ — the double-zero corner: if both Δ H = 0 and Δ S = 0 , then Δ G = 0 − T ( 0 ) = 0 at every temperature. There is neither an energy push nor an entropy push, so Δ G = 0 always → the system is at equilibrium with no spontaneous drive in either direction. This is the flat line lying exactly on the grey zero-axis. It completes the taxonomy: every combination of { − , 0 , + } for Δ H and Δ S is now covered.
Worked example Ex 6 — Mixing two ideal gases
Two ideal gases mix with Δ H = 0 (no bonds change) but Δ S = + 12 J/K (they spread into each other). Spontaneous?
Forecast: No energy help or hindrance — only messiness talks. Mess goes up → should go.
Match units: Δ S = + 12 J/K = + 0.012 kJ/K (÷1000).
Why this step? Even though Δ H = 0 contributes nothing, we still want the final Δ G in kJ to match every other example, so we convert Δ S to kJ/K first.
Substitute Δ H = 0 : Δ G = 0 − T Δ S = − T Δ S .
Why this step? With enthalpy gone, spontaneity rides entirely on the sign of − T Δ S .
Read the sign: since T > 0 and Δ S = + 0.012 kJ/K > 0 , the product − T ( 0.012 ) is negative for every T > 0 .
Why this step? A negative times two positives is negative — so Δ G < 0 at all real temperatures, no crossover.
At 298 K: Δ G = − 298 ( 0.012 ) = − 3.58 kJ .
Verify: In the figure a Δ H = 0 line (dotted grey) passes through the origin (intercept Δ H = 0 ) with negative slope — below zero for all T > 0 . Entropy alone drives mixing; this is why gases never un-mix on their own. ✓
Worked example Ex 7 — Which term survives at the extremes?
Take the limestone reaction from Ex 4 (Δ H = + 178 kJ , Δ S = + 0.161 kJ/K ). What is Δ G as T → 0 and as T → ∞ ?
Forecast: Cold → energy rules; hot → entropy rules (parent's "Cold loves H, Hot loves S").
T → 0 : Δ G → Δ H − 0 = + 178 kJ > 0 .
Why this step? The T Δ S term shrinks to nothing, so only enthalpy is left — and it is uphill, so non-spontaneous near absolute zero.
T → ∞ : the term − T Δ S = − T ( 0.161 ) grows without bound negatively, dwarfing the fixed + 178 . So Δ G → − ∞ .
Why: the entropy term is linear in T while Δ H is constant, so entropy inevitably wins at large T whenever Δ S > 0 .
Numbers: at T = 10 K , Δ G = 178 − 1.61 = 176.4 kJ ; at T = 5000 K , Δ G = 178 − 805 = − 627 kJ .
Verify: These are the two ends of line D (butter) in the figure: it starts near its intercept + 178 at T = 0 and plunges downward forever. This connects to the Second Law of Thermodynamics — at high T the universe's entropy demand overwhelms energy cost. ✓
Definition The reaction quotient
Q (needed before this example)
For a reaction a A + b B → c C + d D , the reaction quotient is
Q = [ A ] a [ B ] b [ C ] c [ D ] d
— products on top, reactants on the bottom, each concentration (or partial pressure) raised to its stoichiometric coefficient. Q measures how far along the reaction is right now : Q small means mostly reactants (starved of product), Q large means mostly product. It has the same form as the equilibrium constant but uses the current, not-yet-settled amounts. More in Chemical Equilibrium and K .
Worked example Ex 8 — A "non-spontaneous" reaction that runs
A reaction has Δ G ∘ = + 5.0 kJ/mol at 298 K (looks non-spontaneous under standard conditions). But the reaction quotient is Q = 1.0 × 1 0 − 3 (lots of reactant, little product). Is it actually spontaneous now ?
Forecast: Standard says no, but starved of product a reaction often wants to go forward. Guess: yes, spontaneous now.
Use the full form Δ G = Δ G ∘ + R T ln Q .
Why this step? Δ G ∘ is fixed for the reaction, but the actual Δ G depends on where you are (via Q ). Spontaneity of the current state uses Δ G , not Δ G ∘ (parent mistake #3).
Compute R T ln Q : R = 8.314 J/mol⋅K , so R T = 8.314 × 298 = 2477.6 J/mol . ln ( 1.0 × 1 0 − 3 ) = − 6.9078 . Product = 2477.6 × ( − 6.9078 ) = − 17117 J/mol = − 17.1 kJ/mol .
Why: Q < 1 makes ln Q negative, pushing Δ G down.
Add: Δ G = + 5.0 + ( − 17.1 ) = − 12.1 kJ/mol < 0 .
Verify: Negative → spontaneous right now , even though Δ G ∘ > 0 . The low product concentration (Q small) tilts the balance. See Chemical Equilibrium and K . ✓ Matches forecast.
Definition The equilibrium constant
K (needed before this example)
When a reaction stops changing (settles), the ratio Q reaches a fixed value called the equilibrium constant K : it is Q evaluated at equilibrium,
K = [ A ] a [ B ] b [ C ] c [ D ] d equilibrium
K is a single number characterising the reaction at a given T : K ≫ 1 means products dominate at equilibrium, K ≪ 1 means reactants dominate. The bridge Δ G ∘ = − R T ln K ties the free-energy scoreboard to this measurable ratio. See Chemical Equilibrium and K .
Worked example Ex 9 — From
Δ G ∘ to K
For ammonia synthesis, Δ G ∘ = − 33.3 kJ at 298 K . Find K .
Forecast: Strongly negative Δ G ∘ → products heavily favoured → large K .
Rearrange Δ G ∘ = − R T ln K into ln K = R T − Δ G ∘ .
Why this step? This bridge (derived in the parent framework) converts the energy scoreboard into a measurable equilibrium ratio.
Numbers: ln K = 8.314 × 298 33300 = 2477.6 33300 = 13.44 .
Exponentiate: K = e 13.44 ≈ 6.9 × 1 0 5 .
Verify: K ≫ 1 confirms products dominate — consistent with Δ G ∘ < 0 . This also underlies Electrochemistry ΔG = −nFE , where the same Δ G ∘ links to a cell voltage. ✓
Recall Which cell is which — quick self-test
Δ H < 0 , Δ S > 0 → always spontaneous? ::: Yes (Cell A) — both terms favour it.
Δ H > 0 , Δ S < 0 → spontaneous when? ::: Never (Cell B).
Crossover temperature formula? ::: T = Δ H /Δ S (only physical when the two share a sign).
Δ S = 0 : what is Δ G ? ::: Δ G = Δ H , temperature-independent (Cell E).
Δ H = 0 : what drives spontaneity? ::: Pure entropy, Δ G = − T Δ S (Cell F).
Δ H = 0 AND Δ S = 0 : what is Δ G ? ::: Exactly 0 at all T — equilibrium with no drive (Cell E′).
As T → ∞ with Δ S > 0 , Δ G → ? ::: − ∞ — entropy term (linear in T ) always wins (Cell G).
Current-state spontaneity uses Δ G or Δ G ∘ ? ::: Δ G = Δ G ∘ + R T ln Q — the actual Δ G (Cell H).
What is Q ? ::: Products-over-reactants ratio (each to its coefficient) at the current, not-yet-settled state.
Mnemonic Reading any line in the master figure
Intercept = Δ H , slope = − Δ S . A line dipping below zero = spontaneous there. Horizontal line = Δ S = 0 ; through the origin = Δ H = 0 ; on the axis = both zero.