2.3.13 · D5Chemical Bonding
Question bank — MO diagrams of H₂, He₂, N₂, O₂, F₂, NO, CO — bond order, magnetism

Recall On-page summary of the two MO orderings (so you needn't leave the page)
- B₂, C₂, N₂ (Z ≤ 7): s–p mixing lifts above the degenerate pair, giving order .
- O₂, F₂ (Z ≥ 8): mixing is weak, sits below , giving order . This single flip is the source of half the "why is B₂ paramagnetic but has fewer electrons than diamagnetic N₂?" confusion below. Figure 2 places the two ladders side by side.

True or false — justify
"Two atomic orbitals always produce exactly two molecular orbitals."
True — the number of MOs out equals the number of AOs in (LCAO conserves states): one in-phase (bonding) plus one out-of-phase (antibonding). See Molecular Orbital Theory (LCAO basics).
"A bonding electron and an antibonding electron cancel each other out in the bond count."
True — that is why the formula subtracts: each bonding electron gives a bond, each antibonding gives , so a filled wipes out a filled .
"He₂ cannot exist because its atoms repel from the start."
False — the bonding pair does attract, but the antibonding pair cancels it exactly, giving bond order ; there is simply no net bond to hold it together.
"O₂ is diamagnetic because the Lewis structure O=O pairs every electron."
False — MO theory puts the last two electrons singly into the two degenerate orbitals (Hund's rule), so O₂ has two unpaired electrons and is paramagnetic. Liquid O₂ sticking to a magnet proves MO right, Lewis wrong. See Paramagnetism and Diamagnetism.
"Bond order must always be a whole number."
False — odd-electron species like NO (BO ), O₂⁺ and O₂⁻ give half-integer bond orders, which are perfectly physical; only Lewis dot-pictures force integers.
"Adding more electrons to a molecule always strengthens its bond."
False — it depends where they go: electrons entering antibonding MOs lower the bond order. F₂ has more electrons than N₂ yet a far weaker single bond.
"The asterisk on just means 'higher energy'."
Partly — but the essential meaning is a nodal plane between the nuclei; that node removes electron density from where glue is needed, which is why it costs energy. See Bond Order, Bond Length, Bond Energy correlation.
"The same MO energy order can be used for every second-period diatomic."
False — for B₂, C₂, N₂ (Z ≤ 7) s–p mixing pushes above the pair; for O₂, F₂ (Z ≥ 8) mixing is weak and sits below (see the on-page summary above). Using the wrong order flips predicted magnetism. See s–p mixing and orbital energy ordering.
"CO and N₂ have identical MO diagrams because they are isoelectronic."
Mostly true in electron count and resulting BO/magnetism (both 14 e⁻, BO 3, diamagnetic), but CO's MOs are skewed toward the more electronegative oxygen, so its levels are not perfectly symmetric. See Isoelectronic species (CO, N₂, CN⁻, NO⁺).
"Degenerate orbitals must be filled one-electron-each before pairing."
True — Hund's rule: parallel spins in separate degenerate orbitals minimise electron repulsion and are lower in energy than pairing up early. See Hund's Rule and Pauli Exclusion.
Spot the error
"For O₂ we fill … then , and since comes last with 2 electrons paired, O₂ is diamagnetic."
The error is pairing those last two — the two orbitals are degenerate (same energy, see Figure 1), so Hund puts one electron in each with parallel spins, leaving O₂ paramagnetic with 2 unpaired electrons.
"NO has 15 electrons, an odd number, so it can't have a defined bond order."
Wrong — odd electron count just means an unpaired electron and a half-integer BO: , , . Perfectly defined.
"N₂ is paramagnetic because it has electrons in the high-energy ."
Wrong — being high in energy doesn't mean unpaired. holds two paired electrons and every N₂ MO is filled or empty, so N₂ is diamagnetic.
"Bond order of F₂ is , so F₂ has no antibonding electrons."
Wrong reasoning — it does have 8 antibonding electrons (); they mostly cancel the 10 bonding ones, leaving a net single bond. Low bond order ≠ no antibonding electrons.
"Removing an electron always lowers bond order, so NO⁺ is weaker than NO."
Backwards here — the electron removed from NO comes from an antibonding , so its loss raises BO from 2.5 to 3, making NO⁺ stronger and shorter than NO.
"Since bonding MOs are lower in energy, we should fill them completely before any antibonding MO — for every molecule."
The Aufbau order is right, but the identity of the next orbital changes with the diagram: for B₂–N₂ the (bonding) fills before (also bonding) because of s–p mixing, which even reorders two bonding levels.
Why questions
"Why do two AOs combining in-phase lower the energy while out-of-phase raises it?"
In-phase addition piles electron density between the nuclei, screening their mutual repulsion and pulling them together; out-of-phase creates a node there, starving the middle of density so the nuclei repel — anti-glue.
"Why does the / order flip exactly around oxygen?"
In early elements the 2s and 2p energies are close, so and mix and repel, shoving above . By oxygen the 2s–2p gap is large, mixing is negligible, and the natural order ( below ) returns.
"Why does MO theory get O₂'s magnetism right when Lewis structures fail?"
Lewis only counts pairs on paper and forces O=O all-paired; MO theory respects orbital degeneracy and Hund's rule, predicting two unpaired electrons — which experiment (magnet, spectroscopy) confirms.
"Why is bond order a good proxy for bond strength and inverse bond length?"
More net bonding electron density between nuclei means a deeper, stiffer energy well — stronger bond and shorter distance. Hence N₂(3) > O₂(2) > F₂(1) in strength and reverse in length. See Bond Order, Bond Length, Bond Energy correlation.
"Why must we divide by 2 to get bond order?"
Because a single chemical bond is a pair of shared electrons; two net bonding electrons make one bond, so dividing the net electron count by 2 converts electrons into bonds.
"Why is CO such a good ligand for metals despite being diamagnetic and neutral?"
Its triple bond leaves a lone pair on carbon (the -donor) plus empty orbitals that accept metal electron density (-backbonding), a two-way binding that also explains its toxicity toward haemoglobin.
Edge cases
"What is the bond order and magnetism of He₂⁺ (3 electrons)?"
Config , so — a weak but real half-bond, and paramagnetic from the single unpaired electron. Unlike He₂, it can exist transiently.
"B₂ has 10 electrons — is it paramagnetic or diamagnetic?"
Paramagnetic. Under the s–p-mixed order the last two electrons enter the degenerate pair one each (Hund), giving two unpaired electrons; BO . This is the trap: without the flipped order you'd wrongly predict a paired and call it diamagnetic.
"C₂ has 12 electrons — bond order and magnetism?"
Under the mixed order the pair is now full (), all paired, so C₂ is diamagnetic with BO . Note the oddity: C₂'s double bond is made of two bonds and no net bond in this simple picture.
"O₂⁺ vs O₂ vs O₂⁻: rank their bond orders."
Removing an antibonding electron raises BO, adding one lowers it: O₂⁺ (2.5) > O₂ (2) > O₂⁻ superoxide (1.5). All three are paramagnetic — O₂⁺ and O₂⁻ each carry one unpaired electron, O₂ carries two.
"What is the bond order of the hypothetical Be₂?"
With 8 electrons filling , bonding and antibonding cancel completely: , so Be₂ is essentially non-bonding, like He₂.
"What happens to N₂'s bond order if it loses one electron to form N₂⁺?"
The electron leaves the highest filled orbital, (a bonding MO under the mixed order), so BO drops from 3 to 2.5 and N₂⁺ becomes paramagnetic with one unpaired electron.
"Is a molecule with bond order 0 always non-existent?"
Not strictly — BO 0 means no net bond, so no stable covalently bonded molecule (He₂, Be₂), but weakly bound van der Waals dimers can flicker into existence; the point is there is no covalent net bonding.
"For an odd-electron molecule, can it ever be diamagnetic?"
No — an odd total number of electrons guarantees at least one unpaired electron, so any odd-electron species (NO, NO₂, ClO₂) is necessarily paramagnetic.
Connections
