Intuition What this page is for
The parent note gave you the rule: rank orbitals by K = n + l , smaller fills first, ties broken by smaller n . This page throws every kind of question that rule can face at you — normal atoms, ions, exception atoms, edge cases like a bare nucleus, and exam traps — so you never meet a scenario you haven't already seen worked out.
Before we start, three tools we will reuse. Each is defined the moment it appears, in plain words:
Definition The three numbers you need
n = the principal quantum number — think "which row / how far out the shell sits." n = 1 , 2 , 3 , … (See Quantum Numbers (n, l, m, s) .)
l = the azimuthal quantum number — the shape code of the subshell. We use the letter names: s → l = 0 , p → l = 1 , d → l = 2 , f → l = 3 .
K = n + l = the Madelung key . It is not an energy in joules; it is a ranking number we invented so that "smaller K = fills earlier" reproduces the true energy order. Smaller K wins; if two tie, smaller n wins.
Definition Subshell capacity
Each subshell holds at most 2 ( 2 l + 1 ) electrons — this comes from Pauli Exclusion Principle . So s holds 2 , p holds 6 , d holds 10 , f holds 14 . We will count with these in every example.
The master order (built entirely from K , no diagram to memorise):
1 s < 2 s < 2 p < 3 s < 3 p < 4 s < 3 d < 4 p < 5 s < 4 d < 5 p < 6 s < 4 f < 5 d < 6 p < 7 s
The staircase above is the rule drawn out: every diagonal line links orbitals with the same K . Sweep them from top (K = 1 ) downward and read off the sequence.
Here is every distinct kind of case this topic can throw at you. Each worked example below is tagged with the cell it fills.
Cell
Scenario class
What is tricky about it
Example
A
Straight neutral atom
just count in K -order
Ex 1 (Fe)
B
The famous 4 s /3 d crossover boundary
K tie & near-tie region
Ex 2 (Ca vs Sc)
C
Tie-break, equal K
Rule 2, smaller n first
Ex 3 (3 d vs 4 p vs 5 s )
D
Cation — electron removal
removal order = filling order
Ex 4 (Fe²⁺)
E
Anion — electrons added
keep filling in K -order
Ex 5 (S²⁻)
F
Aufbau exception
half/full subshell stability
Ex 6 (Cr, Cu)
G
Degenerate / zero input
Z = 0 , Z = 1 , hydrogen
Ex 7
H
Real-world word problem
translate story → Z → config
Ex 8 (colour of gold-ish metal)
I
Exam-style twist
reverse question: config → element
Ex 9
Worked example Example 1 — Cell A: straight neutral atom (Iron,
Z = 26 )
Forecast: Before reading on, guess: does the last electron of iron go into 3 d or 4 s ? Jot it down.
Step 1 — List orbitals in K -order until we've placed 26 electrons.
Why this step? Aufbau says fill lowest-K first, so we just walk the master sequence.
1 s ( 2 ) , 2 s ( 2 ) , 2 p ( 6 ) , 3 s ( 2 ) , 3 p ( 6 ) , 4 s ( 2 ) , 3 d ( ?)
Step 2 — Running total before 3 d .
Why this step? We need to know how many electrons are left when we reach 3 d .
2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 + 2 = 20 . Remaining: 26 − 20 = 6 .
Step 3 — Put the last 6 into 3 d (capacity 10, so it fits).
Why this step? 3 d is next in K -order after 4 s , and 6 ≤ 10.
1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 6 3 s 2 3 p 6 4 s 2 3 d 6
Verify: 2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 = 26 ✅. The forecast answer is 4 s filled before 3 d because K 4 s = 4 < K 3 d = 5 .
Worked example Example 2 — Cell B: the crossover boundary (Ca
Z = 20 → Sc Z = 21 )
Forecast: Calcium is Z = 20 , Scandium Z = 21 . Where does that one extra electron of Sc go — into 4 s or 3 d ?
Step 1 — Fill Ca (Z = 20 ).
Why this step? Ca is the last element before 3 d starts, so it's our reference floor.
1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 6 3 s 2 3 p 6 4 s 2 → count = 20 ✅. 4 s is now full .
Step 2 — Add one more electron for Sc.
Why this step? 4 s (K = 4 ) is already full; the next-lowest K is 3 d (K = 5 ).
The 21st electron goes into 3 d : [ Ar ] 3 d 1 4 s 2 .
Step 3 — Read the figure. Look at the red arrow in the diagram: it shows the energy of 3 d dropping below 4 s once electrons occupy it — but for filling order we still used K , which correctly put 4 s first.
Why this step? This is the subtle bit: 4 s fills first, yet in the built atom 3 d ends up lower . That is why on ionisation (Ex 4) 4 s leaves first. See Penetration and Shielding .
Verify: Sc config electron count = 18 ( Ar ) + 1 + 2 = 21 ✅.
Worked example Example 3 — Cell C: pure tie-break (rank
3 d , 4 p , 5 s )
Forecast: All three have the same K . Which fills first?
Step 1 — Compute K for each.
Why this step? Rule 1 needs K ; if they tie we go to Rule 2.
K 3 d = 3 + 2 = 5 , K 4 p = 4 + 1 = 5 , K 5 s = 5 + 0 = 5.
All equal 5 — a three-way tie.
Step 2 — Apply Rule 2: smaller n first.
Why this step? When K ties, the inner shell (smaller n ) penetrates more and sits lower.
3 d ( n = 3 ) < 4 p ( n = 4 ) < 5 s ( n = 5 ) .
Verify: This matches the master sequence … 3 d < 4 p < 5 s … exactly ✅.
Worked example Example 4 — Cell D: cation, electron removal (Fe²⁺)
Forecast: Fe is [ Ar ] 3 d 6 4 s 2 . To make Fe²⁺ we remove 2 electrons. Do we remove them from 3 d (filled last) or 4 s ?
Step 1 — State the removal rule (different question!).
Why this step? Filling uses K ; removal uses "highest n leaves first." Here n 4 s = 4 > n 3 d = 3 . See Ionization and Electron Removal Order .
Step 2 — Remove both electrons from 4 s .
Why this step? 4 s has the highest n , so it empties first.
Fe 2 + = [ Ar ] 3 d 6
Not [ Ar ] 3 d 4 4 s 2 — that would be the "first-in-first-out" trap.
Verify: Electron count = 18 + 6 = 24 = 26 − 2 ✅ (started with 26, removed 2).
Worked example Example 5 — Cell E: anion, electrons added (S²⁻)
Forecast: Sulfur is Z = 16 . S²⁻ has 2 extra electrons (18 total). Where do they go?
Step 1 — Config of neutral S (Z = 16 ).
Why this step? Fill 16 electrons in K -order.
1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 6 3 s 2 3 p 4 → 2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 4 = 16 ✅.
Step 2 — Add 2 electrons; keep filling in K -order.
Why this step? Adding electrons still obeys Aufbau — next available lowest-K slot is the rest of 3 p (capacity 6, currently 4).
3 p 4 → 3 p 6 .
S 2 − = 1 s 2 2 s 2 2 p 6 3 s 2 3 p 6
Verify: 2 + 2 + 6 + 2 + 6 = 18 ✅ — identical to Argon (isoelectronic with a noble gas, which is why S²⁻ is stable).
Worked example Example 6 — Cell F: the Aufbau exceptions (Cr
Z = 24 , Cu Z = 29 )
Forecast: Plain Aufbau predicts Cr = [ Ar ] 3 d 4 4 s 2 and Cu = [ Ar ] 3 d 9 4 s 2 . Both are wrong . Guess the real configs.
Step 1 — Naive Aufbau count.
Why this step? Establish what the rule predicts so we can see it get overridden.
Cr: 18 + 4 + 2 = 24 ; Cu: 18 + 9 + 2 = 29 . Counts are fine — the prediction is arithmetically right but energetically wrong.
Step 2 — Apply half/fully-filled stability.
Why this step? A half-filled (d 5 ) or completely filled (d 10 ) d subshell is extra stable, so one 4 s electron drops into 3 d . See Electron Configuration Exceptions (Cr, Cu) .
Cr = [ Ar ] 3 d 5 4 s 1 , Cu = [ Ar ] 3 d 10 4 s 1 .
Verify: Cr: 18 + 5 + 1 = 24 ✅. Cu: 18 + 10 + 1 = 29 ✅. Counts still correct; only the distribution changed.
Worked example Example 7 — Cell G: degenerate / zero inputs
Forecast: What is the "configuration" of (a) a bare nucleus with Z = 0 electrons, and (b) hydrogen Z = 1 ? Does Madelung even matter for one electron?
Step 1 — Case Z = 0 (no electrons).
Why this step? Always check the empty edge case — a rule must not break at zero.
Zero electrons → configuration is empty (written as nothing / [ ] ). Total electrons = 0 ✅.
Step 2 — Case Z = 1 (hydrogen).
Why this step? With one electron there is no shielding , so K -ranking and pure-n ranking agree — the crossover (4 s below 3 d ) does not happen in H.
H = 1 s 1 .
The single electron takes the smallest-K orbital, 1 s (K = 1 ).
Verify: Electron count = 1 ✅. (Note: in H alone, 3 d actually lies below 4 s because there is nothing to shield — Madelung's crossover is a multi-electron effect.)
Worked example Example 8 — Cell H: real-world word problem
Forecast: A jeweller has a soft, yellow, corrosion-resistant metal used in circuits. Its atomic number is 29. Predict its ground-state configuration and say why one 4 s electron seems "missing."
Step 1 — Identify the element.
Why this step? Translate the story into a number. Z = 29 → copper (Cu). The "yellow, conductive, corrosion-resistant" clues match Cu.
Step 2 — Build the configuration.
Why this step? Cu is an exception (Cell F), so use the 3 d 10 rule.
Cu = [ Ar ] 3 d 10 4 s 1 .
Step 3 — Explain the "missing" 4 s electron.
Why this step? The word problem asks why . A full 3 d 10 shell is so stable that one 4 s electron migrates into 3 d , leaving 4 s 1 — this loosely-held 4 s 1 electron is exactly what makes copper such a good conductor.
Verify: 18 + 10 + 1 = 29 ✅.
Worked example Example 9 — Cell I: exam twist (reverse — config → element)
Forecast: An element in its ground state ends in … 4 s 2 3 d 10 4 p 3 . What is it, and which block of the Periodic Table Blocks (s, p, d, f) is it in?
Step 1 — Sum all electrons up to that point.
Why this step? The element's identity is just its total electron count = Z .
Core [ Ar ] = 18 , then 4 s 2 ( 2 ) + 3 d 10 ( 10 ) + 4 p 3 ( 3 ) = 15 . Total = 18 + 15 = 33 .
Step 2 — Identify.
Why this step? Z = 33 is arsenic (As).
Step 3 — Block?
Why this step? The last electron entered a p subshell (4 p 3 ) → p-block .
Verify: 18 + 2 + 10 + 3 = 33 ✅, and Z = 33 = As, p-block, group 15 (5 valence electrons: 4 s 2 4 p 3 ) ✅.
Cover the answers. (1) Where does the extra electron of Sc go? (2) Is Fe²⁺ [ Ar ] 3 d 6 or [ Ar ] 3 d 4 4 s 2 ? (3) Real config of Cr?
Sc → 3 d ::: because 4 s is already full, next-lowest K is 3 d .
Fe²⁺ ::: [ Ar ] 3 d 6 — remove highest-n (4 s ) electrons first.
Cr ::: [ Ar ] 3 d 5 4 s 1 — half-filled 3 d stability.