1.1.5 · D5Matter, Measurement & the Mole
Question bank — SI units in chemistry — kg, mol, K, Pa; derived units (J, L)

True or false — justify
A "base unit" is one that cannot be built by multiplying or dividing other units.
True — a base unit is defined independently (one of the seven: kg, mol, K, m, s, A, cd); derived units like J and Pa are constructed from those through a defining equation.
The pascal is an SI base unit because pressure is fundamental in chemistry.
False — pressure is important but the pascal is derived: . Substitute and divide by (subtract 2 from the m-exponent): , all base units.
Doubling the Celsius temperature doubles the average kinetic energy of a gas.
False — kinetic energy tracks absolute temperature. From 20 °C to 40 °C you go 293.15 K → 313.15 K, only about a 7% rise, not double; the Celsius zero is arbitrary so ratios in °C are meaningless.
One litre and one cubic decimetre are exactly the same volume.
True — a litre is defined as , a cube 10 cm on each edge, which equals .
A mole of electrons and a mole of water molecules contain the same number of particles.
True — the mole counts entities, always of them, regardless of what the entity is; only their mass differs.
Molar mass must be expressed in kg/mol because kg is the SI base unit of mass.
False — the coherent SI form (base units only) is kg/mol, but chemists tabulate g/mol because atomic masses come out as tidy numbers (water = 18 g/mol). Any consistent mass unit works as long as and match.
The joule and the newton-metre are two different quantities that happen to have similar sizes.
False — they are identical: by definition, since energy is force acting over distance.
Absolute zero (0 K) means the coldest temperature that is physically possible.
True — it is the point of zero thermal motion; for an ordinary system you cannot remove more energy than "all of it," so no temperature lies below 0 K.
Spot the error
"Water has molar mass 0.018, so 18 g of water is 1000 moles."
Error: 0.018 is in kg/mol, but 18 is in grams. Match units first: mol, or mol. The grams cancel the grams; you can't cancel grams against kg.
"To use at 25 °C, just plug in ."
Error: carries kelvin in its units, so must be in kelvin for the K to cancel. Convert first: K.
"A 2 L flask holds 0.002 m³ of gas, so I converted using ."
The written factor is nonsense (litres to litres). The correct relation is ; use it: — the litres cancel, leaving m³ (so the number was right by luck).
"1 J = 1 kg·m/s², because force is mass times acceleration."
Error: is a newton (force). Energy = force × distance, so multiply by one more metre (add 1 to the m-exponent): .
"Since 1 atm = 1 bar roughly, I'll use Pa for atm too."
Work the gap: . So is about larger than — small, but it matters in precise work.
"I have grams of carbon, so that's one mole."
Error: one mole of carbon is atoms, weighing about 12 g — not grams (which would be an astronomically huge mass). Don't confuse a count with a mass.
Why questions
Why did we invent the mole instead of just counting atoms directly?
Atoms are far too small and numerous to count individually, yet reactions occur in fixed whole-number particle ratios — the mole packages a huge fixed count () into a weighable mass, bridging the particle world and the lab balance.
Why must the temperature in be on an absolute scale?
Because the law assumes is proportional to kinetic energy, so must mean zero thermal motion. Only kelvin has a physical zero; Celsius's zero (water's freezing point) is arbitrary and breaks the proportionality. The units of (…K⁻¹) also demand kelvin.
Why don't we need to memorise derived units like J and Pa?
They are read off their defining equations by adding/subtracting base-unit exponents: work gives , pressure gives . Know the physics formula and the derived unit assembles itself.
Why do chemists use litres when the coherent SI volume unit is the cubic metre?
A cubic metre (1000 L) is far larger than any bench-top glassware, so it's an inconvenient scale. A litre (a 10 cm cube) matches beakers and flasks, so it survives as a practical non-SI unit.
Why is checking units before computing a value worthwhile?
If the units don't reduce to the expected unit (e.g. joules for an energy), the formula is wrong and no number will save it. Unit analysis catches structural errors before arithmetic ever begins — see Dimensional Analysis.
Why does Avogadro's number have that specific value rather than a round number?
It was originally chosen so that one mole of a substance weighs its atomic/molecular mass in grams, tying the count to convenient tabulated masses; itself is now fixed by definition.
Edge cases
What is the amount of substance, in moles, of exactly helium atoms?
Exactly 1 mole — . This is the defining case, independent of what element it is.
What happens to the pressure predicted by as at fixed and ?
Pressure , since is directly proportional to . Zero absolute temperature means zero molecular motion, so no collisions push on the walls — consistent with Kinetic Theory of Gases.
Can in kelvin ever be negative in the ideal gas law?
Not for an ordinary gas — kelvin starts at absolute zero, so here ; a negative value would predict impossible negative pressure. Always keep at or above zero when using .
If a molar mass were reported with no unit as just "44", how do you interpret it safely?
Assume g/mol by convention (so CO₂ = 44 g/mol), but flag the ambiguity: without a unit the number is meaningless, and you must confirm before using it in .
What is expressed in cubic metres, and does the conversion factor still apply?
— the same factor still multiplies, it just turns zero into zero. A linear conversion always carries zero to zero.
How many moles are in 0 g of any substance?
Zero moles, since for any nonzero molar mass. "No stuff" is a valid amount and gives a well-defined answer.
Connections
- The Mole Concept — the counting logic these traps test
- Ideal Gas Law — where the kelvin and pascal traps bite
- Significant Figures and Measurement Uncertainty — why "1 atm ≈ 1 bar" precision matters
- Molar Mass and Molecular Mass — the g/mol vs kg/mol distinction