3.5.28 · D4Guidance, Navigation & Control (GNC)

Exercises — Block diagram algebra

2,814 words13 min readBack to topic

Every symbol used below is defined once here so you never meet a stranger:

The figure below is your visual dictionary of the three shapes these exercises hide inside them — glance back at it whenever you are unsure which rule a problem is asking for.

Figure — Block diagram algebra
Figure 1 — The three canonical structures. Orange (top): a series cascade, whose two blocks multiply into (Rule 1). Teal (middle): a parallel split whose branches rejoin at a summer, giving (Rule 2). Plum (bottom): a feedback loop — notice the return path re-entering the summer before the forward block , the tell-tale sign of Rule 3, collapsing to .


Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: name the rule and write the one-line result. No algebra to clear yet.

Exercise 1.1

Two blocks and sit one after another (cascade), signal flowing then . Write the single equivalent block.

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT rule: Blocks in series multiply (Rule 1). WHY: the output of becomes the input of , and "passing through a block" means "multiply by that block". This is the orange top row of Figure 1.

Exercise 1.2

The same input splits at a take-off point into and , and their outputs meet at a summer that subtracts the bottom branch from the top. Write the equivalent block.

Recall Solution 1.2

WHAT rule: Blocks in parallel add/subtract (Rule 2), sign taken from the summer. This matches the teal middle row of Figure 1. WHY the minus: the summer subtracts the bottom branch, so we carry that same minus into the combination.

Exercise 1.3

A forward block has a negative unity feedback (). Write without simplifying.

Recall Solution 1.3

WHAT rule: The feedback loop (Rule 3), unity-feedback case — the plum bottom row of Figure 1 with the block set to . (Simplification comes in L2 — here we only recognise the form.)


Level 2 — Application

Goal: turn the crank once and clear the fractions.

Exercise 2.1

Finish Exercise 1.3: simplify to a single ratio of polynomials.

Recall Solution 2.1

WHAT we do: multiply top and bottom by to clear the inner fraction. WHY it is valid: multiplying a fraction's numerator and denominator by the same non-zero quantity is multiplying by , so the value cannot change. WHY it helps: it removes the "fraction inside a fraction", leaving a clean ratio of polynomials whose poles you can read off. Sanity check: a single pole at , further left than the open-loop pole at — feedback pushed the pole leftward (faster response). More on that in L5.

Exercise 2.2

Forward path is a cascade , ; feedback , negative. Find .

Recall Solution 2.2

Step 1 (series): . WHY: Rule 1 turns the cascade into one forward block so Rule 3 applies. Step 2 (feedback): Step 3 (clear): multiply top and bottom by . WHY it is valid: is exactly the common denominator of every fraction in sight, so multiplying top and bottom by it is again multiplying by — the value is untouched. WHY it helps: it wipes out all the nested denominators at once, collapsing the mess into a single polynomial ratio.

Exercise 2.3

Two blocks and in series. Simplify.

Recall Solution 2.3

The two blocks are inverses — they cancel exactly, leaving a pure pass-through of gain . WHY it matters: this is precisely the "" correction you insert when moving a take-off point past a block (Rule 4): the extra block undoes the block it crossed.


Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: choose the right order and untangle nesting.

Exercise 3.1 (two loops, inside-out)

Inner loop: forward , feedback (negative). Outer loop: forward then the inner block, feedback (negative). Find .

The figure below shows this exact two-loop layout; the plum dashed box marks the inner loop you must collapse first, before the outer feedback formula can even be written.

Figure — Block diagram algebra
Figure 2 — Nested loops for Exercise 3.1. Teal is the inner loop ( with feedback ), boxed by the plum dashed line and labelled "reduce THIS first". Orange is the outer loop ( with feedback ) that wraps everything. Two plum take-off dots feed the two return paths.

Recall Solution 3.1

Step 1 — reduce the innermost loop first. WHY: the outer feedback formula needs the forward path to be one block; it cannot see through a hidden loop (the plum dashed box in Figure 2). Step 2 — series with : Step 3 — outer loop: apply Rule 3, then multiply top and bottom by . WHY multiply by : it is the common denominator of the fractions stacked inside the big fraction, so multiplying top and bottom by it is multiplying by — the value stays put. WHY it helps: it clears the nested fraction in one stroke, leaving a single first-order transfer function whose pole () is immediately visible.

Exercise 3.2 (move a take-off point, then reduce)

Forward: with . The feedback take-off currently sits after and returns through . You are asked to move the take-off before and give the new feedback block, then confirm is unchanged.

Recall Solution 3.2

Step 1 — what the tap reads now: after , the tapped signal is . The fed-back signal is . Step 2 — move the tap before : now it reads , not — we lost a factor of . To keep identical we insert in the moved branch: new feedback block . (Rule 4: "cross a block, pay the toll ".) Step 3 — check the closed loop is unchanged. The loop gain is still either way, so Moving the junction changed the drawing, never the transfer function. ✔


Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: assemble several moves you were never handed pre-arranged.

Exercise 4.1 (parallel forward, single feedback)

The forward path is a parallel combination: input splits into and , their outputs added at a summer to form the forward output. This forward output then drives a negative unity feedback loop. Find .

Recall Solution 4.1

Step 1 — collapse the parallel forward path (Rule 2, sign ). WHY combine into one fraction: Rule 3 needs a single forward block , so we first add the two parallel branches over a common denominator . Step 2 — apply unity feedback (Rule 3, ), then clear the compound fraction by multiplying top and bottom by . WHY multiply by : is the shared denominator of the pieces inside the big fraction, so this is multiplication by — value unchanged. WHY it helps: it flattens the fraction-inside-a-fraction into a plain ratio of first-degree polynomials.

Exercise 4.2 (cascade with feedback around only part of it)

, where the take-off point (between and ) feeds back through into the summer. So the loop wraps only , and is a plain cascade after the loop. With , , , find .

Recall Solution 4.2

Step 1 — identify the loop scope. The tap sits between and , so the fed-back signal is the output of only. The loop encloses just with feedback . Step 2 — reduce that inner loop (Rule 3), clearing the fraction by multiplying top and bottom by for the same "multiply by " reason as before: Step 3 — cascade the leftover (Rule 1, is outside the loop): WHY this order: is downstream of the take-off, so no feedback wraps it — treat the loop first, then multiply the clean cascade block.


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: reason about poles, stability, sign of feedback, and degenerate inputs.

Exercise 5.1 (characteristic equation → stability)

For the system of Exercise 2.2, , the characteristic equation is the denominator set to zero, . Find the poles and state whether the closed loop is stable.

Recall Solution 5.1

WHAT rule: poles are the roots of the characteristic equation , which is exactly the denominator . Here (the imaginary unit) and . Both poles have real part , i.e. they lie in the left half of the complex plane. Verdict: stable. The oscillation (from the imaginary part) decays because the envelope shrinks.

Exercise 5.2 (positive feedback and the sign flip)

Take forward with positive feedback, . The closed-loop denominator becomes . For what value of does the closed loop have a pole exactly at (the boundary of instability)?

Recall Solution 5.2

WHAT changes for positive feedback: the denominator is , not . The pole is at . A pole at requires , so Interpretation: for the pole is at (stable); at it sits on the imaginary axis (marginal); for it crosses into the right half-plane and the system blows up. Positive feedback pushes the pole rightward — the opposite of the stabilising leftward push we saw in Exercise 2.1.

Exercise 5.3 (degenerate case — the loop gain vanishes)

In a negative feedback loop , suppose the feedback path is broken (an open wire), which we model as . What does the closed loop become, and what does that mean physically?

Recall Solution 5.3

Set : Meaning: with no feedback returning, there is no round trip, so the loop gain and only the direct pass-through (the "") survives. The system is just the raw open-loop block — exactly the op-amp running at its full untamed gain. This confirms the physical reading of the in : it is the signal going straight through, once, with no feedback trip.

Exercise 5.4 (limiting behaviour — huge loop gain)

Still using , examine what happens as the forward gain (very large). Simplify the closed-loop expression in that limit.

Recall Solution 5.4

Divide top and bottom by . WHY divide by : it isolates the term, which is the only thing that changes as grows — making the limit trivial to read. Meaning: when the forward gain is enormous, the closed-loop behaviour depends only on the feedback path , not on . This is the golden principle of precision op-amps and feedback control: make huge and cheap, and let a precise, stable set the actual gain .



Connections

  • Parent: Block diagram algebra — the rules these drill.
  • Transfer functions — every block above is one.
  • Laplace transform — why appears and why blocks multiply.
  • Feedback control loops — the physical setting of Rule 3.
  • Signal flow graphs & Mason's gain formula — an alternative to inside-out reduction.
  • Op-amp gain — Exercises 5.3 and 5.4 in disguise.
  • Stability & characteristic equation — Exercise 5.1 and 5.2.