3.2.19 · D4 · HinglishOrbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics

ExercisesHohmann transfer — derivation, minimum energy transfer

2,949 words13 min read↑ Read in English

3.2.19 · D4 · Physics › Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics › Hohmann transfer — derivation, minimum energy transfer

Core toolkit — neeche words mein dobara bataya gaya hai (pehli teen lines hi sach mein "big three" hain; baaki lines sirf named shorthands hain jo in teeno se bani hain):

Raise ka map Figure 1 mein dekho neeche — har problem is ek picture ka variation hai.

Figure 1 — Hohmann geometry (raise).

Figure — Hohmann transfer — derivation, minimum energy transfer


Level 1 — Recognition

L1.1

Ek satellite Earth ke around km radius ki circular orbit mein hai. Uski speed kya hai?

Recall Solution

Yeh circular speed formula hai — "circle hold karne ke liye kitni fast" sawaal ka exactly ek hi jawab hota hai.

L1.2

Ek Hohmann transfer km se km tak jaata hai. Transfer ellipse ka semi-major axis kya hai?

Recall Solution

Ellipse ka sabse lamba diameter inner circle se outer circle tak pahunchta hai, isliye uski length hai, aur uska aadha hai.

L1.3

L1.2 ke transfer ke liye, ellipse ka kaunsa end periapsis (closest point) hai aur kaunsa apoapsis (farthest point)?

Recall Solution

Periapsis = Earth ke sabse paas = chhota radius . Apoapsis = Earth se sabse door = bada radius . Satellite periapsis par sabse fast aur apoapsis par sabse slow hoti hai (chadhte waqt speed height ke badle mein exchange hoti hai).


Level 2 — Application

L2.1

Ek spacecraft ko Earth ke around km se km tak raise karo. , pehla burn, nikalo.

Recall Solution

Step A — current speed (inner circle par): Step B — transfer ellipse size: km. Step C — periapsis par zaroori speed (vis-viva at , ): Step D — burn (dono velocities same direction mein point karti hain, isliye magnitudes subtract karo):

L2.2

Same transfer jaise L2.1. , doosra burn, aur total nikalo.

Recall Solution

Step A — apoapsis par speed (vis-viva at , abhi bhi ): Step B — par target circular speed: Step C — burn (tum bahut slow pahunche, isliye speed up karo): Total: .

L2.3

Same transfer ke liye, do burns ke beech coast kitni lambi hai?

Recall Solution

Tum ellipse ka aadha hissa fly karte ho, isliye time orbital period ka aadha hai. Half-period formula:

L2.4

Edge case — orbit lower karna. Ek spacecraft ko outer circle km se neeche inner circle km tak jaana hai (L2.1 ka reverse). Dono burns (unke signs/direction ke saath) aur total nikalo.

Recall Solution

Pehle sign convention. Fuel cost ke roop mein hamesha positive magnitude hoti hai; direction (prograde = speed up, retrograde = brake) woh hoti hai jo lowering mein flip hoti hai. Transfer ellipse L2.1 waali same ellipse hai — sirf travel direction reverse ho jaata hai: ab periapsis target hai aur apoapsis start hai. km (unchanged — averaging symmetric hai).

Burn 1 — outer circle par (yeh ellipse ka apoapsis hai). Tum abhi outer circle par km/s par ho. Ellipse par drop karne ke liye tumhe apoapsis speed km/s tak slow karna hoga (same jaise L2.2). Kyunki tum slower jaate ho, yeh retrograde (braking) burn hai: Burn 2 — inner circle par (ellipse ka periapsis). Tum periapsis speed km/s par pahunchte ho (same jaise L2.1), jo inner circular speed km/s se faster hai. Circularize karne ke liye tumhe dobara brake karna hoga: Total: .

Key symmetry: L2.1–L2.2 ke raise se identical total (dono burns ke same magnitudes hain, sirf swap ho gaye hain aur ab retrograde hain). Same do circles ke beech lower karna aur raise karna exactly same fuel cost karta hai — tum sirf boost ki jagah brake karte ho.


Level 3 — Analysis

L3.1

Ek transfer km se km (LEO→GEO) tak jaata hai. Koi claim karta hai "kyunki hum sirf ke factor se raise kar rahe hain, total kisi base value ka hona chahiye." Actual total compute karo aur explain karo kyun raise ratio cost ko linearly scale nahi karta.

Recall Solution

km. Comment: har burn ki size radii ke square roots ke differences par depend karti hai, raise ratio par nahi. double karne se double nahi hota; asliyat mein jab total ek finite limit ki taraf jaata hai (L4.1 dekho). Cost ratio mein sub-linear hai — orbits ko bada banana sasta hai, deep banana mehenga.

L3.2

Do spacecraft dono apni orbit ko same height km se raise karte hain. Ek neeche se shuru karta hai ( km), doosra upar se ( km). Kaunsa transfer kam total cost karta hai, aur kyun?

Recall Solution

Low starter (, ): High starter (, ): High starter 10× se zyada sasta hai same height gain ke liye. Kyun: gravity well mein deep speeds badi hoti hain aur gravity steep hai, isliye orbit ki energy badalne ke liye bade velocity changes chahiye. Door bahar, sab kuch slow hai aur gravity gentle hai, isliye same height almost kuch cost nahi karti. Yeh Oberth effect ka geometric chehra hai ulta chal raha hai — deep hona energy per amplify karta hai lekin saath hi baseline speeds bhi badhata hai jo tumhe orbit reshape karne ke liye overcome karni padti hain.


Level 4 — Synthesis

L4.1

Dikhao ki jab outer radius without bound badhta hai () fixed inner radius ke liye, pehla burn escape-boost ki taraf approach karta hai: . Phir ise km ke liye evaluate karo.

Recall Solution

Pehle, pehle-burn ka formula toolkit se redrive karo. jahan aur , . substitute karo: (aakhri step bracket se factor out karta hai). Isliye working form: Limit lo. Root ke andar top aur bottom ko se divide karo: Toh Yeh exactly woh burn hai jo circle ko parabola (escape orbit) mein convert karta hai: escape speed hai. Interpretation: infinitely-large Hohmann ka periapsis burn escape burn hai — samajh mein aata hai, kyunki infinite ellipse parabola hi hoti hai. Numbers: km/s, toh

L4.2

Sun ke around planet-to-planet Hohmann ke liye, Earth ki orbit km aur Mars ki km lo, ke saath. Dono heliocentric burns aur transfer time days mein nikalo. (Yeh woh Delta-v budget hai jo ek probe ko Earth chhodne ke upar chahiye.)

Recall Solution

km. Transfer time: Days mein convert karo ek din ke seconds se divide karke, (kyunki ):


Level 5 — Mastery

L5.1

Classic threshold prove karo: ek bi-elliptic transfer Hohmann transfer ko tab beat karna shuru karta hai jab ratio ≈ 11.94 se zyada ho jaata hai (ek bi-elliptic ke liye jiska intermediate apoapsis ho). Yeh karo total 's ko ke functions ke roop mein compare karke aur dhundho kahaan woh cross karte hain.

Recall Solution

Pehle bi-elliptic aur uska symbol define karo. Ek Bi-elliptic transfer teen burns use karta hai: ek bade ellipse par burn out karo jiska apoapsis ek ==intermediate radius == tak pahunchta hai jo se bada choose kiya gaya ho; tak coast karo aur dobara burn karo periapsis ko tak raise karne ke liye; tak waapis coast karo aur circularize karne ke liye teesra burn karo. Yahan woh intermediate apoapsis radius hai — "detour distance." Hum limiting case analyze karte hain (infinity tak fling out), jo best deta hai jo bi-elliptic kabhi kar sakta hai.

Units mein kaam karo jahan aur . lo.

Hohmann total (do burns ka sum, , , ke saath):

Bi-elliptic with infinite intermediate apoapsis (). Burn 1 circle ko par ek escape-like ellipse par raise karta hai: L4.1 se woh cost karta hai. Jab apoapsis infinity tak jaata hai beech ka burn cost ki taraf jaata hai. Final burn tumhe ek infinite-apoapsis ellipse se par circle mein drop karta hai: same escape argument apply karo radius par, jahan circular speed hai, cost deta hai. Total:

Crossover dhundho . Yeh transcendental hai, isliye numerically solve karo. Dono expressions tabulate karo:

  • : , Hohmann jeet ta hai.
  • : , tie (yeh root hai).
  • : , bi-elliptic (infinite) jeetta hai.

Root yahan hai: Padhna: ke liye koi bi-elliptic Hohmann ko beat nahi kar sakta; ke liye ek infinite (aur isliye kafi bada finite) kar sakta hai. aur ke beech sirf ek finite jeetta hai; se upar infinite case bhi outright jeetta hai. Bi-elliptic transfer dekho. Figure dono curves ko cross karte hua dikhata hai.

Figure 2 — Hohmann vs bi-elliptic total vs ratio .

Figure — Hohmann transfer — derivation, minimum energy transfer

L5.2

Design check. Tumhe ek satellite ko km se km () tak raise karna hai. Hohmann total compute karo, phir infinite bi-elliptic bound, aur batao kaun si strategy aur investigate karni chahiye.

Recall Solution

km/s aur use karo. Hohmann: km. Infinite bi-elliptic bound: Verdict: Kyunki , bound already Hohmann se neeche hai (). Ek finite- bi-elliptic aur bhi behtar karega — isliye yeh raise ek genuine candidate hai Bi-elliptic transfer ke liye. Lekin transfer time ke against weigh karo, jo bi-elliptic ke liye kai zyada lambi ho sakti hai.


Recall

Recall One-line self-test
  • par circular speed? ::: .
  • Transfer ke periapsis par speed? ::: vis-viva at with .
  • Door ऊपर same-height raise sasta kyun hai? ::: speeds ki tarah fall karti hain, isliye same tiny speed change cover karta hai.
  • Kya lowering utna hi cost karti hai jitna raising? ::: haan, same magnitudes — tum sirf boost ki jagah brake karte ho.
  • Bi-elliptic threshold? ::: .
  • ka limit jab ? ::: , escape boost.

Related: 3.2.19 Hohmann transfer — derivation, minimum energy transfer (Hinglish) · Vis-viva equation · Kepler's Third Law · Oberth effect · Two-body problem.