Worked examples — Orbital elements (Keplerian) — semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, inclination i, RAAN Ω, argument of perigee ω, true ano
This is the drill page for the parent topic. The parent taught you the six numbers and the formulas. Here we throw every kind of case at those formulas — every sign, every degenerate shape, every quadrant of an angle, plus a real-world problem and an exam trap — and grind each one out by hand.
Before any symbol appears, remember the toolkit the parent built (all defined there):
Recall The formulas we will hammer (all from the parent)
- Radii of the ends: perigee , apogee . Here is the semi-major axis (half the long diameter) and is the eccentricity (how squashed, = circle).
- Recover : , .
- Vis-viva: , with the gravitational parameter (Earth's "gravity strength number").
- Orbit shape: , semi-latus rectum .
- Angular momentum magnitude (area-sweeping rate ) links to by , so .
- True anomaly = angle from perigee to the satellite, measured at Earth's centre.
- Energy: (negative = bound, zero = escape, positive = flyby).
Everywhere on this page and Earth radius .
The scenario matrix
Every problem this topic can throw is one of these cells. Each worked example below is tagged with the cell it fills.
| Cell | What makes it special | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A. Standard ellipse | , plain numbers | Ex 1 |
| B. Circle (degenerate ) | perigee = apogee, meaningless | Ex 2 |
| C. Escape (limiting ) | , | Ex 3 |
| D. Hyperbolic flyby () | , energy positive | Ex 4 |
| E. Angle quadrant trap | recover where alone is ambiguous | Ex 5 |
| F. Orientation angles: signs & quadrants | , from a vector, all sign cases | Ex 6 |
| G. Real-world word problem | GEO / mission framing | Ex 7 |
| H. Exam twist | mixes two formulas, hidden step | Ex 8 |
A. Standard ellipse
B. The circle — a degenerate case
When the ellipse collapses to a circle. Two things quietly break: perigee and apogee become the same point, and the argument of perigee and true anomaly lose their meaning (there's no "closest point" to measure from). The figure below shows the collapse — the two black dots that were once perigee and apogee now sit at the same distance from the focus, and the red loop is the same radius all the way round.

C. The escape limit —
As climbs toward the orbit stops being a closed loop. Watch what the formulas do at exactly : energy hits zero and runs off to infinity.
(Cell C, limiting case) From a circular LEO of radius km, what is the escape speed (the speed of the parabolic orbit passing through that point)?
Forecast: escape speed vs circular speed at the same radius — factor of exactly what?
- Energy of escape. A parabola has total energy (just barely unbound). Why this step? Escape means "reach infinity with zero speed left over": .
- Set . . Why this step? Solving the energy equation for when .
- Number. km/s.
Verify: circular speed here is km/s, and . ✓ Escape speed is always times circular speed — a clean check. In vis-viva terms , the same result. ✓
D. Hyperbolic flyby — and a negative
Now push past escape. For the "ellipse" becomes a hyperbola, energy is positive, and the semi-major axis comes out negative. It still works — you just have to keep the sign. In the figure the red curve is the open hyperbolic path: it swings in past perigee (black dot) and flies back out to infinity, never closing — the visual signature of an unbound orbit.

(Cell D, e>1, sign case) A probe flies past Earth on a hyperbola with and perigee radius km. Find and the speed at perigee.
Forecast: will be positive or negative? Will beat escape speed at that radius?
- Perigee still obeys . So km. Why this step? The perigee formula is geometric and holds for any conic; with the factor is negative, forcing . A negative is the flag for an unbound orbit.
- Speed via vis-viva, keeping the sign of . . Why this step? Vis-viva is universal; becomes , adding energy — exactly why hyperbolic orbits are faster.
- Number. , so km/s.
Verify: escape speed at km is km/s. Our ✓ — a hyperbola must exceed escape. Energy km²/s² is positive ✓, confirming unbound. ✓
E. The angle-quadrant trap — recovering
Here is the classic pitfall. Given , the orbit equation gives you — but can't tell "going away from perigee" () from "coming back" (), because . You need a second piece of information to pick the quadrant. In the figure, one red radius points to (outbound, above the axis) and the other to (inbound, below the axis) — both hit the same radius, which is exactly the ambiguity we must resolve.

? (Cell E, quadrant ambiguity) Using km, (from Ex 1), the satellite is at radius km. Find — and note there are two answers.
Forecast: at one radius, how many points on the orbit share it? (Draw a horizontal chord.)
- Semi-latus rectum. km. Why this step? is the numerator of the orbit equation.
- Invert the orbit equation for . From : . Why this step? Solve algebraically for ; the negative sign of the bracket tells us we're past .
- List BOTH angle solutions. The equation has two solutions on : a principal one , and its mirror below the major axis . Why this step? is even, so any value has one angle above the axis and one below it — never assume alone is the answer.
- Resolve the quadrant with the radial velocity sign. The rate of change of is (positive = moving outward, negative = moving inward), where is the angular-momentum magnitude from the recall box above — a fixed positive constant for this orbit. So the sign of is just the sign of . The fully unambiguous recipe is (recall: numerator = , denominator = ), where if outbound () and if inbound (). Why this step? Because and , only carries the sign of . Feeding both and into returns the correct quadrant directly — outbound gives , inbound gives . No manual case-splitting needed.
Verify: plug both back into . For : , km ✓. For : too, same km ✓. Both radii match — proving the ambiguity is real, not a mistake, and that the / sign is what breaks the tie.
F. Orientation angles — every sign of and
The tilt (0°–180°) and the swing (0°–360°) come from the angular-momentum vector . Getting them right means handling all quadrants and both hemispheres. The 3D figure fixes the geometry: the black arrow is Earth's spin axis (North), the faint plane is the equator, and the red arrow is — the angle between them is the inclination.

, all cases (Cell F, signs/quadrants) Given the specific angular-momentum vector , extract and . Then evaluate three vectors: (a) , (b) , (c) . Units km²/s.
Forecast: which of these is equatorial, which retrograde, which prograde-inclined?
- Inclination from the -component. , so , ranging –. Why this step? is the angle between and the -axis (North). over needs no quadrant fix — the range is already the full inclination range.
- The node vector. points to the ascending node in the equatorial plane. ( is the unit vector along from the notation legend.) Why this step? RAAN is measured in that plane; is the line of nodes.
- RAAN with quadrant fix. ; then if , . Why this step? Exactly like in the parent's style: alone can't tell east swing from west swing. The sign of (the -component of the node) picks the correct half-circle.
Now the three cases:
- (a) : — equatorial, prograde. Node : the node is undefined (the plane never crosses the equator), so is meaningless — a degenerate case (same spirit as dying for a circle).
- (b) : , so — inclined, prograde. Node , , ; here so no flip: .
- (c) : — equatorial, retrograde (going the "wrong" way, points South). Node again undefined, so is meaningless too.
Verify: (a) ✓ equatorial; (b) , ✓; (c) ✓ retrograde. The three cover , , and — the full sign story of the tilt, plus both degenerate ( undefined) endpoints. ✓
G. Real-world word problem
(Cell G, real world) A comms satellite must hover over one spot on the equator, so its orbital period must equal one sidereal day s. Find the required semi-major axis , then its altitude and its (circular) speed. What and does "hover over one spot" force?
Forecast: roughly how high — hundreds of km like LEO, or tens of thousands?
- Kepler's third law. . Why this step? Period is fixed by size alone in the two-body problem — this is the tool that turns "one day" into a distance.
- Number. km. Why this step? Direct substitution.
- Altitude & speed. Altitude km. Circular speed km/s. Why this step? "Altitude" means height above the surface, so we subtract Earth's radius; and since the orbit is circular (, next step) vis-viva collapses to at every point.
- Forced elements. To stay over a fixed point it must not drift north–south (⇒ , equatorial) and must move at constant angular rate matching Earth's spin (⇒ , circular). Why this step? Any would speed up near perigee and slow near apogee (Kepler's 2nd law), so the ground track would swing east–west; any would tilt the plane and trace a north–south figure-8 on the ground. Only holds the satellite over one point.
Verify: the famous GEO altitude is km; our km matches to (difference is the exact sidereal-day value and used). ✓ Speed km/s is the textbook GEO speed. ✓
H. The exam twist
(Cell H, exam trap) An orbit has km and . At the point where the satellite's speed equals the circular speed for that same radius, find and .
Forecast: is there such a point, and is it before or after apogee? (Trap: it is not apogee or perigee.)
- Write both speeds. Actual: . Local circular: . Why this step? The condition links vis-viva to the circular formula — the hidden bridge the examiner is testing.
- Set equal, solve for . km. Why this step? The cancels; the algebra collapses to the elegant fact exactly when (the ends of the minor axis).
- Find from the orbit equation. with km. So . Why this step? Inverting the orbit equation converts the radius into an angle; is the tidy signature of the minor-axis endpoints.
- Quadrant. , and by symmetry also (the two minor-axis ends). Why this step? As in Ex 5, gives two solutions — one on each side of the major axis — and both are physically valid crossings.
Verify: at , actual , and circular — identical ✓. And plugged into ✓. The trap was assuming the point is apogee; it is actually the minor-axis crossing at . ✓
Recall Self-test: match the cell
Circle has and speed ::: , constant everywhere. Parabolic escape speed relates to circular speed by factor ::: . For a hyperbola the semi-major axis is ::: negative, and energy is positive. Given only , to pick the right you also need ::: the sign of (radial-velocity direction), best done with atan2. To get from the node vector you flip past when ::: the node's -component . The point where orbital speed equals local circular speed is at ::: , i.e. the minor-axis ends, .
See also: Kepler's equation and mean anomaly for turning into time, State vectors to orbital elements for the full elements pipeline, Perifocal coordinate frame and Angular momentum vector h for the geometry behind Ex 6, and Eccentricity vector for a sign-clean way to get and .