3.2.8 · D5Orbital Mechanics & Astrodynamics

Question bank — Orbital elements (Keplerian) — semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, inclination i, RAAN Ω, argument of perigee ω, true ano

2,067 words9 min readBack to topic

Before any traps, we lock down every symbol and the reference frame so nothing on this page is used undefined.

Figure — Orbital elements (Keplerian) — semi-major axis a, eccentricity e, inclination i, RAAN Ω, argument of perigee ω, true ano

True or false — justify

TF1. A circular orbit still has a well-defined argument of perigee .
False. A circle has , so there is no perigee — no "closest point" to measure from — and is undefined; engineers use the argument of latitude instead.
TF2. Two orbits with the same always have the same period.
True. Period depends only on via ; eccentricity, tilt, and orientation do not enter, so a nearly circular and a very elongated orbit with equal share one period.
TF3. Increasing eccentricity while holding fixed raises the total orbital energy.
False. Energy is , which depends only on . Changing reshapes the ellipse but leaves the energy — and hence — untouched (see Vis-viva equation).
TF4. An orbit with passes over both poles.
True. Inclination is the tilt of the plane from the equator; at the plane contains the (spin) axis, so the ground track sweeps over the North and South poles.
TF5. RAAN is meaningful for an exactly equatorial orbit.
False. With the plane never leaves the equator, so there is no ascending node to point to; becomes undefined (a degenerate/singular case).
TF6. The true anomaly increases at a constant rate over one orbit.
False. By Kepler's 2nd law the satellite sweeps equal areas in equal times, so races through perigee and crawls at apogee; the uniform angle is the mean anomaly (see Kepler's equation and mean anomaly).
TF7. Semi-major axis equals the average of apogee and perigee radii.
True. Since and , adding gives , so — of radii from the focus, not altitudes.
TF8. A retrograde orbit has negative inclination.
False. Inclination is defined on ; retrograde motion is encoded by (the vector leans below the equator), never by a negative angle.
TF9. If you know at one instant you can recover all six elements.
True. Six state numbers carry exactly the same information as six elements; the conversion computes for the plane, the eccentricity vector for and perigee direction, and energy for — done by State vectors to orbital elements, which is the standard state→elements recipe (see also Angular momentum vector h, Eccentricity vector).

Spot the error

SE1. "Perigee altitude is km, so km."
The error is forgetting the focus is Earth's center: km. Altitude is measured from the surface, radius from the center.
SE2. "The orbit is very eccentric (), so it must be huge."
Eccentricity sets shape, not size; a tiny orbit and a giant orbit can both have . Only (and hence ) sets the size scale.
SE3. " and are both measured from the ascending node."
Only starts at the ascending node (to perigee). starts at perigee (to the satellite), so their sum is the node-to-satellite angle.
SE4. "Vis-viva says , so at apogee is largest because is large."
Backwards: larger makes smaller, so (the scalar speed) is smallest at apogee. Speed peaks at perigee where is smallest.
SE5. "Inclination is the angle between the orbit plane and the -axis."
It is the angle between (perpendicular to the plane) and , which equals the angle between the orbit plane and the equatorial plane — not between the plane and the axis.
SE6. "To convert perifocal position to ECI, rotate by first, then , then ."
The correct order is acting on . These are active rotations (they move the vector, holding axes fixed), and in matrix form the rightmost matrix touches the vector first — so reading right-to-left we swing perigee within the plane (), then tilt the plane about the node line (), then swing the node to its longitude (). Doing first would tilt before perigee is placed, giving a different, wrong orientation (see Perifocal coordinate frame, which defines the P–Q–W axes this starts from).
SE7. "For an escape trajectory still holds with a positive ."
For a parabola (so ), and for a hyperbola forcing . The formula holds but is not a positive "size" anymore.

Why questions

WQ1. Why exactly six orbital elements and not five or seven?
Because the full state is 3 position + 3 velocity = six independent numbers; the elements are a repackaging of the same six degrees of freedom (see Two-body problem, which shows the motion is fixed by these six).
WQ2. Why are five elements constant and only changes in ideal two-body motion?
The ellipse's shape and orientation are fixed by conserved quantities (energy fixes ; fixes the plane; the Eccentricity vector — a fixed arrow pointing to perigee — fixes and ); only the satellite's position along the fixed curve moves, and that is .
WQ3. Why do we bother with elements instead of just tracking ?
Elements separate the unchanging geometry (5 constants) from the one moving number, making the orbit's shape, tilt, and orientation instantly readable rather than buried in six wiggling coordinates.
WQ4. Why does matter to this "constant" picture?
is the largest zonal harmonic — a dimensionless number ( for Earth) measuring how much Earth's equatorial bulge makes gravity depart from a perfect . That extra pull slowly drifts and , so the five "constants" become slowly varying (see Orbital perturbations (J2)).
WQ5. Why is the semi-latus rectum the radius at ?
The orbit equation gives , so exactly a quarter-orbit past perigee — is that "sideways" radius.
WQ6. Why must be measured in the direction of motion?
Otherwise the sign is ambiguous and would not track the satellite correctly through apogee; motion direction fixes whether increases toward apogee or back toward perigee.

Edge cases

EC1. What happens to the elements as ?
Perigee vanishes, so (and with it the reference for ) becomes undefined; the fix is the argument of latitude , which stays well-defined.
EC2. What happens to and as ?
The node line disappears (plane never leaves the equator), so both lose their reference; the fix is the true longitude , measured straight from the -axis.
EC3. What does physically mean, and what happens to ?
It is a parabolic escape trajectory with exactly zero total energy ; since , this forces — the "ellipse" opens up and never closes.
EC4. What is the inclination of an orbit whose points along ?
: the plane is equatorial but the motion is fully retrograde, the extreme opposite of a prograde equatorial orbit at .
EC5. If perigee altitude equals apogee altitude, what are and ?
The orbit is a circle, so exactly, and is undefined because there is no unique closest point.
EC6. For a hyperbolic flyby (), is there an apogee?
No — the trajectory is open, so there is no farthest point; only perigee (closest approach, ) exists, and is bounded by the asymptote angles where .

Recall One-line summary of every trap

Size = (energy, period); shape = ; tilt = ; swing = ; where-perigee-points = ; where-the-satellite-is-now = . The degenerate cases (, , ) are exactly where the "where" references break and need , , or open-orbit thinking.