Exercises — Aspect ratio — effect on induced drag
Before we start, let us re-earn every symbol so a reader who arrives cold can follow line one.

The figure above is our master reference: the black bar is a wing seen from the front, the orange curls are the tip vortices, and the red angle is the downward tilt of the flow. Every problem is a variation on reading this picture correctly.
Level 1 — Recognition
Here you only need to pick the right formula and plug in. No traps beyond arithmetic.
Problem 1.1
A rectangular wing has span and constant chord . Find its planform area and its aspect ratio .
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT: We want then . WHY these: area comes first because needs it. A rectangle's area is length width: Now the aspect ratio: Check: for constant chord — same answer. Good.
Problem 1.2
State, in words and symbol, what happens to if you keep and fixed but triple the aspect ratio.
Recall Solution 1.2
WHAT: track the dependence. In , with held fixed, . Tripling multiplies the denominator by 3, so: Induced drag drops to one third. This is exactly the "long thin wing wins" story from Aspect ratio — effect on induced drag.
Problem 1.3
An elliptical-loaded wing has and flies at . Compute .
Recall Solution 1.3
WHY : "elliptical loading" is the ideal case, so and we may use the short formula.
Level 2 — Application
Now you must rearrange the formula or chain two facts together.
Problem 2.1
A glider wing has , , and must produce in a slow thermalling turn. Find .
Recall Solution 2.1
Full formula because : Notice how tiny it is despite the high : the enormous is doing the work. That is why sailplanes look the way they do.
Problem 2.2
A wing produces at with . What is its aspect ratio?
Recall Solution 2.2
WHAT: solve for . Start from and isolate : Sanity check: plug back: . ✓
Problem 2.3
Two wings fly at the same and same . Wing A has , wing B has . By what factor is B's induced drag smaller?
Recall Solution 2.3
With fixed, , so the ratio is just the inverse ratio of the aspect ratios: B's induced drag is A's — i.e. 60% smaller.
Level 3 — Analysis
Here you weigh induced drag against its rival, parasite drag — see Drag polar and Parasite drag.
Problem 3.1
The total drag coefficient is where is the (roughly constant) parasite part. A wing has , . At , is induced or parasite drag larger, and what is total ?
Recall Solution 3.1
Induced part: Compare: vs . Induced drag is larger — over 3× the parasite drag — because is high (slow flight). Total:
Problem 3.2
Same wing as 3.1 but now in fast cruise at . Recompute and the total. Which term now dominates?
Recall Solution 3.2
Now parasite drag dominates ( vs ). The lesson: induced drag is a low-speed / high- problem; parasite drag is a high-speed problem. This is the whole reason gliders (slow, high ) crave high while fighters (fast, low ) do not — see Glide ratio & L/D max.

The figure shows how the two drag pieces cross over as grows: the flat gray parasite line and the rising orange induced curve.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Combine the formula with real dimensional quantities: forces, span, area, speed.
Problem 4.1
An aircraft weighs , wing area , span , . It flies straight and level (so lift ) at density and speed . Find , , and the actual induced-drag force in newtons.
Recall Solution 4.1
Step 1 — aspect ratio. . Step 2 — dynamic pressure. . Step 3 — lift coefficient. Level flight means , so Step 4 — induced-drag coefficient. Step 5 — turn the coefficient back into a force by reversing : So of the plane's total drag, about is purely the price of making lift.
Problem 4.2
For the same aircraft, a designer proposes stretching the span to (keeping and everything else fixed). What is the new induced-drag force, and how much power (at ) does the change save? (Power .)
Recall Solution 4.2
New aspect ratio: . is unchanged (same ) at , so New force: Power saved: A longer, thinner wing here saves over 43 kW of engine power — real fuel money. (In practice you'd then check the extra wetted area and structural weight; see the next level.)
Level 5 — Mastery
Full reasoning, optimisation, and edge cases. No hand-holding in the problem statements.
Problem 5.1 — The induced/parasite optimum
Total drag coefficient is . For a fixed weight and speed (so is fixed), induced drag falls with but parasite drag rises because more span means more wetted area; model this as with . Take , . Find the that minimises total , and the minimum .
Recall Solution 5.1
WHAT: minimise over . WHY calculus: the function has one term growing with and one shrinking; the minimum is where their slopes cancel, i.e. where the derivative is zero. Write . So . Differentiate and set to zero: Minimum total drag (note at the optimum the two terms are equal, each ): Interpretation: the sweet spot is where induced drag equals the extra parasite drag it costs to shrink it. Push higher and parasite/weight penalties win — exactly the "higher AR isn't always better" caveat, now made quantitative.
Problem 5.2 — Winglet as an effective- boost
A wing has geometric , , flying at . A winglet raises the effective span efficiency to without changing or . Because and enter only as the product , we can quote an effective aspect ratio at the old . Find (a) the drag reduction as a percentage, and (b) .
Recall Solution 5.2
(a) Since with everything else fixed: That is a reduction of , i.e. 13.0% less induced drag. (b) The product went from to . Expressed as an effective aspect ratio at the original efficiency : The winglet makes an wing behave, drag-wise, like an one — without physically growing the span.
Problem 5.3 — The degenerate cases
Explain, using the formula and the physics, what does in each limit: (a) (no lift); (b) (infinite wing); (c) (pathologically bad lift shape). Confirm each is consistent with the parent note.
Recall Solution 5.3
(a) : numerator , so . Physics: no lift means no pressure difference, no tip leakage, no vortices — nothing to tilt. Matches "no lift ⇒ no induced drag." (b) : denominator , so . Physics: an infinitely long wing has tips infinitely far away — the 2-D case where induced drag is exactly zero (see Lifting-line theory (Prandtl)). This is why induced drag is a purely finite-wing, 3-D effect. (c) : denominator , so . Physics: is an impossibly bad, spiky lift distribution that dumps all its energy into concentrated tip vortices. Real wings never get near it (–), but the limit correctly warns that a poor spanwise shape is punished hard. The best possible case, , is the Elliptical lift distribution.
Recall One-line self-test before you close the page
formula ::: Convert coefficient to force ::: with Optimum when ::: , and there the two drags are equal Three limits that give zero or infinite ::: (zero), (zero), (infinite)
Connections
- Aspect ratio — effect on induced drag — the parent formula every problem uses
- Drag polar — the split behind Levels 3–5
- Parasite drag — the rival term in the optimisation
- Wingtip devices (winglets) — the effective- idea in Problem 5.2
- Elliptical lift distribution — the ideal
- Lifting-line theory (Prandtl) — why kills induced drag
- Glide ratio & L/D max — where the drag balance pays off