Throughout, take γ=1.4 (air) unless a problem says otherwise. Angles are in degrees. We use the master relation
The figure above is the picture to keep in your head for every problem: the shock leans at β from the incoming flow, the streamline bends by θ, and the velocity splits into a normal part (into the shock, gets squashed) and a tangential part (along the shock, glides through unchanged).
The smallest a wave angle can be is the Mach angleμ=sin−1(1/M1) defined above — a vanishingly weak shock is just a Mach wave (see Mach Angle and Mach Waves).
μ=sin−1(31)=19.47∘
Since 15∘<19.47∘, the claimed β is impossible. Any real shock must satisfy μ≤β≤90∘, so here 19.47∘≤β≤90∘.
Recall Solution
Setting θ=0 in the master relation forces the numerator M12sin2β−1=0, i.e. sinβ=1/M1, or the factor cotβ=0, i.e. β=90∘.
β=μ=sin−1(1/M1) → a Mach wave (infinitely weak, see Mach Angle and Mach Waves).
β=90∘ → a normal shock (see Normal Shock Waves).
Both endpoints turn the flow by nothing; everything in between turns it.
Plug straight into the master relation. Compute pieces first.
sin40∘=0.6428⇒sin240∘=0.4132, so M12sin2β=6.25×0.4132=2.582.
Numerator: M12sin2β−1=2.582−1=1.582.
cos2β=cos80∘=0.1736, so M12(γ+cos2β)+2=6.25(1.4+0.1736)+2=6.25(1.5736)+2=11.835.
cot40∘=1/tan40∘=1/0.8391=1.1918.
tanθ=2(1.1918)11.8351.582=2.3836×0.13367=0.3186θ=arctan(0.3186)=17.67∘
So the streamline bends by about θ≈17.7∘.
Recall Solution
Only the normal component matters for shock strength:
Mn1=M1sinβ=2.5×sin40∘=2.5×0.6428=1.607
Since Mn1=1.607>1, the perpendicular flow is supersonic — a real compression shock forms. (If Mn1 came out ≤1 we would have picked a β below the Mach angle and no shock would exist.)
Try β=45.5∘: RHS climbs to ≈0.270. So the root sits at βweak≈45.3∘.
Continuing past the maximum, the RHS comes back down and crosses 0.2679again near βstrong≈79.8∘ — that is the strong shock (larger β, flow behind goes subsonic).
Answer:βweak≈45.3∘, βstrong≈79.8∘. External aerodynamics almost always selects the weak branch.
The picture below plots the entire θ(β) curve for M1=2 so you can see why L3.1 has two answers. Follow the dashed horizontal line at θ=15∘: it crosses the blue curve twice — once on the rising left side (the green dot, weak branch β≈45.3∘) and once on the falling right side (the red dot, strong branch β≈79.8∘). The yellow dot at the top is the ceiling θmax we compute in L4.1, and the dotted vertical line marks the Mach-angle floor μ=30∘ where the curve starts. Any horizontal line below the peak cuts the curve twice; a line above it never touches — that is the geometric meaning of "no attached solution."
Recall Solution
Step 1 — normal upstream Mach: Mn1=2sin45.3∘=2×0.7108=1.4215.
Step 2 — normal-shock Mn2 using the formula stated in the box near the top of the page:
Mn22=γMn12−2γ−11+2γ−1Mn12=1.4(2.0207)−0.21+0.2(2.0207)=2.62901.4041=0.5341
so Mn2=0.7308 (subsonic normal component — expected behind any shock).
Step 3 — recover the full downstream Mach by un-projecting through (β−θ)=45.3∘−15∘=30.3∘:
M2=sin(β−θ)Mn2=sin30.3∘0.7308=0.50450.7308=1.449M2≈1.45>1: flow is still supersonic ⇒ this really is the weak branch. ✓
θ(β) rises from 0 at β=μ=30∘, peaks, then falls to 0 at β=90∘ (this is exactly the blue curve in the L3 figure). At any smooth interior peak of a curve the slope is momentarily flat, so the maximum is the β where the derivative vanishes:
dβdθ=0.Why this criterion:θ(β) is smooth and rises then falls, so its single top is where it stops rising and starts falling — the tangent there is horizontal, i.e. slope zero. That is the calculus definition of an interior maximum.
How to locate it without solving the messy derivative by hand: just evaluate θ(β) on a march of β values and watch where it turns around. We start near a plausible peak and step in 1∘ increments; when the value rises then falls, we bracket the top and refine:
β=60∘⇒θ=21.6∘ (still rising)
β=64∘⇒θ=22.7∘
β=65∘⇒θ=22.77∘ (essentially flat here — we are near the top)
β=66∘⇒θ=22.71∘ (now falling — peak is bracketed)
β=70∘⇒θ=21.3∘
Refining the bracket 65∘–66∘ on a fine grid gives the turn-around at β≈64.7∘ with θmax≈22.97∘. The values change by less than 0.01∘ near the top, confirming the march has converged.
Answer:θmax≈23.0∘ at β≈64.7∘.
Meaning: a wedge of half-angle up to ≈23∘ can hold an attached oblique shock at M1=2. Ask for more turning and no attached solution exists.
Recall Solution
From L4.1, θmax(M1=2)≈23.0∘. The required turn 25∘>23.0∘, so no attached oblique shock can turn the flow that much.
The shock therefore detaches: a curved bow shock stands off ahead of the wedge nose. Near the centreline the bow shock is essentially a normal shock (flow goes subsonic there), and it curves back to a weak Mach wave far off to the sides. See Supersonic Wedge & Cone Flow for how a cone (which relaxes the turning in 3-D) can stay attached where a wedge cannot.
θmax grows with M1: faster flow can turn more sharply while staying attached. We want the M1 whose ceiling exactly equals 20∘.
We march in M1, and at each M1 we run the same peak-finding march over β from L4.1 to get θmax(M1):
M1=1.8⇒θmax≈17.7∘ (too low)
M1=1.9⇒θmax≈20.0∘ (essentially the target)
M1=2.0⇒θmax≈23.0∘ (over)
The crossing θmax=20∘ lands at M1≈1.90.
Answer: the shock is attached for M1≳1.90 and detaches for M1<1.90. A slower supersonic flow simply cannot bend 20∘ across a single oblique shock.
Recall Solution
Analytic: in the master relation the whole right side is proportional to (M12sin2β−1). As θ→0, tanθ→0, so we need the numerator →0:
M12sin2β−1=0⇒sinβ=M11⇒β=sin−1M11=μ.
That is exactly the Mach angle — a zero-turn "shock" is a infinitesimal wave. (The other root of tanθ=0, namely cotβ=0⇒β=90∘, is the strong-branch limit → a normal shock.)
Numeric at M1=2, θ=1∘: the Mach angle is μ=sin−1(1/2)=30.00∘. Solving the master relation for the small weak root just above the floor:
Try β=30.5∘: numerator 4sin230.5∘−1=4(0.5075)2−1=0.0304; denominator 4(1.4+cos61∘)+2=4(1.4+0.4848)+2=9.539; cot30.5∘=1.696. RHS =2(1.696)(0.0304/9.539)=0.0108, giving θ=arctan(0.0108)=0.62∘ — still short of 1∘.
Try β=31.0∘: numerator 4sin231∘−1=4(0.5150)2−1=0.0611; denominator 4(1.4+cos62∘)+2=4(1.4+0.4695)+2=9.478; cot31∘=1.664. RHS =2(1.664)(0.0611/9.478)=0.02146, giving θ=arctan(0.02146)=1.23∘ — just over 1∘.
Interpolating between these brackets, the weak root sits at β≈30.9∘, only 0.9∘ above the Mach angle μ=30∘.
Conclusion: as the wedge thins (θ→0) the weak wave angle collapses onto the Mach angle, exactly as the analytic argument predicts. ✓
Recall One-line self-test recap
Each line below is a question and its answer, separated by a dash — cover the right of the dash and test yourself.
Attach floor? — μ=sin−1(1/M1) is the smallest possible β.