This page assumes nothing. Before you can read a single line of the parent topic, you need a small toolkit of ideas. We build each one from a picture, say what it looks like, and say why the topic can't live without it. Read top to bottom — each tool leans on the one above it.
The picture: a dashed line making a perfect square-corner with the surface at the hit-point (look at the dashed line in the next figure).
Why the topic needs it: the law of reflection measures angles from the normal, not from the mirror. And for a curved mirror the normal at any point aims straight at the sphere's centre — that single fact powers the f=R/2 derivation.
The picture: two wedges opening away from the dashed normal — one for the arriving arrow, one for the leaving arrow.
Why the topic needs it: this is the only physical law in the whole chapter. Everything else is geometry stacked on top of i=r. See Reflection of Light — Laws & Normal for a deeper drill.
A curved mirror is a shiny slice cut from a hollow ball (a sphere). To talk about it we name a few landmarks.
The picture: a curved arc (the mirror), a dot C off to one side, a straight horizontal line joining C through the middle-dot P. Every "spoke" from C to the arc is a radius, and — crucially — each spoke is a normal (it hits the arc square-on).
Why the topic needs it: these names are the vocabulary of every ray diagram. The f=R/2 proof is literally "draw the radius (=normal), apply i=r, spot an isosceles triangle."
The picture: several parallel arrows hit a concave mirror and squeeze together to one bright dot — that dot is F.
Why the topic needs it:F is where the mirror's "converging power" lives, and f is the number that goes into the mirror equation. The parent page proves f=R/2, i.e. the focus sits halfway between the mirror and the ball's centre.
Why the topic needs it: the mirror equation v1+u1=f1 and the magnification m=−uv are only true with signed numbers. Feed in raw magnitudes and you'll predict images that don't exist.
Why the topic needs it: it packages "how big?" and "which way up?" into one value, and it drops straight out of the similar-triangle ratio from §6. Explored fully in Magnification & Image Formation.
Why the topic needs it: the famous form v1+u1=f1 is a reciprocal equation. If reciprocals feel alien, that final step will look like magic instead of arithmetic.