2.4.3 · D4Thermodynamics & Statistical Mechanics (Advanced)

Exercises — Maxwell relations — derivation from each potential

2,850 words13 min readBack to topic

Before we begin, one reminder of the four relations you will reach for constantly:

And two measurable quantities that keep appearing — defined once, in plain words:


L1 — Recognition

Problem 1.1 (L1)

You want to compute how the entropy of a fluid changes when you compress it at constant temperature, i.e. . Which Maxwell relation gives this directly, and from which potential does it come?

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT we look for: a relation with differentiated with respect to at constant on one side. Scan the toolkit — that is the fourth relation: WHY this one: the left side matches exactly. It comes from Gibbs free energy , whose natural variables are — precisely the two variables in play here ( held, varied). WHY it's useful: the right side is , which you measure with a thermometer and a ruler. So .

Problem 1.2 (L1)

Match each held-constant subscript to the correct potential: the relation appears in a Maxwell relation. What is the subscript, and which potential?

Recall Solution 1.2

WHAT: find where is differentiated by . That is the first relation (from ): WHY the subscript is : 's natural variables are . When we differentiate with respect to , the other natural variable, , is the one held fixed. Dropping or changing that subscript makes the relation false — see the mistake box below.


L2 — Application

Problem 2.1 (L2)

For one mole of an ideal gas, . Compute using a Maxwell relation, then integrate to find at fixed (up to a constant).

Recall Solution 2.1

Step 1 — pick the relation (WHY): we need at constant . The Helmholtz relation gives it in measurable terms: Step 2 — evaluate the RHS (WHAT): from , differentiate with respect to holding fixed: So . Step 3 — integrate at fixed : Sanity check: this is exactly the volume-dependence of the Sackur–Tetrode entropy — the famous term — recovered from a Maxwell relation alone.

Problem 2.2 (L2)

Show that where is the thermal expansion coefficient, and evaluate it for 1 mol of ideal gas at , . Use .

Recall Solution 2.2

Step 1 (WHY): the Gibbs relation . By the definition of , , so immediately Step 2 — ideal gas : with , , so (since ). For an ideal gas . Step 3 — number: . Meaning: raising the pressure lowers the entropy (squeezing orders the gas) — the sign is negative, exactly as intuition demands.


L3 — Analysis

Problem 3.1 (L3)

Derive the general relation Then confirm it gives for one mole of ideal gas.

Recall Solution 3.1

Step 1 — start from entropy (WHY): heat capacities are and . We want their difference, so express once as and compare. Step 2 — expand : Divide by at constant : Step 3 — multiply by to turn each into a heat capacity: Step 4 — apply the Helmholtz Maxwell relation : Step 5 — kill the unmeasurable with the cyclic (triple-product) rule. For any three variables tied by an equation of state, the general identity is Solve this for the piece we want by moving the other two factors to the right (note that , the reciprocal): Now insert the two measurable coefficients, and : Step 6 — assemble (using once more): Step 7 — ideal-gas check: , (from : , so ). Then > This is the celebrated result of Heat capacities $C_P - C_V$note it required a Maxwell relation to prove for a general substance, not just ideal gases. Because , , and are all , this also proves always.

Problem 3.2 (L3)

A gas obeys the van der Waals equation where measures the strength of intermolecular attraction and is the excluded volume (the finite size of the molecules — the space they physically occupy and so cannot be compressed into). Find and interpret its sign.

Recall Solution 3.2

Step 1 — the energy equation (proven in the parent note): . Step 2 — solve for : . Step 3 — differentiate at constant : only the first term depends on : Step 4 — assemble: Interpretation: because (attractions), internal energy rises as the gas expands — you must feed energy in to pull molecules apart against their mutual attraction. Notice the excluded-volume constant cancels out entirely: the energy's volume-dependence is set purely by the attractions. This is the microscopic origin of cooling in a Joule (free) expansion of a real gas.


L4 — Synthesis

Problem 4.1 (L4)

Derive the temperature change in a Joule–Thomson (throttling) expansion, i.e. the coefficient expressed only in measurable quantities , , , . Then evaluate for an ideal gas and comment.

Recall Solution 4.1

Step 1 — the process is isenthalpic (WHY): throttling through a porous plug conserves enthalpy , so we differentiate with respect to at constant . Step 2 — cyclic rule on : the three variables , , are linked (any two fix the state), so the same general cyclic identity used in Problem 3.1 applies to them: Solving for the piece we want (and using ): The denominator is by definition. Step 3 — evaluate from . Divide by at constant : Step 4 — kill the entropy term with the Gibbs Maxwell relation : Step 5 — assemble: Step 6 — ideal gas: , so and . An ideal gas does not cool on throttling — consistent with and . Real gases cool when (below the inversion temperature), which is how liquefiers work.

Problem 4.2 (L4)

Prove the identity , and use it to show that of an ideal gas is volume-independent.

Recall Solution 4.2

Step 1 — write via entropy: . Differentiate with respect to at constant : Step 2 — swap the order of differentiation (WHY — Schwarz): since is a state function, mixed partials commute: Step 3 — apply the Helmholtz Maxwell relation : Step 4 — assemble: Step 5 — ideal gas: is linear in at fixed , so . Hence : cannot depend on volume for an ideal gas — again derived, not assumed.


L5 — Mastery

Problem 5.1 (L5)

Show, using only thermodynamics (Maxwell relations + the third law), that the thermal expansion coefficient of any substance must vanish as .

Recall Solution 5.1

Step 1 — bring in a Maxwell relation (WHY): , and the Gibbs relation converts this into an entropy derivative: So . Step 2 — invoke the third law (Nernst): as , the entropy of every system approaches a constant that is independent of (and of ). Therefore Step 3 — conclude: Meaning: this is a universal prediction — no material expands or contracts (to first order in ) as it approaches absolute zero. It has been confirmed for solids, liquid helium, everything. A pure thermodynamic theorem falling out of a Maxwell relation plus one law.

Problem 5.2 (L5)

Consider a material with a negative thermal expansion coefficient (e.g. water between and , or zirconium tungstate). Using Maxwell relations, predict the sign of the temperature change when such a material is compressed adiabatically and reversibly. Show your reasoning fully.

Recall Solution 5.2

Step 1 — what "adiabatic reversible" means (WHY): no heat flow and reversible constant entropy, . We want the sign of under compression (). Step 2 — cyclic rule on : Step 3 — identify the pieces. Denominator: (heat capacity and temperature are positive). Numerator: use the Gibbs Maxwell relation Step 4 — assemble: Step 5 — read off the sign. , , are all positive, so the sign of is the sign of .

  • Normal material (): compression warms it () — the familiar bicycle-pump heating.
  • Negative-expansion material (): compression cools it (). Meaning: the counter-intuitive expansion behaviour of water near freezing flips the sign of its adiabatic heating — a striking, testable consequence extracted from one Maxwell relation and the cyclic rule.
Figure — Maxwell relations — derivation from each potential

Recall One-paragraph recap of the whole ladder

L1: recognise which potential owns which derivative (match the differentiated variable and the subscript). L2: apply a relation by pushing the calculation onto the measurable equation-of-state side. L3: combine relations with the cyclic rule to get and . L4: synthesise brand-new results — Joule–Thomson, — using Maxwell + Schwarz together. L5: master universal theorems ( at ; the sign-flip for negative-expansion materials) where thermodynamics alone forecasts real experiments. Throughout: derive, never memorize signs.

Connections

  • Parent topic — Maxwell relations
  • Heat capacities $C_P - C_V$ — L3.1 is its full derivation
  • Joule expansion and internal energy — L3.2 gives its microscopic cause
  • Thermal expansion coefficient and isothermal compressibility, used throughout
  • Equality of mixed partial derivatives (Schwarz theorem) — the engine of L4.2
  • Thermodynamic potentials & Legendre transforms
  • First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics