2.3.31 · D2Modern Physics

Visual walkthrough — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

2,475 words11 min readBack to topic

Step 1 — First, what is momentum at all?

WHAT. Newton's answer is simply "multiply them together":

WHY. Double the mass, twice as hard to stop. Double the speed, twice as hard to stop. A plain product captures both. This is Newtonian momentum p = mv.

PICTURE. Below, a ball of mass slides right along a track. The green arrow is its momentum — it points the way the ball moves and its length grows if either or grows.

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv
Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 2 — Velocity secretly depends on whose clock you use

WHAT. We split the two clocks apart and name them:

  • = a tiny tick of the lab clock (the observer standing still).
  • = a tiny tick of the proper-time clock, the one travelling with the ball. The Greek letter ("tau") is just its name.

WHY. In the "" is the lab's clock — a quantity every different observer disagrees about. If our momentum is built from a number observers disagree on, it will not survive being passed between frames. We need a clock everyone agrees on. That clock is . See Lorentz factor and time dilation.

PICTURE. Two clocks over the same journey: the lab clock (coral) has swept more time than the ball's own clock (mint) for the identical trip. The ball's clock is the honest, shared one.

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 3 — How much do the two clocks disagree? Meet

WHAT. The exact size of comes from time dilation: Read the pieces: is "how close to light speed, squared" — a number between and . Subtract it from , take the square root, then flip it (that's the reason it sits under a ). Flipping makes grow as grows.

WHY this shape and not another? Because we need something that is

  • exactly when the ball is slow (: clocks agree),
  • and blows up to as ( under the root dividing by zero).

That is precisely the behaviour experiments demand. Note depends on , so it is the same whether the ball goes right () or left ().

WHY the reciprocal (not the bare root)? A very common trap is to write , which shrinks below 1. But the lab clock must run ahead, so must be . The guarantees it.

PICTURE. The curve of against : flat and equal to 1 for slow speeds, then rearing up to a vertical wall at .

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 4 — Rebuild momentum using the honest clock

WHAT. Define the repaired momentum: Term by term: = the tiny step the ball takes (an arrow, has direction); = the ball's own clock-tick (agreed by all, from Step 2); = the invariant rest mass, the same label in every frame.

WHY. and each transform cleanly between frames (they are pieces of the Energy-momentum four-vector). So their ratio does too — meaning if this is conserved in one frame, it is automatically conserved in all frames. That was the whole goal.

PICTURE. Same displacement arrow , but now we label the divisor as the mint proper-clock tick rather than the coral lab tick.

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 5 — Translate back to the speed we actually measure

WHAT. Use the chain rule — a way of inserting a clock we know into one we don't:

Watch the two factors appear:

  • is exactly the everyday velocity from Step 1.
  • is exactly the clock-mismatch from Step 3 (flip ).

Because carries the direction, automatically points the same way the ball moves — right for , left for — while only scales its length.

WHY the chain rule specifically? It is the tool that says "a rate with respect to equals the rate with respect to , times how fast changes per ". It lets us borrow the clock we understand () to compute a rate in the clock we need (). Nothing else bridges the two clocks so cleanly.

PICTURE. Newton's short green arrow , and stacked on top the extra stretch supplied by , giving the longer relativistic arrow.

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 6 — Edge case: slow ball (does it reduce to Newton?)

WHAT. At everyday speeds the new formula collapses onto the old one.

WHY it must. Newton's laws work superbly for cars and cricket balls. Any correct upgrade has to agree with them where they were tested. This is the correspondence principle — a physics safety check, not a coincidence.

PICTURE. Below the relativistic curve and the straight Newtonian line lie on top of each other; they only peel apart at high speed.

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 7 — Edge case: ball approaching light speed

WHAT. Infinite momentum would need infinite push. So no finite force can drive a massive particle to .

WHY it matters. This is the direct root of Why nothing exceeds the speed of light — momentum, not some mystical barrier, is what forbids it.

PICTURE. versus : gentle straight-ish start, then a runaway vertical asymptote glued to .

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

Step 8 — Degenerate case: a massless particle ()

WHAT. For massless particles we instead read momentum off the energy–momentum relation (from Energy-momentum four-vector), where is the total energy just defined:

WHY. was built for massive particles (they have a proper-time clock). Light has no rest frame and no proper clock, so the derivation's very first ingredient is missing. See Photon momentum and radiation pressure.

PICTURE. The energy–momentum right triangle: legs and , hypotenuse . Shrink the leg to zero and the hypotenuse becomes the other leg: .

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

The one-picture summary

Figure — Relativistic momentum p = γmv

The whole journey in one frame: start with , notice the lab clock is not the ball's clock, measure the mismatch , divide by the honest clock, convert back, and the arrow grows by exactly .

Recall Feynman retelling (plain words)

Imagine you want a fair score for "how hard is this thing to stop". You take how far it moved and divide by time. But whose watch? Your watch on the ground, or the watch the flying thing carries? Those two watches disagree — the flying one ticks slower, and the amount it lags is a number we call gamma. Everyone in the universe agrees on the flying thing's own watch, because it is glued to the thing itself and to the one speed of light everyone measures the same. Einstein says: use that honest watch. When you do the division with it and then translate the answer back into speeds your ground-radar can read, a spare gamma pops out and rides on top of the old times . So momentum is . Point it whichever way the thing goes — right is plus, left is minus. For slow things gamma is just 1 and you're back to Newton. For super-fast things gamma explodes, so momentum explodes, so you can never quite shove anything up to light speed. And for light itself — which has no watch of its own — this recipe breaks, and we use instead, where is its total energy.

Recall

Why divide by proper time instead of lab time ? ::: is the same for every observer, so momentum built from it is conserved in all frames. What makes the same for all observers? ::: It comes from the invariant interval , built only from (same for everyone). Where does the extra come from in the chain rule? ::: From , the time-dilation clock mismatch. What happens to for a photon? ::: It gives (undefined); use instead. Why can't a massive particle reach ? ::: As , so , needing infinite push. What is in ? ::: The particle's total energy ( for a massive particle).

Connections