This page assumes you have seen none of the notation on the parent note. We will earn every symbol — one at a time, each anchored to a picture, each explained by why the topic needs it. Read top to bottom; nothing below uses a symbol not built above it.
Forget the equation for a moment. In the world you know, a ball has a position. In quantum physics a particle instead has a cloud of possibility. Where the cloud is thick, the particle is likely; where thin, unlikely.
Look at the figure: the blue curve is the cloud's "thickness" at each position x. The particle is nowhere and everywhere until you look — and when you look, it appears somewhere, more often where the blue curve is tall. That blue curve is what the whole topic is trying to compute and predict.
Why the topic needs them: the cloud is different at different places (x) and it drifts and reshapes as time passes (t). So everything is a function of these two inputs. We write "a thing that depends on x and t" as (x,t) after its name.
In the figure, a horizontal yellow arrow of length 1 (the number +1) becomes vertical when multiplied by i, then points backward (−1) after another i, then down (−i), then home. Four multiplications by i = one full turn.
Why the topic needs it:Ψ is a complex arrow at every point. The length-squared∣Ψ∣2 throws away the "which part of the swing" information and keeps only "how big" — and that size is what becomes a probability (always a positive real number). The complex phase wiggles; the length can stay still. That distinction is the whole meaning of a stationary state.
Why this tool and not another? We need something that rotates smoothly forever and never changes length. A spinning arrow of fixed length is exactly a wave that "wiggles in phase without changing its probability." The green arrow in the figure has length always 1, so ∣eiθ∣2=1: the phase spins, the size never moves. (Later, once we have named the physics quantities, we will meet the parent's stationary state — a shape multiplied by exactly such a spinning arrow.)
Why the topic needs them: these two numbers fully describe the spinning-arrow wave from Section 4 — one controls its wiggle in space, the other its ticking in time. Putting them together, a wave travelling to the right is written
Ψ(x,t)=Aei(kx−ωt),
where A is just its overall size. In the very next section we will attach physical meaning (k carries momentum, ω carries energy) — but first those physical quantities need names.
Why the topic needs them: the Schrödinger equation is just energy conservation written for a wave: total energy = motion energy + landscape energy, i.e. E=2mp2+V. Each symbol is one word in that sentence.
Why these two tools, and not others? The parent needs to extractE and p from the wave. One time-derivative pulls the ticking rate ω (hence E=ℏω) down out of the exponential; two space-derivatives pull k2 (hence p2) down. The derivative is the only tool that answers "how fast is this changing?" — exactly the question that turns a wave back into energy and momentum.
Why the topic needs it: it lets the whole equation shrink to H^ψ=Eψ — "apply the energy machine to the shape, get the energy times the same shape back." (More in Hamiltonian Operator.)
Why the topic needs it:∣Ψ∣2 is a probability density; to get an actual probability you add up (integrate) the cloud over a region. Total cloud must weigh exactly 1.