2.1.13 · D5Analytical Mechanics

Question bank — Phase space — trajectories, phase portraits

2,170 words10 min readBack to topic
Figure — Phase space — trajectories, phase portraits

The figure above is the mental picture behind every question. Look at it now: the horizontal axis is position , the vertical axis is momentum . The cyan loop is one energy contour (). The amber dot is a state point sitting on it, and the white arrow is its flow velocity — always tangent to the loop, sweeping clockwise. The white square at the origin is a center (fixed point). Refer back to it whenever a reveal mentions "the loop," "the arrow," or "the center."


Why the energy stays constant (do this once, then reuse it)

Several traps below hinge on the fact that never changes along a conservative orbit. Here is the cancellation spelled out, step by step, so you own it.


True or false — justify

The phase plane axes are position versus time.
False. The axes are position versus momentum (equivalently vs ); time is the hidden parameter running along each curve, not an axis — look again at the figure, which has no time axis.
Knowing only the position of a mass fixes its future motion.
False. Newton's law is second order, so you also need the velocity/momentum — a spring released from rest and one whipped past the same point move differently. That is exactly why phase space needs two axes.
A closed loop in phase space means the motion repeats periodically.
True for a conservative 1-D system. The state returns to , and since the flow arrow there is fixed, it must retrace the same loop forever — a genuine period. (In Harmonic Oscillator every loop is an ellipse.)
For a conservative system, every trajectory lies on a curve of constant energy .
True. As shown above, once the flow rule is inserted, so stays fixed along the orbit. Trajectories are energy contours (see Energy Conservation).
Two phase trajectories can cross at an ordinary (non-fixed) point.
False. The flow arrow is single-valued, so a crossing would give one state two futures — forbidden by determinism. Curves meet only where the arrow vanishes (fixed points).
A bigger phase loop means the state point moves faster at every point of the loop.
False. Bigger loop = more energy, but the phase speed varies around the loop — fast where is large, nearly stopped near the turning points where .
The area enclosed by a bundle of trajectories can shrink for a frictionless (Hamiltonian) system.
False. Liouville's Theorem says phase-space area (volume) is conserved by Hamiltonian flow — it can deform but never shrink. Shrinking areas require dissipation, as in a damped oscillator.
A damped oscillator has closed phase trajectories.
False. Energy falls, (the friction constant ), so each turn crosses a smaller ellipse — the orbit spirals inward to the origin (a stable focus), never closing.
Every fixed point in phase space is stable.
False. Minima of the potential give centers (stable, closed loops); maxima give saddles (unstable — states fly off along one direction). See Stability and Fixed Points.
The separatrix is a trajectory just like the loops around it.
False. Although it is a trajectory, it is a distinguished one: it carries exactly the critical energy, passes through a saddle, and divides qualitatively different motions (swinging vs whirling for the Pendulum) — ordinary loops do none of that.
At a fixed point the state has zero velocity, so trajectories can touch there.
True. means the flow arrow is zero, so the "no-crossing" rule (which forbids two nonzero arrows at one point) doesn't apply — separatrix branches genuinely meet at saddles.

Spot the error

", by symmetry with ."
The minus sign is missing: . Without it the two terms in would add instead of cancel, so energy wouldn't be conserved and oscillator loops would spiral out instead of closing.
"The harmonic oscillator traces a circle in the plane."
Only if the axes are scaled so the two semi-axes match. Start from energy and divide both sides by : . The two denominators become the semi-axes-squared, so in raw units it is an ellipse, generally not a circle.
"The oscillator loop runs counter-clockwise because time moves forward."
It runs clockwise: for the force gives , so momentum decreases — the point sweeps downward on the right side, which is clockwise (matching the white arrow in the figure).
"For the pendulum, (bob straight up) is a stable resting point."
It is a maximum of (largest when ), hence a saddle — unstable. The stable center is (bob hanging down, lowest).
"Since for the damped oscillator, its orbits are energy contours."
The damped system is not conservative: , so no fixed exists. Only for time-independent conservative do trajectories coincide with energy contours.
"A fixed point sits wherever the velocity is zero."
You need both and . A turning point of an oscillation has (momentum zero) yet , so it is not a fixed point — the state keeps moving.

Why questions

Why does the phase portrait of a conservative system reduce to a contour map?
Because is constant along each orbit (, shown above), every trajectory is a level set — drawing the contours of the energy is drawing the portrait.
Why must the flow arrow be tangent to the trajectory everywhere?
The trajectory is the path traced by the moving state, and is its instantaneous velocity — velocity is by definition tangent to the path it generates (see the white arrow on the loop in the figure).
Why does adding friction turn a loop into an inward spiral rather than a smaller loop?
Friction removes energy continuously in time (), so the state cannot return to its start — each cycle lands on a lower-energy curve, producing a spiral that converges to the equilibrium.
Why does the separatrix, not any random energy, mark the boundary between libration and rotation of a pendulum?
It is the exact energy that just reaches the unstable top () with zero speed; below it the bob turns back (swings), above it it keeps going over the top (whirls).
Why can a smart reader "see" instability in a phase portrait without solving equations?
Instability shows as trajectories that diverge away from a point (saddle) rather than looping around it (center) — the geometry of the flow directly encodes the dynamics.

Edge cases

What does the phase trajectory of a mass at absolute rest at a stable equilibrium look like?
A single point — the state never moves, so the "curve" degenerates to the fixed point itself (zero-energy loop of zero size), like the white square at the origin of the figure.
What happens to the harmonic-oscillator ellipse as the energy ?
Both semi-axes and shrink to zero, so the ellipse collapses onto the center point at the origin — consistent with a mass sitting still at the bottom.
At a turning point of an oscillation, what is happening in phase space?
The trajectory crosses the -axis where : momentum momentarily zero, but , so the point is at maximum displacement and about to reverse — it is not at rest.
For the pendulum spinning fast over the top, why is the trajectory an open wavy line, not a loop?
Because keeps increasing without bound — the bob just circulates. On a flat plane it runs off to the right forever; the wavy line reflects rising and falling as the bob speeds through the bottom and slows over the top.
Why does the pendulum phase space really "want" to be a cylinder, not a flat plane?
The angle is periodic: and are the same physical position. Rolling the -axis into a loop turns the "open" whirling trajectories into closed circles going around the cylinder — the topological edge case that plane pictures hide.
What is the trajectory of a free particle (no potential, ) in phase space?
A horizontal straight line : with the momentum is conserved so it never changes, while drifts steadily — the energy contours are just horizontal lines.

Recall One-line self-test

Cover everything: name the axes, the flow rule, the no-crossing reason, and the one thing friction changes. Axes ::: position and momentum (time hidden along the curve). Flow rule ::: (minus lives with ). No-crossing reason ::: single-valued flow arrow ⇒ one state, one future (determinism). What friction changes ::: energy drops, so closed loops become inward spirals.