1.7.14 · D2Thermodynamics

Visual walkthrough — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

2,206 words10 min readBack to topic

We lean on the First Law of Thermodynamics, the Ideal Gas Law, Heat Capacities Cv and Cp, and Work done by gas — PV diagrams. Everything traces back to the parent: the topic note.


Step 1 — What "adiabatic" even means (a wall heat cannot cross)

WHAT. We put gas in a cylinder wrapped in perfect insulation. A piston caps it.

WHY. Setting is the single constraint that makes this process special. Every other process lets heat sneak in or out; here the gas is on its own — whatever work it does must come from its own energy.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. In the figure, the orange hatched wall blocks the wavy red heat arrows: they bounce back. Only the piston can move.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Step 2 — The First Law, drawn as an energy bucket

WHAT. The First Law of Thermodynamics says energy is just bookkeeping: . In tiny-step form, .

WHY. We need a relation that connects the gas's temperature change to the work it does, because that link is what will bend the curve. The First Law is the only law that ties , , and together.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. Picture a bucket labelled . Heat pours in from the top (), work leaks out the side (). With , the top is capped — the bucket can only drop as work leaks out.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Step 3 — Naming the two little pieces: and

WHAT. We replace the vague and with concrete formulas.

  • Internal energy of an ideal gas: . This holds in every process (it is the parent's second "mistake" — is just the dial from temperature to internal energy).
  • Work when the piston sweeps a tiny volume : (from Work done by gas — PV diagrams — force distance repackaged as pressure swept volume).

WHY. To combine them into one equation we must speak the same language — both must become expressions in the state variables , , .

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The figure shows the piston nudged out by the swept sliver of volume (blue). The gas cooled a touch: , drawn as the thermometer dropping.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Substitute both into : nC_V\,dT = -\,P\,dV \tag{$\ast$}


Step 4 — The problem: three variables, we want only two

WHAT. Equation mixes , , and . But a curve on a diagram only knows about and . We must evict .

WHY. The Ideal Gas Law is the bridge. It ties to and , so we can rewrite any using and instead.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. Think of as a shadow of the point : the picture shows a point moving on the plane, and is a colour that follows it. We want the equation in the plane, so we trade the colour for coordinates.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

So , giving .


Step 5 — Fuse the two equations and let appear

WHAT. Put the -expression from Step 4 into .

WHY. This is the moment the two physical laws (energy and gas law) become one equation with only and — exactly what a curve needs.

Starting from : . Replace :

Multiply through by :

Now Heat Capacities Cv and Cp hands us Mayer's relation , so , where .

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The figure shows the messy three-variable relation collapsing, with dropping in as the single knob that controls steepness.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Substitute :


Step 6 — Tidy into a clean separated form

WHAT. Move everything to one side and group the terms.

WHY. We want the pattern , because that pattern is instantly integrable — each piece is the tiny change of a logarithm.

Divide by (both positive — a gas always has real pressure and volume):

  • :: the fractional change in volume, weighted by .
  • :: the fractional change in pressure.
  • :: they must cancel — when volume grows, pressure must fall to keep the balance.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The figure shows a seesaw: pushing up by a fraction forces down by times that fraction. This is why the adiabat drops faster than the isotherm (where the weight would be just , not ).

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Step 7 — Integrate: logs turn into the boxed law

WHAT. Integrate both terms.

Use log rules ( and ):

WHY. Exponentiating removes the log, leaving the pure product frozen along the whole path.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The figure plots the finished adiabat (orange) against an isotherm (blue) from the same start point — the adiabat plunges below it, exactly the steepness bought us in Step 6.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

Step 8 — Edge cases: what if , or the gas just sits still?

Every derivation must survive its own extremes.

  • (isothermal limit). If , the boxed law becomes — the plain hyperbola of the isothermal process. Physically would mean , i.e. infinite heat capacity: the gas soaks up energy without changing temperature. So the adiabat continuously deforms into the isotherm as . The two curves are cousins, not strangers.
  • (piston jammed). Then , and gives : no work, no temperature change — the adiabatic and isochoric conditions coincide at a single frozen point. No contradiction, just a still frame.
  • Compression (). The balance now forces and gives : pushing in heats the gas with nowhere for heat to escape. This is the diesel-ignition case flagged in the parent's sign mistake.

WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. The figure overlays three adiabats for (=isotherm), , from one point — steeper as climbs — plus an arrow marking the compression direction where rises.

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

The one-picture summary

Figure — Thermodynamic processes — isothermal (T const), isochoric (V const), isobaric (P const), adiabatic (Q = 0)

The whole story on one canvas: insulated cylinder () → energy bucket with capped lid () → name the pieces () → evict with appears → separate → integrate the logs → , steeper than the isotherm.

Recall Feynman retelling (say it to a friend)

Wrap a gas cylinder in a perfect blanket so no heat can get in or out. Now let the gas push the piston. Where does the pushing energy come from? It has nowhere to borrow from — no heat is allowed in — so it spends its own internal jiggling energy, and cools as it expands.

To find the exact curve: energy says "temperature drop equals work done" (). But a picture doesn't know about temperature, so we use to trade the temperature term for pressure-and-volume terms. When we do, the ratio pops out as the natural weight. The equation tidies into "a -weighted fractional change in volume must cancel a fractional change in pressure." Summing those tiny fractional changes is exactly what a logarithm does, and un-logging leaves the clean, frozen quantity . Because , volume changes are amplified, so the adiabat dives steeper than the plain constant-temperature hyperbola. And if you dial down to , the adiabat morphs smoothly back into that hyperbola.


Quick self-check

Fill the reveals before peeking.

What single assumption starts the whole adiabatic derivation?
, hence at every step.
Why can we write even though volume is changing?
of an ideal gas depends only on , so this holds in all processes.
Which law lets us remove from the equation?
The Ideal Gas Law , differentiated to .
Where does come from in the algebra?
From , using Mayer's relation.
Why does a logarithm appear at the last step?
Because and are the tiny changes of and ; integrating them gives logs.
As , what does the adiabat become?
The isotherm .
In adiabatic compression, does rise or fall?
Rises — work is done on the gas with no heat escape.