1.7.6 · D5 · HinglishThermodynamics

Question bankHeat transfer — conduction (Fourier's law k), convection, radiation (Stefan-Boltzmann σT⁴)

2,205 words10 min read↑ Read in English

1.7.6 · D5 · Physics › Thermodynamics › Heat transfer — conduction (Fourier's law k), convection, ra


True ya false — justify karo

Ek metal ka chammach usi room temperature par ek wooden chammach se thanda lagta hai.
Sensation mein True, actually mein nahi — dono room temperature par hain. Metal ka thermal conductivity zyada hota hai isliye woh tumhare haath se heat bahar zyada tezi se conduct karta hai, jise tumhare nerves "thanda" padhte hain; tum heat-flow rate feel karte ho, temperature nahi.
Heat ek thande body se hot body mein flow ho sakti hai.
Akele mein False, madad se True. Apne aap chhodne par, heat sirf hot→cold flow karti hai (Second law of thermodynamics); ek fridge ya heat pump ise doosri taraf move kar sakta hai, lekin sirf external work karke.
Ek wall ki thickness double karne par conductive heat current aadha ho jaata hai.
True. mein, thickness denominator mein hai, isliye double → aadha . Physically, heat molecular collisions ki relay se cross karti hai; do guni moti wall matlab do guni chain of hand-offs aur do guni total resistance , isliye flow aadha ho jaata hai.
Ek ke baad ek rakhi do identical windows ek ki tulna mein do guni heat lose karti hain.
True — yeh thermal resistances parallel mein hain, aur parallel paths conductances () jodte hain, isliye total conductance double hoti hai aur same ke liye double hota hai.
Ek perfect black body () hamesha rang mein kaala hota hai.
False. "Black body" ka matlab hai woh saari incident radiation absorb karta hai aur best possible emitter hai; Sun almost ek black body hai phir bhi white-hot glows karta hai. Colour ek hot spectrum ke visible slice ke baare mein hai — dekho Black body radiation.
Radiation tab ruk jaati hai jab ek body apne surroundings ki temperature tak pahunch jaati hai.
False. Kisi bhi K ke liye emission kabhi nahi rukti; thermal equilibrium par body emit karti hai aur identical absorb karti hai, isliye net exchange zero hoti hai jabki dono flows jaari rehti hain.
Radiation ka accha absorber bhi accha emitter hota hai.
True — yeh Kirchhoff's law hai: ek given wavelength par emissivity absorptivity ke barabar hoti hai, isliye ek matte black surface dono efficiently soakta aur radiate karta hai, jabki shiny silver dono mein se koi bhi achha nahi karta.
Convection ek solid metal bar mein ho sakti hai.
False. Convection ke liye bulk flow of a fluid chahiye; ek rigid solid circulate nahi kar sakta, isliye ek metal bar heat sirf conduction se move karta hai. Note: us solid ke andar, heat abhi bhi microscopically travel karti hai — lattice vibrations (phonons) aur free-electron drift ke zariye — lekin woh hand-off conduction hai, convection nahi, kyunki koi matter bulk mein move nahi karta.
Steady state mein, heat current ek composite wall ki har layer mein same hota hai.
True. Agar ek layer mein zyada heat daakhil hoti aur kam nikalti, to energy pile up hoti aur temperatures change hoti rehti — jo "steady" ko contradict karti. Isliye har series layer se identical hai, jaise series resistors mein ek current.

Galti dhundho

"Sun C par radiate karta hai, mein ."
Ek hi root error: absolute (kelvin) hona chahiye, Celsius nahi. Sahi value hai K. Kyunki absolute temperature ko power tak uthata hai, (ek Celsius number) plug karna "close enough" nahi hai — yeh bilkul alag quantity hai aur power ko underestimate karta hai.
"Fourier's law hai ; minus sign ek typo hai."
Galat — minus hatana direction tod deta hai. Heat gradient ke neeche flow karti hai (lower ki taraf), isliye jahan hai wahan minus current ko positive banata hai; iske bina tum predict karte ki heat uphill chadh rahi hai, jo Second law of thermodynamics violate karta hai. Isse sirf tab chhodo jab deliberately magnitude se compute kar rahe ho.
"Slabs in series: total conductance hai ."
Galat — woh conductances jodhta hai, jo sirf parallel paths ke liye apply hota hai. Series mein same current ko dono slabs cross karni padti hai, isliye unki resistances jodti hain: , phir . Yahan conductances jodhna ek moti insulator ko magically flow badhane deta, jo bakwaas hai.
"Thermos drinks ko hot mainly radiation block karke rakhta hai apne vacuum se."
Vacuum medium hatata hai, isliye yeh conduction aur convection ko khatam karta hai, dono ko matter chahiye — radiation ko yeh kuch nahi karta, jo waves hain aur vacuum mein freely cross karte hain. Radiation ek alag trick se roki jaati hai: silvered walls low emissivity ke saath. Dono features ko confuse karna miss karta hai ki thermos ko dono kyun chahiye.
"Ek body ko K se K tak uthane par uski radiated power double hoti hai."
Bahut zyada galat. Power , isliye factor hai , nahi. Trap yeh hai ki fourth-power law ko linear ki tarah treat karna; Stefan–Boltzmann ka poora point yahi hai ki chhote temperature rises huge power jumps dete hain.
"Newton's law of cooling mein dono temperatures kelvin mein chahiye."
Zaroori nahi — yeh ek difference use karta hai, aur difference °C aur K mein numerically identical hota hai ( offsets cancel ho jaate hain). Kelvin sirf tab zaruri hota hai jab tum ek absolute temperature ko power tak uthao, jaise mein.
"Kyunki glass ka chhota hai, ek glass window ek accha insulator hai."
Misleading — insulation depend karta hai resistance par, sirf par nahi. Ek pane bahut patla hota hai ( tiny), jo ko shrink karta hai aur ko bada banata hai. Asli insulation double glazing mein trapped air gap se aati hai, jahan bahut kam hota hai — dekho Thermal conductivity k.

Why questions

Stefan–Boltzmann law mein temperature ki fourth power kyun hoti hai, pehli power kyun nahi?
Yeh Planck's law (blackbody spectrum) ko saari wavelengths par integrate karne se aata hai; us curve ke neeche ka total area ke saath scale karta hai. Yeh haath se choose nahi kiya gaya — yeh Black body radiation ki physics se nikalta hai.
Sun ki heat Earth tak pahunch sakti hai lekin Sun ki sound nahi pahunch sakti, kyun?
Radiation electromagnetic waves hain jinhein koi medium nahi chahiye, isliye woh space ke vacuum mein cross karti hain; sound ek pressure wave hai jise travel karne ke liye matter chahiye, aur space mein essentially kuch nahi hai.
Convection room heat minutes mein distribute kyon karta hai jabki still air mein ghanton lagte hain?
Still air ka bahut chhota hai, isliye pure conduction bahut dheemi hoti hai. Convection physically hot air packets ko room mein buoyant circulation ke zariye transport karta hai, energy ko molecule-to-molecule hand-off se kahin zyada tezi se move karta hai.
Thermal-resistance analogy useful kyun hai jab heat charge nahi hai?
Dono ek hi linear "flow = drive / resistance" structure follow karte hain, isliye Electrical resistance Ohm's law ke series/parallel combination rules directly carry over karte hain, jo tumhe composite walls ke baare mein bina kuch naye derivation ke reason karne deta hai.
Greenhouse effect ek planet ko warm kyon karta hai jab incoming aur outgoing energy dono radiation hain?
Atmosphere Sun ki short-wavelength radiation ke liye transparent hai lekin Earth ki long-wavelength (infrared) re-emission ke liye partly opaque hai, outgoing energy trap karta hai aur equilibrium temperature badhata hai — yeh Greenhouse effect ke peeche ka mechanism hai.
Bahut hot object ke liye hum surroundings term kyun usually neglect karte hain?
Jab hota hai, term orders of magnitude chhoti hoti hai (jaise lagbhag 4800× chhota hai se), isliye woh answer ko barely shift karti hai — ek legitimate 80/20 estimate, physics ka rule nahi.
Acchi emissivity ek car radiator ke paint ko shiny ki jagah matte black kyun banati hai?
Ek matte black surface ki high emissivity near 1 hoti hai, radiated power maximize karti hai; ek shiny low- surface poorly radiate karti aur kam heat shed karti.

Edge cases

Exactly K par ek body ki radiated power kya hogi?
Zero. mein hone par milta hai. Yeh ek limiting/degenerate case hai — charges ki koi thermal agitation nahi matlab koi thermal radiation nahi.
Agar ek body aur uske surroundings same temperature par hain, kya woh abhi bhi radiate kar rahi hai?
Haan — woh emit karti hai aur barabar amount absorb karti hai, isliye emission kabhi nahi rukti; sirf net flow equilibrium par khatam hoti hai.
Kya Fourier's law ek rod mein temperature difference hone par bhi zero heat current de sakti hai?
Steady state mein ek single uniform rod ke liye nahi — nonzero nonzero force karta hai. Lekin agar (perfect insulator) ya , to ; ek near-vacuum gap conduction ko completely khatam karke ise approximate karta hai.
Wall thickness hone par conductive heat current ka kya hoga?
. Infinitely patli wall zero resistance offer karti hai, isliye heat freely pass hoti hai — woh mathematical limit jo explain karta hai ki kyun patle, high- contacts (jaise ek metal chammach) itne effective lagte hain.
Emissivity (perfect reflector) wale object ke liye net radiative exchange kya hai?
Zero — . Woh na radiation emit karta hai na absorb, isliye woh sirf conduction ya convection se heat exchange kar sakta hai.
Kya ka sign kabhi negative hota hai, aur physically iska kya matlab hai?
Haan — jab (body surroundings se thandi), , isliye : body balance mein radiant energy gain karti hai, jaise ek warm room mein ek thanda object warm ho raha ho.
Recall Ek-line self-test

Teen modes mein se kaun sa perfect vacuum mein operate kar sakta hai, aur kyun? ::: Sirf radiation — yeh EM waves hain jinhein koi medium nahi chahiye, jabki conduction aur convection dono ko energy carry karne ke liye matter chahiye.