Intuition What this page is for
The parent note gave you the three regimes and the formulas. This page hunts down every case the topic can throw at you — every sign of the discriminant, the degenerate zero-damping case, the limiting behaviours, a real-world word problem, and an exam-style twist. If you can do all ten examples below, no damped-oscillator question can surprise you.
Before anything, let us re-state the physical law itself so nothing appears "out of nowhere". A mass m on a spring of stiffness k , dragged by a resistive force − b x ˙ proportional to velocity, obeys Newton's second law:
m x ¨ + b x ˙ + k x = 0.
Here x is the displacement, x ˙ its velocity, x ¨ its acceleration; b > 0 is the damping constant (N·s/m). Divide through by m to reach the standard form
x ¨ + 2 γ x ˙ + ω 0 2 x = 0 ,
whose characteristic roots are
λ = − γ ± γ 2 − ω 0 2 .
The quantity under the root, ==γ 2 − ω 0 2 == (call it the discriminant Δ ), is the whole story.
γ = damping coefficient = 2 m b (how hard the syrup pulls) — this is where b and m enter.
ω 0 = natural frequency = m k (how eager the spring is to swing) — this is where k and m enter.
So every time you see γ or ω 0 below, remember they are just bundled versions of the physical b , m , k from that original ODE.
Each sign of Δ produces a different shape of solution. Memorise these three forms now; every example below just plugs numbers into one of them.
Where do these roots live ? Plot each root λ as a dot on a plane whose horizontal axis is the real part (the decay rate, always ≤ 0 here) and whose vertical axis is the imaginary part (the oscillation rate). This plane is the honest picture behind the loose word "quadrant": it is the complex plane , and the sign of Δ decides whether the root dots sit off the horizontal axis (oscillation) or on it (pure decay) .
Read the figure like this: as damping γ grows from 0 , the two red root-dots start as a conjugate pair up/down the imaginary axis (underdamped — they have height, so they oscillate), slide left as decay increases, then collide on the real axis at γ = ω 0 (critical — the two dots merge into one), and finally split apart along the real axis (overdamped — both real, no height, so no oscillation). "Off the axis ⇒ wobble; on the axis ⇒ crawl" is the entire topic in one moving picture. Whenever an example asks which regime , you are really asking where do the red dots sit .
Every question in this topic lands in exactly one of these cells. Each example below is tagged with the cell(s) it covers.
Cell
Case class
Sign of Δ = γ 2 − ω 0 2
What happens
Example
A
Underdamped
Δ < 0
oscillates in shrinking envelope
Ex 1, 6
B
Critically damped
Δ = 0
fastest clean stop
Ex 2
C
Overdamped
Δ > 0
two decaying exponentials, sluggish
Ex 3
D
Degenerate: γ = 0
Δ < 0 , no decay
pure SHM, rings forever
Ex 4
E
Limiting: γ → ∞
Δ > 0 , one root → 0
one term lingers, very slow
Ex 5
F
Boundary crossing (find b )
set Δ = 0
classify above/below
Ex 2, 7
G
Energy / Q decay
underdamped
how fast energy drains
Ex 8
H
Word problem (real device)
any
translate words to m , k , b
Ex 9
I
Exam twist (measure ω d , infer γ )
underdamped
invert the formulas
Ex 10
Each row corresponds to a position of the red root-dots in the figure above: rows A/D put them off the real axis, row B on it (merged), rows C/E split along it.
Worked example Ex 1 — Classify a system · Cell A (underdamped)
m = 0.5 kg, k = 200 N/m, b = 4 N·s/m. Which regime, and what is ω d ?
Forecast: Guess before computing — is b = 4 "small" here? Jot underdamped / critical / overdamped.
ω 0 = k / m = 200/0.5 = 400 = 20 rad/s.
Why this step? ω 0 is the spring's undamped eagerness — we need it to compare against damping.
γ = b /2 m = 4/ ( 2 ⋅ 0.5 ) = 4/1 = 4 s⁻¹.
Why this step? γ is the standard-form damping; only γ and ω 0 appear in Δ .
Δ = γ 2 − ω 0 2 = 16 − 400 = − 384 < 0 .
Why this step? The sign of Δ picks the cell. Negative ⇒ underdamped (Cell A) — root-dots off the axis.
ω d = ω 0 2 − γ 2 = 400 − 16 = 384 ≈ 19.60 rad/s, so x ( t ) = A e − 4 t cos ( 19.60 t + ϕ ) .
Why this step? When Δ < 0 the imaginary part of λ is the real oscillation rate; drop it into the underdamped shape.
Verify: ω d < ω 0 (19.60 < 20) ✓ — damping always lowers frequency. Units: ( s − 2 ) = s − 1 ✓.
Worked example Ex 2 — Tune to critical damping · Cells B, F (boundary)
Same m = 0.5 kg, k = 200 N/m. What b gives critical damping? What is the repeated root?
Forecast: Will critical b be bigger or smaller than the b = 4 in Ex 1? Guess.
Critical means Δ = 0 , i.e. γ = ω 0 .
Why this step? Δ = 0 is the definition of the boundary between wobble and crawl — the moment the red dots collide.
γ = ω 0 ⇒ 2 m b = m k ⇒ b cr i t = 2 k m .
Why this step? Algebraically solve for b ; the mass cancels into the clean form 2 k m .
b cr i t = 2 200 ⋅ 0.5 = 2 100 = 2 ⋅ 10 = 20 N·s/m.
Why this step? Plug the numbers into the boundary formula.
Repeated root: λ = − γ = − ω 0 = − 20 s⁻¹, solution x = ( A + B t ) e − 20 t .
Why this step? At Δ = 0 the two roots merge; the second independent solution carries a factor t — the critically-damped shape.
Verify: b cr i t = 20 > 4 (Ex 1's b ) ✓ — Ex 1 had less damping, correctly underdamped. Units: N/m ⋅ kg = N⋅kg/m ; since N = kg·m/s², this is kg 2 / s 2 = kg/s = N⋅s/m ✓.
Worked example Ex 3 — Overdamped roots · Cell C (overdamped)
m = 1 kg, k = 9 N/m, b = 10 N·s/m. Find both decay rates.
Forecast: Two real roots — which is bigger in magnitude? Which one dominates the long-time motion?
ω 0 = 9/1 = 3 rad/s; γ = b / ( 2 m ) = 10/ ( 2 ⋅ 1 ) = 10/2 = 5 s⁻¹.
Why this step? Standard-form parameters first, always. Note γ = b / ( 2 m ) needs the mass in the denominator — here m = 1 so it looks like 10/2 , but the general formula carries the factor m .
Δ = γ 2 − ω 0 2 = 25 − 9 = 16 > 0 ⇒ overdamped (Cell C), Δ = 4 — dots split along the real axis.
Why this step? Positive Δ ⇒ two real roots, no oscillation.
λ 1 = − γ + Δ = − 5 + 4 = − 1 s⁻¹; λ 2 = − γ − Δ = − 5 − 4 = − 9 s⁻¹, so x = C e − t + D e − 9 t .
Why this step? Both signs of the root give the two exponentials of the overdamped shape.
Long-time motion ≈ C e − t — the slow root λ 1 = − 1 lingers 9× longer than λ 2 = − 9 .
Why this step? The root nearest zero decays slowest and therefore rules the tail of the motion.
Verify: Both roots negative ✓ (system must decay). Product λ 1 λ 2 = ( − 1 ) ( − 9 ) = 9 = ω 0 2 ✓ and sum λ 1 + λ 2 = − 10 = − 2 γ ✓ — Vieta's formulas confirm they solve λ 2 + 2 γ λ + ω 0 2 = 0 .
Worked example Ex 4 — Degenerate case
γ = 0 · Cell D (no damping)
Set b = 0 with m = 0.5 , k = 200 . What is the motion?
Forecast: With zero syrup, does it ever stop?
γ = b /2 m = 0 .
Why this step? Zero damping is the degenerate limit of the same equation.
λ = − 0 ± 0 − ω 0 2 = ± i ω 0 , purely imaginary — root-dots sit on the imaginary axis , zero decay.
Why this step? No real part ⇒ no decay envelope; only oscillation survives.
ω d = ω 0 2 − 0 = ω 0 = 20 rad/s, and x ( t ) = A cos ( 20 t + ϕ ) — pure Simple Harmonic Motion .
Why this step? When γ = 0 , ω d collapses to ω 0 ; the underdamped shape loses its envelope and becomes SHM.
Verify: Envelope e − γ t = e 0 = 1 — constant amplitude, rings forever ✓. This is the sanity anchor: damped theory must reduce to SHM when damping vanishes.
Worked example Ex 5 — Limiting behaviour
γ → ∞ · Cell E (heavy overdamp)
Fix ω 0 = 3 rad/s. As γ grows huge, what happens to the slow root λ 1 ?
Forecast: Does the slow root go to 0 or to − ∞ ? What does that mean physically?
λ 1 = − γ + γ 2 − ω 0 2 .
Why this step? λ 1 (the + root) is the slow, dominant term for the tail.
For large γ : γ 2 − ω 0 2 = γ 1 − ω 0 2 / γ 2 ≈ γ ( 1 − 2 γ 2 ω 0 2 ) = γ − 2 γ ω 0 2 .
Why this step? We expand the root for γ ≫ ω 0 using 1 − ϵ ≈ 1 − ϵ /2 — the tool that turns "very large" into a clean estimate.
So λ 1 ≈ − γ + γ − 2 γ ω 0 2 = − 2 γ ω 0 2 → 0 − as γ → ∞ .
Why this step? The dominant − γ and + γ cancel, leaving a tiny negative number — one red dot creeps toward the origin.
Check at γ = 100 , ω 0 = 3 : exact λ 1 = − 100 + 10000 − 9 = − 100 + 99.955 ≈ − 0.04500 ; approx − 9/200 = − 0.04500 .
Why this step? Numerically confirm the approximation is trustworthy.
Verify: λ 1 → 0 − means the decay slows without bound — more damping makes it slower , the classic overdamped paradox. Approx − 0.04500 matches exact − 0.04500 (to 4 dp) ✓.
Worked example Ex 6 — Amplitude & phase from initial conditions · Cell A (underdamped, full solve)
Underdamped with γ = 1 s⁻¹, ω d = 4 rad/s. Released from rest at x ( 0 ) = 2 m. Find A and ϕ in x ( t ) = A e − γ t cos ( ω d t + ϕ ) .
Forecast: "From rest" means x ˙ ( 0 ) = 0 . Will ϕ be exactly 0 ? Guess.
x ( 0 ) = A cos ϕ = 2 .
Why this step? Apply the position condition at t = 0 ; e 0 = 1 .
x ˙ ( t ) = A e − γ t [ − γ cos ( ω d t + ϕ ) − ω d sin ( ω d t + ϕ ) ] ; at t = 0 : − γ cos ϕ − ω d sin ϕ = 0 .
Why this step? Differentiate (product rule) and impose zero initial velocity.
tan ϕ = − γ / ω d = − 1/4 ⇒ ϕ = arctan ( − 1/4 ) ≈ − 0.2450 rad.
Why this step? Solve the velocity equation for the phase. Branch choice: tan ϕ = − 1/4 has two solutions per turn, ϕ ≈ − 0.2450 and ϕ ≈ π − 0.2450 ≈ 2.897 . We need x ( 0 ) = A cos ϕ = 2 > 0 with A > 0 , so cos ϕ must be positive — that rules out the second-quadrant value 2.897 (where cos < 0 ) and forces the principal branch ϕ ≈ − 0.2450 rad. This is exactly the sign-based quadrant reasoning behind arctan .
A = 2/ cos ϕ = 2/ cos ( − 0.2450 ) = 2/0.97014 ≈ 2.0616 m.
Why this step? Back-substitute ϕ into the position condition to get amplitude; since cos ϕ > 0 we correctly get A > 0 .
Verify: Recompute x ˙ ( 0 ) = A ( − γ cos ϕ − ω d sin ϕ ) = 2.0616 ( − 1 ⋅ 0.97014 − 4 ⋅ ( − 0.24254 )) = 2.0616 ( − 0.97014 + 0.97016 ) ≈ 0 ✓. And A > x ( 0 ) (2.06 > 2) ✓ — envelope must start at least as high as the starting displacement.
Worked example Ex 7 — Boundary test (above/below critical) · Cell F (classify)
A system has k = 100 N/m, m = 1 kg. Three candidates: b = 15 , 20 , 25 N·s/m. Classify each.
Forecast: Which single b is the knife-edge?
b cr i t = 2 k m = 2 100 ⋅ 1 = 2 ⋅ 10 = 20 N·s/m.
Why this step? The boundary value from Ex 2's formula; everything compares to this.
b = 15 < 20 ⇒ underdamped (Cell A).
Why this step? Less damping than critical ⇒ wobble survives — dots off the axis.
b = 20 = 20 ⇒ critically damped (Cell B).
Why this step? Exactly on the boundary ⇒ repeated root — dots collide.
b = 25 > 20 ⇒ overdamped (Cell C).
Why this step? More damping than critical ⇒ two real roots, sluggish — dots split.
Verify: γ values are 7.5 , 10 , 12.5 ; ω 0 = 100 = 10 . So γ < ω 0 , γ = ω 0 , γ > ω 0 respectively ✓ — matches the b -comparison exactly.
Worked example Ex 8 — Energy and Quality factor · Cell G (energy decay)
Underdamped, ω 0 = 50 rad/s, γ = 0.5 s⁻¹. Find Q , the energy fraction left after 2 s, and how many radians of phase the oscillation has rung by then.
Forecast: With such small γ , will most energy survive 2 s or be gone?
Q = 2 γ ω 0 = 2 ⋅ 0.5 50 = 1 50 = 50 .
Why this step? Q measures how lightly damped — high Q rings long. See Quality factor & bandwidth .
Amplitude decays as e − γ t , so at t = 2 : e − 0.5 ⋅ 2 = e − 1 ≈ 0.3679 of the original amplitude remains.
Why this step? The envelope is A e − γ t ; set t = 2 .
Energy ∝ amplitude², so E ( t ) = E 0 e − 2 γ t , giving fraction e − 2 ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ 2 = e − 2 ≈ 0.1353 , i.e. ≈ 13.53% of energy remains.
Why this step? Squaring the amplitude ratio ( e − 1 ) 2 = e − 2 produces the energy factor 2 γ .
Phase rung: exact ω d = 5 0 2 − 0. 5 2 = 2499.75 ≈ 49.9975 , a relative error of only γ 2 / ( 2 ω 0 2 ) = 0.25/5000 = 5 × 1 0 − 5 , so ω d ≈ ω 0 is safe. Phase ≈ ω 0 t = 50 ⋅ 2 = 100 rad ≈ 100/ ( 2 π ) ≈ 15.9 full cycles.
Why this step? Only use ω d ≈ ω 0 when γ ≪ ω 0 ; here we quantify the error and confirm it is negligible.
Verify: Cross-check via the per-cycle rule: amplitude falls by factor e − 2 π / Q = e − 2 π /50 = e − 0.12566 ≈ 0.8820 each cycle. Over n = ω 0 t /2 π = 100/2 π ≈ 15.915 cycles the amplitude ratio is ( e − 2 π / Q ) n = e − 2 π ⋅ 15.915/50 = e − 1.0 , matching step 2's e − 1 exactly ✓. Energy ratio = ( e − 1 ) 2 = e − 2 ≈ 0.1353 ✓. Units of Q : dimensionless ✓.
Worked example Ex 9 — Real device: a car suspension · Cell H (word problem)
A car quarter-body of m = 300 kg sits on a spring k = 27000 N/m. Engineers want critical damping (no bounce after a bump). Find the required shock-absorber constant b and confirm the settle is non-oscillatory.
Forecast: Bigger or smaller b than, say, the 20 N·s/m of a lab spring? Guess the order of magnitude.
ω 0 = k / m = 27000/300 = 90 ≈ 9.487 rad/s.
Why this step? The bare bounce frequency of the car body on its spring.
Critical: b cr i t = 2 k m = 2 27000 ⋅ 300 = 2 8.1 × 1 0 6 = 2 ⋅ 2846.05 ≈ 5692 N·s/m.
Why this step? Same boundary formula; real shocks are indeed thousands of N·s/m.
At b cr i t , γ = b cr i t / ( 2 m ) = 5692/600 ≈ 9.487 = ω 0 so Δ = 0 : single root λ = − 9.487 s⁻¹, x = ( A + B t ) e − 9.487 t — no cosine, no bounce.
Why this step? Confirm the motion class from Δ , matching the design goal.
Verify: γ ≈ 9.487 = ω 0 ✓, so Δ = 0 exactly at critical. This is why car shocks are (near-)critical: fastest settle with no oscillation — see also Forced Oscillations & Resonance for why you never want the suspension underdamped near road-bump frequencies.
Worked example Ex 10 — Exam twist: measure
ω d , infer γ · Cell I (invert formulas)
You measure a damped oscillation with damped frequency ω d = 19.60 rad/s, and the undamped frequency is known to be ω 0 = 20 rad/s. Find γ and the damping constant b if m = 0.5 kg. (This inverts Ex 1.)
Forecast: Should the recovered b match Ex 1's b = 4 ? Predict yes/no.
From ω d 2 = ω 0 2 − γ 2 , solve γ = ω 0 2 − ω d 2 .
Why this step? We know the outputs ω d , ω 0 and want the input γ — rearrange the defining relation.
γ = 2 0 2 − 19.6 0 2 = 400 − 384.16 = 15.84 ≈ 3.980 s⁻¹.
Why this step? Plug numbers; note the near-cancellation of two big numbers demands care.
b = 2 mγ = 2 ⋅ 0.5 ⋅ 3.980 = 3.980 N·s/m.
Why this step? Invert γ = b /2 m to recover the physical damping constant.
Verify: Recovered b ≈ 3.98 ≈ 4 N·s/m — matches Ex 1's input ✓ (the tiny gap is because Ex 1's ω d = 384 = 19.5959 was rounded to 19.60 ). The round-trip closes.
Recall Which cell is which — quick self-test
Sign of Δ < 0 means ::: underdamped (oscillates); root-dots off the real axis.
Sign of Δ = 0 means ::: critically damped (fastest clean stop); dots merged on the real axis.
Sign of Δ > 0 means ::: overdamped (two decaying exponentials); dots split along the real axis.
γ = 0 reduces the solution to ::: pure SHM, x = A cos ( ω 0 t + ϕ ) , no decay; dots on the imaginary axis.
As γ → ∞ the slow root λ 1 tends to ::: 0 − (motion becomes ever slower).
Formula for critical damping constant ::: b cr i t = 2 k m .
Per-cycle amplitude decay factor in terms of Q ::: e − 2 π / Q .
Mnemonic The one test to rule them all
Always compute Δ = γ 2 − ω 0 2 first. Its sign tells you where the red root-dots sit in the complex plane — off the axis wobbles, merged clicks, split oozes.
See also Second-order linear ODEs for the general theory behind the characteristic equation, and RLC circuits where L , R , C play the roles of m , b , k exactly.