Exercises — Centre of mass — derivation for common shapes (rod, triangle, semicircle, hemisphere)
1.4.10 · D4· Physics › Momentum & Collisions › Centre of mass — derivation for common shapes (rod, triangle
Level 1 — Recognition
Kya tum integrate kiye bina standard result bata sakte ho?
L1.1
Ek uniform rod jiska length hai, table par rakha hua hai. Uska centre of mass left end se kitni door hai?
Recall Solution
WHAT tool: parent note ka rod result . WHY: uniform linear density constant hai, isliye mein yeh cancel ho jaata hai — COM purely geometric hai, yaani centroid, seedha middle.
L1.2
Ek uniform semicircular wire aur ek uniform semicircular disc, dono ka radius hai, dono ki flat side -axis par hai. Dono ka COM us axis ke upar kitni height par hai?
Recall Solution
WHAT tool: wire , disc . WHY alag hain: wire apna sara mass rim par rakhta hai; disc ka mass centre ke paas gather hota hai, jo average ko neeche kheenchta hai. Silhouette same hai, mass distribution alag hai → answer alag hai. (Yeh exactly parent note ka Error 1 wala trap hai.)
Level 2 — Application
khud set up karo aur integrate karo.
L2.1
Ek rod jiska length hai, uski non-uniform density ek end se linearly badhti hai: , jahan light end se measure kiya gaya hai. nikalo.
Recall Solution
WHAT slice: position par width ka ek tukda mass carry karta hai. WHY sirf nahi: density constant nahi hai, isliye cancel nahi hota — heavier (right) end average ko apni taraf kheenchta hai, isliye hum expect karte hain . Jaise predict kiya tha, : average heavy end ki taraf jhukta hai.
L2.2
Figure s01 refer karo. Ek uniform right-triangular plate ka base -axis par hai aur apex height par hai. Base ke upar COM ki height nikalo.

Recall Solution
WHAT slice: height par ek horizontal strip, jiska width similar triangles se (red strip dekho — apex ke paas yeh zero ho jaata hai). Phir . WHY horizontal strips: hum chahte hain, isliye hum same height wale saare mass ko ek mein group karte hain — ek slice ke andar vary karne ki zaroorat nahi. Step 1 — full integrals likho, har factor ko carry karte hue: Step 2 — dono integrals se constants bahar nikalo: aur par depend nahi karte, isliye har integral ban jaata hai: Step 3 — WHY yeh vanish ho jaate hain: same factor numerator aur denominator dono mein hai, isliye exactly cancel ho jaata hai. Isliye answer purely geometric hai — yeh depend nahi kar sakta ki triangle kitna heavy () ya kitna wide () hai. Note: yeh se independent hai — exactly isliye kyunki aur Step 3 mein cancel ho gaye.
Level 3 — Analysis
Known shapes ko combine ya subtract karo — koi nayi integral nahi chahiye.
L3.1
Figure s02 refer karo. Ek uniform disc jiska radius hai, usme ek circular hole radius ka punch kiya gaya hai. Hole ka centre big disc ke centre se -axis par door hai. Baaki plate ka COM kahan hai?

Recall Solution
WHAT tool — subtraction (negative-mass) trick: punched plate ko (full disc) minus (removed small disc) ki tarah treat karo. Superposition ke liye, WHY yeh kaam karta hai: COM formula mass mein linear hai, isliye material remove karna = negative mass add karna. Dekho Centre of mass — definition and system of particles.
Surface density lo. Mass area:
- Full disc: , centred at .
- Hole: radius , isliye , centred at .
COM hole se door shift hota hai (solid side mein) — sensible hai, kyunki humne side se mass remove kiya. Symmetry se .
L3.2
Ek L-shaped plate teen identical square tiles se bani hai jinka side hai: tile A par; tile B par; tile C par. COM nikalo.
Recall Solution
WHAT tool: har uniform square ko apne centre (centroid) par ek point mass maano, phir mass-weighted average lo. Equal tiles → equal mass ; masses cancel ho jaate hain aur hum centres ka average lete hain. WHY: poore body ka COM nikalne ke liye har square ka mass uske COM par ek point se replace kiya ja sakta hai — yeh Centre of mass — definition and system of particles ka ek theorem hai.
Centres: , , . ke saath: . COM corner tile se thoda bahar hai, dono outer squares ne diagonally kheencha.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Parts se ek nayi body banao aur dimensions ke across reason karo.
L4.1
Figure s03 refer karo. Ek "lollipop" ek uniform semicircular disc jiska radius hai, usse (flat side neeche) ek uniform rectangular strip jiska height aur width hai, uske upar glue karke banaya gaya hai, dono ki same surface density hai. Rectangle ke bottom ko maante hue, COM height nikalo.

Recall Solution
WHAT tool: do known centroids ko mass-weighted average se combine karo. Rectangle: area , mass , centroid apne middle par. Semicircle: area , mass . Uska apna COM apne flat edge ke upar hai, aur woh flat edge par hai. Isliye uski centroid height hai . WHY add karo: disc ka apne base se measure hota hai, jo humne tak lift kiya hai. Sub-COMs ko hamesha common origin par re-anchor karo.
cancel karo. Numerator . Denominator . Glue line () se thoda neeche — heavier rectangle balance point ko low rakhta hai, lekin disc usse seam ke paas upar kheenchti hai.
L4.2
Ek solid hemisphere jiska radius hai, uske flat face se ek chota solid hemisphere jiska radius hai, nikala gaya hai, same flat plane aur axis share karte hue (ek "bowl"). Dono parts same density ki hain. Flat face ke upar COM height nikalo.
Recall Solution
WHAT tool: solid-hemisphere result ke saath negative-mass subtraction. Hemisphere ka volume ; use karo .
- Big: , .
- Removed small (radius ): , .
cancel karo: numerator . Denominator . Plain se zyada: humne neeche se mass scoop kiya (chota hemisphere flat face ke paas rehta hai), isliye average upar uth jaata hai.
Level 5 — Mastery
Open-ended reasoning aur limiting behaviour.
L5.1
Ek wire radius ke semicircle mein bend ki gayi hai, phir usse close karne ke liye ek straight diameter wire (same ) add ki gayi hai, ek "D" banaate hue. Diameter ke upar COM height nikalo. Phir discuss karo: agar hum imagine karein ki pure perimeter ka mass sirf arc par concentrate ho jaaye, toh COM upar jaayega ya neeche — aur kaunse limits answer ko bracket karte hain?
Recall Solution
WHAT parts: arc aur diameter, dono uniform linear density ke saath.
- Arc: length , mass , uska COM par (parent result #3).
- Diameter: length , mass , axis par rakhi hai isliye .
Limiting discussion: diameter par baitha hai, isliye use add karne se COM sirf neeche ja sakta hai. Isliye Pure arc () upper bound hai (axis par koi dead weight nahi); lower bound hoga agar diameter par infinite mass hoti. "D" beech mein land karta hai — exactly jaise ek mass-weighted average apni extremes ke beech mein hona chahiye. Yeh Symmetry arguments in physics principle aur Centre of mass — definition and system of particles averaging law dono ek saath hain.
L5.2
Integrate kiye bina, argue karo kyun solid hemisphere ka COM () hemispherical shell ke COM () se neeche hona chahiye. Phir shell result ko jaldi verify karo.
Recall Solution
The argument: solid hemisphere mein material har depth par hai — flat face se pole tak, including flat face ke paas bahut zyada mass (bade base discs). Shell apna sara mass curved surface par rakhta hai, jo average par flat plane se zyada door baitha hai. Zyada door material ka mass-weighted average upar land karta hai. Isliye solid shell. Koi numbers nahi chahiye — bas "mass kahan rehta hai?"
Quick verification (shell) — WHAT slice: top se polar angle par ek ring ki height hai aur mass hai (circumference × slant width × density). Step 1 — likho har factor carry karte hue: Step 2 — constants bahar nikalo: ke siwa har factor mein constant hai. Numerator mein hai; denominator mein hai: Step 3 — WHY constants ek single mein collapse hote hain: shared factor top aur bottom cancel ho jaata hai; sirf numerator ke wala extra bachta hai. Isliye — answer ek pure number times hona chahiye, jaise koi bhi length honi chahiye. Wakai . ✓
Related build-up ideas: Centroid vs centre of mass vs centre of gravity · Moment of inertia — derivation for common shapes · Momentum conservation.