Exercises — Variation of g — with altitude, latitude, depth
Everywhere below we use the three tools built in the parent parent note:
Recall the underlying laws whenever you feel lost: Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, Shell Theorem, Centripetal Force & Circular Motion.
Level 1 — Recognition
L1·Q1
An astronaut climbs from the ground to the top of a mountain of height , with . Which single formula gives the fractional drop in , and what is that drop as a fraction of ?
Recall Solution
WHAT we do: identify altitude, not depth. Going up uses the inverse-square law. WHY the factor 2: the shape, expanded for small , brings down the exponent . Answer: the fractional drop is — i.e. twice the value .
L1·Q2
Which produces a larger change in for the same distance near the surface: rising a height , or descending a depth ? State the ratio of the two drops.
Recall Solution
Altitude drop , depth drop . Answer: rising changes twice as much as descending the same distance. This is the "UP gets a 2, DOWN gets a 1" rule.
Level 2 — Application
L2·Q1
A satellite orbits at altitude (half of Earth's radius). Use the exact altitude formula. What is there?
Recall Solution
WHY exact, not approximate: here , which is NOT , so the linear approximation would be badly wrong. Use the full inverse-square form. Check with approximation (to expose the error): the linear formula would give — completely wrong. That's the whole point of using the exact form.
L2·Q2
A miner descends to depth (again half of ), assuming uniform density. What is ?
Recall Solution
WHY exact works directly: depth is linear, no approximation needed at any depth. Answer: . Note that at half-radius depth, exactly half the gravity remains.
L2·Q3
At the equator (), how much does Earth's rotation alone reduce ?
Recall Solution
Answer: rotation lowers by about at the equator.
Level 3 — Analysis
L3·Q1
At what altitude does fall to half its surface value? Give the answer in terms of and numerically.
Recall Solution
WHAT we invert: we want , and is large, so use the exact form. Answer: above the surface.
L3·Q2
At what depth does fall to half? Compare with the altitude answer.
Recall Solution
Comparison: to halve you must climb km up but only dig km down. Near the surface altitude is faster (the factor 2), but by half- the two have crossed because altitude uses the slowing inverse-square curve while depth stays linear. Answer: , larger than .
L3·Q3
An object is taken to altitude where . Using the linear approximation, find . Is the approximation justified?
Recall Solution
Justified? , so the linear approximation is excellent (next term , negligible). Answer: , approximation valid.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Look at the geometry of the latitude problem before solving:

L4·Q1
Combine altitude and rotation. A person of mass stands on a mountain of height located at the equator. Using the linear altitude correction and the equatorial rotation correction, find the effective they feel and their apparent weight. (Ignore oblateness.)
Recall Solution
Step 1 — WHAT: altitude reduces . Step 2 — WHAT: rotation at the equator subtracts . Strictly the spin radius is , but is , utterly negligible, so use : Step 3 — apparent weight: Answer: , weight (vs at sea level with no spin). See Weight vs Mass — mass stays kg throughout.
L4·Q2
Find the single depth that lowers by the same absolute amount that the mountain in L4·Q1 lowered it by altitude (the from Step 1). Interpret the size.
Recall Solution
Altitude drop from Step 1: . Depth drop: . Set equal: Interpretation: a climb equals a dig — the depth is twice the height, the "UP gets a 2" rule in action (). Answer: .
Level 5 — Mastery
L5·Q1 (limit / design)
Find the rotation rate at which effective at the equator becomes zero (objects float off), and the corresponding "day length" . Use , .
Recall Solution
WHY this matters: it is the hard physical limit of the rotation effect — you cannot make negative. Set : Answer: , day h. At this spin the required centripetal acceleration exactly consumes all of true gravity — this is the equatorial orbit condition, closely tied to Escape Velocity & Orbital Mechanics and Centripetal Force & Circular Motion.
L5·Q2 (prove + limit-check)
Prove that inside a uniform-density Earth is exact, and verify the two boundary cases and .
Recall Solution
WHAT — build inside. By the Shell Theorem, at radius only the inner sphere pulls. Its mass with uniform density : WHY linear: the gravity there is The (mass) beats the (distance), leaving one clean power of : , a straight line, no approximation. Ratio to surface ( gives surface ): Boundary checks:
- (surface): . ✓
- (center): . ✓ — all mass is in shells above you, net pull zero.
L5·Q3 (synthesis of all three)
An engineer needs the true (non-rotating) at the pole from a measurement taken at the equator at sea level. The measured equatorial value is . Add back only the rotation correction and predict the polar . Then state why the real measured pole value () is even larger.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — undo rotation. At the equator the true (radial) gravity is Step 2 — pole has no rotation term (), so if Earth were a sphere, . Step 3 — why reality is bigger. Earth is an Oblate Spheroid Earth: the pole is closer to the center than the equator, so by the pole feels extra pull beyond the rotation restoration. That shape effect adds the remaining . Answer: rotation alone predicts ; oblateness accounts for the further rise to .
Recall check
Recall Which formula for each scenario?
Halving by going up needs ::: km (use exact form, large) Halving by digging needs ::: km (linear, exact) Equatorial rotation drop in ::: m/s Spin day that makes equatorial ::: h A 5 km climb equals how deep a dig for equal ? ::: 10 km (because )
Connections
- Parent topic
- Newton's Law of Universal Gravitation, Shell Theorem, Centripetal Force & Circular Motion
- Weight vs Mass, Oblate Spheroid Earth, Escape Velocity & Orbital Mechanics