1.1.22 · D5 · HinglishMeasurement, Vectors & Kinematics
Question bank — Reference frames — Galilean transformations
1.1.22 · D5· Physics › Measurement, Vectors & Kinematics › Reference frames — Galilean transformations
Shuru karne se pehle, symbols ka ek-line reminder taaki kuch bhi mystery na rahe:
- = ground frame, = frame jo constant velocity se ke relative move kar raha hai.
- position, velocity, acceleration; primed = mein measure kiya gaya.
- Dictionary: , , , .
True or false — justify
Ek ball jo smoothly chalti train ke andar drop ki gayi woh thrower ke paon ke paas girti hai, isliye train zaroor rest mein hogi.
False. Apne paon ke paas girna kisi bhi inertial frame mein hota hai — ball poore time train ki horizontal velocity share karti hai; andar koi experiment aapko constant speed nahi bata sakta.
Do alag inertial frames mein baithe observers hamesha kisi object ki velocity par disagree karte hain.
Mostly true, ek exception hai. Dono se differ karte hain, isliye agree tabhi karte hain jab special case mein ho (same frame) ya jab object ki velocity sirf us direction mein measure ho jo purely... nahi — har component mein ke along differ karte hain, isliye jab bhi ho, genuine disagreement hoti hai.
Sabhi inertial observers kisi bhi object ke acceleration par agree karte hain.
True. Kyunki constant hai, , isliye ; yahi invariance exactly wajah hai ki har inertial frame mein hold karta hai.
Galilean physics mein do events jo mein simultaneous hain, mein bhi simultaneous hoti hain.
True. Kyunki (universal time) hai, agar mein hai toh mein — simultaneity absolute hai, special relativity ke ulat.
Do events ke beech ka time interval sabhi Galilean observers ke liye same hota hai.
True. se, koi bhi difference ; Galilean duniya mein koi time dilation nahi hota — woh sirf Special relativity — Lorentz transformation mein appear karta hai.
Do simultaneous events ke beech ki spatial distance sabhi Galilean observers ke liye same hoti hai.
True. ; same wale do events ke liye, shift identical hai aur difference mein cancel ho jaata hai, isliye .
Ek akele moving particle dwara do alag times ke beech tay ki gayi distance frame-independent hoti hai.
False. Yahan do events ke alag hain, isliye terms cancel nahi hote; path length aur displacement dono frames ke beech differ karte hain (platform ek curve dekhta hai, train ek seedha drop dekhti hai).
Constant speed par turning car se attached frame inertial hota hai.
False. Constant speed ke saath direction badalna matlab constant nahi hai (), isliye pseudo-forces appear hoti hain — Inertial and non-inertial frames dekhein.
Kisi object ki kinetic energy sabhi inertial frames mein same hoti hai.
False. KE par depend karta hai, aur se shift hota hai; ek ball train mein zero KE rakh sakti hai phir bhi platform se large KE dikha sakti hai.
Spot the error
"Ek boat river ko north mein m/s par cross kar rahi hai jabki current east mein m/s bah rahi hai, isliye uski ground speed m/s hai."
Error: perpendicular vectors ko scalar-add karna. Galilean addition ek vector equation hai; speed m/s hai, nahi — Relative velocity dekhein.
"Kyunki acceleration invariant hai, object ki velocity bhi har inertial frame mein same hogi."
Error: invariance sirf derivative ke baad survive karta hai. Velocity se differ karti hai; yeh time-derivative of velocity hai, jisme constant extra term ko khatam kar deta hai, jo invariant hota hai.
"Do cars ek-doosre ki taraf m/s par aa rahi hain, isliye ek car ke frame mein doosri m/s par approach karti hai."
Error: relative velocity ka sign. East positive lete hue, m/s; opposite motions mein speeds add hoti hain.
" se par wapas jaane ke liye use karo."
Error: inverse ka galat sign. ko invert karne par milta hai; reverse transform mein use hota hai, nahi.
"Moving train mein main ek ball seedha upar toss karta hoon; platform bhi use seedha upar jaate dekhta hai."
Error: shared horizontal velocity ko ignore karna. Ball train ki maintain karti hai, isliye platform ek parabola aage badhte dekhta hai, jabki aap ek vertical line dekhte ho.
"Rozmarrah ki speeds par bhi hame safe rehne ke liye likhna chahiye."
Error: wahan Lorentz correction import karna jahan woh negligible hai. term tiny hai; Galilean physics define karta hai aur yahi correct model hai jab ho.
Why questions
Position transform mein term kyun hota hai lekin acceleration transform mein kuch nahi?
Har time-derivative shift se ki ek power hata deta hai: , kyunki constant hai. Position carry karta hai, velocity carry karti hai, acceleration zero carry karta hai.
Newton's laws mein identical dikhne ke liye constant kyun hona chahiye?
Tabhi hota hai, jisse milta hai; ek accelerating frame add karta hai aur isliye pseudo-forces aati hain jo Newton's laws naturally contain nahi karti.
Velocity rule paane ke liye hum position rule differentiate kyun karte hain, instead of ek naya law assume karne ke?
Velocity by definition position ki time-derivative hoti hi hai, isliye velocity transform position transform se forced hai — koi extra physics invent nahi ki gayi, sirf calculus apply kiya gaya.
"Velocity relative to what?" ek zaroori sawaal kyun hai lekin "acceleration relative to what?" utna zaroori nahi?
Velocity inertial frames ke beech se change hoti hai, isliye ek reference frame state karna zaroori hai; acceleration unme sabhi mein same hai, isliye inertial observers ke beech yeh unambiguous hai.
Rozmarrah ki "speeds ko bas add karo" ki success (Example 1) river-boat par generalize kyun nahi hoti?
Scalar addition vector addition ka special case hai jab velocities parallel hoti hain; river-boat ki velocities perpendicular hain, isliye sirf poora vector rule kaam karta hai.
Galilean transform light ki speed ke paas fail kyun hoti hai?
Yeh (absolute time) bake-in karti hai, lekin experiment dikhata hai ki clocks aur lengths speed ke saath change hoti hain; Special relativity — Lorentz transformation ise replace karta hai jab ho.
Edge cases
Galilean transform par kya deta hai?
Yeh identity tak reduce ho jaata hai: , , — do frames coincide karte hain aur sabhi measurements agree karti hain.
Agar koi object mein exactly par move kare toh mein uski velocity kya hogi?
; woh mein rest mein hai — yeh precisely ek passenger hai jo train mein still baitha hai.
par dono origins coincide karte hain; tab position transform kya kehta hai?
; positions us instant par agree karti hain jab frames overlap karte hain, aur baad mein time ke saath linearly diverge karte hain.
Agar "object" moving frame ka khud origin ho, toh velocity rule kya deta hai?
mein woh par move karta hai; apne frame mein , jo consistent hai ke mein fixed hone ke saath.
Agar do cars same direction mein equal speed par move karein toh closing-speed formula kya hoga?
; woh mutually rest mein hain, jo us intuition se match karta hai ki same-velocity travellers ek-doosre ko frozen dekhte hain.
Recall Ek-sentence self-test
Agar aap explain kar sako ki "position carry karta hai, velocity carry karti hai, acceleration kuch nahi carry karta" sirf yeh phrase use karke — "har derivative ki ek power hata deta hai" — toh aapne poora page samajh liya hai.