Exercises — Common continuous distributions — Uniform, Normal, Exponential, Gamma, Beta
Reminders you will lean on (all proven in the parent). Note the support (where the density is nonzero) each time — outside it, , which prevents edge-case slips:
Here is the "cumulative area under the standard bell curve up to a point" — the function that answers "what fraction of a variable sits at or below this ?" We use these standard values throughout: .
Level 1 — Recognition
L1.1
State which of the five distributions best models each and give its one-line "story": (a) the exact time you wait for the first raindrop to hit a sensor firing at a constant average rate; (b) an unknown coin's bias (a probability, so it lives in ); (c) a number you know only to lie between and with no further preference.
Recall Solution
(a) Exponential — waiting time to the first event of a Poisson Process with constant rate. (b) Beta — a random probability/proportion on . (c) Uniform — "maximum ignorance inside an interval," flat density.
L1.2
For , write down , then compute and using only the boxed formulas (no integrals).
Recall Solution
for , else . . .
Level 2 — Application
L2.1
A help desk answers calls as a Poisson process at rate per minute. Let be the wait for the first answered call. (a) Mean wait? (b) ? (c) ?
Recall Solution
, support . (a) min. (b) survival: . (c) CDF: .
L2.2
Exam scores are (so ). Find and .
Recall Solution
Standardize (tables only work for ). . , so .
The figure below shows this exact problem: the blue curve is , the yellow shaded region is the answer to (a), , and the red line at marks where the second question cuts off — everything to its right, , is the answer to (b). Notice how far into the left tail sits: two full standard deviations below the mean, so only a sliver () lies below it.

L2.3
(wait for the 3rd event, rate 2). Give and two ways: the formulas, and the "sum of exponentials" argument.
Recall Solution
Formula: , . Sum argument: with each , mean , var . Means add: . For independent variables variances add: . Same answer.
Level 3 — Analysis
L3.1 (memorylessness)
A machine's lifetime is . It has already run years. Show does not depend on the , and evaluate for .
Recall Solution
The cancels — the elapsed vanishes. That is memorylessness: the machine "forgets" it is 4 years old. Value: .
L3.2 (68–95–99.7 rule)
Heights are cm. Without a full table, estimate and .
Recall Solution
and are ⇒ by the empirical rule . and are ⇒ . Check with : . ✓
L3.3 (Beta shape reasoning)
For , compute and , and explain from the story why the mean sits left of .
Recall Solution
. . Story: think of "successes" and "failures" of weight. More failure mass drags the balance point toward , so .
The figure makes the "pulled left" story visible: the green curve is the density on its support , the white dashed line marks the midpoint , and the yellow line marks the mean . Because dumps far more probability mass near than puts near , the balance point (mean) sits noticeably to the left of the midpoint — exactly what the algebra predicts.

Level 4 — Synthesis
L4.1 (Gamma ↔ Exponential bridge)
Show algebraically that is , using the density and .
Recall Solution
Gamma density (support ): . Put : using the Gamma Function fact (the general definition is ; here makes the power ) and . This is exactly the Exponential density on . So Exponential is the member of the Gamma family. ✓
L4.2 (Uniform → Exponential via inverse CDF)
Let . Define . Show by computing its CDF. Then, with and a drawn value , compute .
Recall Solution
Find for (the support of an Exponential): Multiply both sides by . Since , the factor is negative, and multiplying an inequality by a negative number flips its direction ( becomes ): Now exponentiate. The function is increasing, so it preserves the direction (no flip): (The last rearrangement subtracts and across, which again flips once — check: .) Since is uniform on , for , so Numeric: : .
L4.3 (Beta = Uniform special case)
Show from the density, using and the Beta Beta Function identity .
Recall Solution
(using ). Beta density with , on its support : which is the constant density of . ✓ So Uniform is the "flat" Beta.
Level 5 — Mastery
L5.1 (derive the Exponential mean from scratch)
Prove for using integration by parts, showing every step. Then confirm via the Gamma Function identity.
Recall Solution
Parts: let (so ) and (so ). Boundary term: at , (exponential beats linear); at it is . So the bracket is . Remaining integral: . Hence . ✓ Gamma check: , using .
L5.2 (derive the Gamma mean)
Starting from (support ), prove .
Recall Solution
Evaluate the integral with the substitution . Compute the differential: differentiating gives , so , and also , hence . The limits are unchanged ( gives since ). Substituting: where the factor (from ) times (from ) produces the , and the remaining integral is the Gamma Function with exponent . So . Using the recursion (proved by parts in the parent), the cancels: Sanity: gives , matching L5.1.
L5.3 (Beta variance, full derivation)
Prove for , given and . Evaluate for .
Recall Solution
. Let to keep it clean. Common denominator : Inside: . : .
Recall Where these connect
The Gamma-as-sum-of-Exponentials picture (L2.3, L4.1) is one step from the Central Limit Theorem intuition, and the Beta-as-random-probability (L1.1b, L3.3, L4.3) is the engine behind Conjugate Priors in Bayesian Inference. The rate story (L2.1, L3.1) comes straight out of the Poisson Process.