Intuition Why this page exists
The parent note showed you the 3-step recipe (Stamp → Solve → Stick-back) and three tidy examples. But real problems throw messy denominators, repeated forcing switches, impulses , resonance , and step forcing that must be rewritten before it fits the table. This page walks every one of those scenarios , so when you meet one in an exam you have already seen its twin.
We assume only what the parent built: the derivative rule L { y ′′ } = s 2 Y − s y ( 0 ) − y ′ ( 0 ) , the standard pairs, the second shifting theorem L { u ( t − a ) g ( t − a )} = e − a s G ( s ) , and Partial Fractions . Everything else is earned here.
Think of every linear-ODE-with-Laplace problem as a point in a grid. The two axes that decide how hard the algebra gets are:
What the denominator of Y ( s ) looks like — distinct real roots, a repeated root, or a complex pair (which becomes an oscillation).
What the forcing does — nothing (homogeneous), a smooth push, a single switch u ( t − a ) , a pulse (switch on then off), or a hammer-blow δ ( t − a ) .
Below, each cell is a class of behaviour. Every cell is covered by at least one worked example.
Cell
Denominator type of Y ( s )
Forcing type
Behaviour you must recognise
Example
A
distinct real roots
smooth (or none)
pure decaying exponentials
Ex 1
B
complex pair s 2 + ω 2
none
pure oscillation
Ex 2
C
complex pair, root = forcing frequency
smooth sinusoid
resonance , amplitude grows like t
Ex 3
D
distinct real roots
single switch u ( t − a )
gated relaxation, delay tag e − a s
Ex 4
E
distinct real roots
pulse u ( t − a ) − u ( t − b )
on-then-off, two delay tags
Ex 5
F
must rewrite forcing as g ( t − a )
ramp × step
shifting trap t = ( t − a ) + a
Ex 6
G
distinct real roots
Dirac δ ( t − a )
instant kick, no 1/ s
Ex 7
H
repeated real root
smooth
terms with a factor t e r t
Ex 8
Intuition How to read the "denominator type" axis
After Step 2 you always get Y ( s ) = characteristic polynomial stuff . The roots of that polynomial tell you the shape of the answer before you do any inversion :
real root r → a term e r t (decays if r < 0 ),
complex pair α ± iω → e α t cos ω t and e α t sin ω t ,
repeated root r (appears twice) → an extra t e r t ,
forcing frequency equal to a root → resonance , an extra t multiplies the oscillation.
Worked example Example 1 ·
y ′′ + 3 y ′ + 2 y = e − 3 t , y ( 0 ) = 0 , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: guess before working. The homogeneous roots come from s 2 + 3 s + 2 = ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) , so e − t and e − 2 t . The forcing adds an e − 3 t . Expect a sum of three decaying exponentials, all → 0 .
Step 1 — Stamp. With both ICs zero, L { y ′′ } = s 2 Y , L { y ′ } = s Y , and L { e − 3 t } = s + 3 1 :
( s 2 + 3 s + 2 ) Y = s + 3 1 .
Why this step? The recipe demands we transform term-by-term; zero ICs mean no boundary terms survive.
Step 2 — Solve. Divide (pure algebra):
Y = ( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) 1 .
Why this step? Y ( s ) is now a rational function — ready for Partial Fractions .
Step 3 — Stick-back. Split by cover-up (multiply by the factor, set s to its root):
( s + 1 ) ( s + 2 ) ( s + 3 ) 1 = s + 1 A + s + 2 B + s + 3 C ,
A = ( 1 ) ( 2 ) 1 = 2 1 , B = ( − 1 ) ( 1 ) 1 = − 1 , C = ( − 2 ) ( − 1 ) 1 = 2 1 .
Read each off the table s − r 1 ↔ e r t :
y ( t ) = 2 1 e − t − e − 2 t + 2 1 e − 3 t
Why cover-up works: multiplying both sides by ( s + 1 ) then setting s = − 1 kills every other term because they still carry an ( s + 1 ) factor.
Verify: at t = 0 , y ( 0 ) = 2 1 − 1 + 2 1 = 0 ✔. Differentiate: y ′ = − 2 1 e − t + 2 e − 2 t − 2 3 e − 3 t , so y ′ ( 0 ) = − 2 1 + 2 − 2 3 = 0 ✔. Both ICs recovered.
Worked example Example 2 ·
y ′′ + 4 y = 0 , y ( 0 ) = 3 , y ′ ( 0 ) = − 2
Forecast: s 2 + 4 has roots ± 2 i → oscillation at ω = 2 . Non-zero ICs feed both a cosine (from position) and a sine (from velocity). Amplitude constant forever (no decay).
Step 1 — Stamp. Now ICs are not zero, so keep every boundary term:
( s 2 Y − s ⋅ 3 − ( − 2 ) ) + 4 Y = 0.
Why this step? L { y ′′ } = s 2 Y − s y ( 0 ) − y ′ ( 0 ) — dropping these is the classic mistake.
Step 2 — Solve.
( s 2 + 4 ) Y = 3 s − 2 ⇒ Y = s 2 + 4 3 s − 2 .
Step 3 — Stick-back. Split to match the two table entries s 2 + ω 2 s ↔ cos ω t and s 2 + ω 2 ω ↔ sin ω t with ω = 2 :
Y = 3 ⋅ s 2 + 4 s − 1 ⋅ s 2 + 4 2 .
Why write − 2 as − 1 ⋅ 2 ? The sine table entry needs the numerator to be exactly ω = 2 ; we factor to make that visible.
y ( t ) = 3 cos 2 t − sin 2 t
Verify: y ( 0 ) = 3 ⋅ 1 − 0 = 3 ✔. y ′ = − 6 sin 2 t − 2 cos 2 t , so y ′ ( 0 ) = − 2 ✔.
Intuition Why resonance is a
special cell
When you push a swing at its own natural rhythm, the amplitude grows. In Laplace-land this shows up as a repeated complex factor : ( s 2 + ω 2 ) 2 . A squared factor in the denominator is exactly what produces a t cos ω t or t sin ω t — the tell-tale linearly-growing envelope.
Worked example Example 3 ·
y ′′ + y = cos t , y ( 0 ) = 0 , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: natural frequency ω = 1 (from s 2 + 1 ), forcing frequency also 1 . Resonance! Expect the amplitude to grow like t .
Step 1 — Stamp. L { cos t } = s 2 + 1 s :
( s 2 + 1 ) Y = s 2 + 1 s .
Step 2 — Solve.
Y = ( s 2 + 1 ) 2 s .
Why this is different: the factor s 2 + 1 appears twice . No sum of plain cos t , sin t can produce this; we need the growing pair.
Step 3 — Stick-back. Recall the pair (derivable, but memorise it):
L { t sin ω t } = ( s 2 + ω 2 ) 2 2 ω s .
With ω = 1 : L { t sin t } = ( s 2 + 1 ) 2 2 s , so ( s 2 + 1 ) 2 s = 2 1 L { t sin t } .
y ( t ) = 2 1 t sin t
The t out front is the growing envelope — the physical signature of resonance.
Verify: y ( 0 ) = 0 ✔. y ′ = 2 1 sin t + 2 1 t cos t , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0 ✔. Plug into the ODE: y ′′ = cos t − 2 1 t sin t , so y ′′ + y = cos t − 2 1 t sin t + 2 1 t sin t = cos t ✔.
Worked example Example 4 ·
y ′ + 2 y = 3 u ( t − 1 ) , y ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: nothing until t = 1 ; then the system relaxes toward its steady value 3/2 (set y ′ = 0 : 2 y = 3 ). Root − 2 → time constant 2 1 .
Step 1 — Stamp. L { u ( t − 1 )} = s e − s :
( s + 2 ) Y = s 3 e − s .
Step 2 — Solve.
Y = e − s ⋅ H ( s ) s ( s + 2 ) 3 .
Why factor out e − s ? The delay tag rides untouched through the algebra; we invert the plain H ( s ) first, then delay-and-gate.
Step 3 — Stick-back. Cover-up on H : at s = 0 residue 2 3 ; at s = − 2 residue − 2 3 = − 2 3 :
H ( s ) = s 3/2 − s + 2 3/2 ⇒ h ( t ) = 2 3 − 2 3 e − 2 t .
Then Y = e − s H ( s ) means delay h by 1 AND gate with u ( t − 1 ) :
y ( t ) = u ( t − 1 ) [ 2 3 − 2 3 e − 2 ( t − 1 ) ]
Verify: for t < 1 , y = 0 ✔. As t → ∞ , y → 2 3 = steady state ✔. Just after t = 1 : y ( 1 + ) = 2 3 − 2 3 = 0 , continuous ✔.
Intuition Building a pulse from two steps
A rectangular pulse "on from a to b " is u ( t − a ) − u ( t − b ) : the first step turns it on, the second subtracts it back to zero. Each step contributes its own delay tag.
Worked example Example 5 ·
y ′ + y = u ( t − 1 ) − u ( t − 3 ) , y ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: rises toward 1 during 1 < t < 3 , then decays back to 0 after the pulse ends. Two delay tags e − s and e − 3 s .
Step 1 — Stamp.
( s + 1 ) Y = s e − s − s e − 3 s .
Step 2 — Solve.
Y = ( e − s − e − 3 s ) H ( s ) s ( s + 1 ) 1 .
Step 3 — Stick-back. From the parent, H ( s ) = s 1 − s + 1 1 ⇒ h ( t ) = 1 − e − t . Apply delay-and-gate to each tag and subtract:
y ( t ) = u ( t − 1 ) ( 1 − e − ( t − 1 ) ) − u ( t − 3 ) ( 1 − e − ( t − 3 ) )
Verify: for t < 1 , y = 0 ✔. At t = 3 − (near end of pulse) y ≈ 1 − e − 2 = 0.8647 ; the term that switches off is 0 there, so continuous ✔. For t ≫ 3 both terms combine to − e − ( t − 1 ) + e − ( t − 3 ) → 0 ✔.
Common mistake The trap this cell trains
To use L { u ( t − a ) g ( t − a )} = e − a s G ( s ) the forcing must literally be a function of ( t − a ) . If you meet t u ( t − 2 ) you cannot just write e − 2 s ⋅ s 2 1 — because s 2 1 is the transform of t , not of ( t − 2 ) . You must rewrite t = ( t − 2 ) + 2 first.
Worked example Example 6 ·
y ′ + y = t u ( t − 2 ) , y ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: silent until t = 2 ; then driven by a ramp. Because the ramp value at the switch is already 2 , expect a jump-like build-up, not a start from zero slope.
Step 1 — Rewrite the forcing. Let τ = t − 2 , so t = τ + 2 :
t u ( t − 2 ) = [ ( t − 2 ) + 2 ] u ( t − 2 ) = g 1 ( t − 2 ) u ( t − 2 ) + g 2 2 u ( t − 2 ) .
Why this step? Both pieces are now genuine functions of ( t − 2 ) , so the shift theorem applies cleanly.
L {( t − 2 ) u ( t − 2 )} = e − 2 s ⋅ s 2 1 , L { 2 u ( t − 2 )} = 2 ⋅ s e − 2 s .
So L { t u ( t − 2 )} = e − 2 s ( s 2 1 + s 2 ) .
Step 2 — Stamp & Solve.
( s + 1 ) Y = e − 2 s ( s 2 1 + s 2 ) ⇒ Y = e − 2 s H ( s ) s 2 ( s + 1 ) 2 s + 1 .
(Combined: s 2 1 + s 2 = s 2 1 + 2 s , then ÷ ( s + 1 ) .)
Step 3 — Stick-back. Partial-fraction H ( s ) = s 2 ( s + 1 ) 2 s + 1 = s A + s 2 B + s + 1 C . Clear denominators: 2 s + 1 = A s ( s + 1 ) + B ( s + 1 ) + C s 2 .
s = 0 : 1 = B .
s = − 1 : − 1 = C .
compare s 2 coefficient: 0 = A + C ⇒ A = 1 .
So H ( s ) = s 1 + s 2 1 − s + 1 1 ⇒ h ( t ) = 1 + t − e − t . Delay-and-gate by 2 :
y ( t ) = u ( t − 2 ) [ 1 + ( t − 2 ) − e − ( t − 2 ) ] = u ( t − 2 ) [ t − 1 − e − ( t − 2 ) ]
Verify: for t < 2 , y = 0 ✔. At t = 2 + : y = 1 + 0 − 1 = 0 , continuous ✔. Check the ODE for t > 2 : y = t − 1 − e − ( t − 2 ) , y ′ = 1 + e − ( t − 2 ) , so y ′ + y = ( 1 + e − ( t − 2 ) ) + ( t − 1 − e − ( t − 2 ) ) = t ✔ (matches forcing t ).
δ is the easiest forcing in Laplace
A unit impulse at t = a has L { δ ( t − a )} = e − a s — no 1/ s , just the bare tag. Physically it dumps a unit of "momentum" instantly. See Heaviside Step and Dirac Delta Functions .
Worked example Example 7 ·
y ′′ + 2 y ′ + 2 y = δ ( t − 1 ) , y ( 0 ) = 0 , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: system at rest is kicked at t = 1 . Roots of s 2 + 2 s + 2 : complete the square ( s + 1 ) 2 + 1 → − 1 ± i → decaying oscillation e − t envelope, ω = 1 . So after t = 1 expect a damped wiggle.
Step 1 — Stamp. L { δ ( t − 1 )} = e − s :
( s 2 + 2 s + 2 ) Y = e − s .
Step 2 — Solve.
Y = e − s H ( s ) ( s + 1 ) 2 + 1 1 .
Step 3 — Stick-back. Match the shifted-sine table entry L { e − t sin t } = ( s + 1 ) 2 + 1 1 (this is the standard ( s − α ) 2 + ω 2 ω with α = − 1 , ω = 1 ). So h ( t ) = e − t sin t . Delay-and-gate by 1 :
y ( t ) = u ( t − 1 ) e − ( t − 1 ) sin ( t − 1 )
Verify: for t < 1 , y = 0 ✔. Just after the kick, y ( 1 + ) = 0 but the velocity jumps: y ′ ( 1 + ) = e 0 ( cos 0 ) = 1 — a unit impulse injects one unit of velocity into a system starting from rest ✔ (consistent with the δ delivering one unit of "kick").
Intuition Why a repeated root breeds a factor of
t
If a factor ( s − r ) appears twice in the denominator, the table entry you need is L { t e r t } = ( s − r ) 2 1 . The extra power of t is the signature of a double root — the same mechanism as resonance, but for real roots.
Worked example Example 8 ·
y ′′ + 2 y ′ + y = e − t , y ( 0 ) = 0 , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0
Forecast: s 2 + 2 s + 1 = ( s + 1 ) 2 — a double root at − 1 . Forcing e − t also has that same root, so we get a triple stack ( s + 1 ) 3 → expect a t 2 e − t term (double resonance!).
Step 1 — Stamp. L { e − t } = s + 1 1 :
( s + 1 ) 2 Y = s + 1 1 .
Step 2 — Solve.
Y = ( s + 1 ) 3 1 .
Step 3 — Stick-back. Use L { t n e r t } = ( s − r ) n + 1 n ! with n = 2 , r = − 1 : L { t 2 e − t } = ( s + 1 ) 3 2 . Hence ( s + 1 ) 3 1 = 2 1 L { t 2 e − t } :
y ( t ) = 2 1 t 2 e − t
Verify: y ( 0 ) = 0 ✔. y ′ = t e − t − 2 1 t 2 e − t , y ′ ( 0 ) = 0 ✔. Plug back: y ′′ = e − t − 2 t e − t + 2 1 t 2 e − t ; then y ′′ + 2 y ′ + y = e − t after the t -terms cancel ✔.
Recall Quick self-test
Which cell has a linearly-growing amplitude and why? ::: Cell C (resonance): forcing frequency equals a natural frequency, giving a repeated complex factor ( s 2 + ω 2 ) 2 → a t sin ω t term.
Why does t u ( t − 2 ) need rewriting before the shift theorem? ::: The theorem needs a function of ( t − 2 ) ; write t = ( t − 2 ) + 2 so both pieces are shifted, giving e − 2 s ( 1/ s 2 + 2/ s ) .
What is L { δ ( t − a )} and why is impulse forcing easy? ::: e − a s — just the bare delay tag, no 1/ s , so it multiplies the transfer factor directly.
Signature of a repeated real root r in the answer? ::: A factor t e r t (double root) or t 2 e r t (triple), from L { t n e r t } = n ! / ( s − r ) n + 1 .
Y ( s ) at a glance
Look at the roots first. Real & distinct → clean exponentials. Complex pair → oscillation. Root squared → multiply by t . Delay tag e − a s → gate with u ( t − a ) and shift. δ → bare tag, no 1/ s .