L1.1L{y′′−4y′+3y} ko general initial conditions y(0)=y0, y′(0)=y1 ke saath Y=Y(s) ke terms mein likho.
Recall Solution L1.1
Term by term transform karo. Hum kya karte hain: har derivative ko uske rule se replace karo. Kyun: transform linear hai, isliye yeh + aur constants se guzar jaata hai.
L{y′′}=s2Y−sy0−y1,L{−4y′}=−4(sY−y0),L{3y}=3Y.
Jodo:
L{y′′−4y′+3y}=(s2−4s+3)Y−sy0−y1+4y0.
L1.2L{u(t−3)} aur L{δ(t−3)} batao.
Recall Solution L1.2
Shift rule ka special case g=1: L{u(t−3)}=se−3s.
Impulse: L{δ(t−3)}=e−3s.
Difference kyun hai? Step "t=3 ke baad forever on" rehti hai (ek lasting s1), impulse "sirf ek instant" ke liye hai (koi s1 nahi).
L1.3s2+92s aur s2+94 ko invert karo.
Recall Solution L1.3
s2+ω2s↔cosωt ko ω=3 ke saath match karo: s2+92s→2cos3t.
s2+ω2ω↔sinωt match karo: humein upar ω=3 chahiye, lekin hamare paas 4 hai. Likho s2+94=34⋅s2+93→34sin3t.
Transform:sY+2Y=se−s, toh Y=s(s+2)e−s.
Pehle un-delayed core invert karo. Maano H(s)=s(s+2)1. Cover-up: at s=0 residue 21, at s=−2 residue −21. Toh H=s1/2−s+21/2 aur h(t)=21−21e−2t.
Delay tag e−s apply karo:h ko 1 se delay karo AUR gate karo:
y(t)=u(t−1)[21−21e−2(t−1)].
Matlab: t=1 tak kuch nahi, phir y21 ki taraf badhta hai. Figure dekho.
L3.2L{tu(t−2)} nikalo.
Recall Solution L3.2
Trick yeh hai: shift rule ke liye forcing ko g(t−2) ke roop mein likhna zaroori hai, yaani (t−2) ka function. Lekin hamare paas plain t hai. Rewrite karo:t=(t−2)+2. Toh g(t−2)=(t−2)+2, yaani g(τ)=τ+2.
G(s)=L{τ+2}=s21+s2. Delay tag se multiply karo:
L{tu(t−2)}=e−2s(s21+s2).
L3.3 Ek rectangular pulse: y′+y=u(t−1)−u(t−3), y(0)=0 solve karo. (Input sirf t=1 aur t=3 ke beech ON hai.)
Recall Solution L3.3
Transform:sY+Y=se−s−e−3s, toh Y=s(s+1)e−s−e−3s.
Core inverse:H(s)=s(s+1)1=s1−s+11⇒h(t)=1−e−t.
Do delay tags → do gated copies (doosre ko subtract karo):y(t)=u(t−1)[1−e−(t−1)]−u(t−3)[1−e−(t−3)].
Matlab: t=1 tak flat 0; 1 ki taraf charge karta hai; t=3 pe input switch off ho jaata hai aur doosra term ise wapas 0 ki taraf relax karta hai. Figure dekho.
L4.1y′′+3y′+2y=u(t−1), y(0)=0, y′(0)=0 solve karo, phir y(2) evaluate karo.
Recall Solution L4.1
Transform:(s2+3s+2)Y=se−s, toh Y=s(s+1)(s+2)e−s.
Core inverse:H(s)=s(s+1)(s+2)1. Cover-up: at s=0: (1)(2)1=21; at s=−1: (−1)(1)1=−1; at s=−2: (−2)(−1)1=21.
H=s1/2−s+11+s+21/2⇒h(t)=21−e−t+21e−2t.Delay + gate:y(t)=u(t−1)[21−e−(t−1)+21e−2(t−1)].
t=2 pe evaluate karo (toh t−1=1): y(2)=21−e−1+21e−2≈0.5−0.367879+0.067668=0.199789.
L4.2y′′+y=sint, y(0)=0, y′(0)=0 solve karo (resonance — forcing natural frequency se match karti hai).
Recall Solution L4.2
Transform:(s2+1)Y=s2+11, toh Y=(s2+1)21.
Yeh special kyun hai? Forcing sint ki frequency natural oscillation se same hai, isliye uska transform wahi denominator share karta hai — use square kar deta hai. Ek repeated quadratic factor resonance signal karta hai, t mein growth.
Invert karo known pair (s2+ω2)21↔2ω31(sinωt−ωtcosωt) use karke, ω=1 ke saath:
y(t)=21(sint−tcost).−21tcost term bina bound ke badhta hai — amplitude linearly climb karta hai, resonance ki fingerprint.
Check: y(0)=0; y′(t)=21(tsint) (simplification ke baad) toh y′(0)=0 ✔.
L5.1y′′+2y′+y=δ(t−2), y(0)=0, y′(0)=0 solve karo. (Critically-damped system pe ek single hammer blow.)
Recall Solution L5.1
Transform:(s2+2s+1)Y=e−2s. Note karo s2+2s+1=(s+1)2. Toh Y=(s+1)2e−2s.
Core inverse:(s+1)21↔te−t (from (s−a)n+1n!↔tneat with n=1,a=−1). Toh h(t)=te−t.
Delay + gate:y(t)=u(t−2)(t−2)e−(t−2).
Matlab: t=2 pe kick tak kuch nahi, phir ek bump jo rise karta hai aur wapas 0 pe decay ho jaata hai — system ka impulse response, delayed. Sanity check: t=3 pe, y=1⋅e−1≈0.367879.
Transform:sY−0=e−0⋅s=1, toh Y=s1 aur y(t)=1 for t>0.
Physical matlab:t=0 pe ek unit impulse instantly ek unit deposit karta hai; baad mein y1 pe stuck rehta hai (koi restoring term nahi). Impulse ek instantaneous "step-in" ki tarah kaam karta hai initial condition ka.
Subtlety: impulse bilkul lower limit t=0 pe baitha hai. Standard one-sided transform ke saath kick fully capture ho jaata hai, giving y=1 for all t>0; exactly t=0 pe value undefined hai (woh jump kar raha hai). Yeh woh boundary/degenerate case hai jahan "0 ke just baad" aur "0 se just pehle" alag hote hain — hamesha poochho ki tumhara matlab kaun sa side hai.
L5.3 Reasoning (poora inversion zaroori nahi): y′′+5y′+6y=f(t) ke liye zero initial conditions ke saath, transform factor hota hai Y(s)=(s+2)(s+3)F(s). Sirf roots use karke long-time behaviour predict karo jab f(t)=u(t) ho (ek constant switch-on).
Recall Solution L5.3
Poles padho. System ke apne decay modes roots s=−2 aur s=−3 se aate hain, dono negative → dono terms e−2t,e−3t dete hain jo khatam ho jaate hain. f=u(t) ke saath, F=s1 ek pole at s=0 add karta hai, jiska residue ek constant term deta hai.
Steady state directly compute karo us constant term ki value se: t→∞ ke baad decaying modes khatam ho jaate hain, s(s+2)(s+3)1 ka s=0 residue bachta hai, jo hai (2)(3)1=61.
Conclusion:y(t)→61. Tumhe poora invert karna hi nahi pada — poles ne sab bata diya. (ODE se cross-check: steady state pe y′′=y′=0, toh 6y=1⇒y=61 ✔.)
e−asH(s) ko tum kaise invert karte ho? ::: Delay AND gate: u(t−a)h(t−a).
tu(t−2) transform karne se pehle t=(t−2)+2 kyun rewrite karte ho? ::: Shift rule ke liye forcing (t−2) ka function honi chahiye; phir G(s)=s21+s2 aur e−2s se tag karo.
Kaun sa denominator resonance signal karta hai? ::: Ek repeated quadratic jaise (s2+ω2)2; yeh ek tcosωt growing term deta hai.
L{δ(t−a)} vs L{u(t−a)}? ::: e−as vs se−as — impulse mein koi s1 nahi.
Steady state of s(s+2)(s+3)1 jab t→∞? ::: s=0 residue 61 (decaying modes khatam ho jaate hain).