Intuition What this page is
The parent note Properties gave you four tricks: linearity , first shift , second shift , and scaling . Rules feel safe until a problem hides a sign flip , a shift a that is negative , an argument that isn't yet in ( t − a ) form , or a degenerate input like c = 1 . This page marches through every such trap so you never meet a case you haven't already solved.
Before anything, the one object every rule is built from — the definition from Laplace Transform — Definition and Existence :
L { f ( t )} = F ( s ) = ∫ 0 ∞ e − s t f ( t ) d t .
Here t is time (always ≥ 0 for us), s is a helper number big enough to make the integral finite, and F ( s ) is the "recipe" the machine spits out. The building-block recipes we reuse are from Laplace Transforms of Standard Functions (1, e^at, sin, cos, t^n) :
L { 1 } = s 1 , L { t n } = s n + 1 n ! , L { e a t } = s − a 1 , L { sin b t } = s 2 + b 2 b , L { cos b t } = s 2 + b 2 s .
Every problem this topic throws at you lands in exactly one of these cells. The worked examples below are labelled [C#] so you can see the whole grid gets covered.
Cell
Case class
What makes it tricky
Example
C1
Pure linearity, positive coefficients
just split & scale
Ex 1
C2
Linearity with a negative / sign-flipped term
keep the minus sign attached
Ex 1
C3
First shift, positive a (growth e a t )
substitute s → s − a everywhere
Ex 2
C4
First shift, negative a (decay e − a t )
s → s + a , sign flips
Ex 3
C5
Second shift, argument already ( t − a )
plug straight in
Ex 4
C6
Second shift, argument NOT in ( t − a ) form
rewrite by algebra first
Ex 5
C7
Scaling, general c > 1 or 0 < c < 1
keep the c 1
Ex 6
C8
Degenerate input (c = 1 , a = 0 , zero function)
rule must reduce to identity
Ex 7
C9
Combined rules (shift + linearity + step)
order of operations
Ex 8
C10
Real-world word problem (delayed switch-on)
translate words → u ( t − a )
Ex 9
C11
Exam twist — reverse direction (inverse)
read the rule backwards
Ex 10
L { 5 t 2 − 7 cos 4 t + 2 } .
Forecast: Guess the shape first — three separate table entries, each just scaled by its coefficient, minus signs kept. Write your guess before reading on.
Step 1. Split by linearity: L { 5 t 2 } − L { 7 cos 4 t } + L { 2 } .
Why this step? Integration is linear, so a sum of terms transforms term-by-term — no need to integrate the whole mess at once.
Step 2. Pull each constant out and read the table: L { t 2 } = s 3 2 , L { cos 4 t } = s 2 + 16 s , L { 1 } = s 1 .
Why this step? Constants slide out of integrals; the leftover is a known building block.
Step 3. Assemble, keeping the minus sign on the cosine term:
L { 5 t 2 − 7 cos 4 t + 2 } = s 3 10 − s 2 + 16 7 s + s 2 .
Verify: Set s = 2 : 8 10 − 20 14 + 2 2 = 1.25 − 0.7 + 1 = 1.55 . Consistent, finite, sign of the middle term stayed negative. ✔
L { e 2 t sin 5 t } .
Forecast: The e 2 t is the trigger for the first shift. Predict what s becomes.
Step 1. Base transform: L { sin 5 t } = s 2 + 25 5 = F ( s ) .
Why this step? Strip off the e 2 t mentally; the first shift theorem says the exponential only moves the base recipe.
Step 2. Apply L { e a t f } = F ( s − a ) with a = 2 : replace every s by s − 2 .
Why this step? Combining e − s t e 2 t = e − ( s − 2 ) t turns the integral into F evaluated at s − 2 .
L { e 2 t sin 5 t } = ( s − 2 ) 2 + 25 5 .
Verify: As s → ∞ the answer → 0 (a valid transform must); and its pole sits at s = 2 ± 5 i , i.e. real part 2 — exactly the growth rate e 2 t predicts. ✔
L { e − 3 t t 2 } .
Forecast: Here a = − 3 . Careful: s → s − a = s − ( − 3 ) = s + 3 . Guess the denominator power.
Step 1. Base: L { t 2 } = s 3 2 = F ( s ) .
Why this step? The t 2 is the pure building block; the decay just shifts its recipe.
Step 2. First shift with a = − 3 means substitute s → s + 3 everywhere.
Why this step? The theorem is F ( s − a ) ; plugging a = − 3 gives F ( s + 3 ) — the sign flips, a classic slip.
L { e − 3 t t 2 } = ( s + 3 ) 3 2 .
Verify: At s = 0 : 27 2 ≈ 0.074 , positive and finite (integrand e − 3 t t 2 is positive, integral must be positive). ✔
L { sin ( t − π ) u ( t − π )} , where u is the unit step .
Forecast: The argument is already ( t − a ) with a = π . Predict the exponential tag.
Step 1. Identify f ( t ) = sin t , so f ( t − π ) = sin ( t − π ) , and F ( s ) = s 2 + 1 1 .
Why this step? The rule L { f ( t − a ) u ( t − a )} = e − a s F ( s ) needs the undelayed f ; strip the delay to read F .
Step 2. Multiply by the delay tag e − π s :
L { sin ( t − π ) u ( t − π )} = s 2 + 1 e − π s .
Why this step? The step function forces the integral to start at t = π ; substituting τ = t − π pulls out exactly e − π s (see the delay picture below).
Verify: The shape factor s 2 + 1 1 is unchanged from plain sin t — delay never alters shape, only stamps e − π s . ✔
L { t u ( t − 1 )} .
Forecast: The step is u ( t − 1 ) so a = 1 , but the multiplier is t , not ( t − 1 ) . What must we do before applying the rule? Guess.
Step 1. Rewrite t in terms of ( t − 1 ) : t = ( t − 1 ) + 1 .
Why this step? The second shift theorem only works on f ( t − a ) . We algebraically force the shifted variable to appear.
Step 2. Split by linearity:
t u ( t − 1 ) = ( t − 1 ) u ( t − 1 ) + 1 ⋅ u ( t − 1 ) .
Why this step? Now each piece has a clean ( t − 1 ) argument (the constant 1 counts as f = 1 , and L { u ( t − a )} = s e − a s ).
Step 3. Transform each: for ( t − 1 ) u ( t − 1 ) use f ( t ) = t , F ( s ) = s 2 1 ; for u ( t − 1 ) use F ( s ) = s 1 . Both wear the tag e − s .
L { t u ( t − 1 )} = e − s ( s 2 1 + s 1 ) .
Why this step? Same delay a = 1 ⇒ same e − s on both; only the base recipes differ.
Verify (sanity check the trap): The wrong answer e − s s 2 1 (grabbing the rule directly) misses the s 1 piece. Our version equals e − s s 2 s + 1 . Numerically at s = 1 : e − 1 ( 1 + 1 ) = 2 e − 1 ≈ 0.7358 . ✔
L { cos t } = s 2 + 1 s , find L { cos 5 t } and L { cos 2 1 t } by scaling.
Forecast: Scaling says L { f ( c t )} = c 1 F ( s / c ) . Predict which way the s -axis stretches for c = 5 vs c = 2 1 .
Step 1. For c = 5 : F ( s ) = s 2 + 1 s , so F ( s /5 ) = ( s /5 ) 2 + 1 s /5 = s 2 /25 + 1 s /5 .
Why this step? Squeezing time by 5 (faster wiggle) must stretch the s -axis by 1/5 — that's the substitution τ = 5 t .
Step 2. Multiply by c 1 = 5 1 and simplify:
L { cos 5 t } = 5 1 ⋅ s 2 /25 + 1 s /5 = 5 1 ⋅ s 2 + 25 5 s = s 2 + 25 s .
Step 3. For c = 2 1 (slower wiggle): F ( 2 s ) = 4 s 2 + 1 2 s , times 1/2 1 = 2 :
L { cos 2 1 t } = 2 ⋅ 4 s 2 + 1 2 s = 4 s 2 + 1 4 s = s 2 + 1/4 s .
Why this step? c < 1 stretches time (slower), so the s -axis compresses — pole moves inward to s = ± 2 1 i .
Verify: Both match the direct table form s 2 + b 2 s with b = 5 and b = 2 1 respectively. ✔
Worked example Show each rule collapses to something obvious when its parameter is "off".
Forecast: A good rule must do nothing when its knob is at the neutral setting. Predict the three neutral settings.
Step 1 — Scaling at c = 1 : L { f ( 1 ⋅ t )} = 1 1 F ( s /1 ) = F ( s ) .
Why this step? No time-squeeze means no change — the rule must reduce to identity, and it does.
Step 2 — First shift at a = 0 : L { e 0 f ( t )} = F ( s − 0 ) = F ( s ) .
Why this step? e 0 = 1 ; multiplying by 1 changes nothing, and the shift by 0 agrees.
Step 3 — Second shift at a = 0 : L { f ( t ) u ( t )} = e 0 F ( s ) = F ( s ) .
Why this step? u ( t ) = 1 for t ≥ 0 (our whole domain), so no delay, tag e 0 = 1 .
Step 4 — Zero function: L { 0 } = ∫ 0 ∞ e − s t ⋅ 0 d t = 0 .
Why this step? Linearity with a = b = 0 forces the transform of nothing to be nothing.
Verify: All four reduce to the identity/zero as required — no rule "invents" a change from a neutral input. ✔
L { e − t ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} .
Forecast: Two exponentials will appear — one a shift (e − t ) and one a delay tag (e − 3 s ). Guess which becomes s → s + 1 and which becomes a factor.
Step 1. Handle the delay first : g ( t ) = ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 ) has f ( t ) = t , F ( s ) = s 2 1 , so
L {( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} = s 2 e − 3 s ≡ G ( s ) .
Why this step? Second shift acts on the time-delayed part; do it before touching the e − t .
Step 2. Now the extra e − t triggers the first shift with a = − 1 : replace s → s + 1 in all of G ( s ) , including the exponential.
Why this step? First shift substitutes s → s − a = s + 1 everywhere — the e − 3 s is part of G , so it too gets shifted to e − 3 ( s + 1 ) .
L { e − t ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} = ( s + 1 ) 2 e − 3 ( s + 1 ) = ( s + 1 ) 2 e − 3 s − 3 .
Verify: At s = 1 : 4 e − 6 = 4 e − 6 ≈ 6.196 × 1 0 − 4 , positive and tiny (integrand decays fast). ✔
Worked example A circuit's input voltage is
off until t = 2 seconds, then equals v ( t ) = 3 volts constant from then on. Find L { v ( t )} .
Forecast: "Off then constant" screams a step u ( t − 2 ) . Predict the e − 2 s tag.
Step 1. Write the input in symbols: v ( t ) = 3 u ( t − 2 ) .
Why this step? u ( t − 2 ) is 0 before t = 2 and 1 after — exactly "off until 2 , then on."
Step 2. Base f ( t ) = 3 (a constant, so f ( t − 2 ) = 3 too, since constants don't feel a shift), F ( s ) = s 3 . Attach the delay tag:
L { 3 u ( t − 2 )} = e − 2 s ⋅ s 3 = s 3 e − 2 s .
Why this step? Second shift with a = 2 ; a constant's shape is untouched, only the switch-on time appears as e − 2 s .
Verify (units/limit): As s → 0 + , s 3 e − 2 s → ∞ — correct, since a constant that never turns off has infinite "total area" in this limit, like L { 3 } = s 3 . The extra e − 2 s only records the 2-second delay. ✔
inverse transform L − 1 { ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 } .
Forecast: You see ( s − 4 ) instead of plain s . Which shift, and what e a t appears in time? (This uses Inverse Laplace Transform and Partial Fractions .)
Step 1. Recognise the pattern: S 2 + 9 S with S = s − 4 is L { cos 3 t } evaluated at S .
Why this step? Reading first shift backwards: an F ( s − a ) in the recipe means an e a t multiplier in time.
Step 2. Restore the e a t with a = 4 :
L − 1 { ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 } = e 4 t cos 3 t .
Why this step? First shift theorem run in reverse: the "s → s − 4 " seen in the denominator/numerator undoes to a factor e 4 t .
Verify: Transform e 4 t cos 3 t forward via Ex 2's method: base cos 3 t → s 2 + 9 s , shift s → s − 4 gives ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 — round-trip matches. ✔
Recall Which cell does each trap belong to?
Argument t 2 sitting on u ( t − 2 ) — which cell? ::: C6 (not yet in ( t − a ) form — rewrite first)
L { f ( c t )} with c = 1 — which cell? ::: C8 (degenerate; reduces to F ( s ) )
e − t multiplying — which cell and substitution? ::: C4, s → s + 1
A voltage that switches on at t = 5 — which cell? ::: C10, real-world u ( t − 5 )
Mnemonic Order of attack for combined problems
"Delay before Decay." Apply the second shift (delay u ( t − a ) ) to build G ( s ) first, then apply the first shift (e a t ) by substituting s → s − a across the whole of G — exponential tag included.