4.6.27 · D3 · Maths › Ordinary Differential Equations › Properties — linearity, first - second shift theorems, scali
Intuition Yeh page kya hai
Parent note Properties ne tumhe char tricks di theen: linearity , first shift , second shift , aur scaling . Rules tab tak safe lagte hain jab tak koi problem ek sign flip , ek shift a jo negative ho , ek aisa argument jo abhi ( t − a ) form mein nahi hai , ya ek degenerate input jaise c = 1 chhupa ke na rakh de. Yeh page har aisi trap se guzarta hai taaki tum koi aisa case kabhi na dekho jo tumne pehle solve na kiya ho.
Shuru karne se pehle, woh ek object jis par har rule bana hai — definition from Laplace Transform — Definition and Existence :
L { f ( t )} = F ( s ) = ∫ 0 ∞ e − s t f ( t ) d t .
Yahan t time hai (hamare liye hamesha ≥ 0 ), s ek helper number hai jo integral ko finite banane ke liye kaafi bada ho, aur F ( s ) woh "recipe" hai jo machine bahar deti hai. Jo building-block recipes hum baar baar use karte hain woh Laplace Transforms of Standard Functions (1, e^at, sin, cos, t^n) se hain:
L { 1 } = s 1 , L { t n } = s n + 1 n ! , L { e a t } = s − a 1 , L { sin b t } = s 2 + b 2 b , L { cos b t } = s 2 + b 2 s .
Is topic mein aane wali har problem exactly inhi cells mein se kisi ek mein jaati hai. Neeche ke worked examples [C#] se label hain taaki tum dekh sako ki poora grid cover ho raha hai.
Cell
Case class
Kya tricky hai
Example
C1
Pure linearity, positive coefficients
bas split aur scale karo
Ex 1
C2
Linearity with a negative / sign-flipped term
minus sign ko saath rakho
Ex 1
C3
First shift, positive a (growth e a t )
har jagah s → s − a substitute karo
Ex 2
C4
First shift, negative a (decay e − a t )
s → s + a , sign flip hota hai
Ex 3
C5
Second shift, argument already ( t − a )
seedha plug in karo
Ex 4
C6
Second shift, argument NOT in ( t − a ) form
pehle algebra se rewrite karo
Ex 5
C7
Scaling, general c > 1 ya 0 < c < 1
c 1 ko rakho
Ex 6
C8
Degenerate input (c = 1 , a = 0 , zero function)
rule ko identity tak reduce hona chahiye
Ex 7
C9
Combined rules (shift + linearity + step)
operations ka order
Ex 8
C10
Real-world word problem (delayed switch-on)
words ko u ( t − a ) mein translate karo
Ex 9
C11
Exam twist — reverse direction (inverse)
rule ko ulta padho
Ex 10
L { 5 t 2 − 7 cos 4 t + 2 } nikalo.
Forecast: Pehle shape guess karo — teen alag table entries, har ek sirf apne coefficient se scale ki hui, minus signs rakhi hui. Aage padhne se pehle apna guess likho.
Step 1. Linearity se split karo: L { 5 t 2 } − L { 7 cos 4 t } + L { 2 } .
Yeh step kyun? Integration linear hai, isliye terms ka sum term-by-term transform hota hai — ek saath poori cheez integrate karne ki zarurat nahi.
Step 2. Har constant bahar nikalo aur table padho: L { t 2 } = s 3 2 , L { cos 4 t } = s 2 + 16 s , L { 1 } = s 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Constants integrals se bahar slip ho jaate hain; jo bachta hai woh ek jaana-pehchana building block hai.
Step 3. Assemble karo, cosine term par minus sign rakho :
L { 5 t 2 − 7 cos 4 t + 2 } = s 3 10 − s 2 + 16 7 s + s 2 .
Verify: s = 2 set karo: 8 10 − 20 14 + 2 2 = 1.25 − 0.7 + 1 = 1.55 . Consistent, finite, middle term ka sign negative raha. ✔
L { e 2 t sin 5 t } nikalo.
Forecast: e 2 t first shift ka trigger hai. Predict karo ki s kya banta hai.
Step 1. Base transform: L { sin 5 t } = s 2 + 25 5 = F ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? e 2 t ko mentally hata do; first shift theorem kehta hai ki exponential base recipe ko sirf move karta hai.
Step 2. L { e a t f } = F ( s − a ) apply karo a = 2 ke saath: har s ko s − 2 se replace karo.
Yeh step kyun? e − s t e 2 t = e − ( s − 2 ) t combine karne se integral F ban jaata hai s − 2 par evaluate hua.
L { e 2 t sin 5 t } = ( s − 2 ) 2 + 25 5 .
Verify: s → ∞ par answer → 0 (valid transform ke liye zaroori); aur iska pole s = 2 ± 5 i par hai, yani real part 2 — exactly wahi growth rate jo e 2 t predict karta hai. ✔
L { e − 3 t t 2 } nikalo.
Forecast: Yahan a = − 3 hai. Dhyan se: s → s − a = s − ( − 3 ) = s + 3 . Denominator ki power guess karo.
Step 1. Base: L { t 2 } = s 3 2 = F ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? t 2 pure building block hai; decay sirf iske recipe ko shift karta hai.
Step 2. First shift with a = − 3 matlab har jagah s → s + 3 substitute karo.
Yeh step kyun? Theorem hai F ( s − a ) ; a = − 3 plug karne par F ( s + 3 ) milta hai — sign flip hota hai, yeh classic mistake hai.
L { e − 3 t t 2 } = ( s + 3 ) 3 2 .
Verify: s = 0 par: 27 2 ≈ 0.074 , positive aur finite (integrand e − 3 t t 2 positive hai, integral bhi positive hona chahiye). ✔
L { sin ( t − π ) u ( t − π )} nikalo, jahan u unit step hai.
Forecast: Argument already ( t − a ) form mein hai a = π ke saath. Exponential tag predict karo.
Step 1. f ( t ) = sin t identify karo, to f ( t − π ) = sin ( t − π ) , aur F ( s ) = s 2 + 1 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Rule L { f ( t − a ) u ( t − a )} = e − a s F ( s ) ko undelayed f chahiye; F padhne ke liye delay hata do.
Step 2. Delay tag e − π s multiply karo:
L { sin ( t − π ) u ( t − π )} = s 2 + 1 e − π s .
Yeh step kyun? Step function integral ko t = π par start karta hai; τ = t − π substitute karne par exactly e − π s bahar aata hai (neeche delay picture dekho).
Verify: Shape factor s 2 + 1 1 plain sin t se unchanged hai — delay shape kabhi nahi badalta, sirf e − π s stamp karta hai. ✔
L { t u ( t − 1 )} nikalo.
Forecast: Step u ( t − 1 ) hai to a = 1 , lekin multiplier t hai, ( t − 1 ) nahi . Rule apply karne se pehle hume kya karna hoga? Guess karo.
Step 1. t ko ( t − 1 ) ke terms mein rewrite karo: t = ( t − 1 ) + 1 .
Yeh step kyun? Second shift theorem sirf f ( t − a ) par kaam karta hai. Hum algebraically shifted variable ko force karke laate hain.
Step 2. Linearity se split karo:
t u ( t − 1 ) = ( t − 1 ) u ( t − 1 ) + 1 ⋅ u ( t − 1 ) .
Yeh step kyun? Ab har piece ka clean ( t − 1 ) argument hai (constant 1 f = 1 count hota hai, aur L { u ( t − a )} = s e − a s ).
Step 3. Har ek transform karo: ( t − 1 ) u ( t − 1 ) ke liye f ( t ) = t , F ( s ) = s 2 1 use karo; u ( t − 1 ) ke liye F ( s ) = s 1 use karo. Dono par tag e − s lagta hai.
L { t u ( t − 1 )} = e − s ( s 2 1 + s 1 ) .
Yeh step kyun? Same delay a = 1 ⇒ dono par same e − s ; sirf base recipes alag hain.
Verify (trap ka sanity check): Galat answer e − s s 2 1 (rule seedha grab karne par) s 1 wala piece miss kar deta hai. Hamara version e − s s 2 s + 1 hai. Numerically s = 1 par: e − 1 ( 1 + 1 ) = 2 e − 1 ≈ 0.7358 . ✔
L { cos t } = s 2 + 1 s , scaling se L { cos 5 t } aur L { cos 2 1 t } nikalo.
Forecast: Scaling kehta hai L { f ( c t )} = c 1 F ( s / c ) . Predict karo ki s -axis c = 5 vs c = 2 1 ke liye kis taraf stretch hogi.
Step 1. c = 5 ke liye: F ( s ) = s 2 + 1 s , to F ( s /5 ) = ( s /5 ) 2 + 1 s /5 = s 2 /25 + 1 s /5 .
Yeh step kyun? Time ko 5 se squeeze karna (tezi se wiggle) s -axis ko 1/5 se stretch karta hai — yahi substitution τ = 5 t hai.
Step 2. c 1 = 5 1 multiply karo aur simplify karo:
L { cos 5 t } = 5 1 ⋅ s 2 /25 + 1 s /5 = 5 1 ⋅ s 2 + 25 5 s = s 2 + 25 s .
Step 3. c = 2 1 ke liye (slow wiggle): F ( 2 s ) = 4 s 2 + 1 2 s , times 1/2 1 = 2 :
L { cos 2 1 t } = 2 ⋅ 4 s 2 + 1 2 s = 4 s 2 + 1 4 s = s 2 + 1/4 s .
Yeh step kyun? c < 1 time ko stretch karta hai (slower), to s -axis compress hoti hai — pole andar ki taraf s = ± 2 1 i par move karta hai.
Verify: Dono direct table form s 2 + b 2 s se match karte hain b = 5 aur b = 2 1 ke saath respectively. ✔
Worked example Dikhao ki har rule obvious cheez mein collapse hota hai jab iska parameter "off" hota hai.
Forecast: Ek accha rule kuch nahi karta jab iska knob neutral setting par hota hai. Teen neutral settings predict karo.
Step 1 — Scaling at c = 1 : L { f ( 1 ⋅ t )} = 1 1 F ( s /1 ) = F ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? Koi time-squeeze nahi matlab koi change nahi — rule ko identity tak reduce hona chahiye, aur hota hai.
Step 2 — First shift at a = 0 : L { e 0 f ( t )} = F ( s − 0 ) = F ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? e 0 = 1 ; 1 se multiply karna kuch nahi badalta, aur 0 se shift bhi agree karta hai.
Step 3 — Second shift at a = 0 : L { f ( t ) u ( t )} = e 0 F ( s ) = F ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? u ( t ) = 1 for t ≥ 0 (hamara poora domain), to koi delay nahi, tag e 0 = 1 .
Step 4 — Zero function: L { 0 } = ∫ 0 ∞ e − s t ⋅ 0 d t = 0 .
Yeh step kyun? a = b = 0 ke saath linearity force karta hai ki kuch nahi ka transform kuch nahi ho.
Verify: Chaaron required identity/zero tak reduce hote hain — koi rule neutral input se change "invent" nahi karta. ✔
L { e − t ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} nikalo.
Forecast: Do exponentials aayenge — ek shift (e − t ) aur ek delay tag (e − 3 s ). Guess karo kaun s → s + 1 banta hai aur kaun factor banta hai.
Step 1. Pehle delay handle karo : g ( t ) = ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 ) mein f ( t ) = t , F ( s ) = s 2 1 hai, to
L {( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} = s 2 e − 3 s ≡ G ( s ) .
Yeh step kyun? Second shift time-delayed part par kaam karta hai; e − t ko touch karne se pehle yeh karo.
Step 2. Ab extra e − t first shift trigger karta hai a = − 1 ke saath: G ( s ) ke poore mein s → s + 1 replace karo, exponential sameit.
Yeh step kyun? First shift s → s − a = s + 1 ko har jagah substitute karta hai — e − 3 s bhi G ka part hai, to woh bhi e − 3 ( s + 1 ) mein shift ho jaata hai.
L { e − t ( t − 3 ) u ( t − 3 )} = ( s + 1 ) 2 e − 3 ( s + 1 ) = ( s + 1 ) 2 e − 3 s − 3 .
Verify: s = 1 par: 4 e − 6 = 4 e − 6 ≈ 6.196 × 1 0 − 4 , positive aur chhota (integrand tezi se decay karta hai). ✔
Worked example Ek circuit ka input voltage
t = 2 seconds tak off rehta hai, phir us ke baad se constant v ( t ) = 3 volts ho jaata hai. L { v ( t )} nikalo.
Forecast: "Off phir constant" ek step u ( t − 2 ) ki taraf ishaara karta hai. e − 2 s tag predict karo.
Step 1. Input ko symbols mein likho: v ( t ) = 3 u ( t − 2 ) .
Yeh step kyun? u ( t − 2 ) , t = 2 se pehle 0 aur baad mein 1 hota hai — exactly "2 tak off, phir on."
Step 2. Base f ( t ) = 3 (ek constant, to f ( t − 2 ) = 3 bhi, kyunki constants shift feel nahi karte), F ( s ) = s 3 . Delay tag lagao:
L { 3 u ( t − 2 )} = e − 2 s ⋅ s 3 = s 3 e − 2 s .
Yeh step kyun? Second shift with a = 2 ; constant ki shape unchanged rehti hai, sirf switch-on time e − 2 s ke roop mein dikhta hai.
Verify (units/limit): s → 0 + par, s 3 e − 2 s → ∞ — sahi hai, kyunki jo constant kabhi band nahi hota uska is limit mein infinite "total area" hota hai, jaise L { 3 } = s 3 . Extra e − 2 s sirf 2-second delay record karta hai. ✔
Inverse transform L − 1 { ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 } nikalo.
Forecast: Tum plain s ki jagah ( s − 4 ) dekh rahe ho. Kaun sa shift hai, aur time mein kaun sa e a t aata hai? (Yeh Inverse Laplace Transform and Partial Fractions use karta hai.)
Step 1. Pattern pehchano: S = s − 4 ke saath S 2 + 9 S woh L { cos 3 t } hai S par evaluate hua.
Yeh step kyun? First shift ulta padhna: recipe mein F ( s − a ) matlab time mein e a t multiplier.
Step 2. a = 4 ke saath e a t restore karo:
L − 1 { ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 } = e 4 t cos 3 t .
Yeh step kyun? First shift theorem ulta run karo: denominator/numerator mein dikhne wala "s → s − 4 " undo hoke e 4 t factor banta hai.
Verify: e 4 t cos 3 t ko Ex 2 ki method se forward transform karo: base cos 3 t → s 2 + 9 s , shift s → s − 4 deta hai ( s − 4 ) 2 + 9 s − 4 — round-trip match karta hai. ✔
Recall Which cell does each trap belong to?
Argument t 2 sitting on u ( t − 2 ) — which cell? ::: C6 (not yet in ( t − a ) form — rewrite first)
L { f ( c t )} with c = 1 — which cell? ::: C8 (degenerate; reduces to F ( s ) )
e − t multiplying — which cell and substitution? ::: C4, s → s + 1
A voltage that switches on at t = 5 — which cell? ::: C10, real-world u ( t − 5 )
Mnemonic Combined problems ke liye attack ka order
"Delay before Decay." Pehle second shift (delay u ( t − a ) ) apply karo G ( s ) banane ke liye, phir first shift (e a t ) apply karo poore G mein s → s − a substitute karke — exponential tag bhi shamil.