L1.1 Which of these are Cauchy-Euler equations? For the ones that are, write the indicial equation. Do not solve.
(a) x2y′′+5xy′+3y=0 (b) x2y′′+5y′+3y=0 (c) 3x2y′′−xy′+y=0
Recall Solution L1.1
The signature is: power of x = order of derivative it multiplies. Look at each term.
(a)x2y′′ (power 2, order 2 ✓), 5xy′ (power 1, order 1 ✓), 3y (power 0, order 0 ✓). Yes. Here a=1,b=5,c=3, so indicial:
m(m−1)+5m+3=0⟹m2+4m+3=0.
(b) The middle term is 5y′ — power of x is 0 but the derivative order is 1. Mismatch. Not Cauchy-Euler.
(c)3x2y′′ (✓), −xy′ (✓), y (✓). Yes.a=3,b=−1,c=1:
3m(m−1)−m+1=0⟹3m2−4m+1=0.
L1.2 Read off the indicial equation of x2y′′−7xy′+16y=0 and state which of the three cases you expect (before solving) by looking at the discriminant.
Recall Solution L1.2
Here a=1,b=−7,c=16. Indicial:
m(m−1)−7m+16=0⟹m2−8m+16=0.
The discriminant is b′2−4a′c′=(−8)2−4(1)(16)=64−64=0. A zero discriminant means one repeated root — Case 2, so a lnx is coming.
a=1,b=−2,c=−4. Indicial: m(m−1)−2m−4=m2−3m−4=0.
Factor: (m−4)(m+1)=0⇒m=4,−1. Distinct real roots → two independent powers:
y=C1x4+C2x−1
L2.2 Solve x2y′′−3xy′+4y=0 for x>0.
Recall Solution L2.2
a=1,b=−3,c=4. Indicial: m(m−1)−3m+4=m2−4m+4=(m−2)2=0⇒m=2 (double).
One power x2; the partner picks up a lnx (from the temt solution in the t=lnx world):
y=(C1+C2lnx)x2
L2.3 Solve x2y′′+xy′+y=0 for x>0.
Recall Solution L2.3
a=1,b=1,c=1. Indicial: m(m−1)+m+1=m2+1=0⇒m=±i. So α=0,β=1.
Since x±i=e±ilnx, Euler's Formula converts to real trig:
y=C1cos(lnx)+C2sin(lnx)
L3.1 Solve the initial value problem x2y′′+5xy′+4y=0, y(1)=3,y′(1)=−11, for x>0.
Recall Solution L3.1
a=1,b=5,c=4. Indicial: m(m−1)+5m+4=m2+4m+4=(m+2)2=0⇒m=−2 (repeated).
General solution: y=(C1+C2lnx)x−2.
Now apply the conditions. At x=1, ln1=0, so y(1)=C1=3.
Differentiate with the product rule:
y′=C2⋅x1⋅x−2+(C1+C2lnx)⋅(−2)x−3=[C2−2(C1+C2lnx)]x−3.
At x=1: y′(1)=C2−2C1=C2−6=−11⇒C2=−5.
y=(3−5lnx)x−2
L3.2 The equation x2y′′+xy′+4y=0 has complex roots. Find the general solution for x>0, and describe what the solution curve does as x→0+ and as x→∞.
Recall Solution L3.2
a=1,b=1,c=4. Indicial: m(m−1)+m+4=m2+4=0⇒m=±2i. So α=0,β=2.
y=C1cos(2lnx)+C2sin(2lnx)Behaviour. Because α=0 there is no growing/decaying power factor xα out front — the amplitude stays constant. The argument is 2lnx. As x→∞, lnx→∞ slowly, so the curve keeps oscillating but the oscillations get stretched out (each cycle spans a wider range of x). As x→0+, lnx→−∞, so the curve oscillates infinitely many times, packing waves ever tighter — it never settles to a limit. See the chalkboard sketch.
L3.3 Solve x2y′′−5xy′+8y=0 on x<0. (Careful: the domain is negative.)
Recall Solution L3.2 — wait, L3.3
a=1,b=−5,c=8. Indicial: m(m−1)−5m+8=m2−6m+8=(m−2)(m−4)=0⇒m=2,4.
On x>0 we would write y=C1x2+C2x4. But here x<0. A power like x1/2 or lnx would be undefined for negative x, so we protect ourselves with ∣x∣: solutions are built from ∣x∣m (and ln∣x∣ when needed).
Here the exponents 2,4 are even integers, so x2=∣x∣2 and x4=∣x∣4 anyway — but the safe general form is:
y=C1∣x∣2+C2∣x∣4=C1x2+C2x4
The habit of writing ∣x∣m matters the moment an exponent is fractional or a ln appears.
L4.1 Solve the non-homogeneous equation x2y′′−xy′+y=lnx on x>0 using the substitution t=lnx.
Recall Solution L4.1
Substitutet=lnx. From the parent note, xy′=y˙ and x2y′′=y¨−y˙ (dots are d/dt). Here a=1,b=−1,c=1, so the transformed constant-coefficient ODE is
y¨+(b−a)y˙+cy=y¨−2y˙+y=t.
(Note the right side lnx became t.)
Homogeneous part: characteristic m2−2m+1=(m−1)2=0⇒m=1 (repeated), so yh=(C1+C2t)et=(C1+C2lnx)x.
Particular part by undetermined coefficients: try yp=At+B (a first-degree polynomial matches the right side t; it does not clash with et). Then y˙p=A,y¨p=0:
0−2A+(At+B)=t⇒At+(B−2A)=t.
Match: A=1 and B−2A=0⇒B=2. So yp=t+2=lnx+2.
y=(C1+C2lnx)x+lnx+2
L4.2 Solve x2y′′−xy′−3y=x2 on x>0. Find yp by the "guess yp=Ax2" shortcut and explain why Ax2 is safe here.
Recall Solution L4.2
Homogeneous:a=1,b=−1,c=−3. Indicial: m(m−1)−m−3=m2−2m−3=(m−3)(m+1)=0⇒m=3,−1.
yh=C1x3+C2x−1.Particular: the right side is x2. Since 2 is not a root of the indicial equation (m=3,−1), the power x2 is not a homogeneous solution, so a plain guess yp=Ax2 is safe (no resonance).
Then yp′=2Ax,yp′′=2A. Substitute:
x2(2A)−x(2Ax)−3(Ax2)=(2A−2A−3A)x2=−3Ax2=x2.
So −3A=1⇒A=−31, giving yp=−31x2.
y=C1x3+C2x−1−31x2
L4.3 Solve x2y′′−xy′+y=x on x>0. Watch for resonance.
Recall Solution L4.3
Homogeneous:a=1,b=−1,c=1. Indicial: m(m−1)−m+1=m2−2m+1=(m−1)2=0⇒m=1 (repeated).
yh=(C1+C2lnx)x.Particular: the right side is x1, and m=1 is a double root of the indicial equation — double resonance. In the t-world this is like forcing et against (m−1)2, which needs t2et. Translating back, we try
yp=Ax(lnx)2.
Easiest to work in t=lnx: transformed equation is y¨−2y˙+y=et (since x=et). Try yp=At2et. Using (D−1)2[t2et]=2Aet (the two derivatives kill the polynomial down to its constant 2A term), we need 2A=1⇒A=21. So yp=21t2et=21(lnx)2x.
y=(C1+C2lnx)x+21(lnx)2x
L5.1 (Third order.) Solve x3y′′′+2x2y′′−xy′+y=0 on x>0.
Recall Solution L5.1
For third order, y=xm needs x3y′′′=m(m−1)(m−2)xm, x2y′′=m(m−1)xm, xy′=mxm, y=xm. Indicial:
m(m−1)(m−2)+2m(m−1)−m+1=0.
Expand: m(m−1)(m−2)=m3−3m2+2m; 2m(m−1)=2m2−2m. Sum with −m+1:
m3−3m2+2m+2m2−2m−m+1=m3−m2−m+1=0.
Factor by grouping: m2(m−1)−(m−1)=(m−1)(m2−1)=(m−1)2(m+1)=0.
Roots: m=1 (double), m=−1 (simple). Double root → pair x1 and (lnx)x1; simple root →x−1:
y=(C1+C2lnx)x+C3x−1
L5.2 (Reverse-engineering.) Build a second-order Cauchy-Euler equation on x>0 whose general solution is y=x3[C1cos(lnx)+C2sin(lnx)].
Recall Solution L5.2
The solution form xα[…cos(βlnx)…] tells us the roots are m=α±iβ with α=3,β=1, i.e. m=3±i.
The indicial polynomial with those roots is
(m−(3+i))(m−(3−i))=(m−3)2+1=m2−6m+10.
Now match to am2+(b−a)m+c with a=1: we need b−a=−6 and c=10, so b=−5, c=10.
x2y′′−5xy′+10y=0Check: indicial m(m−1)−5m+10=m2−6m+10=0⇒m=3±i. ✓
L5.3 (Degenerate / singular point.) Consider x2y′′−2y=0. (i) Solve it. (ii) Explain what goes wrong at x=0 and why the point x=0 is a singular point — connect this to when a series method would be needed.
Recall Solution L5.3
(i) Here a=1,b=0,c=−2. Indicial: m(m−1)−2=m2−m−2=(m−2)(m+1)=0⇒m=2,−1.
y=C1x2+C2x−1(ii) Write the ODE in standard form y′′+p(x)y′+q(x)y=0 by dividing by x2:
y′′+0⋅y′−x22y=0.
The coefficient q(x)=−2/x2blows up at x=0: the leading coefficient x2 of the original equation vanishes there, so x=0 is a singular point. Notice the solution C2x−1 literally goes to ±∞ as x→0 — you cannot pose a well-behaved initial condition atx=0.
Because x⋅p(x)=0 and x2⋅q(x)=−2 stay finite as x→0, it is a regular singular point — exactly the setting where the Frobenius method applies. In fact Cauchy-Euler is the simplest Frobenius case: the indicial equation here is the Frobenius indicial equation, and the power solutions xm are the leading terms of Frobenius series with no correction terms needed.
Recall Self-test: match the fingerprint to the case
Distinct real roots :::y=C1xm1+C2xm2, no logs.
Repeated root :::y=(C1+C2lnx)xm, one log.
Complex roots α±iβ:::y=xα[C1cos(βlnx)+C2sin(βlnx)].
Right side xr with r a simple indicial root :::yp needs an extra lnx factor.
Right side xr with r a double indicial root :::yp needs (lnx)2.