4.5.24 · D4Linear Algebra (Full)

Exercises — Cramer's rule

1,491 words7 min readBack to topic

This page is a self-test ladder. Each rung is harder and expects the rung below. Every problem has a hidden full solution — try first, then reveal. We only ever use the one machine from the parent note:

Reminders you will need (all from parent + Determinants):

  • determinant: — the "cross-product minus" pattern.
  • by Cofactor Expansion along row 1: where each is the little determinant you get by deleting that entry's row and column. The signs alternate .
Figure — Cramer's rule

L1 — Recognition

These check that you can spot the pieces: what is , what is , what is , and whether the rule even applies.

Recall Solution L1.1

The coefficients of in each row become the columns of (column 1 = the -coefficients, column 2 = the -coefficients): To find (), cover column 1 with : (Column 2 stays exactly as it was.)

Recall Solution L1.2

(a) . Rule does not apply — no unique solution. (b) . Rule applies. The condition is exactly the invertibility check.


L2 — Application

Straight computation. Get the denominator first, then each numerator.

Recall Solution L2.1

. ✓. Check: ✓, ✓. Answer .

Recall Solution L2.2

. (cofactor along row 1): Careful — recompute each minor: ; ; . So . Cramer's rule does NOT apply here. Switch to Gaussian Elimination. (This is deliberate: the trap is grinding out numerators without checking the denominator.)


L3 — Analysis

Now reason about signs, quadrants of sign-combinations, and degenerate cases.

Recall Solution L3.1

. (row 1): . : , ; . : , ; . : , ; . Check: ✓, ✓, ✓. Answer .

Recall Solution L3.2

, . Sign logic: numerator and denominator have opposite signs ( over ), so the ratio is negative. A determinant is a signed volume — the sign flips when the column-box's orientation flips. just means covering column 2 with collapses that box flat, giving ; the original box , so the system is still fine.


L4 — Synthesis

Combine Cramer with a parameter, or with another concept.

Recall Solution L4.1

, . Fails when or . When it works (): , so . By symmetry , so . Answer: for . (At both equations become — infinitely many solutions. At they contradict — none. Cramer correctly refuses both.)

Recall Solution L4.2

The first column of solves (because , so ). . , . First column of is . See Matrix Inverse.


L5 — Mastery

Prove/generalise, and handle a fully symbolic or limiting case.

Recall Solution L5.1

As , , so we're dividing by a vanishing volume.

  • (e.g. ): , growing to .
  • (e.g. ): , going to . The solution blows up, exactly the numerical instability the parent warns about: near-zero makes enormous and sign-flippy. Geometrically, the two column-vectors become nearly parallel, so the box is nearly flat and a small change in demands a huge mix.
Recall Solution L5.2

, . Verify equation 1: ✓. Verify equation 2: ✓. Both hold identically — this is the parent's made concrete for . This alternating cancellation is the fingerprint of Multilinear and Alternating Maps.

Recall Solution L5.3

. (row 1): . : , ; . : , ; . : , ; . Check eq 1: ✓. Answer: .


Connections