Yeh page ek self-test ladder hai. Har rung pichle se harder hai aur expect karta hai ki aapne pichla kar liya ho. Har problem ka ek hidden full solution hai — pehle khud try karo, phir reveal karo. Hum sirf wahi ek machine use karte hain jo parent note mein hai:
Reminders jo tumhe chahiye honge (sab parent + Determinants se):
3×3 ka Cofactor Expansion row 1 ke along: a11M11−a12M12+a13M13 jahan har M woh chhota 2×2 determinant hai jo us entry ki row aur column delete karne par milta hai. Signs alternate hote hain +,−,+.
Yeh check karte hain ki tum pieces ko spot kar sako: A kya hai, b kya hai, Ai kya hai, aur rule apply bhi hota hai ya nahi.
Recall Solution L1.1
Har row mein x,y ke coefficients A ke columns ban jaate hain (column 1 = x-coefficients, column 2 = y-coefficients):
A=(312−1),b=(71).x find karne ke liye (i=1), column 1 ko b se cover karo:
A1=(712−1).
(Column 2 bilkul waise hi rehta hai jaise tha.)
A=121253132,b=4138.
detA (row 1 ke along cofactor):
11(5⋅2−3⋅3)−21(2⋅2−3⋅1)+11(2⋅3−5⋅1)=1−2+1=0?
Dhyan se — har minor recompute karo: 5⋅2−3⋅3=10−9=1; 2⋅2−3⋅1=4−3=1; 2⋅3−5⋅1=6−5=1. Toh detA=1(1)−2(1)+1(1)=0.
detA=0 → Cramer's rule yahan APPLY NAHI HOTA.Gaussian Elimination par switch karo.
(Yeh deliberate hai: trap yeh hai ki denominator check kiye bina numerators grind karte raho.)
x=detAdetA1=−412=−3, y=detAdetA2=−40=0.
Sign logic: numerator aur denominator ke opposite signs hain (+ over −), toh ratio negative hai. Ek determinant ek signed volume hai — sign tab flip hota hai jab column-box ki orientation flip hoti hai. detA2=0 ka bas matlab hai ki column 2 ko b se cover karne par woh box flat collapse ho jaata hai, jisse y=0 milta hai; original box detA=0 hai, toh system bilkul theek hai.
Cramer ko ek parameter ke saath combine karo, ya kisi aur concept ke saath.
Recall Solution L4.1
A=(k11k), detA=k2−1=(k−1)(k+1).
Fail hota hai jabdetA=0⇒k=1 ya k=−1.
Jab kaam karta hai (k=±1):
detA1=det(111k)=k−1, toh x=k2−1k−1=(k−1)(k+1)k−1=k+11.
Symmetry se detA2=det(k111)=k−1, toh y=k+11.
Answer:x=y=k+11 for k=±1.
(At k=1 dono equations x+y=1 ban jaati hain — infinitely many solutions. At k=−1 woh contradict karte hain — koi nahi. Cramer dono ko correctly refuse karta hai.)
Recall Solution L4.2
A−1 ka first column Ax=e1=(10) solve karta hai (kyunki AA−1=I, toh A×(col 1)=col 1 of I).
detA=(2)(2)−(1)(3)=1.
x=1det(1012)=12=2, y=1det(2310)=1−3=−3.
A−1 ka first column (2−3) hai. Dekho Matrix Inverse.
Prove/generalise karo, aur ek fully symbolic ya limiting case handle karo.
Recall Solution L5.1
Jab k→−1, detA=(k−1)(k+1)→0, toh hum ek vanishing volume se divide kar rahe hain.
k→−1+ (jaise k=−0.9): x=0.11=+10, +∞ ki taraf badh raha hai.
k→−1− (jaise k=−1.1): x=−0.11=−10, −∞ ki taraf ja raha hai.
Solution blow up hota hai, bilkul wahi numerical instability jo parent warn karta hai: near-zero detA se xi enormous aur sign-flippy ho jaata hai. Geometrically, dono column-vectors almost parallel ho jaate hain, toh box almost flat hai aur b mein ek chhoti si change ke liye bahut bada mix chahiye.
Recall Solution L5.2
A=(acbd), detA=ad−bc.
x=ad−bcdet(efbd)=ad−bced−bf,y=ad−bcdet(acef)=ad−bcaf−ce.Equation 1 verify karo:ax+by=ad−bca(ed−bf)+b(af−ce)=ad−bcaed−abf+abf−bce=ad−bce(ad−bc)=e ✓.
Equation 2 verify karo:cx+dy=ad−bcc(ed−bf)+d(af−ce)=ad−bcced−bcf+adf−cde=ad−bcf(ad−bc)=f ✓.
Dono identically hold karte hain — yahi parent ka detA⋅xi=detAi hai, n=2 ke liye concrete banaya gaya. Yeh alternating cancellation Multilinear and Alternating Maps ka fingerprint hai.