Exercises — Coordinate vectors — change of basis
Quick symbol reminder, so nothing appears before it is named:
Level 1 — Recognition
Exercise 1.1
In take with , . A vector has coordinate vector . What is the plain vector (in the standard basis)?
Recall Solution
WHAT: the coordinate vector is a recipe. It says: take copies of and copies of . WHY: by the very definition . Equivalently with . Same answer: .
Exercise 1.2
For the same , you are given the plain vector . Find by inspection.
Recall Solution
WHAT: we want how many 's and 's rebuild . WHY inspection works here: only touches the -slot, only the -slot (a diagonal basis). So they don't interfere.
- : .
- : . Check: . ✓
Level 2 — Application
Exercise 2.1
with , . Find for .
Recall Solution
WHAT: solve , i.e. . WHY and not : turns recipe→plain; we have plain and want recipe, so we run it backwards with the inverse. is invertible because its columns are linearly independent (they're not multiples of each other). Check: . ✓ .
The figure below shows reached by walking steps of then step of .

Exercise 2.2
Two non-standard bases: as in 2.1, and with , . Build , then use it on the vector from 2.1 (which had ).
Recall Solution
WHAT: use . WHY this order: read right to left — turns -numbers into standard numbers, then turns standard into -numbers. The inner "standard" cancels, leaving . Now apply to : Sanity check with the plain vector : . ✓ .
Level 3 — Analysis
Exercise 3.1 (polynomials)
In (degree polynomials) let and . Find for .
Recall Solution
WHAT: find with . WHY match top-down: the highest-degree basis vector is the only one carrying , so its coefficient is forced first; then ; then the constant. This is triangular — one unknown per step. Expand . Collect:
- : .
- : .
- const: . Check: . ✓
Exercise 3.2
Still in . Build the full matrix (columns = ), and confirm it reproduces the answer of 3.1 when applied to .
Recall Solution
WHAT: each column is an old basis vector written in . So express using . WHY: by the parent formula, column of is .
- , so .
- : solve . Top-down: gives ; gives ; const . So .
- : . Using the previous line for : — cleaner to solve directly. Set : gives ; gives ; const . So . Apply to : Matches 3.1. ✓ Notice the matrix is upper-triangular — exactly because 's -th vector has degree , so low-degree 's never need high-degree 's.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Exercise 4.1 (chained changes, three bases)
In : with columns ; with columns ; with columns . Show that , and compute the product.
Recall Solution
WHAT: change , then , and check it equals going directly. WHY it must hold: translating dictionaries compose. Numerically each is , and the middle basis cancels: . Product: Direct route: Identical. ✓ .
Exercise 4.2 (transformation in two bases — similarity)
A linear map has standard matrix . Let have columns , . Find the matrix of in the -basis, i.e. .
Recall Solution
WHAT: to apply using -numbers, first convert standard (), apply , then convert standard (). Reading right to left: . WHY this is a similarity: and describe the same map through different rulers, so they are similar via the change-of-basis matrix . — diagonal! The new basis happens to be the eigenvector basis, so just stretches each axis. (Trace and determinant are preserved from , as similarity guarantees.)
Level 5 — Mastery
Exercise 5.1 (prove the shortcut)
Prove that in , if and hold the bases as columns, then . Then explain in one line why is guaranteed invertible.
Recall Solution
WHAT/WHY, step by step.
- For any , its plain (standard) form is recovered from -coordinates by . Why: the columns of are the , so , the definition of a coordinate vector.
- Likewise .
- Set them equal: . Why we can: both express the same invariant arrow .
- Multiply on the left by : .
- This holds for every , so the matrix that sends is exactly . That matrix is by definition.
Why is invertible: its columns are a basis, hence linearly independent, hence has full rank, hence invertible. Same for .
Exercise 5.2 (degenerate / edge cases)
(a) What is (same basis both sides)? (b) If (the standard basis), what does reduce to? (c) A student proposes using the vectors as a "basis." Why does the whole change-of-basis machinery break?
Recall Solution
(a) Same ruler in and out changes nothing, so . Formula-check: . ✓
(b) For the standard basis , so and . Meaning: to read -numbers as ordinary numbers you just multiply by . This is the "standard-basis shortcut" from the parent note.
(c) , so the two vectors are linearly dependent — they only span a line, not all of . Consequences that each break the machinery:
- Not a basis: vectors off that line have no expansion at all, so may not exist.
- No uniqueness: vectors on the line have infinitely many expansions, so the coordinate vector isn't well-defined.
- not invertible: , so (needed for ) doesn't exist.
All three are the same fact seen three ways: a valid basis must be linearly independent.
Wrap-up recall
Recall One-line answers (cover them)
- Plain vector from coordinates? ::: .
- Coordinates from plain vector? ::: .
- matrix in ? ::: .
- Chain ? ::: multiply .
- Map in new basis? ::: (a similarity).
- Why must a basis be independent? ::: else coordinates fail to exist or fail to be unique, and isn't invertible.