Before you can trust the sentence "every basis has the same number of vectors", you must know what a vector, a vector space, a linear combination, independence, spanning, a basis, and cardinality actually are — as pictures, not just words. We build them in the order they depend on each other.
We write vectors with lowercase letters like v, w. In the plane R2 ("all pairs of real numbers") a vector is a pair (x,y): walk x steps right, then y steps up, plant the arrow tip there.
Why the topic needs it. The whole theorem counts vectors in a basis. If you don't picture the object being counted, nothing that follows means anything.
The symbol ∑ ("sigma") is shorthand for "add all of these up": ∑i=1naiwi means exactly the sum above. The subscript i is just a counter running from 1 to n.
Why the topic needs it. The exchange lemma's very first step writes v1=a1w1+⋯+anwn. That line is a linear combination. Every proof step rearranges one.
The symbol ∈ means "is a member of": v∈V reads "v is a vector in the space V". The symbol ⊆ means "is a subset of": S⊆V reads "S is a collection of vectors all living inside V".
Why the topic needs it. Steinitz says "independent ≤spanning". The spanning set provides the slots that get filled. No notion of spanning, no lemma.
The symbol ⟹ means "forces" / "implies": the left statement being true forces the right statement to be true.
Why the topic needs it. In the lemma's key step, independence is exactly what guarantees "some coefficient on a leftover w is nonzero", so a swap is always possible. See Linear Independence.
Why the topic needs it. The theorem measures the size of a basis. A basis plays both roles — independent AND spanning — which is why the exchange lemma can be applied to it in both directions. See Basis of a Vector Space and Spanning Sets.