Question bank — Lines and planes in 3D — vector equations
Quick symbol reminder before we start (so nothing appears un-earned):
- = position vector of a general point (an arrow from the origin to some point in space).
- = position vector of a fixed known point on the object.
- = a direction vector — an arrow saying "walk this way"; only its direction matters, not where it's drawn.
- = a normal — an arrow pointing straight out of a plane, perpendicular to it.
- = parameters — dials you turn to slide along the object.
- = dot product; = cross product.

True or false — justify
Recall T/F items (cover the answers)
The lines and are different lines. ::: False. Doubling the direction only changes how fast the dial moves you, not which points you reach. The set of points is identical, so it's the same line. Two lines with parallel direction vectors must be the same line. ::: False. Parallel directions make them parallel lines, but they can be shifted apart (like two rails). They coincide only if they also share at least one point. A single linear equation like describes a line in 3D. ::: False. In 3D one linear equation pins down one degree of freedom, leaving a 2D flat sheet — a plane. A line in 3D needs two such equations (or one vector equation). The vector passes through the origin for some only if the origin lies on the line. ::: True. Reaching the origin means has a solution ; that solution exists exactly when the origin is a point of the line — it isn't guaranteed. In , scaling the whole equation by gives a different plane. ::: False. has the same solution set; the normal just doubled in length, still pointing the same way. Same plane. The parametric plane requires and to be perpendicular. ::: False. They only need to be non-parallel so they span two genuinely different directions. Skewed (non-perpendicular) spanning vectors still sweep out the whole plane. The distance from a point to a plane can be negative. ::: False. Distance is a length, so the formula uses absolute value with . The unsigned quantity can be negative — it only tells you which side of the plane you're on. If a line's direction vector is , the line is horizontal (constant height ). ::: True. The -component of is , so walking along the line never changes . Every point sits at whatever fixed height started at. Every point in a plane satisfies , and only plane points do. ::: True. In-plane displacements are perpendicular to (dot ); any point off the plane gives a displacement with a nonzero component along , so the dot product isn't zero.
Spot the error
Recall Find and fix the mistake
"Plane , so its normal is ." ::: The normal is only — the coefficients of . The is the constant ; it slides the plane along the normal but carries no direction, so it can't be part of the normal vector. "Line through and : symmetric form ." ::: You may never divide by . Since has , write separately and use symmetric form only for and : . "To get the plane's normal from spanning vectors , compute ." ::: The dot product returns a number, not a direction. The normal must be a vector perpendicular to both and , which is exactly what (the cross product) produces — see the perpendicular arrow in Figure s02. "Line and plane are parallel because the line's direction equals the plane's normal." ::: That's backwards. If the direction equals the normal, the line pierces the plane at a right angle. A line is parallel to a plane when its direction is perpendicular to the normal (dot product zero). "Point–to–line distance ." ::: The numerator must be a magnitude: . A cross product is a vector; distance is a single non-negative number, so you take its length. "The point lies on plane ? Check: ." ::: Arithmetic slip: , not . It equals , so does lie on the plane — as it must, since the plane was built through .
Why questions
Recall Reasoning behind the machinery
Why does the line equation separate a point from a direction instead of using slope like ? ::: Slope divides by a run and breaks for vertical lines; splitting position from direction avoids division entirely and works in any dimension, including 3D where "slope" isn't even well-defined. Why does the normal form capture a whole 2D plane with just one equation? ::: One dot-product-equals-zero condition removes exactly one degree of freedom (the "how far along " direction), leaving the two in-plane freedoms intact — precisely a plane. Why do we use the cross product, not the dot product, to build a plane's normal? ::: We need a vector perpendicular to two given directions at once. The cross product is defined to output exactly that orthogonal vector (Figure s02); the dot product outputs a scalar and can't point anywhere. Why does dividing by give the perpendicular distance to a line? ::: The cross product's length is the parallelogram area (Figure s01). Dividing out leaves , which is exactly the perpendicular height from to the line. Why does the point–to–plane formula divide by ? ::: You must measure how far the displacement projects along a unit normal; dividing by its own length turns it into , so is a true length, not scaled by 's size. Why is a line through two points written so convenient? ::: The weights and always sum to , so lands on , lands on , and traces exactly the segment between them. Why can two different pairs describe the same line? ::: A line is a set of points, not a formula. Any point on it works as , and any scalar multiple of the direction works as , so infinitely many descriptions give one geometric object.
Edge cases
Recall Degenerate and boundary situations
What happens to the vector equation of a line if ? ::: It collapses: every gives the single point . A zero direction has no "way to walk," so you get a point, not a line — that's why the definition demands . What if you try to build a plane with parallel to ? ::: Both spanning arrows point the same way, so combinations only sweep out a line, not a plane. Their cross product signals the failure — no normal exists. Can three points fail to determine a plane? ::: Yes — if the three points are collinear (all on one line), infinitely many planes contain that line. Then and are parallel and . What does the point–to–line distance formula give when lies on the line? ::: is then parallel to , so and the cross product is . Distance — correctly, the point is on the line. What does mean in the plane-distance formula (with )? ::: The point satisfies the plane equation exactly, so it lies on the plane and its distance is . The sign of that expression (when nonzero) tells you which side you're on. If a plane passes through the origin, what is its constant ? ::: with gives . So the equation is — a plane through the origin always has zero constant term. A line lies entirely within a plane — what must be true of the line's direction and the plane's normal ? ::: (direction perpendicular to normal, so the line doesn't rise out of the plane) and one point of the line satisfies the plane equation. Both conditions are needed; the first alone only makes them parallel.
Connections
- Lines and planes in 3D — vector equations — the parent these traps stress-test.
- Vectors and scalar (dot) product — powers every "dot to zero" and side-of-plane check.
- Cross product — the "why not dot product for the normal" items.
- Vector projection — the engine behind both distance formulas.
- Intersection of lines and planes — the line-inside-a-plane edge case.
- Systems of linear equations — why one equation ≠ a line in 3D.
- Parametrisation and parameters — why many describe one line.
#flashcards/maths