Now combine the operations and produce quantities you'll actually use.
Recall Solution 2.1
WHAT: scale each vector, then subtract. WHY: subtraction is just adding the negative scaling (u−v=u+(−v), from the cheat-sheet).
2u=(2,4),21v=(2,−1).2u−21v=(2−2,4−(−1))=(0,5).
Recall Solution 2.2
WHAT: divide by the length. WHY: dividing by ∥a∥ rescales to length 1 without rotating.
First check a=0 so the division is legal: here a=(3,−4)=0. ✓
∥a∥=32+(−4)2=25=5,a^=51(3,−4)=(0.6,−0.8).
Check: 0.62+(−0.8)2=0.36+0.64=1=1. ✓
Recall Solution 2.3
WHAT: multiply matching components and sum. WHY: the dot product weighs how much the two arrows align.
u⋅v=2⋅4+(−1)⋅0+3⋅(−2)=8+0−6=2.
Here the numbers must be interpreted: angles, perpendicularity, and what the sign of a dot product tells you.
The figure below shows Exercise 3.1. What to observe: the black arrow b=(1,0) lies flat
along the horizontal x-axis, while the red arrow a=(1,1) climbs the diagonal. The small
red arc between them is the angle θ. Notice the red arrow sits exactly halfway between the
x-axis and straight up — that visual "halfway" is precisely the 45∘ we compute.
Recall Solution 3.1
WHAT: use cosθ=∥a∥∥b∥a⋅b.
WHY this tool: the dot product is the only operation that packages the angle into arithmetic — we rearrange its geometric form to isolate θ.
a⋅b=1⋅1+1⋅0=1,∥a∥=2,∥b∥=1.cosθ=2⋅11=21⇒θ=45∘.WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE: exactly the red arrow of the figure above — halfway between flat and vertical, hence 45∘.
Recall Solution 3.2
WHAT: compute the dot product and read its sign. WHY: perpendicularity is exactly the statement u⋅v=0, and the sign otherwise reports whether the angle is acute or obtuse.
u⋅v=3⋅4+(−2)⋅6=12−12=0.
Zero ⇒perpendicular (u⊥v). Because cosθ=∥u∥∥v∥u⋅v and the norms are positive, the sign of the dot product is the sign of cosθ:
Dot >0: cosθ>0, so θ<90∘ — arrows lean the same way.
Dot =0: θ=90∘ — a right angle.
Dot <0: cosθ<0, so θ>90∘ — arrows lean apart (obtuse).
Recall Solution 3.3
WHAT: apply the same cosθ formula, now expecting a negative cosine. WHY: the dot product came out negative, which by the sign rule of 3.2 forces an obtuse angle — we still solve for θ the same way.
p⋅q=1⋅(−1)+0+0=−1,∥p∥=1,∥q∥=(−1)2+12=2.cosθ=1⋅2−1=−21⇒θ=135∘.
The negative dot product forces an obtuse angle — the arrows point into different half-planes.
Combine addition, norms, and dot products in one chain of reasoning.
The figure below illustrates Exercise 4.1. What to observe: the four black arrows form a
parallelogram with sides u and v. The red solid arrow is one diagonal
u+v; the red dashed segment is the other diagonal u−v (running
between the tips of u and v). The parallelogram law says: square those two red
diagonals, add them, and you get exactly twice the squared sides — watch the red objects, they are
the whole point.
Recall Solution 4.1
WHAT: compute both diagonals of the parallelogram and both sides. WHY: the law says the two diagonals' squared lengths together equal twice the two sides' squared lengths.
u+v=(4,1)⇒∥u+v∥2=16+1=17.u−v=(−2,3)⇒∥u−v∥2=4+9=13.
Left side: 17+13=30.
∥u∥2=1+4=5,∥v∥2=9+1=10⇒2(5)+2(10)=30.
Both sides equal 30. ✓ WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE: the two red diagonals of the parallelogram in the figure above, u+v (short, solid) and u−v (dashed), balance against its four equal black sides.
Recall Solution 4.2
WHAT: set the dot product to zero. WHY: perpendicular ⟺ dot =0.
a⋅b=3t+2t=5t=0⇒t=0.
So a=(0,2) (straight up) and b=(3,0) (straight right) — indeed a right angle. Only t=0 works.
Recall Solution 4.3
WHAT: use ∥cu∥=∣c∣∥u∥. WHY: scaling by c multiplies length by ∣c∣ (the absolute value, since flipping doesn't change length).
∥u∥=5,∣c∣⋅5=15⇒∣c∣=3⇒c=3 or c=−3.
Both are valid: c=3 keeps the direction, c=−3 reverses it — same length either way.
One extended problem weaving the whole chapter together.
Recall Solution 5.1
WHAT we're doing: splitting u into a piece along v and a piece square to it — a first taste of Projections and Orthogonal Decomposition.
WHY this works: the parallel piece is a scaling of v, and the right scaling is picked so the leftover is perpendicular. The dot product is the exact tool that measures "how much of u lies along v."
Step 0 — legality check. We are about to divide by v⋅v=∥v∥2, so we need v=0. Here v=(1,3)=0, so the projection is well-defined. (Projecting onto 0 would be meaningless — 0 points nowhere.)
Step 1 — the parallel part. Write p=kv for some scalar k (parallel means "a scaled copy"). The formula that makes the remainder perpendicular is
k=v⋅vu⋅v.
Compute:
u⋅v=2⋅1+1⋅3=5,v⋅v=12+32=10.k=105=21,p=21(1,3)=(21,23).
Step 2 — the perpendicular part. Whatever is left over (using subtraction u−p=u+(−p)):
q=u−p=(2−21,1−23)=(23,−21).
Step 3 — (b) verify perpendicularity.q⋅v=23⋅1+(−21)⋅3=23−23=0.✓
And p+q=(21+23,23−21)=(2,1)=u. ✓
WHY the choice of k was forced: we insisted the leftover q=u−kv be perpendicular to v, i.e. q⋅v=0. Expand that requirement using the dot product's distributive rule:
(u−kv)⋅v=u⋅v−k(v⋅v)=0.
Solving the single unknown k gives k=v⋅vu⋅v — this is the only value that makes the leftover square to v. Any other k would leave a nonzero dot product, so q would not be perpendicular. (Note v⋅v=0 because v=0 — the same legality check as Step 0.)
Recall Solution 5.2
WHY this should hold:p and q meet at a right angle, so they form a right triangle with u as the hypotenuse — Pythagoras applies.
∥u∥2=22+12=5.∥p∥2=(21)2+(23)2=41+49=410=2.5.∥q∥2=(23)2+(−21)2=49+41=2.5.∥p∥2+∥q∥2=2.5+2.5=5=∥u∥2.✓