4.4.27 · D4Multivariable Calculus

Exercises — Line integrals — scalar and vector, work done

1,625 words7 min readBack to topic

Before we start, a one-line reminder of the two tools you will keep reaching for.

Figure — Line integrals — scalar and vector, work done

Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: pick the right tool and set up the integral. No cleverness yet.

Problem 1.1

A wire follows for with constant density . Its total mass is just its length. Find that length.

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT tool? Density spread along a wire → scalar line integral. With this is Arc length.

  • Velocity: differentiate each component. .
  • Speed: . Why this step? converts a step in into a step in length.
  • Sanity: the curve is a straight segment from to , whose ordinary distance is . ✓

Problem 1.2

For (a constant force) and the straight path , , set up and evaluate .

Recall Solution 1.2

WHAT tool? A force dragging along a path → vector line integral (work).

  • .
  • — constant, so no substitution needed.
  • Dot product: . Why dot? Only the part of along the motion does work.

Level 2 — Application

Goal: substitute a genuine parametrisation and integrate.

Problem 2.1

Density along the quarter unit circle , . Find the mass.

Recall Solution 2.1
  • , so . Unit circle → unit speed.
  • . Substitute the parametrisation into the density.
  • Mass

Problem 2.2

along , . Find the work .

Recall Solution 2.2
  • .
  • .
  • .

Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: reason about what changes when the setup changes — orientation, speed, parametrisation.

Problem 3.1 (orientation)

For , compute the work along the reversed parabola: from to , i.e. , . Compare with Problem 2.2.

Recall Solution 3.1
  • . Chain rule on each component.
  • .
  • Dot: .
  • Let , ; as , . So , exactly the negative of Problem 2.2. Why? Reversing orientation flips , hence flips the whole dot-product integral.

Problem 3.2 (reparametrisation invariance of scalar integrals)

Redo Problem 2.1's mass but walk the quarter circle twice as fast: , . Show the mass is unchanged.

Recall Solution 3.2
  • , so . Twice the speed.
  • .
  • Mass . Substitute , : Same answer, . Why? The extra speed factor is exactly cancelled by covering the arc in half the -interval — is the same physical length either way.

Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: combine the tool with a bigger idea — conservative fields and the Fundamental Theorem.

Problem 4.1

Show that is conservative by finding a potential with , then use the Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals to compute the work along any path from to .

Recall Solution 4.1

Find . We need and .

  • Integrate the first in : .
  • Differentiate in : ; match to constant. Take .
  • Check via Gradient and conservative fields: . ✓ Apply the theorem. For a conservative field, . Why is this legal for any path? Because the work depends only on endpoints — a direct consequence of .

Problem 4.2

Verify Problem 4.1's answer directly along the straight segment , .

Recall Solution 4.2
  • .
  • .
  • Dot: .
  • . ✓ Matches the endpoint computation.

Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: a closed-curve computation, two ways, revealing when the shortcut collapses.

Problem 5.1

Let . Compute the work around the full unit circle counterclockwise, , . Then explain, using Green's Theorem, why a conservative field would have given .

Recall Solution 5.1

Direct computation.

  • .
  • .
  • Dot: .

Green's Theorem check. For a positively oriented closed curve bounding region , Here , so . Thus ✓ Same .

Why nonzero? A conservative field returns to the same potential value after a loop, giving . Here , so is not conservative — the loop genuinely does of net work. This is the swirling "rotation" field.

Problem 5.2 (mastery of the two-readings identity)

For on the same circle, verify by computing the right-hand side.

Recall Solution 5.2
  • Unit tangent: .
  • . The field is entirely tangential here — it points exactly along the motion, magnitude .
  • , so ✓ Identical, as promised by .
Figure — Line integrals — scalar and vector, work done

Recall

Recall Rapid self-test
  • Which integral did you use for "mass of a wire"? → scalar .
  • Reversing the curve changed which of your answers? → only the vector/work integral (P3.1, sign flip).
  • Speeding up the parametrisation changed the mass? → no (P3.2), is invariant.
  • The shortcut needs what condition? → conservative.
  • Why wasn't the loop of zero? → curl ; not conservative.

Connections