Exercises — Line integrals — scalar and vector, work done
Before we start, a one-line reminder of the two tools you will keep reaching for.

Level 1 — Recognition
Goal: pick the right tool and set up the integral. No cleverness yet.
Problem 1.1
A wire follows for with constant density . Its total mass is just its length. Find that length.
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT tool? Density spread along a wire → scalar line integral. With this is Arc length.
- Velocity: differentiate each component. .
- Speed: . Why this step? converts a step in into a step in length.
- Sanity: the curve is a straight segment from to , whose ordinary distance is . ✓
Problem 1.2
For (a constant force) and the straight path , , set up and evaluate .
Recall Solution 1.2
WHAT tool? A force dragging along a path → vector line integral (work).
- .
- — constant, so no substitution needed.
- Dot product: . Why dot? Only the part of along the motion does work.
Level 2 — Application
Goal: substitute a genuine parametrisation and integrate.
Problem 2.1
Density along the quarter unit circle , . Find the mass.
Recall Solution 2.1
- , so . Unit circle → unit speed.
- . Substitute the parametrisation into the density.
- Mass
Problem 2.2
along , . Find the work .
Recall Solution 2.2
- .
- .
- .
Level 3 — Analysis
Goal: reason about what changes when the setup changes — orientation, speed, parametrisation.
Problem 3.1 (orientation)
For , compute the work along the reversed parabola: from to , i.e. , . Compare with Problem 2.2.
Recall Solution 3.1
- . Chain rule on each component.
- .
- Dot: .
- Let , ; as , . So , exactly the negative of Problem 2.2. Why? Reversing orientation flips , hence flips the whole dot-product integral.
Problem 3.2 (reparametrisation invariance of scalar integrals)
Redo Problem 2.1's mass but walk the quarter circle twice as fast: , . Show the mass is unchanged.
Recall Solution 3.2
- , so . Twice the speed.
- .
- Mass . Substitute , : Same answer, . Why? The extra speed factor is exactly cancelled by covering the arc in half the -interval — is the same physical length either way.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Goal: combine the tool with a bigger idea — conservative fields and the Fundamental Theorem.
Problem 4.1
Show that is conservative by finding a potential with , then use the Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals to compute the work along any path from to .
Recall Solution 4.1
Find . We need and .
- Integrate the first in : .
- Differentiate in : ; match to ⇒ ⇒ constant. Take .
- Check via Gradient and conservative fields: . ✓ Apply the theorem. For a conservative field, . Why is this legal for any path? Because the work depends only on endpoints — a direct consequence of .
Problem 4.2
Verify Problem 4.1's answer directly along the straight segment , .
Recall Solution 4.2
- .
- .
- Dot: .
- . ✓ Matches the endpoint computation.
Level 5 — Mastery
Goal: a closed-curve computation, two ways, revealing when the shortcut collapses.
Problem 5.1
Let . Compute the work around the full unit circle counterclockwise, , . Then explain, using Green's Theorem, why a conservative field would have given .
Recall Solution 5.1
Direct computation.
- .
- .
- Dot: .
Green's Theorem check. For a positively oriented closed curve bounding region , Here , so . Thus ✓ Same .
Why nonzero? A conservative field returns to the same potential value after a loop, giving . Here , so is not conservative — the loop genuinely does of net work. This is the swirling "rotation" field.
Problem 5.2 (mastery of the two-readings identity)
For on the same circle, verify by computing the right-hand side.
Recall Solution 5.2
- Unit tangent: .
- . The field is entirely tangential here — it points exactly along the motion, magnitude .
- , so ✓ Identical, as promised by .

Recall
Recall Rapid self-test
- Which integral did you use for "mass of a wire"? → scalar .
- Reversing the curve changed which of your answers? → only the vector/work integral (P3.1, sign flip).
- Speeding up the parametrisation changed the mass? → no (P3.2), is invariant.
- The shortcut needs what condition? → conservative.
- Why wasn't the loop of zero? → curl ; not conservative.
Connections
- Arc length — Problem 1.1 is exactly .
- Dot product — every vector integral above.
- Parametric curves — every .
- Gradient and conservative fields — Problems 4.1–4.2.
- Fundamental Theorem for Line Integrals — the endpoint shortcut.
- Green's Theorem — Problem 5.1.