Throughout, the Jacobian determinant of a map T:(u,v)↦(x,y) is
∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(xuyuxvyv)=xuyv−xvyu,
and the change-of-variables rule replaces the tiny old area dxdy by
dxdy=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)dudv.
Here xu means "the partial derivative of x with respect to u" — how fast x moves when you nudge u and hold v fixed. That is all the machinery we need.
The four partials are xu=3,xv=0,yu=0,yv=5.
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(3005)=3⋅5−0⋅0=15.What it looks like: a unit square in uv becomes a 3×5 rectangle in xy — area 15 times bigger. The scaling factor is ∣J∣=∣15∣=15.
Recall Solution 1.2
The polar Jacobian is r (derived in the parent note). At r=2 it equals 2: a polar cell at radius 2 has twice the area of the same drdθ box at radius 1. The farther out, the fatter the wedge — see the Polar Coordinates picture.
Recall Solution 1.3
(a) J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(111−1)=−2=0 everywhere — valid.
(b) J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(2u001)=2u, which is 0 at u=0. The map also fails to be one-to-one there (u and −u give the same x). Invalid at u=0. A zero Jacobian means the little cell got squashed flat — see the Inverse Function Theorem.
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(cosvsinv−usinvucosv)=ucos2v+usin2v=u.Why the collapse:cos2v+sin2v=1, so everything folds to u. Hence dxdy=ududv, exactly the rdrdθ of the parent note.
Recall Solution 2.2
First the forward Jacobian (easy, since u,v are given as functions of x,y):
∂(x,y)∂(u,v)=det(2x2y−2y2x)=4x2+4y2.Why reciprocate: the theorem needs old area per new cell, i.e. ∂(x,y)/∂(u,v), and the two Jacobians are inverse matrices so their determinants multiply to 1. Therefore
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=4(x2+y2)1.
At (1,1): 4(1+1)1=81=0.125.
Recall Solution 2.3
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(2113)=6−1=5.
The unit uv-square maps onto R, so
Area=∫01∫01∣J∣dudv=∫01∫015dudv=5.
This is exactly the Determinant as Volume Scaling statement: the parallelogram's area equals ∣det∣ of the edge vectors. Answer: 5.
The four corners map to (0,0),(1,1),(2,0),(1,−1) — the parallelogram in the figure below.
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(111−1)=−2,∣J∣=2.
The parallelogram's edge vectors are a=(1,1) (image of the u-edge) and b=(1,−1) (image of the v-edge). Its area by the Cross Product and Area rule is ∣axby−aybx∣=∣1⋅(−1)−1⋅1∣=2. It matches ∣J∣ exactly, as it must.
Figure — read it like this: the left panel is the plain unit square in uv (area 1); its bottom yellow arrow is the u-edge, its left pink arrow the v-edge. The right panel is the image in xy: the yellow arrow a=(1,1) is where the u-edge landed, the pink arrow b=(1,−1) where the v-edge landed. The tilted blue parallelogram they span has area 2 — exactly ∣J∣, the number written inside it.
Recall Solution 3.2
Let JT be the Jacobian matrix of T:(u,v)↦(x,y) and JT−1 that of the inverse map. Composing T−1∘T gives the identity, so by the multivariable chain rule (which multiplies Jacobian matrices) JT−1JT=I. Taking determinants and using det(AB)=detAdetB:
detJT−1⋅detJT=detI=1.
Since these determinants are exactly ∂(u,v)/∂(x,y) and ∂(x,y)/∂(u,v), their product is 1. What it means geometrically: if T triples areas, T−1 must shrink them to a third — the stretches undo each other.
Recall Solution 3.3
At r=0 the map is not injective: every angle θ maps to the same point (0,0). The Jacobian vanishing signals the whole θ-line collapsing to one point — the cell is squashed to zero area. The theorem's hypotheses (injective, nonzero Jacobian) fail on this single line/point. But the origin is a set of area zero, so it contributes nothing to the integral; we may simply exclude it. This is the standard "measure-zero exception" — see Double Integrals over General Regions.
Invert: x=2u+v,y=2u−v. Jacobian
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(1/21/21/2−1/2)=−21,∣J∣=21.New region: the vertices give u=x+y∈[0,2] and v=x−y∈[0,2] — a clean square 0≤u≤2,0≤v≤2. Integrand x+y=u. So
∬R(x+y)dA=∫02∫02u⋅21dvdu=21∫022udu=21⋅4=2.
Answer: 2.
Recall Solution 4.2
Invert: adding/subtracting, y=2u+v,x=2v−u.
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(−1/21/21/21/2)=(−21)(21)−(21)(21)=−21,∣J∣=21.New region: the triangle's edges x=0,y=0,x+y=1 become v=u (from x=0: v−u=0), v=−u (from y=0), and v=1 (from x+y=1). Together: 0≤v≤1 and −v≤u≤v. Integrand =eu/v.
∬Re(y−x)/(y+x)dA=∫01∫−vveu/v21dudv.
Inner: ∫−vveu/vdu=v(e1−e−1). Then
21(e−e−1)∫01vdv=21(e−e−1)⋅21=4e−e−1.
Numerically 4e−e−1≈0.5875. Answer: 4e−e−1.
Figure — read it like this: the left panel is the original triangle in xy with its slanted hypotenuse x+y=1 marked in yellow. The right panel is the transformed region in uv-space: it is bounded by the two pink slanted lines u=v and u=−v (from the two legs of the triangle) and the horizontal yellow line v=1 (from the hypotenuse). We integrate u from −v to v, then v from 0 to 1 — read those limits straight off the picture.
Cylindrical: x=rcosθ,y=rsinθ,z=z. The 3D Jacobian is r (the z-row/column contribute a factor 1; see Spherical and Cylindrical Coordinates). So dV=rdrdθdz and
∭BzdV=∫02π∫01∫02zrdzdrdθ.
Integrate in stages: ∫02zdz=2; then ∫012rdr=1; then ∫02π1dθ=2π. Product =2π. Answer: 2π.
Recall Solution 5.2
The map is linear and diagonal:
J=∂(u,v,w)∂(x,y,z)=deta000b000c=abc.
Under this map the ellipsoid becomes the unit ball u2+v2+w2≤1 (volume 34π). Therefore
V=∭ball∣abc∣dudvdw=abc⋅34π=34πabc.Sanity check: setting a=b=c=R gives 34πR3, the sphere. Answer: 34πabc.
Recall Solution 5.3
J=∂(u,v)∂(x,y)=det(xuyuxvyv)=det(1100)=1⋅0−0⋅1=0.
The Jacobian is 0everywhere, not just at a point. What it looks like: the two image edge vectors ru=(1,1) and rv=(0,0) are — the second is the zero vector, so the "parallelogram" is squashed flat onto the line y=x, which has zero area. The map is not injective and the theorem does not apply; the image is a curve of area zero, and any double integral over it is 0. This is the fully degenerate cousin of the origin-in-polar case (3.3): here it fails on all of space, so there is no rescue.