Worked examples — Double integrals in polar coordinates — Jacobian r
This page is the drill floor for the parent topic. The parent proved why . Here we make sure you can survive every kind of problem an exam or the real world can throw — full-circle sweeps, angle-dependent boundaries, integrands that vanish, integrals that run to infinity, and one word problem.
Before any symbol appears, recall the only three facts you need:
Recall The three facts every example below uses
- and (a point's Cartesian coordinates from its distance and angle ).
- (Pythagoras on the little triangle the point makes with the axes).
- (the tiny curved box has area = straight side × arc side ).
Here means "how far the point is from the origin" and means "the angle swept from the positive -axis, counter-clockwise". Both are pictured in the first figure.

The scenario matrix
Every polar double-integral problem lives in one of these cells. The examples below are numbered to cover each cell at least once.
| Cell | What makes it distinct | Example |
|---|---|---|
| A. Full sweep, constant radius | , (a disk) | Ex 1 |
| B. Annulus (hole in the middle) | starts above | Ex 2 |
| C. Single quadrant / sector | in a limited range, sign of matters | Ex 3 |
| D. Angle-dependent -limit | boundary like | Ex 4 |
| E. Degenerate / zero integrand | integrand vanishes at origin or by symmetry | Ex 5 |
| F. Infinite / limiting region | , improper integral | Ex 6 |
| G. Real-world word problem | mass, average, physical units | Ex 7 |
| H. Exam twist (region "between two curves") | outer minus inner in | Ex 8 |
We march A → H.
Ex 1 — Cell A: the disk (the sanity anchor)
Forecast: you already know a disk's area is . With radius that should be . Watch the machinery reproduce it.
- Set up the region. runs from the centre out to the rim: . The angle sweeps the whole circle: . Why this step? "Full sweep, constant radius" is exactly Cell A — both limits are constants.
- Write the integral of with the Jacobian. Why the ? Because . Drop it and you'd be adding up lengths, not areas.
- Inner integral. Why inner first? The limits are constant, so we can do the -integral independently.
- Outer integral.
Verify: , matching . Units: is (length)(length) = area — correct.
Ex 2 — Cell B: the annulus (a hole in the middle)
Forecast: it's a big disk (radius 5) minus a small disk (radius 2): .
- Region. (note: starts at , not — that's the hole), . Why this step? Cell B differs from A only in the lower -limit; the origin is excluded.
- Integral.
- Inner. Why this step? Subtracting the two values is the "big disk minus small disk" idea, done automatically by the limits.
- Outer.
Verify: . ✓ (See Area of Regions Bounded by Polar Curves for the general subtraction idea.)
Ex 3 — Cell C: a single quadrant, signs matter
Forecast: is positive everywhere in the first quadrant, so the answer must be positive. Rough size: average near , area , so guess something around –.
- Convert the integrand. . Why this step? Mistake 2 from the parent — you must convert , not leave it as-is.
- Assemble with the Jacobian. Why ? One from , one from the Jacobian.
- Separate. The integrand factors into an -part and a -part: Why allowed? Because the limits are constant and the integrand is a product of a function of times a function of .
- Evaluate each. , and . Why here? In the first quadrant , so — the sign of never flips.
- Multiply. .
Verify: , positive as forecast. If we had integrated over the full disk instead, symmetry ( positive on the right, negative on the left) would cancel to — see Ex 5.
Ex 4 — Cell D: angle-dependent radius
The boundary is a full circle of radius centred at — it passes through the origin. Here the inner -limit is a function of , the trickiest exam case.

Forecast: it's a circle of radius , so its area must be .
- Find the -range. For we need , i.e. . Why this step? is a distance and cannot be negative; when the formula would demand a negative , so those angles are excluded (they'd re-trace the same circle).
- Set -limits. For each fixed , a ray from the origin enters at and leaves the circle at . So . Why this step? Cell D: the outer boundary bends with , so its value is , not a constant. Look at the red radius in the figure lengthening then shrinking as sweeps.
- Integral.
- Inner. Why does the upper limit appear squared? Because and we plug the -dependent top in.
- Outer. Use : Why the identity? has no elementary antiderivative by inspection; the double-angle identity turns it into something you can integrate.
Verify: , the area of a radius- circle. ✓
Ex 5 — Cell E: degenerate / vanishing integrand (symmetry gives )
Forecast: the disk is symmetric about the -axis. For every point with there's a mirror point with . They cancel. Predict exactly — no computation needed.
- Convert & assemble. Why factor out? Same product structure as Ex 3.
- The integral kills it. Why zero? Over a full turn spends equal time positive and negative — the signed area under one full cosine cycle is zero. This is the analytic face of the mirror-symmetry.
- Whole product = 0, regardless of the -integral's value ().
Verify: anything . Matches the symmetry forecast. This is the degenerate case: the Jacobian is present and correct, but the integrand's sign structure forces the answer to vanish.
Ex 6 — Cell F: infinite region (the Gaussian, generalised)
Forecast: the parent showed , and this double integral is that square. So predict .
- Polarise. , , region , : Why polar? The integrand depends only on distance from origin — perfect circular symmetry (Cell F meets Cell A but with an infinite radius).
- Substitute , . Why does the improper integral converge? As , faster than grows, so the tail contributes nothing — the "infinite" region has finite integral. The Jacobian is exactly the piece the substitution needs.
- Angle.
Verify: , matching the forecast and Gaussian Integral. ✓
Ex 7 — Cell G: real-world word problem (mass of a disk)
Forecast: density grows outward, so most mass sits near the rim. If density were the constant average, mass would be ; expect a value a few times . Guess "tens of kg".
- Mass = integral of density over area. Why this step? Mass is density times area, summed over the plate. Density already lives in polar form.
- Two 's again. contributes one , the Jacobian another, giving :
- Inner.
- Outer & constant.
Verify — units: , has units m³, times dimensionless ⇒ kg. ✓ Numeric: , "tens of kg" as forecast.
Ex 8 — Cell H: exam twist, region between two curves
Forecast: throughout the first quadrant, so the answer is positive. The -integral runs (Cell B/H "outer minus inner"), the -integral picks up .
- Convert integrand & assemble. , Jacobian : Why ? One from , one from the Jacobian.
- Radial part (outer minus inner). Why this step? The subtraction is the "between two curves" mechanic — big radius cubed minus small radius cubed.
- Angular part. Why positive? across the first quadrant, so everywhere — no cancellation, unlike Ex 5.
- Multiply.
Verify: , positive as forecast. ✓
Case-coverage self-check
Recall Did we hit every cell?
A (disk) ::: Ex 1 B (annulus) ::: Ex 2 C (sector, signs) ::: Ex 3 D (angle-dependent -limit) ::: Ex 4 E (degenerate / zero by symmetry) ::: Ex 5 F (infinite region) ::: Ex 6 G (word problem, units) ::: Ex 7 H (between two curves, exam twist) ::: Ex 8
Connections
- Double Integrals in Polar Coordinates — Jacobian r — the parent this drill supports.
- Change of Variables Theorem — why converting everything (Ex 3, 5, 8) is mandatory.
- Jacobian Determinant — the source of the every example carries.
- Arc Length and Radian Measure — why the arc side is .
- Gaussian Integral — Ex 6 in full.
- Area of Regions Bounded by Polar Curves — Ex 2, 4, 8 are area-style setups.
- Triple Integrals in Cylindrical and Spherical Coordinates — the next step up in dimensions.