WHAT we look at: the shape (x−a)n. The number subtracted from x is a=7, the centre.
WHY it always converges there: plug x=7. Then (x−7)n=0n=0 for every n≥1, so only the n=0 term c0 survives. A single number is a finite sum, which trivially converges.
Answer: centre a=7; guaranteed convergence at x=7 (the black dot in the opening figure).
Recall Solution L1·(b)
WHY this formula applies: the Ratio Test version R=limn→∞∣cn/cn+1∣ is valid exactly when that limit exists — and here we are handed its value.
WHAT we get:R=5. The centre is a=0 (no shift in xn), so the open interval is (0−5,0+5)=(−5,5).
Answer:R=5, open interval (−5,5). (Endpoints unknown until we know the cn.)
Step 1 — WHAT (ratio): with an=n5n(x−4)n,
anan+1=∣x−4∣n/(n5n)∣x−4∣n+1/((n+1)5n+1)=5∣x−4∣⋅n+1n.WHY this step: the ∣x−4∣n cancels leaving one factor, the 5n leaves one factor of 5, and n+1n→1.
Step 2 — from the test's conclusion to R: the limit is L=5∣x−4∣. The Ratio Test says the series converges whenever L<1 and diverges whenever L>1. So the exact set of x that converge is found by solving the inequality L<1 for the distance ∣x−4∣:
5∣x−4∣<1⟺∣x−4∣<5.
That last line is the defining condition ∣x−a∣<R of the radius, so we simply read off R=5. This is why solving L<1 hands us R: the boundary L=1 is exactly the boundary ∣x−a∣=R. Centre a=4, open interval (−1,9).
Step 3 — endpoints (substitute!):
x=9: ∑n5n5n=∑n1 — the harmonic series, a p-series with p=1: diverges.
x=−1: ∑n5n(−5)n=∑n(−1)n — by the Alternating Series Test the terms 1/n decrease to 0: converges.
Answer:R=5, interval [−1,9).
Recall Solution L2·(b)
Ratio:(2n)!xn(2n+2)!xn+1=(2n+2)(2n+1)∣x∣.WHY:(2n)!(2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1), which →∞.
For any x=0 this limit is ∞>1, so the series diverges except at x=0.
Answer:R=0; converges only at x=0.
Ratio:anan+1=∣x−1∣⋅n+1n.WHY n+1n→1: inside the root, n+1n=1+1/n1, and as n→∞ the 1/n shrinks to 0, so the fraction →1. The square root of something tending to 1 also tends to 1 (the root function is continuous at 1). Hence the ratio →∣x−1∣.
From L<1 to R: solving ∣x−1∣<1 gives R=1, centre a=1, open interval (0,2).
Endpoint x=2:(x−1)=1, giving ∑n(−1)n. Terms 1/n decrease to 0 ⇒ Alternating Series Test gives convergence. (Note: it is not absolutely convergent, since ∑1/n is a p-series with p=21<1: this is conditional.)
Endpoint x=0:(x−1)=−1, so (−1)n(x−1)n=(−1)n(−1)n=1. The series is ∑n1 — a p-series with p=21<1: diverges.
Answer:R=1, interval (0,2].
Recall Solution L3·(b)
Ratio:anan+1=3∣x+2∣⋅(n+1)2n2.WHY (n+1)2n2→1: write it as (n+1n)2=(1+1/n1)2. Since 1/n→0, the inside →1, and squaring 1 still gives 1. Hence the ratio →3∣x+2∣.
From L<1 to R: converge when 3∣x+2∣<1⟺∣x+2∣<3: R=3, centre a=−2, open interval (−5,1).
Endpoint x=1:(x+2)=3, giving ∑n23n3n=∑n21 — p-seriesp=2>1: converges.
Endpoint x=−5:(x+2)=−3, giving ∑n23n(−3)n=∑n2(−1)n — converges absolutely: converges.
Answer:R=3, interval [−5,1].
WHAT is subtle: only even powers appear, so the coefficient of x2n+1 is 0. Naively writing cn/cn+1 mixes zero and nonzero terms — dangerous. Fix: apply the Ratio Test directly to the actual terms, treating the whole x2n as the object.
x2n/4nx2(n+1)/4n+1=4∣x∣2.WHY:x2n+2/x2n=x2 and 4n+1/4n=4. Here the limit L=4∣x∣2 has no n left in it at all. Solving the test's convergence condition L<1: 4∣x∣2<1⟺∣x∣2<4⟺∣x∣<2. So R=2, centre 0, open interval (−2,2).
Sanity check via Geometric Series: the series is ∑(x2/4)n, geometric with ratio r=x2/4; it converges exactly when ∣r∣<1, i.e. ∣x2/4∣<1, i.e. ∣x∣<2 — matches.
Endpoints x=±2: ratio r=4/4=1, so each is ∑1=1+1+1+⋯ — the terms don't go to 0: diverges (divergence test).
Answer:R=2, interval (−2,2).
Recall Solution L4·(b)
Step 1 — differentiate term by term:dxdnxn=nnxn−1=xn−1. So
f′(x)=∑n=1∞xn−1=1+x+x2+⋯=∑k=0∞xk.Step 2 — WHY the radius is unchanged: this is the term-by-term differentiation theorem from Term-by-term Differentiation and Integration. Its proof rests on the Root Test master formula R1=limsupnn∣cn∣. Differentiating turns the coefficient cn into ncn (roughly), so the new radius uses limsupnnn∣cn∣. But nn→1 (the n-th root of n tends to 1, since n grows far slower than any exponential rn), so the extra factor of ndisappears in the limsup — leaving R1 exactly as before. That is precisely why differentiation preserves R. Here R=1 still, and indeed this f′ is a Geometric Series with ratio x: converges for ∣x∣<1.
Step 3 — endpoints CAN change:
x=1: ∑1=1+1+⋯ — diverges (was excluded for f too).
x=−1: ∑(−1)k=1−1+1−⋯ — partial sums oscillate, terms don't →0: diverges (was convergent for the original f!).
The lesson:f converged at x=−1 but its derivative f′ does not. Differentiation keeps R but can lose endpoints.
Answer:f′(x)=1−x1 on (−1,1); interval (−1,1).
Why the ratio fails: the ratio ∣cn+1/cn∣ is 3n1 (even→odd step) or 3n+1 (odd→even step). It oscillates between near-0 and huge — no limit exists, so R=lim∣cn/cn+1∣ has nothing to converge to.
Why the root works: the Root Test uses n∣cn∣, which is
n3n=3(n even),n1=1(n odd).
This sequence just alternates between 3 and 1 — its limit superior (the largest value it keeps returning to) is β=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣=3.
Cauchy–Hadamard:R1=β=3⇒R=31.Why limsup and not lim: the limsupalways exists in [0,∞], so it is the master tool; the ratio limit is only a convenient special case when things settle down.
Recall Solution L5·(b)
WHAT is subtle: only odd powers x2n+1 appear (the even-power coefficients are 0). As in L4·(a), we sidestep the gap by applying the Ratio Test to the actual termsan=(2n+1)!(−1)nx2n+1, treating x2n+1 as the object.
Ratio:anan+1=x2n+1/(2n+1)!x2n+3/(2n+3)!=(2n+3)(2n+2)∣x∣2.WHY:x2n+3/x2n+1=x2, and (2n+3)!(2n+1)!=(2n+3)(2n+2)1 (the extra two factorial factors sit in the denominator).
Take the limit: for every fixedx, the denominator (2n+3)(2n+2)→∞, so the whole ratio →0. Since 0<1 no matter what x is, the Ratio Test gives convergence for all real x.
Conclusion:R=∞; interval (−∞,∞). Because R=∞ there are no finite endpoints to check — the series converges everywhere (as it must, since it equals sinx, defined for all x).
Recall Solution L5·(c)
Root values:n∣cn∣ is n2n=2 on the perfect squares (n=0,1,4,9,…) and n5n=5 everywhere else.
Which value dominates the limsup? The perfect squares get rarer and rarer, but between them the value is 5 infinitely often. The limit superior is the largest value hit infinitely often, so β=5.
Cauchy–Hadamard:R1=5⇒R=51, centred at a=2; open interval (2−51,2+51)=(59,511).
Centre of ∑cn(x+3)n? ::: x=−3 (set base x+3=0).
Given lim∣cn/cn+1∣=5 and centre 0, the open interval is? ::: (−5,5).
At ∣x−a∣=R the ratio test gives limit =? ::: exactly 1 — inconclusive; test endpoints separately.
If the coefficient ratio oscillates, which formula still works? ::: 1/R=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣ (Cauchy–Hadamard / Root).
Does term-by-term differentiation change R? ::: No — R is unchanged (because nn→1), but endpoints must be re-tested.
∑x2n/4n has radius? ::: R=2; geometric with ratio x2/4.