KYA dekh rahe hain:(x−a)n ki shape. x mein se jo number ghata hai woh a=7 hai, yani centre.
WHY wahan hamesha converge karta hai:x=7 plug karo. Tab (x−7)n=0n=0 har n≥1 ke liye, isliye sirf n=0 waali term c0 bachti hai. Ek akela number finite sum hai, jo trivially converge karta hai.
Answer: centre a=7; x=7 par guaranteed convergence (opening figure mein black dot).
Recall Solution L1·(b)
WHY yeh formula apply hota hai:Ratio Test version R=limn→∞∣cn/cn+1∣tabhi valid hai jab woh limit exist kare — aur yahan uski value directly di hui hai.
KYA milta hai:R=5. Centre a=0 hai (xn mein koi shift nahin), isliye open interval (0−5,0+5)=(−5,5) hai.
Answer:R=5, open interval (−5,5). (Endpoints tab tak unknown hain jab tak cn nahin pata.)
Step 1 — KYA (ratio):an=n5n(x−4)n ke saath,
anan+1=∣x−4∣n/(n5n)∣x−4∣n+1/((n+1)5n+1)=5∣x−4∣⋅n+1n.WHY yeh step:∣x−4∣n cancel hokar ek factor bachta hai, 5n se ek factor 5 bachta hai, aur n+1n→1.
Step 2 — test ke conclusion se R tak: limit L=5∣x−4∣ hai. Ratio Test kehta hai series converge karti hai jab L<1 aur diverge karti hai jab L>1. Toh x ka woh exact set jo converge karta hai milega L<1 ki inequality ∣x−4∣ ke liye solve karke:
5∣x−4∣<1⟺∣x−4∣<5.
Yeh aakhri line hi radius ki defining condition ∣x−a∣<R hai, isliye seedha R=5 padh lete hain. Yahi wajah hai ki L<1 solve karne se R milta hai: boundary L=1 exactly ∣x−a∣=R ki boundary hai. Centre a=4, open interval (−1,9).
Step 3 — endpoints (substitute karo!):
x=9: ∑n5n5n=∑n1 — harmonic series, ek p-series jismein p=1: diverges.
x=−1: ∑n5n(−5)n=∑n(−1)n — Alternating Series Test se terms 1/n decrease hokar 0 par jaate hain: converges.
Answer:R=5, interval [−1,9).
Recall Solution L2·(b)
Ratio:(2n)!xn(2n+2)!xn+1=(2n+2)(2n+1)∣x∣.WHY:(2n)!(2n+2)!=(2n+2)(2n+1), jo →∞ hai.
Kisi bhi x=0 ke liye yeh limit ∞>1 hai, isliye series diverge karti hai sivaay x=0 ke.
Answer:R=0; sirf x=0 par converge karta hai.
Ratio:anan+1=∣x−1∣⋅n+1n.WHY n+1n→1: root ke andar n+1n=1+1/n1 hai, aur n→∞ ke saath 1/n shrink hokar 0 ho jaata hai, isliye fraction →1. Kisi cheez ka square root jo 1 ki taraf ja raha ho woh bhi 1 ki taraf jaata hai (root function 1 par continuous hai). Isliye ratio →∣x−1∣ hota hai.
L<1 se R tak:∣x−1∣<1 solve karne par R=1 milta hai, centre a=1, open interval (0,2).
Endpoint x=2:(x−1)=1, milta hai ∑n(−1)n. Terms 1/n decrease hokar 0 par jaate hain ⇒ Alternating Series Test se convergence. (Note: yeh absolutely convergent nahin hai, kyunki ∑1/n ek p-series hai jismein p=21<1: yeh conditional hai.)
Endpoint x=0:(x−1)=−1, toh (−1)n(x−1)n=(−1)n(−1)n=1. Series hai ∑n1 — ek p-series jismein p=21<1: diverges.
Answer:R=1, interval (0,2].
Recall Solution L3·(b)
Ratio:anan+1=3∣x+2∣⋅(n+1)2n2.WHY (n+1)2n2→1: isse (n+1n)2=(1+1/n1)2 likho. Kyunki 1/n→0, andar wala →1, aur 1 ko square karne par bhi 1 milta hai. Isliye ratio →3∣x+2∣ hota hai.
L<1 se R tak: converge karta hai jab 3∣x+2∣<1⟺∣x+2∣<3: R=3, centre a=−2, open interval (−5,1).
Endpoint x=1:(x+2)=3, milta hai ∑n23n3n=∑n21 — p-seriesp=2>1: converges.
Endpoint x=−5:(x+2)=−3, milta hai ∑n23n(−3)n=∑n2(−1)n — absolutely converge karta hai: converges.
Answer:R=3, interval [−5,1].
KYA subtle hai: sirf even powers aate hain, isliye x2n+1 ka coefficient 0 hai. cn/cn+1 naively likhne par zero aur nonzero terms mix ho jaate hain — dangerous. Fix:Ratio Test directly actual terms par apply karo, poore x2n ko object maan ke.
x2n/4nx2(n+1)/4n+1=4∣x∣2.WHY:x2n+2/x2n=x2 aur 4n+1/4n=4. Yahan limit L=4∣x∣2 mein koi n nahin bacha. Test ki convergence condition L<1 solve karke: 4∣x∣2<1⟺∣x∣2<4⟺∣x∣<2. Toh R=2, centre 0, open interval (−2,2).
Sanity check via Geometric Series: series ∑(x2/4)n hai, geometric with ratio r=x2/4; converge karta hai exactly jab ∣r∣<1, yaani ∣x2/4∣<1, yaani ∣x∣<2 — match karta hai.
Endpoints x=±2: ratio r=4/4=1, toh har ek ∑1=1+1+1+⋯ hai — terms 0 ko nahin jaate: diverges (divergence test).
Answer:R=2, interval (−2,2).
Recall Solution L4·(b)
Step 1 — term by term differentiate karo:dxdnxn=nnxn−1=xn−1. Toh
f′(x)=∑n=1∞xn−1=1+x+x2+⋯=∑k=0∞xk.Step 2 — WHY radius unchanged rehta hai: yeh term-by-term differentiation theorem hai Term-by-term Differentiation and Integration se. Iska proof Root Test master formula R1=limsupnn∣cn∣ par tika hai. Differentiate karne par coefficient cn roughly ncn ban jaata hai, isliye naya radius limsupnnn∣cn∣ use karta hai. Lekin nn→1 (n ka n-th root 1 ki taraf jaata hai, kyunki n kisi bhi exponential rn se bahut dheere badhta hai), isliye n ka extra factor limsup mein gayab ho jaata hai — R1 bilkul pehle jaisa rehta hai. Yahi reason hai ki differentiation R preserve karta hai. Yahan R=1 abhi bhi hai, aur waqai f′ ek Geometric Series hai ratio x ke saath: ∣x∣<1 ke liye converge karta hai.
Step 3 — endpoints BADAL sakte hain:
x=1: ∑1=1+1+⋯ — diverges (f ke liye bhi excluded tha).
x=−1: ∑(−1)k=1−1+1−⋯ — partial sums oscillate karte hain, terms →0 nahin jaate: diverges (original f mein convergent tha!).
Lesson:f, x=−1 par converge karta tha lekin uska derivative f′ nahin karta. Differentiation R rakhta hai lekin endpoints kho sakta hai.
Answer:f′(x)=1−x1 on (−1,1); interval (−1,1).
Ratio kyun fail karta hai: ratio ∣cn+1/cn∣ ya toh 3n1 hai (even→odd step) ya 3n+1 (odd→even step). Yeh near-0 aur huge ke beech oscillate karta hai — koi limit exist nahin karta, isliye R=lim∣cn/cn+1∣ ke paas converge karne ko kuch nahin.
Root kyun kaam karta hai:Root Testn∣cn∣ use karta hai, jo hai
n3n=3(n even),n1=1(n odd).
Yeh sequence sirf 3 aur 1 ke beech alternate karti hai — iska limit superior (woh sabse badi value jis par yeh baar baar return karta hai) β=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣=3 hai.
Cauchy–Hadamard:R1=β=3⇒R=31.limsup kyun na ki lim:limsuphamesha[0,∞] mein exist karta hai, isliye yeh master tool hai; ratio limit sirf tab convenient special case hai jab cheezein settle ho jaayein.
Recall Solution L5·(b)
KYA subtle hai: sirf odd powers x2n+1 aate hain (even-power coefficients 0 hain). L4·(a) ki tarah, hum gap bypass karte hain aur Ratio Test directly actual termsan=(2n+1)!(−1)nx2n+1 par apply karte hain, x2n+1 ko object maan ke.
Ratio:anan+1=x2n+1/(2n+1)!x2n+3/(2n+3)!=(2n+3)(2n+2)∣x∣2.WHY:x2n+3/x2n+1=x2, aur (2n+3)!(2n+1)!=(2n+3)(2n+2)1 (do extra factorial factors denominator mein hain).
Limit lo: har fixedx ke liye, denominator (2n+3)(2n+2)→∞, isliye poora ratio →0. Kyunki 0<1 chahe x kuch bhi ho, Ratio Testsaare real x ke liye convergence deta hai.
Conclusion:R=∞; interval (−∞,∞). Kyunki R=∞ hai isliye check karne ke liye koi finite endpoint nahin hai — series har jagah converge karti hai (jaisa hona chahiye, kyunki yeh sinx ke barabar hai jo saare x ke liye defined hai).
Recall Solution L5·(c)
Root values:n∣cn∣ perfect squares par (n=0,1,4,9,…) n2n=2 hai aur baaki jagah n5n=5 hai.
Kaun si value limsup dominate karti hai? Perfect squares rarer aur rarer hote jaate hain, lekin unke beech value infinitely baar 5 hoti hai. Limit superior woh sabse badi value hai jo infinitely baar hit hoti hai, isliye β=5.
Cauchy–Hadamard:R1=5⇒R=51, centred at a=2; open interval (2−51,2+51)=(59,511).
∑cn(x+3)n ka centre? ::: x=−3 (base x+3=0 rakho).
lim∣cn/cn+1∣=5 aur centre 0 diya, toh open interval kya hai? ::: (−5,5).
∣x−a∣=R par ratio test limit = kya deta hai? ::: exactly 1 — inconclusive; endpoints alag se test karo.
Agar coefficient ratio oscillate kare, toh kaun sa formula phir bhi kaam karta hai? ::: 1/R=limsupn→∞n∣cn∣ (Cauchy–Hadamard / Root).
Kya term-by-term differentiation R change karta hai? ::: Nahin — R unchanged rehta hai (kyunki nn→1), lekin endpoints re-test karne padenge.
∑x2n/4n ka radius kya hai? ::: R=2; geometric with ratio x2/4.