4.3.12 · D4Calculus III — Sequences & Series

Exercises — Ratio test — proof, limitations

1,897 words9 min readBack to topic

Everything here rests on one engine from the parent note: if the tail is trapped under a geometric series and converges absolutely; if the terms grow so and the term test kills it; if the test says nothing.


Level 1 — Recognition

Goal: form the ratio, cancel, read off , state the verdict. No traps yet — just fluency.

Exercise 1.1

Test .

Recall Solution 1.1

WHAT: we divided term by term . WHY these cancel: and — factorials telescope.

Exercise 1.2

Test .

Recall Solution 1.2

Factorials always eventually crush a fixed exponential.

Exercise 1.3

Test with the ratio test and comment.

Recall Solution 1.3

The series does converge (it is a $p$-series with ), but the ratio test cannot see it — power-law terms always give .


Level 2 — Application

Goal: ratios where cancellation needs a little algebra (squares, shifted indices, mixed factors).

Exercise 2.1

Test .

Recall Solution 2.1

WHY: the gives ; the polynomial part is a ratio of squares.

Exercise 2.2

Test .

Recall Solution 2.2

Group the two factorial families. For the top: . For the bottom: . So

Exercise 2.3

Test .

Recall Solution 2.3

WHY this limit: rewrite as . The classic limit gives


Level 3 — Analysis

Goal: cases where the answer depends on a parameter, or where forces you to switch tools.

Exercise 3.1

For which real does converge? (Find the radius, then check endpoints.)

Recall Solution 3.1

So . Ratio test: converges for , diverges for — the radius of convergence is . Endpoints (, ratio test blind):

  • : — a convergent -series (). Converges.
  • : — converges absolutely (since does). Converges. Answer: converges for all .

Exercise 3.2

Let . Find all for which it converges.

Recall Solution 3.2

Using Exercise 2.3's ratio for the part and attaching : . So radius : converges for , diverges for . Endpoint gives (inconclusive); a finer tool (Raabe's test or Stirling) is needed — the ratio test has done its job of pinning the radius.

Exercise 3.3

Test . (Hint: the ratio is ugly — which sibling test is cleaner?)

Recall Solution 3.3

The whole term is raised to the -th power, so the root test cuts through it: The ratio test works too but the ratio is painful — recognising an "everything-to-the-" form and reaching for the root test is the analysis skill here.


Level 4 — Synthesis

Goal: combine the ratio test with the term test, comparison, or a limitation you must diagnose yourself.

Exercise 4.1

A student applies the ratio test to and gets stuck. Resolve it.

Recall Solution 4.1

Dominant-term thinking: for large , and . So Rigorously, divide top/bottom by the leading power: the limit is converges absolutely. (Alternatively compare with — same conclusion, and it confirms the ratio limit.)

Exercise 4.2

Show the ratio test is inconclusive for , then decide convergence by another method.

Recall Solution 4.2

Both and , so inconclusive (as expected for a power/log term). Switch to the integral test: . Substitute , : The integral diverges the series diverges. The ratio test could never have found this — logs make .

Exercise 4.3

Suppose . Prove . (Synthesis: link the ratio bound to the term test.)

Recall Solution 4.3

Pick (any number in ). Since the ratio , there is an with for all . Chaining (as in the parent proof): As , because , so , hence . This is exactly why passes the term test automatically — the geometric bound forces the terms to zero.


Level 5 — Mastery

Goal: reverse-engineer, construct counterexamples, and reason about the boundary itself.

Exercise 5.1

Construct two series, both with ratio limit , one convergent and one divergent, whose terms are not the standard and . Verify each .

Recall Solution 5.1

Any two -series with vs work. Take:

  • Divergent: (). Ratio , so ; diverges by the -test.
  • Convergent: (). Ratio , so ; converges by the -test. Both sit at yet split — the boundary is genuinely undecidable by ratio alone. See the figure below for why every power law flattens to .
Figure — Ratio test — proof, limitations

Exercise 5.2

Find all for which converges. (Mastery: this is the inverse of Ex 2.2, now with a variable.)

Recall Solution 5.2

From Exercise 2.2, has ratio , so its reciprocal has ratio . Attaching : . Radius : converges for , diverges for . Endpoint : , inconclusive — Stirling shows the term behaves like , so diverges there. Ratio test correctly locates .

Exercise 5.3

True or false, with proof: "If for every , then converges."

Recall Solution 5.3

FALSE. The condition " for every " is weaker than "": the ratio can approach from below without any fixed trapping it. Counterexample: the harmonic series . Here for every , yet the series diverges (). The moral: the ratio test needs the limit to be strictly below , giving a fixed gap for geometric domination. A ratio merely creeping up toward leaves no such gap.



Flashcards

for ?
, converges.
for ?
, diverges.
for ?
, converges.
for ?
, diverges.
for ?
, converges.
Interval of convergence of ?
(both endpoints converge).
Radius of convergence of ?
.
Radius of ?
.
Does for all imply convergence?
No — harmonic series is a counterexample ().
Why does the ratio test fail on ?
Ratio (); use the integral test (diverges).

Connections