Exercises — Ratio test — proof, limitations
Everything here rests on one engine from the parent note: if the tail is trapped under a geometric series and converges absolutely; if the terms grow so and the term test kills it; if the test says nothing.
Level 1 — Recognition
Goal: form the ratio, cancel, read off , state the verdict. No traps yet — just fluency.
Exercise 1.1
Test .
Recall Solution 1.1
WHAT: we divided term by term . WHY these cancel: and — factorials telescope.
Exercise 1.2
Test .
Recall Solution 1.2
Factorials always eventually crush a fixed exponential.
Exercise 1.3
Test with the ratio test and comment.
Recall Solution 1.3
The series does converge (it is a $p$-series with ), but the ratio test cannot see it — power-law terms always give .
Level 2 — Application
Goal: ratios where cancellation needs a little algebra (squares, shifted indices, mixed factors).
Exercise 2.1
Test .
Recall Solution 2.1
WHY: the gives ; the polynomial part is a ratio of squares.
Exercise 2.2
Test .
Recall Solution 2.2
Group the two factorial families. For the top: . For the bottom: . So
Exercise 2.3
Test .
Recall Solution 2.3
WHY this limit: rewrite as . The classic limit gives
Level 3 — Analysis
Goal: cases where the answer depends on a parameter, or where forces you to switch tools.
Exercise 3.1
For which real does converge? (Find the radius, then check endpoints.)
Recall Solution 3.1
So . Ratio test: converges for , diverges for — the radius of convergence is . Endpoints (, ratio test blind):
- : — a convergent -series (). Converges.
- : — converges absolutely (since does). Converges. Answer: converges for all .
Exercise 3.2
Let . Find all for which it converges.
Recall Solution 3.2
Using Exercise 2.3's ratio for the part and attaching : . So radius : converges for , diverges for . Endpoint gives (inconclusive); a finer tool (Raabe's test or Stirling) is needed — the ratio test has done its job of pinning the radius.
Exercise 3.3
Test . (Hint: the ratio is ugly — which sibling test is cleaner?)
Recall Solution 3.3
The whole term is raised to the -th power, so the root test cuts through it: The ratio test works too but the ratio is painful — recognising an "everything-to-the-" form and reaching for the root test is the analysis skill here.
Level 4 — Synthesis
Goal: combine the ratio test with the term test, comparison, or a limitation you must diagnose yourself.
Exercise 4.1
A student applies the ratio test to and gets stuck. Resolve it.
Recall Solution 4.1
Dominant-term thinking: for large , and . So Rigorously, divide top/bottom by the leading power: the limit is converges absolutely. (Alternatively compare with — same conclusion, and it confirms the ratio limit.)
Exercise 4.2
Show the ratio test is inconclusive for , then decide convergence by another method.
Recall Solution 4.2
Both and , so — inconclusive (as expected for a power/log term). Switch to the integral test: . Substitute , : The integral diverges the series diverges. The ratio test could never have found this — logs make .
Exercise 4.3
Suppose . Prove . (Synthesis: link the ratio bound to the term test.)
Recall Solution 4.3
Pick (any number in ). Since the ratio , there is an with for all . Chaining (as in the parent proof): As , because , so , hence . This is exactly why passes the term test automatically — the geometric bound forces the terms to zero.
Level 5 — Mastery
Goal: reverse-engineer, construct counterexamples, and reason about the boundary itself.
Exercise 5.1
Construct two series, both with ratio limit , one convergent and one divergent, whose terms are not the standard and . Verify each .
Recall Solution 5.1
Any two -series with vs work. Take:
- Divergent: (). Ratio , so ; diverges by the -test.
- Convergent: (). Ratio , so ; converges by the -test. Both sit at yet split — the boundary is genuinely undecidable by ratio alone. See the figure below for why every power law flattens to .

Exercise 5.2
Find all for which converges. (Mastery: this is the inverse of Ex 2.2, now with a variable.)
Recall Solution 5.2
From Exercise 2.2, has ratio , so its reciprocal has ratio . Attaching : . Radius : converges for , diverges for . Endpoint : , inconclusive — Stirling shows the term behaves like , so diverges there. Ratio test correctly locates .
Exercise 5.3
True or false, with proof: "If for every , then converges."
Recall Solution 5.3
FALSE. The condition " for every " is weaker than "": the ratio can approach from below without any fixed trapping it. Counterexample: the harmonic series . Here for every , yet the series diverges (). The moral: the ratio test needs the limit to be strictly below , giving a fixed gap for geometric domination. A ratio merely creeping up toward leaves no such gap.
Flashcards
for ?
for ?
for ?
for ?
for ?
Interval of convergence of ?
Radius of convergence of ?
Radius of ?
Does for all imply convergence?
Why does the ratio test fail on ?
Connections
- Ratio test — proof, limitations — the parent this page drills.
- Geometric Series — the domination target that makes work.
- Root Test — cleaner for "everything-to-the-" terms (Ex 3.3).
- Radius of Convergence — what the power-series exercises compute.
- p-Series and Integral Test — the tool for the power/log cases.
- Raabe's Test — sharper ruler at the boundary .