Exercises — Telescoping series
This page is a self-testing ladder. Each problem sits inside a collapsible solution callout — read the problem, try it, then open the solution. Levels climb from "just spot it" to "invent your own."
Everything here rests on the parent result from Telescoping Series:

Level 1 — Recognition
(Can you see the difference that's already there, and read off the two survivors?)
L1.1
Given , write out the first four terms of and state without adding fractions the long way.
Recall Solution
What we do: just substitute. . Why we don't add the hard way: the master formula already tells us the answer is first minus last. With : What it looks like: term 's kills term 's ; the each get eaten too. Only (from the front) and (from the back) survive.
L1.2
Which of these is telescoping as written (already in the form )? For the ones that are, name . (a) (b) (c)
Recall Solution
(a) Not telescoping as written — it is a single blob, no difference visible. (It has no elementary telescoping split at all; leave it.) (b) Yes, but reversed sign order: with . That is still telescoping — the survivors just swap sign: . (c) Yes, textbook form: , so . ✓ Why (b) still counts: telescoping only needs consecutive cancellation; whether goes up or down is a sign bookkeeping detail, not a new phenomenon.
Level 2 — Application
(Manufacture the difference with Partial Fraction Decomposition, then sum.)
L2.1
Find the exact value of .
Recall Solution
Step 1 — split. Want . Why partial fractions? It is the engine that turns one fraction into a difference we can telescope. Clear denominators: . Set : . Set : . Step 2 — identify . , and . Gap-1 telescope. ✓ Step 3 — partial sum. Step 4 — limit. , so
L2.2
Evaluate .
Recall Solution
Step 1 — split. . From : ; . Step 2 — spot the gap of 2. This is with , not . So two terms survive at each end. Step 3 — write out and collapse: The eats a later , etc. Survivors at the front: . At the back: . Step 4 — limit. Both tail terms :

Level 3 — Analysis
(The difference is hidden or the sum is not . You must reason about what survives.)
L3.1
Compute .
Recall Solution
Step 1 — identify . Here , and the term is literally . No partial fractions needed. Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — the crucial limit. Here , not (see Limits of Sequences). So: Why the answer is negative: each pair steps down toward , but the running total is anchored at minus the ceiling . The leftover limit is the whole story here — the middle cancels, but the "last" survivor does not vanish.
L3.2
Show converges and find its value.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — split the log into a difference. Logs turn products/quotients into sums/differences: Check by expanding: ✓. Step 2 — identify . , term . Gap-1 telescope. Step 3 — partial sum. Step 4 — limit. As , , so . Thus
Level 4 — Synthesis
(Combine ideas, or handle a shifted starting index.)
L4.1
Evaluate . (Note: starts at .)
Recall Solution
Step 1 — same split. , so . Step 2 — respect the starting index. The sum runs . The first surviving term is , not : Step 3 — limit. , so Sanity check: the full sum from is ; subtracting the first two terms gives . ✓
L4.2
Find by building a gap-1 telescope.
Recall Solution
Step 1 — the clever grouping. Notice Verify: common denominator gives ✓. Why this shape? We want . Setting makes — a perfect gap-1 telescope. Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — limit. The tail :
Level 5 — Mastery
(Invent, generalise, or defeat a series that only telescopes after real work.)
L5.1
Evaluate . (Hint: write .)
Recall Solution
Step 1 — engineer the difference. Using : Why this trick? We needed a telescoping shape; factorials shrink one step when the numerator matches . So . Step 2 — partial sum. Step 3 — limit. (factorials blow up), so
L5.2
A general theorem you prove. Let (a finite limit). Show Then apply it to to re-derive
Recall Solution
Part A — the gap-2 theorem. Write the partial sum and match survivors: Everything from to appears in both brackets and cancels. Front survivors: . Back survivors: . Take : since , both tail terms , giving Part B — apply to (so ). Then , and the theorem gives hence . ✓ (Matches the parent note — the general theorem contains that example.)
Answer Key (quick check)
| Problem | Answer |
|---|---|
| L1.1 | |
| L2.1 | |
| L2.2 | |
| L3.1 | |
| L3.2 | |
| L4.1 | |
| L4.2 | |
| L5.1 | |
| L5.2 | ; applied |
Connections
- Partial Fraction Decomposition — powers L2.1, L2.2, L4.2.
- Sequence of Partial Sums — every solution is really "find , then take a limit."
- Limits of Sequences — the that decides L3.1 and every mastery problem.
- Convergence Tests for Series — telescoping delivers the exact value, not just convergence.
- Method of Differences — L5.2 is this idea stated as a theorem.
- Geometric Series — the other exact-sum family; contrast the mechanism.